Huma Abedin Is So Hot, Her Creepy Husband Can’t Resist Other Women

Posted on Comments

There is an old joke that whenever you see a really hot woman, you know that somewhere there’s a guy who’s sick and tired of her bullshit.

Which is to say, we can’t really blame Huma Abedin for her husband’s sleazy sexual compulsions. It’s wrong to derogate her looks or imply that somehow her Castrating Democrat Power Bitch personality might be the real explanation for why Anthony Weiner was looking for love phone sex in all the wrong places 22-year-olds.

Anyway, David Weigel has a piece at Slate about how the media never do anything else except praise Huma, and then there’s this:

Nobody forced the Weiner-Abedin clan to re-enter electoral politics. Nobody forced Abedin to go along with the stories that Weiner had fallen from grace in 2011 and gone on to be a devoted, chastened husband. Twice now, Weiner has used his personal life to sell himself as a more trustworthy politician. He did this after 2008, when he married Abedin, and he did it in 2012, after the birth of their kid. His 2013 campaign launch video began with a shot of the couple and the baby playing at home in the morning. “Every day starts right here,” said Weiner—who’s now insisting that his private life isn’t relevant to politics.
But back to Abedin. It’s very nice that her friends are feeling for her in this time of self-inflicted hardship. What, though, is missing from our politics if Abedin’s not in it? Before this week, she had a sterling reputation (based in part on how she didn’t appear at Weiner’s press conferences, but oh well) based on … what, exactly?

Read the rest because it’s amazing how Huma Abedin got a reputation for being amazing, simply because Democrats kept telling the media how dadgum amazing Huma is all the time.

Notice there are no conservative women who have this kind of amazing reputation? Michelle Malkin is arguably one of the most innovative New Media entrepreneurs on the planet, but you’ll never read any glowing profile features about her in Vanity Fair, will you? Nor could you imagine any prominent Republican getting caught “sexting” young hotties — say, maybe three young hotties, as a ballpark estimate — and then have feminists write of their undying admiration for the wife that this Republican creep betrayed.

Let’s be charitable: As loveless sham marriages go, certainly the Weiner-Abedin marriage is no less plausible than Bill and Hillary.

 

48 comments

  6. I think skinny chicks are hot, even if they are lesbian. The lack of self esteem is a turn off though.

  7. Read the rest…

    Pimple faced Wiggle? Slate? Pass.

    This is little Davey/Slate’s way of saying ‘look at me, I’m legitimate, I can do the ‘pox on both houses schtick when necessary.‘

    And when Slate needs to bring a little heat onto the left they surely call out the little guns.

    Weiner is a egotistical horn dog with no self control.

    Abedin is something infinitely worse.

    And the only reason Weigel is commenting on this is that he’s been given clear signals that the blood is already in the water. But he’s no shark – he’s nothing more than a remora – a slimy, finned sea leech.

  9. I could easily see spending a fun evening at a bar with Bill Clinton. Weiner? Not so much.

    Weiner’s problem is he has Bill’s proclivities without Bill’s likability.

    Huma’s problem is having an unlikable husband who’s a bad liar and doesn’t have the staff to cover up his bimbo eruptions. She’ll eventually understand this, and move on.

  12. What we’re seeing here with Abedin and Hillary is a replay of the Harry Hopkins / FDR situation all over again.

    As Diana West documents so well and thoroughly in her new book, American Betrayal, Hopkins was an agent of the Soviet Union [buy the book by clicking on any one of Stacy’s Amazon links].

  13. I’m thinking this is more of the political marriage issue. They’ve got a kid for show, and they couple gains the respectability of being married.

    At one time, a politician could get away with keeping a mistress, but not anymore.

    And that is, of course, a good thing.

Comments are closed.