The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Exceptions, Rules and Tumblr Feminism

Posted on | June 5, 2015 | 26 Comments

How many data points are necessary to demonstrate a pattern? In the news business, the old joke was, “Three’s a trend,” describing the unfortunately too-common method by which feature writers manufacture “trend” stories from thin air.

When the “Sex Trouble” series began way back when, I was extraordinarily conscious of the “arguing by exceptions” trick through which any attempt to state a general rule immediately provokes protestations about some example that does not fit within the rule. Anyone who has tried to discuss abortion with a liberal understands how this works. Far more than 90 percent of abortions are simply a matter of personal convenience, a sort of belated contraception, and thus we might reduce abortions to 1/10th their current number if we could agree that stupidity and selfishness are no justification for what is, objectively, homicide, which should be prohibited by law. Yet this immediately provokes the liberal into furious rants about the single-digit percentage of abortions which involve rape, incest or threats to the life and health of the pregnant woman. Ultimately, one realizes, the liberal is an irrational fanatic who has what can only be described as a religious devotion to abortion (the “sacrament” of liberalism, as Ann Coulter famously observed) so that any attempt to discuss abortion as a matter of public policy is quite hopeless.

Conscious of this, I understood that a project aimed at documenting the radical ideology of feminism, especially as propagated within the academic Feminist-Industrial Complex of university Women’s Studies programs, would be met with the accusation that this was not “real feminism.” This tactic is addressed on page 8 of Sex Trouble:

When confronted with the extremist rhetoric of feminists — vehement denunciation of males, condemnation of heterosexuality, claims that men (collectively) oppress and victimize women (collectively) in ways comparable to the Holocaust — the average woman is understandably startled and, if she thinks of herself as a feminist, she quickly shifts into denial mode. The anti-male passage you’ve just quoted to her is an aberration, an anomaly, an expression of fringe beliefs that does not represent the feminism that she endorses. She is not a Marxist, she is not a lesbian or a man-hater, she is not the kind of pro-abortion fanatic who views motherhood as male-imposed tyranny. The question thus arises: Is she actually a feminist?

This question of what we mean by the word “feminism” is seldom adequately examined, because everybody seems to have in mind their own definition, so that everybody claims to be an expert on the subject. The fact that I have spent more than a year plowing through dozens of feminist books published over the course of the past several decades — necessary to a defense against the common feminist claim that their critics are “ignorant” of what “real feminism” is — does not seem to fully register with many of my fellow conservatives. Ten years after Larry Summers’ statements about “innate differences” between men and women resulted in a feminist firestorm that ended his tenure as president of Harvard University, most people still don’t recognize the reality of feminism’s hegemonic control of academia, or understand the far-reaching consequences of what is, in essence, an intellectual dictatorship on our nation’s campuses. My reputation for sarcasm permits my friends to imagine I’m exaggerating when I say,  “Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It.” And I’m like, “No! You don’t understand! This is serious!”

Demonstrating the cultural significance of feminism’s death-grip on academia is why I keep returning to the phenomenon of feminist Tumblr. Why has Tumblr.com become notorious for a particularly stupid and angry type of feminism? Explaining this would take more time than it’s probably worth. The point is that it seems to attract a lot of distinctly abnormal women, e.g., Alicia. Artist, feminist, activist. Graphic designer, currently working with a nonprofit. . . . Bisexual. ENFJ. 23 years old. Actual princess living in Denver, Colorado”:

I blog about politics and feminism and clothing and art. I like photography. I like selfies, and I really love dogs. I like sewing and pastel colors and newspapers. I like adventure.
I recently moved across the country with my high school sweetheart. We’ve been together for over eight years and we’re very very in love.

This is quite remarkable. Alicia is bisexual, but she’s been with her “high school sweetheart . . . for over eight years”? Wouldn’t you expect that, if Alicia had been with a male partner that long, she would describe herself as heterosexual, whereas if her partner were female, she would call herself a lesbian? Ah, but Alicia is a feminist, you see, and 21st-century feminism is all about gender theory, i.e., the “social construction” of the gender binary within the heterosexual matrix. As a matter of fact, Mimi Marinucci — a professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at Eastern Washington University — published a 2010 textbook entitled Feminism is Queer: The Intimate Connection Between Queer and Feminist Theory:

Feminism is Queer is an introduction to the intimately related disciplines of gender and queer theory. While guiding the reader through complex theory, the author develops the original position of “queer feminism,” which presents queer theory as continuous with feminist theory. While there have been significant conceptual tensions between second wave feminism and traditional lesbian and gay studies, queer theory offers a paradigm for understanding gender, sex, and sexuality that avoids the conflict in order to develop solidarity among those interested in feminist theory and those interested in lesbian and gay rights. This accessible and comprehensive textbook carefully explains nuanced theoretical terminology and includes extensive suggested further reading to provide the reader with a full and thorough understanding of both disciplines.

The reason I keep returning to feminist Tumblr, you see, is that young women online who call themselves feminists nowadays are most often either university students or recent graduates, so that their discourse tends to reflect the attitudes promoted on campus by the ideologues and intellectuals like Professor Marinucci. We can observe this in the case of Alicia, the 23-year-old “Actual princess” (?) who describes herself as “bisexual” despite her eight-year relationship with a “high school sweetheart” who, being one sex or another, would logically seem to define Alicia’s own preference as either heterosexual or lesbian. However, because Feminism Is Queer, everybody self-defines (or “socially constructs”) their own identity and, while it would appear that Alice’s partner is male, he seems to be non-binary, a gender theory term that is not to be misunderstood as a synonym for “sissy.”

What. Ever.

People’s lives and choices are their own private business, except that (a) feminists insist “the personal is political,” and (b) the Tumblr feminist must always advertise herself to the world by posting selfies and making her own idiosyncratic indictments of the oppressive patriarchy. We are only aware of Alicia’s bisexuality (and her preference for an ostensibly effeminate male partner) because she decided this was something she needed to publish to the entire online world. Like Catholicism, feminism turns confession into a sacred ritual, so that the feminist obtains a kind of holiness by telling her inmost secrets and desires. Like many other Tumblr feminists, Alicia includes her Myers-Briggs personality type (ENFJ) in her profile, the same way others would include their zodiac sign. Declaring one’s sexuality is likewise de rigueur on feminist Tumblr. Why? To ask such a question is to step off into The Feminist Abyss, a fantasy universe where everything is subject to “deconstruction” through “critical theory,” where nothing is certain and there is no such thing as “human nature.” Never mind, for now, why feminists are so obsessed with sexuality. Instead, briefly contemplate why Alicia felt the need, during her senior year at the University of Michigan, to confess her feelings of body shame in the student newspaper:

I spent hours in front of my bedroom mirror trying to convince myself that what I saw staring back at me, annoyed and exposed, was beautiful. And some days, I really believed it. I saw my dimpled thighs, I saw my long nose, and I felt pretty despite them. But usually, I found myself repeating empty words at my reflection: “you are beautiful, you are beautiful, you are beautiful.” Frustrated with the double standards before me — like a Dove commercial telling me to love my body moments before it reminds me that I still need to buy special soap to prevent that nasty dry skin — I wondered if I’d ever stop needing to convince myself to like how I looked. . . .
Especially for women, body image is learned as an incredibly competitive notion. Many of us are conditioned to hate those we perceive as prettier than ourselves, and to feel superior to those that are not. But learning to love your own stretch marks and arm hair means that you slowly release yourself from being critical of “flaws” in others. Freeing myself from thoughts like “she shouldn’t be wearing that” is almost as relieving as finally being able to wear outfits I like without constantly worrying about what’s “flattering for my body type.”

Where does it come from, this jargon of “body image” and the idea that women are “conditioned” to think certain ways? Once they have been taught that neither beauty nor emotion are natural, but rather that everything is “socially constructed,” feminists must next learn how to identify the social machinery that explains their self-consciousness, their sense of shame, their envy, etc., etc. To be a feminist means that you cease to believe that there is anything natural about the human condition and, furthermore, you must reject everything “normal” as inherently oppressive. So the purpose of Alicia’s confession — all that stuff about dimpled thighs, dry skin, stretch marks and arm hair — was to help others attain Feminist Consciousness. By constantly sharing everything, all their feelings and stories and selfies, feminists forge the bonds of Radical Sisterhood, as they struggle to overthrow the power of Male Supremacy.

You might dismiss Alicia the ENFJ Bisexual Actual Princess as an exception, however, if I didn’t keep going back to Tumblr and finding similar cases that demonstrate the extent to which these weirdos are the rule of 21st-century feminism. The bizarre eruptions of “rape culture” hysteria on college campuses are not random or coincidental; rather, these public spasms of madness are symptomatic of the surrealistic belief system that the Feminist-Industrial Complex instills in the minds of young people. Is the reader curious to know how I found Alicia on Tumblr? By searching for the term “male entitlement,” which led me to a May 2014 post in which Alicia said this:

Always remember that women who call themselves feminists will be accused so many times of being man-haters, but when a man kills women just for being women, he is called mentally unwell, and a madman rather than a woman-hater or misogynist.

That 41-word sentence has been liked or reblogged more than 150,000 times on Tumblr in the past year. It was written in reaction to the Isla Vista Massacre, perpetrated near the campus of the University of California-Santa Barbara by the demented Elliot Rodger. As I wrote when this atrocity happened:

It is apparently very important to some people that the blame for Elliot Rodger’s crimes be generalized so that the murders in Isla Vista are not the sole responsibility of the Creepy Little Weirdo who perpetrated them, but rather are fitted seamlessly into the “War on Women” narrative that helped Obama win re-election in 2012.
Having stayed awake until 4 a.m. reading Elliot Rodger’s bizarre 141-page “manifesto,” however, I recognize his collectivist worldview, his envious obsession with “fairness” and especially his narcissistic sense of entitlement as typical of left-wing Millennials.
Yet there was nothing genuinely political — neither liberal nor conservative, neither Republican nor Democrat — about his twisted hatred: Crazy is not a political philosophy.

In other words, despite the extraordinary nature of this event and the freakish insanity of Elliot Rodger, pure partisan politics required that responsibility for Rodger’s crimes be generalized, so that anyone who had ever criticized feminism could be portrayed as complicit in mass murder. Such rhetorical methods — akin to totalitarian propaganda — serve to create the impression that critics of feminism are dangerous and potentially violent. Disagreement becomes a hate crime.

Is it a waste of time to pay attention to what feminists write on their blogs? Is it an exercise in silliness to notice a university professor’s book declaring Feminism Is Queer? Maybe you think so, but I think we need to take this seriously. “Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It,” and Hillary Clinton might become the next President of the United States because Tumblr feminists can vote.

Be afraid, America. Be very afraid.





 

Comments

  • http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/ Evi L. Bloggerlady

    I cannot believe how many crazy people are feeling empowered like never before.

    This is not going to end well.

  • http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/ Evi L. Bloggerlady

    You are just going to have to embrace it. https://twitter.com/Van_der_Leun/status/606264262349066240

  • http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/ Evi L. Bloggerlady
  • arcadius
  • http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/ Evi L. Bloggerlady

    That is actually pretty good stuff. It is great when trolled attacked to just spin the argument like that.

  • RS

    This question of what we mean by the word “feminism” is seldom adequately examined, because everybody seems to have in mind their own definition, so that everybody claims to be an expert on the subject.

    It is the same problem which exists in arguments about anything with the Progressive Left: The failure to define terms at the outset of the discussion. It’s especially pernicious, because the Progressive appropriates terms and changes meaning ad hoc in bad faith in order never to confront and defend their true agenda. Jeff Goldstein has been writing about this for years. When words mean anything–or everything–they mean nothing, and without concrete definitions of what’s under discussion, Truth remains hidden.

    And that is the Progressive Left’s goal.

  • Fail Burton

    It’s hard to figure out this ideology. It’s tempting to read minds and talk about projection. This is an ideology which from day one has been concerned with in-group/out-group prejudices. The odd thing about that is it displays those prejudices in a far more formal manner than does society at large. That is why feminists seem to see society at large as a far more formally acting ideology like a KKK against women, gays and non-whites rather than the more casual construct it is.

    This may be why gender feminists so often call heterosexuality itself an ideology, the better to rail against it without betraying their biological phobia or even hatred similar to open racism.

    The bottom line is law vs. a lack of it. Anytime someone acts like they’re living in a Jim Crow without Jim Crow laws you’re being sold a con game.

  • Jeanette Victoria

    Tumblr the home of the perputal victum

  • Quartermaster

    Feminism is indeed queer, but in no way is that positive. It’s simply a sick religion.

  • Quartermaster

    That there is just sick!

  • AwD

    I am certainly willing to start calling feminist man-haters “mentally ill persons in need of institutionalization lest they become a danger to themselves and others.” They often identify themselves as having some kind of mental illness on Tumblr, after all.

    Somehow I doubt Alicia would be entirely pleased.

  • Nigel Rae

    Is it a waste of time to pay attention to what feminists write on their blogs?
    Most definitely not!
    What I have found most frustrating since I tumbled down the well of feminist theory in the late 80’s early 90’s is the absolute disbelief of the vast majority in regard to REAL STATED feminist ideology. Nobody believes it’s true because it’s so crazy.
    But it’s true.
    Your work here McCain is of absolute utmost importance. Mainly because you have a relatively large conservative audience. Conservatives, surprisingly, have always been the hardest to convince about the truth of feminist ideology in my experience.

  • Adobe_Walls

    Feminism is just one of the many varieties of stupid/crazy that is leftism.

  • Pingback: Exceptions, Rules and Tumblr Feminism | Living in Anglo-America()

  • Durasim

    Hey, Mr. McCain, remember the WNBA lesbian couple who were arrested for their charming domestic violence?

    They overcame all the haters and their own fisticuffs and had their butch/femme “wedding.”

    And it lasted for…29 days.

    http://espn.go.com/wnba/story/_/id/13021166/brittney-griner-files-papers-seeking-annul-marriage-glory-johnson

    Unfortunately, by then, one of them had already stuck in the turkey baster.

  • Finrod Felagund

    I remember Dr. Walter Martin saying “If you can’t define the words you use in the context in which you’re using them, then you really haven’t said anything.”

  • Daniel Freeman

    Okay, so the one in the wedding dress is pregnant, and the one in the suit filed for an annulment before the other could file for a divorce. Makes sense.

  • Zohydro

    Gay Family Values™! (I’ve never heard of a homosexual “marriage” being annulled… It shouldn’t be too difficult to do!)

  • Lamprotatia

    How the heck do they determine if it was consumm-

    Wait, I shouldn’t ask questions when I don’t want to know the answer.

  • Lamprotatia

    Was it a baster or did she cheat with a man? Oh man why am I trying to understand this?

  • JoshuaLConner

    nowRead this theothermccain… Here’s a Blog

    lllllllllllll

  • Steve Skubinna

    …the old joke was, “Three’s a trend,”

    On the other end of that query are lines such as “99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.”

    In this case, the self appointed custodians of feminism, the ones writing the standard books used in the university courses they design and teach, are the ones giving it a bad name. So by taking the words used by the people who are defining the term and building your argument with them…

    … well, what you’re doing is male oppression, I guess. Because these people have already demonstrated an unwillingness or inability to argue in good faith, and when facing their own arguments have no other response than to scream oppression and denounce you for hate crimes.

    What I would really like to read is an argument, by which I mean a logical argument, building the claims of feminism. There is no scholarship, no study, no gathering of data, no testing of hypotheses involved. There’s nothing but an insane collection of half verbalized grievances and frustration directed at… nothing really. A fantasy villain, fit for a fantasy ideology. At least George R. R. Martin has to construct his stories with a fidelity true to the logic of the world he has created and not violate narrative consistency. Feminists invent mythical prehistories where the world was a golden age under a benevolent matriarchy or some preposterous society of witches exterminated by hateful men, and nobody asks to see the research material. Nobody shows the archeological sites or the museums filled with artifacts. If you can’t show your work and research materials what you’re doing is not scholarship. Just ask Michael Bellesiles.

  • Fail Burton

    Shopping the internet for sexual adjuncts would probably suffice for a de facto consummation.

  • Bert

    Romans 1. None of this is new.

  • Eidolon

    Rodger killed more men than women, you freaking nutjob feminist. Of course it’s misogyny when a man kills some women, but just him being crazy when he kills more men.

  • Pingback: dustbury.com » Because activities()