The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Because Sluts Should Be Ashamed

Posted on | January 24, 2017 | 1 Comment

Great minds think alike and, at the very moment I was tsk-tsking over Meghan Murphy’s sad fate, Zaklog the Great was posting this video:

 

Now, one of my pet peeves is video bloggers (“vloggers”) who post splendid rants but fail to provide transcripts for those us who would like to be able to quote what they say. As if he could read my mind, Zaklog the Great had a transcript ready when I asked for one:

I’d like to talk a little bit today about slut-shaming. There’s a real problem with it these days. We simply do not have nearly enough.
Let’s spell out exactly what the phrase “slut-shaming” means, shall we? It means criticizing a woman for promiscuous sexual behavior. Why, exactly, is this bad? Oh . . . I see. It’s unfair! Men do not get treated the same. Well, you’re kind of right. Men are not held to account for our sexual behavior nearly enough. This is unfair. I don’t know if I would say unjust because “fair” is a loose word, easy to sling around. “Just” . . . is a bit more hard-edged, however.
But, if you have an important rule that is not being enforced even-handedly, the sane decision is not to abolish the rule for everyone, but to enforce the rule for those who have been getting off light. We need more slut-shaming for men.
But don’t get me wrong. This is not just about men. There is also a dreadful dearth of slut-shaming for women these days.
You may object, however, that these rules against sexual promiscuity are not important, that, in fact, they are silly, and outdated, and passé. To that, I have a few replies. First, how’s that gonorrhea infection treating you? Did they get to it before it rendered you permanently sterile? Second, yes, these rules are important, and even more so for women than for men.
You see, and I know this is unfair, women tend to bear the consequences of irresponsible sexual behavior more heavily than men do. First, we have to establish some basic facts. Sex, you see, is how we get more people, who, in common practice, start out as babies. Now, there are all kinds of fantastic things that can be said about babies, but two drawbacks cannot be debated: Babies are expensive and babies are time-consuming.
Why do I bring this up? Well, if two people are having casual sex and a baby results, who generally ends up responsible for it? That’s right, the woman. Even if she manages to get child support from the father, which is a doubtful proposition in that situation, that is still a large burden for one person.
So, in purely practical terms, women tend to bear more of the costs of promiscuous sex. But that’s not all. You see, and I hate to break this to those of you who’ve been listening to feminists, but women and men are not the same. Women and men do not react to sexual intimacy the same way. And years of playing genital-tag leave different marks on women than they do on men.
There was a study a few years ago that showed that the odds of a woman being happy in her marriage go down as her number of lifetime sexual partners goes up. It also showed no such pattern among men. Is this unfair? Yes. It’s also reality. Sorry.
You put these two important facts together and it looks like enforcing societal rules against sexual promiscuity is even more important for women than for men. These rules protect women far more than they do men.
Now, societies have basically two options for enforcing their various rules: ostracism or force, mockery or the barrel of a gun. I, personally, think ostracism would be by far the preferable option here. Perhaps you disagree.
So yeah. Slut-shaming. We could really use more. Now go out and do your part!

Exactly right. Why does shame exist, anyway? Because if people were not shamed for doing bad things, they might do bad things all the time, like posting video rants and not providing a transcript. Shame on vloggers who do that — and praise to Zaklog the Great!

 

Category: Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 01.24.17

Posted on | January 24, 2017 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 01.24.17

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Obama State Dept. Flunky Marie Harf Hired By…Fox News?
Twitchy: Senior Secret Service Officer In Hot Water Over Facebook Post
Louder With Crowder: Hypocrisy Exposed! Crowder Crashes #WomensMarch As Undercover Transgender!


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: Is It Okay To Punch A Nazi?
American Thinker: Chronicles Of Self-Destruction
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s First Full Presidential Day Work News
Bring The HEAT: The Strange Case Of Lieutenant Commander Lin
Da Tech Guy: Baldilocks – Post-Inauguration Short Takes, also, John Ruberry – Why Is Chicago So Corrupt?
Don Surber: “Citizens Impeachment! Citizens Impeachment” /Gomer Pyle, also, West Virginia Almost Abortion Free
Dustbury: I Think She Wears A Small
Hogewash: Yours Truly, Johnny Atsign
Jammie Wearing Fools: Failing NY Tabloid Attacks Tom Brady For Friendship With Donald Trump
Joe For America: No More Spanish! White House Announces English-Only Website
JustOneMinute: Waves In The Pacific
Power Line: Burn, Baby, Burn?, also, Governor Dayton Collapses
Shark Tank: Obama’s Last-Minute Gift Of $221 Million To The Palestinian Authority
Shot In The Dark: Dear “Feminist” Bobblehead
STUMP: Actuaries On Social Security – Schobel On Reforms, Myers On History, And Foster On Medicare/ACA
The Geller Report: Anti-Trump Protester Lights Girl’s Hair On Fire (Video), also, HuffPo Attacks Trump For Vow To Fight “Radical Islamic Terrorism”
The Jawa Report: Banned From YouTube – Boobies, Not Banned From JihadTube – Death To America
The Political Hat: Tweens And Sharia Law
This Ain’t Hell: Veronica Dale Hahn Stole $400K From VA, also, Old Enough To Know Better
War Is Boring: A Professor Claimed Video Games Make People Better Shooters – Then His Study Got Retracted
Weasel Zippers: Sharia Supporting Womens’ March Organizer Encourages Lawbreaking By Creating Sanctuaries For Illegals, also, Trump Asks FBI Director Comey To Stay On
Megan McArdle: The Democrats’ Rise Is Far From Inevitable
Mark Steyn: When The March Is Over


Today’s Digital Deals
Shop Handmade – The Wedding Store

Category: Linkagery

Hook-Up Culture: ‘Since I Started Having Sex With Men, Back in, Like, 1997’

Posted on | January 24, 2017 | 4 Comments

“Hookup culture has been alive and kicking since I started having sex with men back in, like, 1997. And I didn’t even have a Hotmail account then.”
— Meghan Murphy, Aug. 10, 2015

Did you ever hear of the “Three-Date Rule”? When I was a teenage hoodlum, the cynical view was that if you weren’t, uh, becoming intimate by the third date, you were wasting your time. Back in the Disco Age — before AIDS, and before MADD had forced the national drinking age up to 21 — there was no shortage of casual female companionship, so why should a guy bother with all that ridiculous slow-motion “relationship” stuff? If you’ve seen Dazed and Confused or Fast Times at Ridgemont High, you get some idea of what a reckless time that was.

 

Many of my readers, of course, are themselves old enough to have direct memories of that era and they can tell their own tales of how it was when, as Bob Seger sang, we were all workin’ on our night moves.

Really, there ought to be a T-shirt, “I Survived the ’70s,” and it’s easy to pretend that was all harmless fun, but there were too many who didn’t survive, or who sustained such damage as to permanently wreck their lives. Looking back, I’m reminded of what General Sherman told an audience in Ohio about 15 years after the Civil War: “There is many a boy here today who looks on war as all glory, but, boys, it is all hell.”

Having learned my lessons the hard way, I was eager to make sure my kids didn’t repeat my mistakes. There is nothing to be learned, nor anything to be proven, by a repetition of the errors of the past. Movies may make the ’70s look like “all glory,” but it was all hell. This brings me back around to the old Three-Date Rule. Once you discarded all constraints of morality or social respectability, as teenage hoodlums do, what was all that “relationship” stuff about anyway? The whole point of a devil-may-care Bad Boy attitude was to convey a message: “Hey, you wanna party?”

This was a yes-or-no question, you see. No need to play games. Better to be up-front and direct about it, instead of wasting time. Oh, sure, there was necessarily some aspect of romance involved, but we knew we were all just a bunch of young sinners, and why pretend otherwise?

Who was it that told me about the Three-Date Rule? I’ve forgotten, and it doesn’t matter, because it was just standard operating procedure. No teenage hoodlum was going to waste weeks or months going through a lot of slow-motion romance when there were so many disco dollies who were ready to get down, get down, get down tonight, baby.

Baby, baby, let’s get together.
Honey, honey, me and you.
And do the things, oh, do the things
That we like to do.
Oh, do a little dance, make a little love,
Get down tonight, get down tonight.
Do a little dance, make a little love,
Get down tonight, get down tonight.

So much for the 1970s, then, and all of that was preamble to discussing Canadian feminist Meghan Murphy’s column about online dating:

Now, speaking only from personal experience, I am not a fan of online dating. When I was single a couple of years ago, everyone was on OkCupid and told me I had to do it because that’s just how people dated nowadays. I tried it for maybe a month, found it super annoying and time-consuming, realized there was no way in hell I was going to go on a date with some stranger from the internet, and went back to my regular life meeting men through friends of friends, at parties, bars, and in my neighbourhood, and lived to tell the tale. . . .
I do not believe either that “hookup culture” is new, directly connected to online dating, or that it has caused The Young People to eschew commitment and relationships completely.
In fact, I think all the hookup culture fearmongering is part of the problem, in that it convinces women they will be SINGLE FOREVER DUN DUN DUNNNN because today’s modern man just wants to f–k and has no interest in committed relationships. Hookup culture has been alive and kicking since I started having sex with men back in, like, 1997. And I didn’t even have a Hotmail account then. Hooking up was just what you did on the weekend and, quite honestly, as a young woman, I really didn’t care about being in a relationship. It wasn’t a priority for me at all. I’ve been both single and in relationships, on and off, for all of my adult life and there is very little that has changed since I was 17.

Read the rest of that if you want, but I just want to make three points:

  1. Online dating is for losers, as I’ve said before;
  2. Not only has the game not changed since 1997, but it has’t really changed since 1977, because sin is still sin;
    and
  3. If you’re still “dating” when you’re 35, you have lost the game.

Point #3 is where we confront the sad truth about Meghan Murphy’s “feminism.” Is she being honest when she says she “really didn’t care about being in a relationship” when she was young? Did she never have any romantic dreams of a happily-ever-after ending? Wedding bells, etc.? If so, she was a very unusual young woman, even by feminist standards.

Even the most cynical Bad Boy has to recognize that his hedonism is not harmless recreation. Bad Girls have their romantic dreams, too, and there is a limit to how many heartbreaks anyone can endure.

Smart girls never play that game. One useful term popularized by the pickup artist (PUA) community is sexual market value (SMV) and the smart girl realizes she doesn’t increase her SMV by, uh, becoming intimate on a casual basis. Furthermore, the smart girl recognizes that youth is a crucial factor in her SMV. There’s no point complaining about unfair double-standards here. We are describing how things are in real life, rather than theorizing an alternative universe of “social justice.” So when we read about Meghan Murphy in her mid-30s “meeting men through friends of friends, at parties, bars, and in my neighbourhood,” we are apt to shake our heads in pity. Oh, “as a young woman, I really didn’t care about being in a relationship,” she says, but what does she have now? Nothing but fading memories of her youth, looking toward a future that probably involves a tiny apartment and lots of cats.

It’s a death trap.
It’s a suicide rap.
We gotta get out while we’re young,
`Cause tramps like us,
Baby, we were born to run.

Yeah, smart girls never get into that game, but if somehow they do, they’re smart enough to get our while they’re young. Sing it, Bruce.

 

Say what you will, kids — the music was just better back then.



 

Category: Sex Trouble

The Dialectic of Feminist Failure

Posted on | January 24, 2017 | Comments Off on The Dialectic of Feminist Failure

Friedrich Engels and the original German edition of ‘The Origin of the Family.’

One of the most predictable insults that liberals direct at their critics is “ignorance.” Liberals consider themselves intellectually superior, and so the fact that you disagree with them is interpreted as proof of your inferiority. Never does a liberal consider the possibility that his antagonist has examined the arguments for liberalism and rejected them.

No, it is only ignorant prejudice that can explain the conservative’s opposition, the liberal believes. Convinced that they are both intellectually and morally superior to others, liberals think of themselves as qualified to tutor the rest of us, as if we are simple-minded children.

 

Limo torched in DC protests
belongs to Muslim immigrant,
may cost $70,000 in damages
— Washington Examiner

When we see headlines like that, we are entitled to ask, where is the evidence that liberals are superior to everyone else? The radical mob that burned that limo were convinced they were striking a blow against Trump’s right-wing agenda. After all, what could more perfectly symbolize “facism” than this luxurious Lincoln limo? But the owner is named Muhammad Ashraf, and the driver was Luis Villarroel. Exactly how did torching this car advance the “progressive” cause?

Well, how dare you ask such a question, you ignorant bigot!

It’s the same with feminism. No matter how well-educated you may be, if you disagree with feminists they will accuse you of ignorance. You’re just a dimwitted subhuman sexist pig, if you don’t support their agenda, and no amount of facts or logic can ever convince feminists otherwise:

How much feminist theory have you read? Probably less than I have. You’d have to be a Ph.D. in Women’s Studies to have read as many volumes of this stuff as I’ve plowed through since I started the Sex Trouble project in 2014. You want to talk Judith Butler and Monique Wittig? Mary Daly and Gerda Lerner? I’m thoroughly prepared. And yet at the end of the day, I return to a basic fact: Men and women are different, in ways that are socially significant.
You know who recognized this? Friedrich Engels. Karl Marx’s colleague and co-author of the Communist Manifesto, Engels in 1884 wrote a very important book, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, which is still worth reading today. Despite his anti-capitalist bias (or perhaps, because of this bias), his foray into anthropology forced Engels to confront the inescapable fact that women’s work as mothers is irreplaceable. . . .

Read the rest at The Patriarch Tree. Not only have I read more feminist theory than has the average feminist, but I’ve also read more Marxism than has the average Marxist. Being accused of ignorance by the kind of fools who voted for Hillary Clinton is a compliment, really.

UPDATE: Gotta quote Ace here:

A caste with pretenses of being superior does not actually become superior until the lower castes affirm the superiority of that caste by conceding to them the immunities and privileges they assert.

Brilliant. I have no problem conceding the superiority of someone like Ace, who obviously is several IQ points smarter than me. What I can’t stand is being lectured by some dimwit Gender Studies major like Jessica Valenti who (a) is nearly 20 years younger than me, and (b) could have titled her memoir My Pathetic Record of Bad Decisions: Why Only a Stupid Whore Would Make Such an Embarrassing Mess of Her Life.



 

Category: Abortion, Democrats, Donald Trump, Sex Trouble

Because She Doesn’t Like Blondes? @ahzimm Attacks @taylorswift13

Posted on | January 23, 2017 | Comments Off on Because She Doesn’t Like Blondes? @ahzimm Attacks @taylorswift13

When was the last time I paid attention to Taylor Swift? Almost a year ago, when those lesbian rumors were swirling around:

Every feminist on Tumblr is certain that Taylor is dating lesbian supermodel Karlie Kloss. As a Neutral Objective Journalist, of course, I’d have to see video proof before I’d believe that bizarre rumor, but if Cara Delevingne can be gay, everybody is gay, and in 2016, any self-respecting feminist would be embarrassed to admit she is heterosexual.

Just tabloid gossip, they said, but who knows, huh? Anyway, I went back to ignoring Taylor Swift and then today I saw this:

 

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? Is this just some kind of cheap traffic-trolling trick? “Hey, let me throw a major celebrity under the feminist bus and see if I can’t get about 10,000 Facebook shares.”

The writer, Amy Zimmerman, is a recent graduate of Columbia University, so maybe she’s desperate to prove her traffic-generating prowess to her editors at The Daily Beast. Also — and there’s probably no delicate or politically correct way to say this — Amy Zimmerman is a swarthy Jew who seems obsessed with Taylor Swift’s gentile blondeness. This is not irrelevant to the content of Zimmerman’s attack:

As a pretty white girl who has written songs that rely heavily on fiddles, Swift undoubtedly counts a healthy handful of Trump supports among her fan base. In fact, the so-called alt-right has crowned Swift as the Aryan prom queen of their burgeoning neo-Nazi movement. The Daily Stormer—deemed a “neo-Nazi website” by The Southern Poverty Law Center—has published articles like “Taylor Swift, Avatar of European Imperialism,” “Aryan Goddess Taylor Swift: Nazi Avatar of the White European People,” and “Aryan Goddess Taylor Swift accused of Racism for Behaving Like an Ape in a Music Video.” Andrew Anglin, the site’s white supremacist founder, explained that, “Taylor Swift is a pure Aryan goddess, like something out of classical Greek poetry.” . . .
If you’re not overtly on board with the resistance, then you’re tacitly chill with being proclaimed an Aryan goddess. If you refuse to denounce your “alt-right” supporters, you risk alienating all of your queer, trans, black, Latino, undocumented, Muslim, and indigenous fans. Taylor Swift’s patriotic one-pieces might transition well to Donald Trump’s America, but her penchant for opting out of the political discourse is already passé.

WHOA!

Is it Taylor Swift’s fault she’s got neo-Nazi fanboys?

Or rather, is it Taylor Swift’s fault she’s a blue-eyed blonde?

These two phenomena are related, you see. The neo-Nazis like Taylor Swift for her blondeness, and it’s her blondness (“a pretty white girl”) that makes Taylor Swift suspect in the paranoid mind of Amy Zimmerman. Therefore, Taylor Swift must get “on board with the resistance,” or else she will stand accused of being pro-Nazi.

By the way, what’s with this “resistance” rhetoric? Ed Morrissey:

In a self-governing republic with established democratic processes, there is no honorable role for “resistance.” What are they “resisting,” especially before the new administration even takes office? Free and fair elections — the kind that this particular group hadn’t lost in twelve years. They only believe in elections when it gives them access to power.
Rather than take on the honorable and difficult task of the opposition party and rebuild themselves for future success, some on the Left have decided that they’re victims of oppression. To excuse that and their actions that have followed, they now wrap themselves in the mantle of the free French in World War II, or perhaps more relevantly, those few and brave dissidents in actual dictatorial regimes like Cuba. That’s not only ridiculous, it’s an insult to those who have had to fight true oppression and who had self-governance stripped from their hands, to the extent they had it at all. . . .
The “resistance” styles itself as anti-fascist, but they are the fascists. They don’t like the outcome of the election, and now they want to seize power by force and intimidation.

Yes, and here’s my hunch about Amy Zimmerman’s attack on Taylor Swift: It’s all about playing victim. She attacks Taylor Swift, poking at the “Aryan goddess” angle, and then waits for a deluge of anti-Semitic comments that she can then cite as “proof” that Taylor Swift’s fans are all a bunch of Trump-supporting neo-Nazis. All she needs is a couple of online death threats, and then she can do the Anita Sarkeesian/Zoe Quinn courageous victim-of-misogyny martyr trip — she’ll be giving TED talks and signing a book contract within a matter of weeks.

This kind of stuff has become tediously predictable. Feminists have become so accustomed to having everything their own way that any dissent is automatically condemned as “hate” or, as in the case of Taylor Swift, a feminist is condemned because she’s not feminist enough to satisfy the demands of some recent Columbia grad at the Daily Beast.

 

Category: Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 01.23.17

Posted on | January 23, 2017 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 01.23.17

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
BattleSwarm Blog: Friday LinkSwarm
EBL: Marco Rubio Makes The Right Decision On Rex Tillerson
Twitchy: Liberal Berates Trump Supporter On Plane, Gets Escorted Off By Cops
Louder With Crowder: Disgusting Leftists Attack Ten-Year-Old Barron Trump – But They LOVE Children!


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: A Few Thoughts On Trump’s Inauguration
American Power: National Park Service Retweets Far-Left Inauguration Posts
American Thinker: Requiem For A Lightweight, also, From The Front Lines – Sharia Compliance In The U.S. Military
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Silicon Valley Monday
BLACKFIVE: Silver City By Jeff Guinn
Bring The HEAT: World Of Warships – Division Of Death
Da Tech Guy: JD Rucker – Mainstream Media Has Earned Every Ounce Of The “Trump Treatment”, And More
Don Surber: CNN Caved To Saddam, Now They Try To Bully Trump, also, Kellyanne Conway Tames Chuck Todd
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries, also, Too Moby For This Bunch
Hogewash: Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Jammie Wearing Fools: Comedy Gold – Anti-Trump Nutcase Screaming “Nooooooo!” As President Is Sworn In
Joe For America: More Than A Vagina – What These Women Are Actually Protesting
JustOneMinute: Dark Night Descending
Power Line: Was Trump Right About His Inauguration Crowd Size?, also, Warren Isn’t Wowing Them In Massachusetts
Shark Tank: Trump Expected To Meet With Congressional Leaders Today
Shot In The Dark: All Roads Lead To George
STUMP: Kentucky Pension Assets – Trends In ERS, County, And Teachers’ Plans
The Geller Report: Stop Operation Soros – Massive Movement To Bring Down Soros Launched In Macedonia, also, Madonna Under Secret Service Scrutiny For Remarks On Blowing Up White House
The Jawa Report: From Missouri With Love, also, Worst. Hijab. Ever.
The Political Hat: Germany Goes Clockwork Orange
This Ain’t Hell: Guess Who Was Left Unpardoned?,
War Is Boring: The Not-So-Secret Way To Kill A Stealth Fighter
Weasel Zippers: Most Of 230 Rioters Arrested On Inauguration Day Could Face 10 Years/$25,000 For Felony Rioting, also, Senator Lindsey Graham (RINO-SC) Doesn’t Know What “America First” Means
Megan McArdle: Welcome To Trump’s America. Start Digging The Moat.
Mark Steyn: Dance Me To The End Of Love


Today’s Digital Deals
Try Amazon Home Services

Category: Linkagery

‘I’m Rubber, You’re Glue,’ and Other Childish Things That Losers Say

Posted on | January 23, 2017 | 1 Comment

 

Name-calling proves nothing, and sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. Nevertheless, I am in the word business. George Orwell’s famous essay “Politics and the English Language” needs to be assigned reading for everyone who wants to understand our current situation.

Because I’ve already exceeded my weekly quota of fat jokes, there isn’t much more I can say about the Women’s March on Washington. Madonna is now claiming she was quoted “out of context,” which is what liberals always say when they’re caught saying what they really mean. However, words actually do mean things, as we have been reminded:

Friday night in Seattle, a man was shot during a riotous protest outside an event at the University of Washington featuring pro-Trump speaker Milo Yiannopoulos, an editor for Breitbart.com. Police say the incident is still under investigation, but a report by the Seattle Times indicates the gunman was part of the anti-Trump mob and that he claimed to have been assaulted by the man he shot, whom he believed to be a “white supremacist.” However, friends of the victim — who is reported to be hospitalized in critical condition — say the man is actually an anti-Nazi activist who voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democrat presidential primaries.
The shooting in Seattle happened on the same day that mobs protesting President Trump’s inauguration rioted in Washington, D.C., where among other criminal acts they broke windows at a Starbucks and a Bank of America branch and burned a limousine parked outside the offices of the Washington Post. A day later, during the anti-Trump “Women’s March on Washington,” aging pop singer Madonna spoke of her violent fantasies: “Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.”
“Love Trumps Hate” and “Make Racists Afraid Again” are among the slogans commonly proclaimed on banners brandished by these violent mobs. This simplistic mentality, equating Republicans with “hate” and “racism,” has the effect of dehumanizing the 63 million Americans who voted to elect Trump. The rioters and their celebrity supporters evidently believe that any American who votes Republican is not merely wrong, but evil. Anyone who doesn’t hate Trump as much as Madonna hates Trump is condemned as ignorant and unworthy of respect. Who is to blame for inciting this dangerously divisive attitude? . . .

Read the whole thing at The American Spectator.



 

 

RELATED:

 

Category: Crime, Democrats, Donald Trump, Sex Trouble

Rule 5 Sunday: Inauguration Celebration

Posted on | January 22, 2017 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Well, that was quite the week, eh? Desperate, flailing folk trying to find a way – any way – to prevent the God-Emperor’s Ascension, a speech by President Trump that was mercifully brief and to the point, idiot anarchists rioting in the streets (and being indicted for same), and the “Women’s” March, another Soros astroturf effort coordinated by a sharia law advocate. Lots of stuff to appreciate, or at least point at and laugh. One of the things worth appreciating is the courage of Jackie Evancho, who sang at the inauguration despite threats to her life and career; in fact, her appearance may actually have boosted her concert ticket sales.

So, as usual, many of not all of the following links are to pics generally considered NSFW, and the management is not responsible for any ill effects incurred by those who fail to exercise discretion in the clicking.

Jackie Evancho

Ninety Miles From Tyranny leads off with Hot Pick of the Late Night, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns, while Goodstuff brings us some Blaze Starr, and Animal Magnetism has Rule Five Inauguration Day Friday and the Saturday Blondepocalypse.

EBL’s herd this week includes Lindsay Lohan, Cyd Charisse, Alanis Morrisette, Stay Chubby, Melania Trump, Ball Gowns, Stay Angry, and Ashley Judd.

A View from the Beach checks in with Alexandra Holden, Happy Inauguration Day!, “Mojo Thunder”, But Can She Hit the High Notes?, Does London Pass the Paint Test?, Vicky Beck Has Regrets, Reason #5394 Trump Was Elected, and She’s Not Kidding.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Marina Squerciati, his Vintage Babe is Bonita Granville, and Sex in Advertising is all about A Coke and a Smile. At Dustbury, it’s the long-awaited Zooeypalooza XXV!

Thanks to everyone for the linkagery!
Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women

Category: Rule 5
« go back — keep looking »