The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

The Internet Is Making You Gay

Posted on | December 17, 2016 | 3 Comments

 

OK, maybe the headline slightly overstates the case — I’ve been on the Internet more than 20 years and am still staunchly heterosexual — but some young people are clearly being influenced in the wrong direction. Having previously reported on “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria,” yesterday I took a long look at the YouTube “coming out” video genre:

Believe it or not, kids, sex actually did happen before we had YouTube or Facebook. I’m old enough to remember sex before there was even email! Those were the days of primitive analog sex, not like the high-tech stuff you kids are having with your iPhones and Tinder apps. We couldn’t just post a selfie on the Internet and wait for somebody to like it. No, we had to go out into what used to be called “the real world” and meet actual human beings.
The great thing about pre-Internet sex was, it was mostly private. You had to be a real celebrity before anybody cared if you were gay, and it was actually possible to avoid such questions. Instead of having an identity posted on your Internet profile — “demisexual genderqueer, Taurus, INFP, they/them” — you were just a flesh-and-blood human being, and most people you interacted with in your daily life knew almost nothing about you. If you were smart, you tried to keep it that way. This 21st-century confessional culture, where everybody seems to feel a need to publicize everything about themselves — post all the details of your life to Facebook — probably isn’t too smart.
Young people don’t seem to understand that the Internet is forever. Thirty or 40 years from now, their grandkids will be like, “Hey, Grandma, tell us the story about that time you were bisexual on YouTube!” . . .

Read the whole thing at The Patriarch Tree. The problem with many young people is that they have no sense of history, and therefore cannot evaluate their own personal problems in any kind of objective way. Growing up, my study of history gave me a sense of myself as the descendant of pioneers and patriots, who had overcome hardships far more difficult than anything I was likely to face in my own life. Although I had my own poignant adolescent woes — who doesn’t? — it was from knowing history that I obtained an understanding of myself as being situated in a brief window of the great span of time.

“The truth is this: The march of Providence is so slow and our desires so impatient; the work of progress so immense and our means of aiding it so feeble; the life of humanity is so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often see only the ebb of the advancing wave and are thus discouraged. It is history that teaches us to hope.”
— Robert E. Lee, 1870

“To live for the moment is the prevailing passion — to live for yourself, not for your predecessors or posterity. We are fast losing the sense of historical continuity, the sense of belonging to a succession of generations originating in the past and stretching into the future. . . .
“Narcissism emerges as the typical form of character structure in a society that has lost interest in the future.”
— Christopher Lasch, The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations (1979)

The astute reader instantly intuits the connection here between a loss of historical sensibility, an intensification of narcissism, and the embrace of homosexuality, which usually carries with it the abandonment of hope for posterity. Decadence and despair always go hand-in-hand.



 

Category: Gays, Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 12.16.16

Posted on | December 16, 2016 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 12.16.16

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Timing Is Everything – The Chinese Know Obama Won’t Do Anything
Twitchy: Kurt Eichenwald Frantically Deletes Post-Tucker Carlson Meltdown Tweets, Claims Seizure – UPDATED
Louder With Crowder: Hate Crime? College Republican President Assaulted, Media Silent


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Podcast #30 – The “Blackwater” Episode
American Power: William Julius Wilson – When Work Disappears
American Thinker: Hollywood Celebs Seek To Disenfranchise Voters
Animal Magnetism: Rule Five Thoughts On Japan Friday
BLACKFIVE:
Da Tech Guy: Letting Facebook Label What News Is Real? Are You Kidding Me?, also, Amazon-Owned Paper Attacks Devotion To Our Lady of Guadalupe During Christmas Season
Don Surber: Fox News Tops ESPN, And Here’s Why, also, Lynch Legacy Blocks Obama
Dustbury: Achievement Unlocked
Jammie Wearing Fools: Dubious “Faithless Elector” Chris Suprun A Fraud Who Claimed To Be 9/11 First Responder At The Pentagon
Joe For America: Texas Judge Orders Biblical “Charlie Brown Christmas” Display Restored At Killeen School
JustOneMinute: Johnny Redline Springs Into Action
Power Line: J Street Freaks Out Over Trump’s Excellent Choice For Ambassador To Israel, also, Thoughts From The Ammo Line
Shark Tank: Wikileaks Says “Russia Was Not Our Source”
Shot In The Dark: Election Fraud
STUMP: Chicago Teachers Pensions – Questioning Assumptions
The Geller Report: Homeland Security Knew Ohio State Attacker Was Terror Recruit, Let Him In Anyway, also, Keith Ellison Fails To Defend Anti-Israel Statements, Blames “Bad Reporting”
The Political Hat: Social Justice Institute
This Ain’t Hell: Attempts To Hack RNC Failed, also, Faithless Elector’s Stolen Valor
Weasel Zippers: RINO Lindsey Graham Won’t Vote For Tillerson Unless Nominee Blames Russians For DNC Hack, also, University Of Wisconsin To Offer New Class – “The Problem Of Whiteness”
Megan McArdle: Tech Upgrades Just Aren’t That Great Any More
Mark Steyn: The Trump Hack Of Notre Dem


Today’s Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Holiday Gift Cards

Category: Linkagery

In The Mailbox: 12.15.16

Posted on | December 15, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Vegan Terrorists Ruin Christmas Cheese Festival
Twitchy: “What Has Happened To Our Press?” Tucker Carlson Has “Knife Fight” With Kurt Eichenwald
Louder With Crowder: Uh-Oh! Jill Stein’s Michigan Recount Finds Voter Fraud – From Democrats!


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: All The Links Fit To Print, Plus The Hawt Chick Of The Week
American Power: Orange Coast College Professor Olga Perez Stable Cox Flees California After Death Threats
American Thinker: The Myth Of Hillary’s Popular Vote Victory
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily News
Da Tech Guy: JD Rucker – The Relentless Drumbeat Of Insanity Will Work If We Let It
Don Surber: Kissing President Trump’s Ring, also, About That “Hate Crime” Against A Reporter
Dustbury: A Majority In Perpetuity
Fred On Everything: John Derbyshire For Secretary Of Education – Extreme Times Call For Extreme Measures
Jammie Wearing Fools: Wikileaks Envoy Says Clinton E-Mails Were Leaked By Disgruntled Democrat Whistleblower
Joe For America: Hillary’s Inner Circle Throwing Huma Under The Bus
JustOneMinute: Abortion “Reporting” At The Times
Power Line: The Clinton Crying Game
Shark Tank: Pam Bondi Continues Focus On Opioid Addiction
Shot In The Dark: The Newest Comedy Morning Show
STUMP: Chicago Public Pensions – Diversity Day!
The Geller Report: UNLV Students File Petition To Stop School’s Sanctuary Status, also, Facebook Using Left-Wing Propagandists To “Fact-Check” “Fake News”
The Political Hat: Happy Bill Of Rights Day!
This Ain’t Hell: Trump To Slash F-35 Program, also, “Midshipman” Won’t Change
Weasel Zippers: After $85 Million In Family Travel, Obama Looks Forward To “Decent Vacation”, also, Desperate Hollywood Celebs Plead With Electors To Vote For Anybody But Trump
Megan McArdle: On Climate Change, Who Will Censure The Censors?
Mark Steyn: The Full English


Today’s Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Shop Amazon – Give the Gift of Amazon Prime

Category: Linkagery

‘Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria’

Posted on | December 15, 2016 | 2 Comments

The Internet is a powerful tool, and evil people have learned to exploit it for dangerous purposes. Last year, I became aware of what seems to be a rapidly spreading phenomenon: Teenagers who, after an intense period of online “research,” suddenly decide they’re transgender. There is a sort of online cult — Web sites, Tumblr blogs, YouTubers, etc. — promoting “gender transition” as the panacea to adolescent angst. Parents describe being shocked at the suddenness with which their children, who had previously been typical teenagers, decide that they must “transition,” demanding hormone treatment, and accusing their parents of “hate” if they do not accept their child’s new “gender identity.” The shocking part is that there is a sort of Transgender-Industrial Complex of psychologists and physicians who are cashing in on this weird trend and, thanks to ObamaCare’s mandates, the costs are being passed on to everybody who pays for health insurance. The teenage transgender phenomenon is, therefore, both a cult and a money-making racket.

Earlier this year, a site called Youth Trans-Critical Professionals began recruiting parents for a survey of “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria,” and a counselor named Lisa Marchiano has recently published “Guidance for Parents of Teens with Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria.”

If readers know any families dealing with this issue, please pass along this post to let them know (a) they’re not alone, and (b) there are professionals and activists — including many feminists — who are trying to help fight this wicked 21st-century cult phenomenon.



 

 

RELATED:

 

Category: Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 12.14.2016

Posted on | December 14, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Michigan Seems Like A Dream To Me Now…
Michelle Malkin: A New Victim In The War On Small-Biz Bakeries
Twitchy: Chris Hayes Defends Politico Reporter Canned For Sick Trump Incest “Joke”
Louder With Crowder: Dr. Clickbait Teaches You To YouTube


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: What Do Cats And School Have In Common?
American Power: Democratic Disgrace Under Pressure
American Thinker: Drain The Intelligence Swamp!
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Hump Day News
Da Tech Guy: Victory In Aleppo Made Impossible By Defeat In The Culture Wars
Don Surber: Unethical Newspaper Endorses Unethical Politicians
Dustbury: An Old Hardware Friend Gives It Up
Jammie Wearing Fools: Muslim Student Who Claimed Harassment By Trump Supporters Charged With Filing False Report
Joe For America: Judge Slams CNN With Massive Bad News
JustOneMinute: Where The Jobs Weren’t
Power Line: It’s Easy Being Green, also, Memo To Rural America – The Urban Elites Hate You
Shark Tank: Tech CEOs Join Trump Team
Shot In The Dark: Faster!
The Geller Report: Muslims In No-Go Zone Attack Filmmaker Ami Horowitz
The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler PSA – Cold War II Chapter IV
The Political Hat: 12 Posts Of Christmas 2016, Day 2
This Ain’t Hell: Michael Tracey – How To Violently Prevent Trump From Taking Power
Weasel Zippers: San Francisco To Spend Millions Of Tax Dollars On Lawyers For Illegal Immigrants, also, IBM To Hire 25K More Workers, Invest $1 Billion In Employee Development Ahead Of Trump Meeting
Megan McArdle: Let Trump’s Election Stand
Mark Steyn: A Note To My Readers (And Would-Be Viewers)


Today’s Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Try Amazon Home Services

Category: Linkagery

Tranny ‘Feminist’ Declares You Are ‘Discriminatory’ Not to Date Him/‘Her’

Posted on | December 14, 2016 | 4 Comments

Left: Justin Dennis in 2012. Right: Riley J. Dennis in 2015.

“Would you date a trans person? Honestly? . . . Well, if you said ‘no,’ I’m sorry, but that’s pretty discriminatory.”
— Riley J. Dennis, November 2016

Justin Dennis, a/k/a Riley J. Dennis, is a transgender activist who describes himself/“herself” as an “intersectional feminist” who is “also super queer (transfeminine lesbian to be specific).” Also, not coincidentally, Riley J. Dennis is a deranged totalitarian who doesn’t believe that other people have a right to their own opinions. Riley J. Dennis wants to tell you what to think, and even presumes to tell you who you are required to date. Your romantic preferences are wrong!

 

Here’s some news for Riley Dennis: Men and women are different.

No matter what they teach in college Gender Studies classes, the truth is still the truth, and the truth is men and women are different. Feminists can shriek all they want about “gender essentialism,” and lecture us from the Cliff Notes version of Judith Butler — the social construction of the gender binary within the heterosexual matrix — but they still can never change the fact that men and women are different.

Orwellian word games, in which other people’s personal preferences are condemned as illegitimate — racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. — are an attempt to impose a totalitarian regime on society. By invoking the concept of “civil rights” and accusing others of discrimination and prejudice, the “social justice” totalitarians seek to silence criticism, by implying that all opposition to their views is analogous Bull Connor unleashing police dogs against black people in Birmingham in 1963.

 

“Because we associate penises with men and vaginas with women” (gosh, I wonder why?) “some people think they could never date a trans man with a vagina or a trans woman with a penis.”

Riley J. Dennis majored in English at Whittier College, so perhaps he/“she” might contemplate the meaning of the word could, as opposed to the word would or the word should. We are not dealing with hypotheticals here, and thus the word “could” is inappropriate. You could do many things, conceivably, that you never actually would do. If you were to ask me what you should do, my advice would be to stay away from the kind of weirdos who go to Whittier College. But please, continue . . .

 

“But I think that people are more than their genitals” (as if this were a startling discovery) “I think that you could feel attraction to someone without knowing what’s between their legs.” Here again we have the word “could” used to suggest a hypothetical, and the word “attraction” is extracted from any practical context. What is the teleological purpose of “attraction”? Riley J. Dennis is talking about genitals — “what’s between their legs” — and therefore we might ask, why do genitals matter in terms of “attraction”? Do you really need me to explain this? Didn’t your mother give you the where-do-babies-come-from talk when you were a child?

 

Unlike kids at Whittier College, when I was in school, we not only studied grammar, logic and rhetoric, but we also studied science

Sex is about reproductive biology. Human beings are mammals, and any eighth-grader can figure out what that means in terms of sex.
Once you understand this scientific definition of sex, everything else is just details. Young people have to figure out how to attract potential partners, how to choose a good partner from among the prospective candidates, and how to negotiate a relationship that will lead toward lifelong monogamous pair-bonding — i.e., a successful marriage — because this is the ideal situation in which to raise children.

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply . . .”
— Genesis 1:27-28 (KJV)

This is very simple. Sex is about procreation, and therefore sexual success can be measured. There are winners — the ones who are blessed, in obedience to the divine commandment — and there are losers.

All of my ancestors were successful in this regard, or else I wouldn’t be here. As the descendant of a long line of sexual winners, therefore, I have inherited a legacy of winning, much the same way the University of Alabama football team has inherited its own winning legacy. Carrying on that victorious tradition, I’ve got six children of my own — the oldest three already married, with two grandchildren so far — and dare to hope that future generations of my descendants will continue this reproductive winning streak. Meanwhile, there’s the intersectional feminist . . .

“I’m very atheist. Like atheist with all of my soul. Except I don’t have a soul, so just like with all of my being. . . . I was raised Christian, and I don’t think I ever bought into it like 100 percent, but it was sometime around eighth grade when I decided like, for sure, I am an atheist.”
— Riley J. Dennis, May 2016

In eighth grade, Justin Dennis decided he was an atheist, and now, at age 23, Riley J. Dennis has decided “she” is a “transfeminine lesbian.” Gosh, it’s almost as if there were a “strong delusion” involved here.

 

Riley Dennis accuses those who disagree with him/“her” of “reducing people to their genitals” — you’re guilty of an ignorant prejudice if you don’t want to date a “woman” with XY chromosomes and a penis, you see. Perhaps the best reply to such an accusation is, “So what?”

How is your “transphobic” prejudice different from, or worse than, Riley J. Dennis’s blatant prejudice against normal people? Riley J. Dennis is abnormal, and expects the rest of us to tolerate his/“her” preference for female clothing and effeminate mannerisms. Most of us do grant such tolerance, so long as these weirdos stay away from our children. If you want to live your life like an extra from the cast of The Rocky Horror Picture Show, you are free to move to San Francisco and let your freak flag fly. And I’ll keep my kids 2,500 miles away from San Francisco.

America is a free country, see? “Riley J. Dennis is a polyamorous, atheist, gender non-binary transwoman . . . educating people on the nuances of gender, sexuality, and intersectional feminism,” and I am a Christian conservative father of six who says Riley J. Dennis is crazy.

Under the First Amendment of the Constitution, I have the right to say that Riley J. Dennis is crazy, and I also have the right to tell you that Riley J. Dennis is a selfish liar, promoting a false concept of “discrimination” for his/“her” personal gain. Riley J. Dennis hopes to get rich selling “intersectional feminism” like Colonel Sanders got rich selling fried chicken. Feminism is being sold as a commodity, and these ideological vendors do not work for free. Riley J. Dennis claims to be an atheist, but he/“she” is in fact a fanatical member of a quasi-religious cult.

Why do devotees of the “intersectional feminist” cult make these false accusations of “discrimination” against their critics? For the same reason that the pagan silversmith Demetrius slandered the early Christians, provoking a famous riot: “Great is Diana of the Ephesians!”

Because their livelihood depends on public acceptance of feminism — there are jobs to be had and money to be made by promoting this ideology — the cult leaders preach to their followers that anyone who criticizes feminism is a racist, sexist, homophobic bigot. Therefore, feminists have succeeded in banishing critics from university campuses, which function as temple shrines of the feminist cult.

This is why feminists tried to shout down K.C. Johnson at Ohio University. This is why feminists called in a bomb threat to a journalism conference where Milo Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak. Feminists cannot exercise total control unless they can silence their critics, which is how feminists have seized control of academia.

Why does Riley J. Dennis believe he/“she” has the authority to condemn other people’s romantic attractions as “discrimination”? Because he/“she” is a recent graduate of Whittier College where the annual tuition is $44,574, plus $12,902 room and board, and a Special Snowflake™ who attends that kind of private liberal arts college is not accustomed to hearing the word “no.” For $57,476 a year, whatever the Special Snowflake™ wants, the Special Snowflake™ gets. The faculty at Whittier College kowtow to their precious little darlings, and after four years of being pampered, these impudent young brats consider themselves qualified to lecture the rest of us about . . . Well, everything.

Riley J. Dennis, Class of 2015, is an expert, “educating people on the nuances of gender, sexuality, and intersectional feminism,” and the rest of us are expected to sit silently while he/“she” educates us. Riley J. Dennis claims to be “a strong believer in equal rights for everyone” — except anyone who disagrees with him/“her.” Nobody has a right to disagree with Riley J. Dennis. To feminist totalitarians like Riley J. Dennis, disagreement is “hate speech” and criticism is “harassment.” If you don’t want to date Riley J. Dennis, that’s “discrimination.”

Yes, Riley J. Dennis made a video called “How to Date a Feminist,” because obviously everybody wants to do that, right? I mean, right?

By the way, did I mention that Riley J. Dennis is a “pacifist . . . socialist, anti-capitalist” who voted for Hillary Clinton? Did I mention that Riley J. Dennis hates all 62 million Americans who voted for Donald Trump?

 

Don’t “normalize” voting Republican, says Riley J. Dennis. Instead, he/“she” wants you to “normalize” weirdos like him/“her.”

Remember: He/“she” is an atheist, and doesn’t have a soul.



 

Category: Gays, Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 12.13.16

Posted on | December 13, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
Dennis Prager: On Men Viewing Women As Sex Objects
EBL: Keith Olbermann Loses It (Again)
Twitchy: Texans Pack School Board Meeting After District Officials Triggered By A Charlie Brown Christmas Poster
Louder With Crowder: “Safe And Rare?” Huge List of Abortion Clinic Health Violations Proves Otherwise


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Have You Taken The Ku Klux Klan Rafting?
American Power: Katherine Cramer’s The Politics of Resentment
American Thinker: The Big Lie – Russia Stole The Election
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily News
BLACKFIVE: The Seventh Plague by James Rollins
Da Tech Guy: Christopher Harper – No Student Loan Bailout!
Don Surber: President Trump Wins Another News Cycle – Kanye Dig It?
Dustbury: Her Swiftness
Jammie Wearing Fools: America’s Most Badass Sheriff Wins Congressional Runoff
Joe For America: Obama Crushes Conspiracy – No Evidence That Russia Tampered With Election Votes
JustOneMinute: Not To Say “Merry Christmas”, But…
Power Line: Two More Good Trump Appointments
Shark Tank: FL Gov Scott Travels To Washington To Discuss Repealing Obamacare
Shot In The Dark: I Have Seen The Future…
STUMP: Chicago Public Schools – Bonds, Budgets, And Tax Bites
The Geller Report: France’s No-Go Zones
The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler PSA – PEOTUS Priapism, also, UN Fires Wonder Woman For Failing To Feel Boob Shame
The Political Hat: Trans-Medicine
This Ain’t Hell: 7th Division Heading For Afghanistan, also, Detroit Registers More Votes Than Voters
Weasel Zippers: Italian Priest Cancels Nativity Scene Because It Could Offend Muslims, also, Trump Selects MT Rep Ryan Zinke For Interior, Former TX Gov Rick Perry For Energy
Megan McArdle: Sears Transformed America. It Deserves To Die With Dignity.
Mark Steyn: Silent Night


Today’s Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Shop Amazon Devices – Fire tablet only $39.99

Category: Linkagery

Never Argue With a Feminist

Posted on | December 13, 2016 | 2 Comments

 

Beware of pretty faces that you find.
A pretty face can hide an evil mind . . .
Oh, don’t you let you let the wrong word slip
While kissing persuasive lips.
Odds are you won’t live to see tomorrow.
— Johnny Rivers, “Secret Agent Man,” 1966

My blog buddy The Political Hat has taken to posting some of my articles on radical feminism to Reddit’s “Men’s Rights” forum. As I have sometimes remarked, I am not a men’s rights activist (MRA) because, as a conservative, I do not believe in the idea of group “rights.”

We have no more rights than we are willing to die defending. All your rights under the Constitution — including your First Amendment rights to free speech and freedom of religion — are ultimately dependent on your Second Amendment right to defend yourself against anyone who would wrongfully deprive you of your life, liberty or property.

Therefore, to speak of “rights” in terms of identity groups is to incite hostility between these groups, an invitation to the Hobbesian nightmare of anarchy and civil war — bellum omnium contra omnes, the war of all against all — and the destruction of civilization:

Hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common Power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called War; and such a war as is of every man against every man. . . . In such condition there is no place for Industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no Culture of the Earth; no Navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by Sea; no commodious Building; no Instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no Knowledge of the face of the Earth; no account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; no Society; and which is worst of all, continual Fear, and danger of violent death; And the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It, and the feminist’s destructive purposes make her an enemy of everyone who values the benefits of civil society, especially including what Jefferson called “the pursuit of happiness.” Feminists are as much anti-happiness as they are anti-male, anti-capitalist and anti-Christian.

When you understand what feminism actually is, you understand why I say, never argue with a feminist. Simply quote them, and the evil of their ideology should be self-evident to every intelligent person. Consider the case of lesbian feminist Hannah Rose McShane.

She was voted “Outstanding Student” in the Gender and Sexuality Studies program at Georgia State University. How can one “argue” with her total hatred of heterosexual men (“cishet white boy tears”)? If a lesbian feminist asserts that “men are trash,” what can you say in reply? Hatred is an emotion, and not subject to factual dispute. America is a free country, and Hannah Rose McShane is therefore free to hate men. All I did was to quote her (e.g., “F**k the patriarchy”) in order to demonstrate the anti-male hate propaganda being taught by her professors at Georgia State University, where Ms. Shane was hired as a student assistant. The taxpayers and legislators of Georgia may wish to investigate why a state university is promoting “Lesbian and queer organizing . . . feminist and queer theory,” to quote one of Ms. McShane’s professors, but that’s up to them. My job is merely to research and document the facts.

About 15 hours work went into that carefully researched article, and when it was posted to Reddit by The Political Hat, the first commenter said, “Just another radicalised feminist. It’s not even worth trying to debate these sorts of people with sound reasoning, facts, and logic. All you’ll get back is abuse.” To which another commenter replied: “No do it, debate them, but make sure other people are watching. Drag them into the light.” As I say, however, there is no point debating feminists. You can’t argue with hate, which is what feminism is.

Documenting this hatred requires research. Think how many hours went into documenting what is being taught for $63,550 a year at Swarthmore, which has an entire department devoted to analyzing “the social relations of power” and offering “feminist critiques of biology,” staffed by professors who are experts in “heteropatriarchal language” and “gender non-conformity and sexual dissidence.”

You cannot argue with these people — they are clearly beyond the reach of rational discourse — but you can expose them:

What bothers me is how, when we are engaged in a war of ideas, so many people continue to be deceived by appearances. Whenever I blog about feminism, this attracts comments from men who disparage the looks of women like Andrea Dworkin — “ugly fat man-hating dyke,” etc. — rather than engaging with the monstrous ideology such women promoted. . . .
For more than two years, I’ve been researching radical feminism . . . to demonstrate what feminism really is. People keep laughing, as if no one could possibly believe such things, and yet this anti-male/anti-heterosexual hate propaganda is promoted in “10,000 courses teaching over 90,000 students at 700 colleges and universities across the nation.” What will happen when, in 10 or 15 years, the alumnae of these Women’s Studies are indoctrinating the next generation of young fools? And what will opponents say when the man-hating dykes are not so fat and ugly? . . .

You can read the rest of that at The Patriarch Tree. The problem posed by feminists who put a pretty face on this ugly ideology is that young men are not trained to beware that “a pretty face can hide an evil mind.” This is also why young men so often suffer romantic misfortune.

 

Ask yourself, what was James Bond’s job? He was an intelligence operative, whose most basic task was gathering information. One must apply one’s self diligently to preparing for the mission:

Luck is the intersection of preparation and opportunity, as they say, and the Boy Scout motto “Be Prepared” is the secret to being lucky in love. . . .
When people tell me how lucky I am to have such a wonderful wife, I smile and say: “Luck? No, it was skill.” The difference between talent and skill is that skill may be improved by practice. Work hard at something — 10,000 hours, as Malcolm Gladwell said — and you are certain to improve your skill. . . .

Read the rest of that, too.

 



 

Category: Sex Trouble
« go back — keep looking »