The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Bizarre Statistical Improbabilities

Posted on | November 10, 2012 | 58 Comments

What are the odds that two players in the same hand of Texas Hold ‘Em will both have outstanding hands — four of a kind or a straight flush? The odds against this are high enough that casinos offer so-called “Bad Beat” jackpots to be paid out in such rare instances. If there were such a jackpot for against-all-odds election results, Dan Collins says the house should be paying it out this year:

St. Lucie County in Florida had a 141% turnout on election night. President Obama also managed to win 99% of the votes, according to the numbers, in various districts in Broward County.
The sheer number of voters shocked the Supervisor of Elections there, though in this piece she’s not asked to comment on the amazingly lopsided voting percentages in some of the districts. It’s really quite impossible that any candidate, much less one with approval numbers the likes of those enjoyed by Obama, should prevail so hyperwhelmingly. I expect that Nate Silver won’t be calculating the likelihoods, but if there were statisticians willing to address the matter, I think we would find that the numbers are far outside the realm of reasonable probability.
The infinitessimal statistical probabilities materialized in Broward County, FL, were not limited to that county. In polling locations in Philadelphia where Republican observers were thrown out, Mr. Obama received once again over 99% of the votes cast. In Cleveland, he received 99.8% of the votes in 44 districts, and he benefitted from 108% turnout from eligible voters in one county in Ohio.
It takes a special kind of person not to see how such amazing, astounding, mind-bending statistical anomalies could crop up in so many precincts all in one election.

Read the whole thing. This isn’t a conspiracy theory so much as it is a recognition of the Democrat Party’s tradition of vote fraud. Two of their most important constituencies are tombstones and vacant lots.



58 Responses to “Bizarre Statistical Improbabilities”

  1. Bob Belvedere
    November 11th, 2012 @ 5:49 pm

    And sometimes, Rick Rolled.

  2. Bob Belvedere
    November 11th, 2012 @ 5:51 pm

    How about we just leave them, effect a seperation?

  3. Bob Belvedere
    November 11th, 2012 @ 5:52 pm

    I prefer Ameritopia

  4. Bob Belvedere
    November 11th, 2012 @ 5:55 pm

    Time to implement OPERATION: WHIG and form a new party, active on the state, county, and local level.
    We need to gather in red states and concentrate on firming up their sovereignty and resisting Leviathan.

  5. rosalie
    November 11th, 2012 @ 6:33 pm

    From what I hear, many red states want to actually secede.

  6. We demand purple fingers at every US election! — 1389 Blog - Counterjihad!
    November 11th, 2012 @ 7:03 pm

    […] obvious: we don’t have to sit around and take it Stacy McCain has a great post up about the “bizarre statistical improbabilities” of Obama winning over 99% of the vote in some districts that also have over 100% […]

  7. How Elections Are Stolen » Monty Pelerin's World
    November 12th, 2012 @ 1:43 am

    […] law  Tagged with: Election, voter fraudNov 122012  Robert Stacy McCain (The Other McCain) offers this information:Bizarre Statistical ImprobabilitiesPosted on | November 10, 2012What are […]

  8. Henry David Ritscher
    November 23rd, 2012 @ 10:47 am

    It is not the person who votes that count, it is the person who counts the votes. We have been told that the overall vote was lower than 2008, yet some precincts/districts had 140% turnout. How does that happen? So many precincts had 99-100 percent Obama votes How does that happen? In some of these precincts Gary Johnson got votes and Romney did not. How does this happen? Can we say massive voter fraud!