In The Mailbox: 12.13.17

An atheist guy named Damien whose Tumblr blog has an obscene anti-police title got a question: “what does MRA mean? I haven’t heard of it before,” to which he supplied a deliberately insulting answer:

Men’s rights activist
Generally, they’re men that spend their time complaining that they’re being oppressed by women and feminism because feminism isn’t doing the work 100% for men.

Is this a fair description of MRAs? Never mind. As I’ve said, I’m not an MRA because I reject the identity-politics concept of group “rights,” which is fundamentally what’s wrong with feminism. While agreeing with many MRAs in their critique of feminism, I consider it foolish to create a mirror-obverse of feminism’s totalitarian ideology. Meanwhile, an asexual feminist Tumblrina amplified Damien’s anti-MRA message:

While simultaneously not doing any Actual advocacy that needs doing. Male rape goes under reported, gender roles are harmful and stifling, prostrate and testicular cancer (not to be a biological essentialist but) kill people, trans men have low life expectancy and difficulty accessing resources, gay men have to deal with fucking mike fucking pence as their VP
Men could do with so much advocacy but MRAs just wanna know why pretty women aren’t objects anymore. Unfair!!

Who says “gender roles are harmful and stifling”? Who wastes time worrying about testicular cancer or the life expectancy of “trans men,” etc.? You see how, in the mind of the asexual feminist, what MRAs should be doing is “advocacy” on these issues, instead of complaining that “pretty women aren’t objects anymore.” Rather than to bother critiquing the asexual feminist’s concept of what MRAs are about, however, I’ll just move on to quote Sara the bisexual socialist witch’s reaction:

THIS IS WHY I FUCKING HATE MRAs. THIS. Because men DO need advocacy for SO MANY THINGS and these fucking washed up fedora-toting shitwipes are pissed that they (understandably) can’t get a date omfg

So, according to the 19-year-old bisexual socialist witch, MRAs are “washed up fedora-toting” obscenities whose chief motivation is that they “can’t get a date.” This is further confirmation of Vox Day’s Third Law: “SJWs always project.” Which is to say that, by portraying her chosen enemies as primarily motivated by sexual dissatisfaction, Sara tells us about her own motivation. Sara is pro-abortion because she is a feminist who hates children and never wants to have babies (which may explain her fascination with the pagan Goddess of Death).

Why did Sara, who was raised Catholic, turn into a pro-abortion bisexual socialist witch who hates children? Does she have some sort of psychiatric problem? Is she possessed by demonic spirits? Well, as I’ve said, Feminism Is Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It, and Sara is one of its victims, along with the many millions of human lives destroyed in the name of “women’s rights.”

She's a 19-year-old bisexual socialist witch. And has a Tumblr blog, of course. pic.twitter.com/tv0TyG2sbI

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) December 11, 2017

Category: Abortion, Sex Trouble

BOMBING IN NEW YORK CITY

Posted on | December 11, 2017 | 1 Comment

A man detonated a small bomb near Times Square in Manhattan this morning. A suspect is reported to be in custody.

UPDATE: In what NYC Mayor Bill DeBlasio called an “attempted terrorist attack,” the 27-year-old suspect named Akayed Ullah detonated a “low-tech improvised explosive device” in a subway station, NYPD commissioner James O’Neill said. The bomb caused only inor injuries to three people, and there are currently no known threats to the city.

UPDATE II: Did we mention that the terrorist is a Muslim immigrant?

This is Akayed Ullah, the 27-year-old Muslim terrorist responsible for the Port Authority bombing. He came to the U.S. seven years ago from Bangladesh. pic.twitter.com/JMhU5mTbpl

— Joe Walsh (@WalshFreedom) December 11, 2017

UPDATE III: More details:

A Bangladeshi man reportedly inspired by ISIS set off a pipe bomb inside New York’s Port Authority bus terminal during rush hour Monday morning, sowing mass chaos but causing few injuries — likely because the “attempted terrorist” detonated his “low-tech device” prematurely.
Akayed Ullah, 27, set off the “effectively low-tech device” in a subway passageway just before 7:30 a.m., New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said in a news conference. Ullah, who lived in Brooklyn, suffered burns and wounds to his abdomen and hands and appeared to be the only person seriously injured in the pipe bomb explosion, authorities said. . . .
Ullah’s attack was inspired by ISIS, but he had no direct contact with the terrorist group, law enforcement officials said. When asked if Ullah made statements about ISIS, NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill said the suspect did make statements, but he did not go into detail about what was said.
Ullah strapped the crude pipe bomb to his body with Velcro and zip ties. The suspect allegedly packed the 5-inch metal pipe bomb and battery pack into the right side of his jacket, but the device exploded earlier than intended, law enforcement sources told The New York Post.

Bangladesh is one of the poorest countries in the world, with a per-capita monthly income of barely $100. You might think any Bangladeshi would be eternally grateful for the opportunity to live in America. However, like so many other Muslim immigrants, Ullah brought with him to the U.S. the same cultural backwardness that has trapped Bangladesh in permanent poverty, and acted upon his fanatical hatred of America.

Category: New York, Terrorism

The Racist Liberal Yankees of Boston

Posted on | December 11, 2017 | Comments Off on The Racist Liberal Yankees of Boston

As a Southerner, I enjoyed reading this:

Google the phrase “Most racist city,” and Boston pops up more than any other place, time and time again.
It may be easy to write that off as a meaningless digital snapshot of what people say about us, and what we say about ourselves — proof of little beyond the dated (or, hopefully, outdated) memories of Boston’s public and fierce school desegregation battles of the 1970s.
Except that Boston’s reputation problem goes much deeper than an online search. A national survey commissioned by the Globe this fall found that among eight major cities, black people ranked Boston as least welcoming to people of color. More than half — 54 percent — rated Boston as unwelcoming.

The perception of my native Atlanta was much better. In truth, most of what is perceived as “racism” is simply bad manners. Teach your children to be courteous — “Yes sir,” “No sir,” “Please” and “Thank you” — and also teach them Christian ideals of kindness and mercy.

Furthermore, we should teach children to have a sense of their own personal dignity. Treating others rudely damages your reputation, as the rude Yankees of Boston demonstrate. Also, being rude is bad for business. During the civil-rights era of the 1950s and 60s, Atlanta was hailed as “the City Too Busy to Hate.” Local cynics joked that, in truth, we were the City Too Greedy to Care — but it’s the same thing, really.

There was always a pro-business attitude in Atlanta, and the Chamber of Commerce didn’t want to do anything that would undermine the city’s growth. Business leaders were less concerned with black and white than with green, and Atlanta’s reputation as a friendly place owes a lot to the legacy of such leaders. It is a historical irony, of course, that Boston was a notorious cauldron of abolitionism before the Civil War, and that Atlanta was burned to the ground by Sherman’s army. The biggest city in New England, a bastion of Democrat Party liberalism, now has a worse reputation for racism than the capital of conservative Georgia.

Save your Confederate money, folks. The South will rise again!

Category: Racism

Rule Five Sunday: Snow Bunnies

Posted on | December 10, 2017 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Having spent half my life in Minnesota, I am invariably amused when snow comes to the South. People act like the glaciers are just a few miles away, and if they don’t obtain mass quantities of milk, bread, and TP, they’ll be trapped in their homes to starve. looking on helplessly as bands of Eskimos riding polar bears pillage their homes and carry off their nubile daughters. Speaking of nubile daughters, with snow you also get skiing, and sweaters, and Gil Elvgren paintings of girls skiing in sweaters, as we have here today.
As usual, many of the following links are to pictures generally considered NSFW. The management is not responsible for any ill effects arising from your failure to exercise discretion when clicking on the links.

Sexy without being revealing.

Ninety Miles From Tyranny leads off with Hot Pick Of The Late Night, The 90 Miles Mystery Box Episode #97, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns; Animal Magnetism makes up for lost time with Rule Five Hawaii Screws Over Gun Owners Friday and Rule Five Bitcoin Friday, along with two weeks worth of the Saturday Gingermageddon.

Outstanding in her field as usual, EBL offers Kamala Harris, Christine Keeler, Gal Gadot, Alexandra Daddario, WW2 Pinup Art, Lizard Women, Dustin Hoffman getting his grope on, Dina Habib Powell, Candace Owens, and Parker Posey as Dr. Smith in Netflix’ reboot of Lost In Space.

A View From The Beach brings us Jarah Mariano, They’re Real?, Frosty Friday!, If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Eat ‘Em, Now, That Was a Sex Scandal!, The FBI Scandal, Massachusetts Considering Commercial Striped Bass Ban, Reindeer Games, #HimToo: Geraldo Rivera! and Pam Thinks Hollywood Victims Had it Coming.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Sofia Milos, his Vintage Babe is Gwili Andre, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Big Mouth. At Dustbury, it’s Sammy Winward and Reiko Aylesworth.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery!

Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women
Amazon Personal Bra Boutique

Category: Rule 5

‘An Open Secret’: Bryan Singer and the Hollywood Gay Pedophile Scandal

Posted on | December 10, 2017 | 1 Comment

“Since 2006 Bryan Singer has contributed at least $87,620 to Democratic candidates and committees. . . . In 2011 and 2012 Singer contributed a combined $61,600 to the Democratic National Committee.”
— Caroline May, Daily Caller, April 17, 2014

When X Men director Bryan Singer was sued in 2014 for raping a teenage boy, he called the accusations “outrageous, vicious and completely false.” This past week, he was sued for raping another teenage boy:

A man is suing “X-Men” director Bryan Singer for allegedly sexually abusing him on a yacht when he was 17 years old, a claim Singer “categorically denies.”
Cesar Sanchez-Guzman says Singer abused him in 2003 during a party on a yacht owned by Lester Waters, “a wealthy tech investor who frequently hosted parties for young gay males in the Seattle area,” according to a suit filed in Washington state superior court.
The suit alleges that Singer “lured Cesar into a room, shut the door and demanded that Cesar perform oral sex. When Plaintiff refused, Bryan Singer forced him into acts of oral and anal sex.”
It adds that Singer later informed Sanchez-Guzman that he could help Sanchez-Guzman get into acting if he didn’t tell anyone about the incident. . . .
A representative for Singer said the director “will vehemently defend this lawsuit to the very end” and questioned why Sanchez-Guzman waited to file the lawsuit.
“Significantly, when Sanchez-Guzman filed for bankruptcy only a few years ago, he failed to disclose this alleged claim when he was supposed to identify all of his assets, but conveniently, now that the bankruptcy court discharged all of his debts, he is able to recall the alleged events,” the statement from the representative said.

Exactly what does the plaintiff’s bankruptcy have to do with whether Singer raped him? This is an irrelevant smear to discredit the accuser. But what do we know about the accuser?

Cesar Sanchez-Guzman . . . said in an interview Friday that fear of being outed as gay kept the then-high school student from reporting the attack to police.
Sanchez-Guzman, now 31, also alleged that Singer boasted of being powerful in the film industry and warned him against reporting the rape.
“He smirked and said, if I say anything, he was very popular and could basically ruin my reputation,” Sanchez-Guzman said. . . .
Sanchez-Guzman said that he and his family had moved to the Seattle area the year before. “I was finding myself, having just recently come out of the closet to my friends,” he said, and began attending parties popular with other young gay men, thrown by a local tech investor.
He described himself as being “selected” by the investor for an invite to the party on the yacht, on which alcohol flowed as it sailed Lake Union and Lake Washington. . . .
He said he later told a close friend of the rape but did not tell his family or go to the police. His family was made up of strict Pentecostal converts who had sent him on two religious retreats, including one in which there was an effort made to “rid [him] of a homosexual evil spirit,” Sanchez-Guzman said.
He believed that reporting Singer would have resulted in them learning that he was gay. “That was not an option,” Sanchez-Guzman said. “I knew if I did, the consequences would be worse for me.”

This highlights one of the factors that enables gay predators to continue preying on teenage boys. Whether the victim identifies as gay or not, if he goes public with an accusation, the boy’s reputation is inevitably damaged. Is he gay? Well, no more party invitations for him, if he’s going to “cause a scene” by objecting to the advances of older men. Is he straight? Oh, sure he’s straight — nudge, nudge, wink, wink — which leaves him to explain why he was hanging out with gay dudes.

Saturday night, I watched Amy Berg’s must-see documentary An Open Secret, which specifically focused on the gay pedophile culture in Hollywood, including the notorious Digital Entertainment Network scandal, which was involved in the 2014 lawsuit against Singer. There is a reason why Berg’s documentary has never been shown on TV, and it’s the same reason why the phrase “gay pedophile” never appears in the media. No one wants to be accused of “homophobia” or promoting harmful “stereotypes” about gay men preying on young boys, and this fear of offending the powerful LGBT lobby is, of course, another one of the factors that permits such predatory behavior to continue.

Political correctness is dangerous. Many journalists apparently believe they have a duty to act as public-relations agents for the gay community, which results in a “see-no-evil” attitude toward homosexual behavior. You’re a bigot — a hater — if you mention that some gay men like to hang out with teenage boys in a not entirely platonic way. And we know which political party benefits from this conspiracy of silence:

“In 2006 and 2007 Singer contributed a combined total of $6,500 to Hillary Clinton’s campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics’ Open Secrets. In 2011 and 2012 Singer contributed a combined $61,600 to the Democratic National Committee.”
Singer has also hosted notoriously raucous gay parties at the home of film director Roland Emmerich, the London Daily Mail reported. In a 2011 interview with the Advocate, a leading gay publication, Emmerich described how Singer invited hundreds of “twinks” — slang for very young gay men — to the annual pool parties at Emmerich’s Hollywood estate. The paper highlighted a photo showing scores of men frolicking in Emmerich’s swimming pool.
It was at Emmerich’s estate in June 2007 that Hillary Clinton attended an “LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) fundraiser event” for her Democrat presidential campaign.

Well, isn’t that an interesting coincidence? Far be it from me to suggest that Hillary Clinton is pro-LGBT in anything other than a political sense, or to wonder why Huma Abedin was spending so much time with Hillary while Huma’s husband was chasing teenage girls online. Such lurid insinuations would be . . . undignified. Also, I don’t want to imply that there are no gay Republicans. You don’t have to be heterosexual to want to Make America Great Again, after all. According to exit polls, Donald Trump got 14% of the gay vote in 2016, which is more than the percentage (8%) of black voters he got. Liberals would probably say the gays who voted for Trump are racist, and the black Trump supporters are homophobes. My hunch is they were all as sick of the Clintons as the white heterosexuals who voted for Trump, but I digress . . .

Bret Skopek (in blue shirt) was 18 when he posed with Bryan Singer and … uh, friends in 2014. https://t.co/mIMqURC9EY pic.twitter.com/hwqlN5rPIX

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) December 10, 2017

It’s a hateful stereotype to suggest gay men are interested in teenage boys, so I guess Bryan Singer’s ex-boyfriend is a homophobe:

One of Bryan Singer’s alleged former lovers has pulled back the curtain on his relationship with the X-Men director — a relationship that he says involved fancy dinners, set visits and easy access to drugs and sex.
‘It was a never-ending supply of cute young men,’ Bret Tyler Skopek, 22, told Deadline in an exclusive interview, in which he opened up about his year-long relationship with Singer.
Then 18, Skopek said that he initially met Singer . . . at a 2013 Halloween party a month after he arrived in Los Angeles, but that he didn’t know who the director at the time.
Not long after the Halloween party, Skopek said a middle-aged computer technician started texting him. Following a lunch, the man invited Skopek to his home, then allegedly plied him with MDMA and raped him while he was unconscious.
Skopek did not press charges against the man, who later introduced him to a variety of prominent Hollywood personalities, Skopek said.
In December 2013, he had his second encounter with Singer at a birthday party dinner that Singer threw for the computer tech at Nobu Restaurant.
Skopek recalled that Singer had boasted about spending $1,000 on the dinner bill that night, then invited him, along with two other young men at the party, back to his house on Sunset Strip.
Following a tour of the house, Skopek said that he and the other young men were ‘kind of chilling’ in the basement. Then, ‘Bryan takes us up, one by one, and gives us all a Molly [MDMA],’ Skopek told Deadline, adding that Singer split the pills with them saying, ‘”I’ll do half if you do half.”‘
After ingesting the drugs, Skopek said that he, Singer and the other two men started having group sex. The next morning, Singer offered to take Skopek to breakfast and then to visit Singer’s Bad Hat Harry Productions studio, where they were editing one of the X-Men movies at the time.
‘We maybe spend almost the whole day together at the studio until I take a Snapchat… Bryan gets mad at me and says he’ll have his assistant drive me home,’ Skopek said.
Skopek said that the December 2013 encounter was the first of many that involved dinner, then group sex with Singer. . . .
Skopek said that he ended his relationship with Singer in December 2014, after coming to the conclusion that their relationship was one-sided.
Skopek, who said that Singer had promised him a part in an X-Men movie that never came through, began to see himself as the ‘after-hours kid’ — Singer’s beck and call guy.
‘I was so depressed,’ Skopek said. ‘They would lead me on that I could get an audition. But all you’re good for is sex.’

You’re just a bigot if you believe homosexual men like teenage boys, so don’t believe Bret Skopek, who was 18 when he was having group sex with homosexual men — allegedly, I hasten to add.

Nothing to see here. Just a teenage boy, Bret Skopek, posing with director Bryan Singer, who is accused of raping teenage boys. https://t.co/mIMqURC9EY pic.twitter.com/B69KZ7JOeg

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) December 10, 2017

Liberal Journalism Rule One: There is no such thing as a “gay pedophile.” https://t.co/QDNnqW4P70

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) December 10, 2017

Category: Crime, Gays, Hollywood, Media Bias, Scandal

« go back — keep looking »

Free Agents
SHAMELESS CAPITALISM

The Other McCain is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for this blog to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Triple-A Franchises
Blogroll

The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

In The Mailbox: 12.13.17

In The Mailbox: 12.12.17

In The Mailbox: 12.11.17

Socialist Tumblrina Witches

BOMBING IN NEW YORK CITY

The Racist Liberal Yankees of Boston

Rule Five Sunday: Snow Bunnies

‘An Open Secret’: Bryan Singer and the Hollywood Gay Pedophile Scandal

THE FULL METAL JACKET REACH-AROUND AWARD

HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!

Search

Recent Posts

Click here to manage your email subscription options.

RSS reader subscription

MEMEORANDUM

Recent Comments

THE AMAZING GONZO FEED

Major Leagues

ADVERTISEMENT

Axis of Fedorables

AMAZING SAVINGS NOW!

Archives

Free Agents

SHAMELESS CAPITALISM

Triple-A Franchises

Blogroll