What #Feminism Hath Wrought
Posted on | December 2, 2014 | 59 Comments
@LauraKipnis is an expert on why men deserve your contempt.
Just in time for the holidays, feminism is the gift that keeps on giving, and another academic sadist tells us what’s wrong with men:
Laura Kipnis begins her preface to Men: Notes from an Ongoing Investigation . . . with an interesting idea: Writing about someone marks a special kind of intimacy. And just as any relationship that’s full of projection, there’s a lot of projection when you’re writing about someone, especially someone who’s been your lover.
“When writing about a relationship, you’re writing about the collusion of two psyches,” she tells me. Explaining further, Kipnis continues, “You project your fantasies on to the person. That’s the most interesting part about writing about someone. You find out things about yourself.” . . .
Women invent notions of men all the time, even if we’re not writing books about them. But why do we do this? And, more to the point, when we invent notions of men, is this empowering, or does it have the opposite effect on us?
Kipnis weighs in.
“I would think it is a powerful position to be in, inventing notions of men. You get to tell the story and in the same way you’re inventing the man, you’re constructing yourself, your persona at the same time.” . . .
“Masculinity seems more of a question mark than a given at the moment,” concludes Kipnis. . . .
You may read the rest of that without gaining any actual insight into who or what Professor Kipnis is. What she is, actually, is another careerist cog in the wheel of the Feminist-Industrial Complex, a combination of academia, media, political power and money that provides feminism absolute hegemony in elite culture. Her official bio:
Laura Kipnis is a cultural critic and former video artist whose work focuses on sexual politics, aesthetics, emotion, acting out, bad behavior, and various other crevices of the American psyche. Her five book have been translated into fifteen languages. The most recent is How to Become A Scandal; previous books include Against Love: A Polemic and The Female Thing: Dirt, Sex, Envy, Vulnerability. She is a professor in the Department of Radio/TV/Film at Northwestern University where she teaches filmmaking; she has received fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Michigan Society of Fellows, the NEA and Yaddo; and has contributed essays and reviews to Slate, Harper’s, Playboy, New York Times Magazine, New York Times Book Review, and Bookforum. She has a BFA from San Francisco Art Institute, an MFA from Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, and also attended the Whitney Museum Independent Study Studio Program. She lives in New York and Chicago.
Do you notice anything about this brief curriculm vitae? She is a tenured professor at an elite university (Northwestern tuition 2014-2015, $47,251) despite the fact that she lacks a doctoral degree. (If you can name any male professors who hold such lofty sinecures with only an MFA, please do so.) The average salary of an assistant professor at Northwestern University is $110,815 and we see that, not content to scrape by on her six-figure academic salary, Professor Kipnis has been busy hoovering up cash from “philanthropic” foundations like Guggenheim and Rockefeller, to say nothing of her (undoubtedly large) fees from major New York publishing firms.
However, the barren middle-aged spinster — never married, never a mother — wants readers to know that men actually like her:
“Men: Notes From an Ongoing Investigation” . . . started out as a fight that writer Laura Kipnis had with her longtime boyfriend over whether she talked too much about her exes. (She doesn’t, she insists.) But the conversation made her realize that regardless of how much she talks about former lovers in private, she’s spent most of the last 15 years writing about men, over and over. . . .
“Men have fascinated me,” her book begins, “maybe too much.” Although her essays catalog a lot of bad male behavior — divided into categories of operators, neurotics, sex fiends and haters — Kipnis is far more intrigued than offended by the “jagged edges” of modern masculinity, and the anxiety over shifting power dynamics she sees poking out from those misdeeds like loose wires. . . .
Pause, dear reader, to imagine a publisher commissioning a book by a male academic who proposed a similar examination of women in the 21st century. Imagine this author (for we can only imagine such a person, as he is non-existent) beginning his book by describing a fight with his girlfriend about his numerous ex-girlfriends.
Now try to imagine a critic for a major newspaper gushing uncritically about that book and that author, as Laura Hudson does in her Los Angeles Times puff-piece interview with Kipnis:
Your book often resists making declarative statements, but what do you see as the status quo for masculinity today?
Power relations have shifted considerably and the economic hit that men took in the last recession was a huge aspect of it. Everything that’s been going on in the last 40 years has really changed the power dynamic in a macro sense, from women’s entry into the workforce and the reshaping of the family structure to the economic hit that men took in the last recession. I think there’s a lot of underlying male anxiety about that. I was interested in the subterranean ways that anxiety manifests itself.
There are several moments where you say you should be offended by male bombast but instead find yourself compelled by its vulnerability. Is this just contrarianism, or is there more to it?
I’m always surprised when women are offended at men like [Norman] Mailer, because he’s kind of hilarious and also self-parodying…. The problem with taking all these things seriously is that it puts you in a reactive position that just reinforces the power of the thing you’re reacting against. I’m a believer in irony, because it gives you two positions; it gives you more latitude to think different thoughts.
The problem with being pissed off at men all the time is that you’re in the same position. You’re just spinning your wheels. . . .
Perhaps you get the general idea here. Professor Kipnis ignorantly speaks of “women’s entry into the workforce” as though it were something that only happened “in the last 40 years,” which is to say that prior to 1974, no woman ever earned a paycheck.
My mother, my grandmother, my aunts — they were all just attending Garden Club meetings and baking cookies until feminism came along and then, in 1974, all women entered the workforce. Never mind the decades my grandmother worked at a textile mill in LaGrange, Georgia. Never mind my mother’s job as a bookkeeper at Mergenthaler Linotype and later RCA Records. Above all, never mind the women school teachers who were wielding absolute authority over children long before anyone heard of Women’s Liberation.
The past must be re-written so that deracinated young people, alienated from their familial communities and thus having no direct knowledge of their ancestors, are taught to believe whatever the intelligentsia finds it politically convenient for youth to believe.
Our mothers’ careers have disappeared behind the fog of feminist rhetoric, and our daughters are taught to believe that their grandmothers and great-grandmothers were helpless victims of a hateful and all-powerful system of slavery, The Patriarchy.
Feminism’s deliberate derogation of the past, its insistence that women groaned under the yoke of male oppression prior to the rise of modern feminism, is necessary to prevent young women from asking questions about feminism itself. Is this ideology really about “empowering” all women generally? Or is it the case that feminism is actually about empowering a certain class of women, namely the academics, activists and authors who are well-paid for their services on behalf of this movement of which they are the elite vanguard?
“Follow the money,” and you learn that the Feminist-Industrial Complex provides lucrative opportunities for those women with the necessary skills (and necessary lack of conscience) to succeed as propagandists for this anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology.
Of course, Professor Kipnis and other feminist intellectuals hasten to deny that they are man-haters or lesbians. Professor Kipnis begins with a humble-brag anecdote, the fight with her long-term boyfriend about her (too-numerous-to-count) ex-boyfriends and, alas, these men have “fascinated” her, “maybe too much.” See? Professor Kipnis really likes men, she dishonestly seeks to convince her naïve readers, before proceeding to write about males as if they were a disease, their behavior symptomatic of their “vulnerability.” Professor Kipnis isolates the masculinity virus and examines it, inviting readers to share her contemptuous pity for the pathetic male.
Feminists are unloved because they are unloving, too selfish to care for others. When this yields predictable results (loneliness, marital failure, childlessness) the feminist blames men for her problems. Feminism means no woman is ever to blame for anything, because everything bad that happens to a woman or anything a woman does wrong must ultimately be blamed on The Patriarchy.
Feminist theory is nothing but a vast rationalization, a psychological defense mechanism, an all-purpose excuse and justification.
It’s not about equality, it’s about revenge.
Look at what happened to Larry Summers at Harvard University. An economist with impeccable liberal credentials, Summers merely suggested the possibility that “innate differences” between men and women could help explain the relative shortage of women working as top research scientists. For this, he was denounced as a misogynist and ultimately forced to resign as Harvard’s president.
When I describe feminists as totalitarians and sadists, this is what I mean: Any suffering they can inflict on any male is always justified by their ideology. Mere disagreement with feminist theory is taken as proof that a man hates women, and any professor calling herself a feminist may therefore be sure that no man will dare ever contradict her. Because this ideology and its adherents exercise unlimited authority in elite culture (of which Harvard is an eminent bastion), the feminist intellectual is a latter-day Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi bureaucrat who inspired Hannah Arendt’s famous phrase “the banality of evil.”
Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and the cruel business of destroying humanity cannot be entrusted to morally sensitive people. Those with humane dispositions do not seek employment as pimps, abortionists or concentration camp commandants.
Feminists crave power, and the reason they crave power is because their resentments of men fuel their fantasies of sadistic revenge. They begin their careers grasping for the whip and, once having obtained it, they wield its punitive power with hideous glee.
And speaking of Amanda Marcotte . . .
Prior to Monday afternoon, the name “Laura Kipnis” meant nothing to me, until somebody on Twitter called my attention to Amanda Marcotte’s Slate.com review of Professor Kipnis’s book:
Kipnis doesn’t produce a grand theory of men, which is as it should be, since there’s little you can say definitively about a diverse group of more than 3.5 billion individuals.
But while it’s hard to come to a meaningful conclusion about men, the collective, there is a lot to be said about the idea of masculinity, a tyrannical concept that the whole group must grapple with, whether they like it or not. . . .
(How is “masculinity . . . tyrannical”? Never mind. She’s on a roll.)
[A] theme emerges: men trying to define themselves against the nebulous dictates of their gender, and all the expectations and privileges it implies.
Kipnis, with her keen eye for human failings, delights in the way this lifelong struggle adds an air of ridiculousness to the whole enterprise of manhood. Masculinity is an idealized state, so of course men are in a permanent state of failing at it, and yet they seem unable to quit. “Something about the poetics of masculine panic, old school and new, just draws me in,” Kipnis writes. . . .
You can read the whole thing, but again the point is obvious enough from a brief excerpt. Feminists being rejects and/or failures — no man will marry them, nor would any man trust one of these hateful creatures to care for his child — Marcotte and Kipnis are spiritual duplicates. They have “boyfriends” rather than husbands, pets rather than children, living lives of immature selfishness while pretending to be socratic archons, arbiters of our sexual morals and manners.
Because men are too stupid to understand themselves. @GlomarResponder @AmandaMarcotte @LapdanceTester #Feminism #tcot pic.twitter.com/LeEgBeUgYI
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 2, 2014
.@GlomarResponder If men were as moral or intelligent as @AmandaMarcotte, we would not need her to tell us how evil we are. @LapdanceTester
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 2, 2014
.@GlomarResponder Thus does the existence of @AmandaMarcotte prove male inferiority. Quod erat demonstrandum. @LapdanceTester #feminism
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 2, 2014
Even if their spitefully vindictive anti-human attitudes did not render them permanently unlovable, however, feminists have fostered such widespread discrimination against males that genuinely marriageable males — i.e., civilized heterosexual men with the economic wherewithal to support a family — are an increasingly rare commodity:
American women . . . are 33 percent more likely to have earned a college degree by the time they reach 27 years of age than their male contemporaries, according to the results of a longitudinal study published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
At most colleges and universities nowadays, one finds that females comprise more than 60 percent of the enrollment, so that if higher education is a place where women expect to meet their future husbands, about one-third of female undergraduates are guaranteed to end up like unmatched socks in the laundry hamper. There simply are no college-educated males available for these women.
Dr. Helen Smith wrote an entire book (Men on Strike) about the multiple consequences of this problem. The fundamental cause is that our educational system during the past three decades has become so oriented toward promoting “equality” (i.e., favoritism toward females rhetorically justified as “empowerment”) that our nation’s K-12 schools now actively discourage male achievement. Christina Hoff Sommers’ book, The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men, is an excellent primer on this phenomenon.
Harming men has always been the basic goal of feminism; the harm feminism does to females is just collateral damage. Young males are being mentally crippled and economically punished because of a feminist agenda that deliberately deprives males of education and employment opportunities, diverting social resources (including federal, state and local tax dollars) toward females. Nothing so emphatically demonstrates the objectives of this feminist project as the proliferation of Women’s Studies programs at colleges and universities, employing ideologues who are devoted to teaching female students to hate their male peers.
The most widely assigned Women’s Studies anthology, Feminist Frontiers, is edited by three lesbian professors, and the pedagogical goal of teaching these anti-male/anti-heterosexual theories is scarcely a secret, as “raging lesbian feminist” Carmen Rios made clear.
If you think masculinity is a problem, feminism is the solution. If you think heterosexuality is problem, feminism can solve that, too.
What will result from feminism’s success, however, is not equality, but rather confusion, unhappiness and destruction. Feminism will eventually destroy our entire civilization. Why? Because there are more than 7 billion people on this planet. Our culture is being weakened by feminism’s orchestrated social sabotage, while the foreign enemies of Western civilization — particularly in the Islamic world — are becoming more numerous, more powerful and more militant.
Three or four decades from now, when America’s daughters are enslaved as the concubines of jihadist conquerors, our elites will be able to congratulate themselves on feminism’s success: “Equality!”
How About: “It Was A Godforsaken Lie”
Posted on | December 1, 2014 | 20 Comments
by Smitty
These people are so ridiculous:
According to pundits, the Democratic Party overplayed the “war on women” narrative in the 2014 midterm election, and this helped the GOP win key Senate and gubernatorial races, including in states carried easily by Obama in 2012. In that election, the birth control mandate in the Affordable Care Act — a crucial aspect of the war on women rhetoric — was hotly debated.
No, the issue was not the amount of crap you put into the soup: you were making soup out of crap.
Now and then the voters wake up and smell the (not) coffee.
Prayer For A Gay Rabbi
Posted on | December 1, 2014 | 36 Comments
by Smitty
Not only is gay marriage now the law for over two-thirds of Americans while the value of marriage in general has been declining for decades; not only are television, film, music, and video games more vulgar than we could have imagined in 1980; but more Americans are declaring themselves “Nones,” that is, people of no religious affiliation, than ever before in our history. Sure, some churches are expanding, but overall, your way of life is in steep decline. In short, you are losing horribly.
Almighty God,
Your might and love are expressed from the breadth of Creation, through your written Word to that Creation, and through the Messiah you sent to reconcile that fallen Creation to Yourself.
You’ve created mankind in your image, with full liberty both to glorify you, or to choose to glorify the flesh. It can seem a party, albeit briefly, the hedonism. But we know that you Justice tends to blast the mockery, past an unspecified point of foolishness.
Lord, I lift up Jay Michaelson, whom I don’t know, but seems confused on some issues. Please, Lord, help him to take a clear look at your Word in faith, and not through the fleshly conceits of the Adversary, who seeks to make the unspeakable into a normal and accepted practice. How much of the history of the Israelites must we examine to see that, when decadence and foolishness reign, You bring in a foreign conqueror to calibrate the wayward?
Lord, help Jay Michaelson to understand the Messiah you sent, and to understand that, from an Evanglical perspective, Your children “are losing horribly” every time we, the branches, operate outside the scope of the vine. We are always “losing horribly” at Satan’s games, when we follow the Gospel as written. The Messiah is the vine, Evangelicals are the branches, and politics is something happening down in the humus, awash with insects, politicians, worms, lobbyists, an vermin (but I repeat myself).
Lord, help Jay Michaelson to understand that, far from causing dismay in any actual Evangelicals, he’s instead written a piece somewhere between cautionary and unintentionally hilarious. He appears to know as much about You as he knows about Evangelicals as he knows about the proper use of the wedding tackle.
Help Jay, Lord. And help Evangelicals to cleave to your Word with even greater fidelity, for all it looks like “losing horribly”, to pagan eyes.
In Jesus’s name, Amen.
—
via Hot Air
LIVE AT FIVESIX: 12.01.14
Posted on | December 1, 2014 | 5 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
Obama To Meddle Further In Ferguson Mess

Thug parents of a dead thug
Cabinet meeting will review DoD programs that provide military equipment to police
No severance pay for Officer Wilson after resignation
STL Police Officer Association condemns Rams players’ gesture
Pope Francis Calls On Muslim Leaders To Condemn Terrorism
But also condemns anti-Islamic sentiments
Hong Kong Warns Protesters Not To Return After Clashes Close Government Offices
Thousands of pro-democracy protesters clash with police, force closure of offices and shops in Admiralty House district
POLITICS
Congress Returns With Budget, Immigration, And ISIS Topping The To-Do List

Working to avoid a shutdown
Temporary spending bill likely to cut funds for Obama’s immigration actions, EPA
Deval Patrick: Not Running For President In 2016
Supremes Weigh Limits Of Free Speech On Internet: When is A Threat Just Venting?
Hundreds Turn Out For Traficant Memorial Service
Incoming Senators Talk Compromise On Jobs, Immigration
Obamacare Small Business Site Opens To Weak Interest
Giuliani Stands Firm: Black Communities Must Do More To End Violence, Mistrust
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Plunges As OPEC Refuses To Cut Production: WTI $64.60, Brent $68.31
Cyber Monday Deals Lasting All Week
Russian Manufacturing Growth In Nov. Most Since October 2013
Amazon’s New Robot Army Is Ready To Ship
Girl Scout Cookie Online Sales Okayed
PNC Reveals Cost Of “Twelve Days Of Christmas” Gifts In Today’s Economy
Roku? Chromecast? Fire TV? Which Streaming Stick Is Right For You?
Next Google Glasses Tipped To Run On Intel Chips
Sony Hires Mandiant Afer Cyber Attack As FBI Begins Probe
Google Unseats Apple In The Classroom As Chromebooks Edge Out iPads
Study: Social Media Misused By Researchers
Super Smash Bros: Game Of The Year?
SPORTS
Pack Beats Pats In Potential Preview Of Super Bowl

Aaron Rodgers shakes hands with Tom Brady after the game
Green Bay defense seals 26-21 win with late sack
Alabama #1 In AP Poll After Iron Bowl Win #rolltide
Calgary Stampeders Finally Win CFL’s Grey Cup, 20-16
NASCAR Fines Ricky Stenhouse Crew $50,000
Grizzlies Top Kings For Fifth Straight Win
Bryant Leads Lakers Past Raptors In OT
49ers Harbaugh On Trading Block?
Are The Nationals Headed To A Grievance Hearing With Bryce Harper?
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Snooki Got Married

“It’s not that hard to plan a wedding.”
Ms. Polizzi married father of her two kids Jionni La Valle on Saturday at Gatsby-themed wedding
Mel B: “I Do Have A Big Ego, And I’m In Love With Myself”
Kendall Jenner Reads Hateful Comments About Herself In “Mean Girls”-Inspired Burn Book
Idina Menzel: “Frozen” Sequel In The Works?
Jake Gyllenhaal’s Startling “Southpaw” Makeover
“Mockingjay” Easily Wins Thanksgiving Box Office With $82.7 Million
Homeless Man “Took A Dive” In Mickey Rourke Bout
Sources: Joan Rivers’ Doctors Delayed CPR As She Lay Dying
Christian Bale Tells George Clooney To “Stop Whining”
Cuba Gooding Jr. Stays Out Of Restaurant Fight
Angelina Jolie’s “Unbroken” Is The Talk Of The Town
James Toback Recalls Watching Dance Icon Fight For Taxi – Literally
Susan Boyle Lands First Boyfriend
Scarlet Johansson Weds In Secret Ceremony
Palm Beach Becoming Thanksgiving’s Social Hot Spot?
FOREIGNERS
Boko Haram Attacks Nigerian State Capital
Suicide Attack At Afghan Funeral Kills Nine
Nigeria’s Economy Hurt As US Oil Exports Dry Up
Former President Vazquez Wins Uruguay Runoff Election
Germany Publishes Video Of Turkish Girl Who Died Fighting Molesters
Netanyahu To Decide Soon On Early Election
Iraq Graft Probe Finds 50,000 “Ghost Troops”
Poroshenko Promises European Path For Ukraine
Marxist FARC Rebels Release Captured Colombian General
Japanese Opposition Caught Off-Guard As Abe Calls Snap Elections
BLOGS & STUFF
American Power: CNN Pushed Bald-Faced Lies To Preserve Ferguson “Peaceful Protest” Narrative
American Thinker: Enough With The Ferguson Pandering
BLACKFIVE: Free Fire Zone – China Hacks Our Power Grid
Conservatives4Palin: Dems Still In Deep Denial Over Midterm Losses
Don Surber: Caveman Liberalism
Jammie Wearing Fools: Loathsome Protesters Crash Seattle Christmas Tree Lighting, Make Children Cry
Joe For America: Leftist Jihad Meets Islamic Jihad In America
JustOneMinute: A Classic Moment In Punditry
Pamela Geller: Popular Imam Omar Bakri Mohammed Preaches Killing Women And Girls On Facebook
Protein Wisdom: The $6.8 Trillion Keynesian Bubble In China
Shot In The Dark: North Dakota’s Greatest Sailor
STUMP: Public Pensions Teaser – A Taste Of Things To Come
The Gateway Pundit: St. Louis Teens Beat Bosnian Driver To Death With Hammers
The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler PSA – Shut Up Kid!
The Lonely Conservative: Obamacare Encourages Employers To Hire Immigrants Instead Of Americans
This Ain’t Hell: Air Force Can’t Walk And Chew Gum
Weasel Zippers: Atheist Group Blocks Food Donations From Children To Needy
Megan McArdle: Is Best Buy Back?
Shop Amazon Cyber Monday Deals Week
Rule 5 Sunday: Thanksgiving Tryptophan Coma Edition
Posted on | November 30, 2014 | 16 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho

Miss Alabama 2012, Katherine Webb
#rolltide
Between the ongoing Sex Trouble slog (which is starting to bear a strong resemblance to Napoleon’s invasion of Russia) and the Crimson Tide’s big comeback in the Iron Bowl Saturday (which is why I posed AJ McCarron’s main squeeze), it may be a while before we hear from Stacy again. Smitty and I will do our best to provide an erratic but daily flow of content – and speaking of which, I have just enough gas in the tank after a weekend in the Shenandoah to get this here Rule 5 post done. As usual, exercise discretion in clicking the links, because some of the pictures linked are most definitely NSFW.
Goodstuff leads off this week with everything you always wanted to know about Catwoman but were afraid to ask. Ninety Miles from Tyranny has Girls with Guns, Hot Pick of the Late Night, and Morning Mistress; Loose Endz submits Denise Crosby in one of the worst ST: Next Generation episodes ever, Animal Magnetism chips in with Rule 5 Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon, and Brian Noggle spices up a review of Tiger at the Gates with some of the actresses who were in the stage version of this Trojan War novel. As usual, First Street Journal has a different spin on Rule 5 and this week is all about American girls in uniform. Also, Average Bubba sent Rule 5 Friday: Hannah Ferguson Edition.
This week, EBL’s herd includes Sea Gals (not actually present at the 49ers’ humiliation), Interstellar Rule 5, Kendall Jenner, and Hollywood Vintage Christmas.
Soylent Siberia found the coffee creamer this week, as well as Overnighty Diamonds, Monday Motivationer Jazmin, Evening Awesome Boots, Tuesday Titillation Twofer With Fur, Perils of Pygmalion, Humpday Hawtness Leona Rajacic, Overnighty Roxana, Soylent Thanksgiving, Evening Encore Leona, Corset Friday: Lascivious Lingerie, T-GIF Friday WeekEnder Foreplay: The Rockettes, Weekender Minion Submission: Clambake Buffet, and Bath Night A La Bond.
A View from the Beach submits Lily Aldridge and the Gap, Three Cups a Day Keeps Dementia Away, Happy Thanksgiving!, Nice Rack!, “I’m Only Happy When it Rains!”, Another Moment of Desperation, I Don’t Care What They Do, As Long As They Don’t Scare the Horses, “Wade in the Water”, Redskins Attack Gold Miners, and Celebrities Stuck in Traffic.
Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Stephanie Szostak, his Vintage Babe is Thanksgiving, Sex in Advertising asks Got Milk? and the obligatory 49ers cheerleader comes with a friend this week. At Dustbury, it’s Noel Neill and Jennifer Batten.
Thanks to everyone for their linkagery! Deadline to submit links to the Rule 5 Wombat mailbox is midnight on Sunday, December 6.
Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
FMJRA 2.0: Day Late And A Dollar Short Thanksgiving Weekend Edition
Posted on | November 30, 2014 | 1 Comment
— compiled by Wombat-socho
Rule 5 Sunday: Wax Ecstatic
Batshit Crazy News
Average Bubba
Regular Right Guy
A View from the Beach
Proof Positive
Ninety Miles from Tyranny
Is Salon Saying That Rep. Paul Ryan Is A Time Traveller?
The Pirate’s Cove
A View from the Beach
Report: Two Black Panther Terrorists Arrested in Ferguson Bomb Plot
Batshit Crazy News
A View from the Beach
FMJRA 2.0: Sold Me Down The River
The Pirate’s Cove
Batshit Crazy News
Why Ferguson?
Batshit Crazy News
Minority Report Blog
Regular Right Guy
Hogewash
In The Mailbox, 11.24.14
Regular Right Guy
LIVE AT FIVE: 11.25.14
Batshit Crazy News
He Stands There Appealing His Fruit
Batshit Crazy News
Regular Right Guy
LIVE AT FIVE: 11.26.14
Batshit Crazy News
Proof Positive
Weekend Reading
Batshit Crazy News
Ferguson Seen As Reverend Al Sharpton’s Racism Industrial Complex Checking In
Batshit Crazy News
Landrieu Would Do Anything For Love Of A Senate Seat. That, Too. With Gusto.
First Street Journal
Batshit Crazy News
Top linker this week: Batshit Crazy News (10)
Thanks to everyone for their linkagery this week!
Shop Amazon Cyber Monday Deals Week
Shout Out To Princess Pelosi
Posted on | November 29, 2014 | 24 Comments
by Smitty
Poor Princess Pelosi; once so regal. Now another beagle.
To the tune of “I’m a Little Teapot“:
I’m a bitter clinger, hear me roar.
Once I had power,
For now, it’s no more.
When I get all Beamed up,
Hear me shout!
Elections are over
Soon they’ll throw me out.I’m a bitter clinger, yes it’s true.
Staying past my sell date’s what I do.
Scheming on my comeback; foes I’ll rout:
Tea Partiers Will. Pay. Have. No. Doubt.
Landrieu Would Do Anything For Love Of A Senate Seat. That, Too. With Gusto.
Posted on | November 28, 2014 | 28 Comments
by Smitty

The #FunnyNotFunny thing about Landrieu is that not only are the wages of her political sin going to be death in the runoff next month, but the way she’d so cheerfully promise to prostitute herself and her state in order to stay in office.

Vote Bill Cassidy
An incumbent who has been reduced to a Meatloaf reference is not worth keeping.
via BCF
« go back — keep looking »