The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

S.E. Cupp Photoshop Was Foul; What About Roseanne’s Glasses?

Posted on | May 27, 2012 | 18 Comments

by Smitty

This blog was distracted by the #BrettKimberlin story and caring for a 10-month-old, respectively. So we’re just catching up with Really Important Things, like the tawdry attack on S.E. Cupp in Hustler. As if Newsweek needed any more pornographic ideas for its covers.

Green Party presidential hopeful and all around ignis obscurus Roseann Barr was in typical, douse-fire-with-gasoline form on the subject of Cupp:

“Your defense of women who hate women is more disgusting than putting pics of penises in their mouths, excuse me!” she tweeted, after Ms. Magazine co-founders Gloria Steinem and Robin Morgan chose to stand behind Cupp.
After Morgan responded over Twitter, saying she was not defending S.E. Cupp’s “atrocious” politics, but rather, standing up for a fellow woman, Barr unleashed a fury of related tweets:
“…defending the indefensible [S.E. Cupp and her politics] is not a common sense thing-it leads to lemming-like thought patterns [in my opinion]”
“…when a woman who works to dispossess women is attacked- i dont think we should come 2 her aid”
“@secupp what goes around seems to come around.”
“sometimes feminist spokeswomen are pro-censorship, and that wont work in America. Supporting woman haters ‘rights’ backfires on them.”
Some of her tweets are certainly more intelligible than others, but the meaning is quite apparent: S.E. Cupp somehow deserved to be foully targeted because of her politics.

Never mind what happened to Cupp: what went wrong with Roseanne’s wardrobe?

Can anyone identify the thing clinging to Roseanne's head?

Some actually worn accessories are too horrible even for someone as depraved as Larry Flynt.

A woman in public wearing glasses like that wants to be our President? Crikey! Were she elected, I bet deficits would exceed $1 trillion/year, we wouldn’t see a budget pass Congress ever again, and we’d talk about pets on car roofs ahead of entitlement reform.


18 Responses to “S.E. Cupp Photoshop Was Foul; What About Roseanne’s Glasses?”

  1. Mike G.
    May 27th, 2012 @ 9:02 am

    See what happens when you go overtime on your fifteen minutes of fame?

  2. AnonymousDrivel
    May 27th, 2012 @ 9:06 am

    “…what went wrong with Roseanne’s wardrobe?”

    Roseanne’s behind it.

    [*Ba-dump, tish*] I’ll be here all week. Please tip your blogger.

  3. ThePaganTemple
    May 27th, 2012 @ 10:19 am

    Some conservative group should pay for Roseanne’s political advertisements in Oregon, where Obama’s approval was at least at one time under fifty percent, which is awful for a leftist leaning state like that. It would be hilarious if Romney could win Oregon and maybe Washington based on Barr draining ten percent or more of the vote away from Obama. 

    I think Republicans should work harder to win Washington anyway. Once you get out of the Seattle and Spokane areas there are plenty of people who hate the environmentalist whack jobs who run roughshod over the state.

  4. JeffS
    May 27th, 2012 @ 10:36 am

     Not just in Spokane or Seattle, TPT — all over the state.  The envirotards ought to be tied to a post and horse whipped.

  5. McGehee
    May 27th, 2012 @ 10:59 am

    I had to take the unusual step of thumbs-downing this post because of that picture of Roseanne. There is no safe condition for one’s stomach when confronted with images of that woman; anyone who thinks the dry heaves are better than projectile vomiting should try looking at that pic afgain after fasting for six hours — that’ll show ya.

  6. ThePaganTemple
    May 27th, 2012 @ 11:44 am

     The best thing environazis could ever do for the earth is fertilize it.

  7. ThePaganTemple
    May 27th, 2012 @ 11:46 am

     Roseanne is gonna moon ya if ya don’t be good.

  8. GAHCindy
    May 27th, 2012 @ 12:00 pm

     I think those glasses would be kinda neat on somebody else, yeah.

  9. richard mcenroe
    May 27th, 2012 @ 12:15 pm

     I was wondering how she hooked the glasses on her butt already.

  10. yestradamous
    May 27th, 2012 @ 1:08 pm

    Her glasses? Hell, it looks like she’s got Medusa snakes woven into her hair. How appropriate.

  11. Bob Belvedere
    May 27th, 2012 @ 5:23 pm

    Those glasses are fine for an hairdresser name Margie.

  12. Bob Belvedere
    May 27th, 2012 @ 5:27 pm

    He’s right, Admiral.  The least you could have done is slap a NSFV label on it to warn us [and then slap Medusa herself].

  13. Adjoran
    May 27th, 2012 @ 6:37 pm

    The best thing to ever come out of Roseanne’s mouth was Tom Arnold.

  14. Quartermaster
    May 27th, 2012 @ 7:38 pm

    The mere thought of that is frightening.

  15. Proof
    May 27th, 2012 @ 8:25 pm

    Smitty: Next time give us a warning (or some eye bleach)  before you post a picture like that one below the fold. That woman has more Chins than the San Francisco phone directory!

  16. K-Bob
    May 27th, 2012 @ 11:17 pm

    She still looks better than that pic of The Orca that Belvedere posted.

  17. ThePaganTemple
    May 28th, 2012 @ 11:45 am

     Hell that’s nothing compared to one pic he posted of this really obese woman. A clue, she’d make two of Roseanne AND Rosie COMBINED. And there was some dude under her, but all you could see was his feet sticking out from under her. Bob is a sadist, methinks.

  18. K-Bob
    May 30th, 2012 @ 3:57 am

    Unless those were Bob’s feet.  That would make him a masochist!  (We’re just yankin’ yer chain, Bob.)