Kaitlyn Hunt: Obsessed Lesbian Predator?

Posted on Comments

A hearing has been scheduled Tuesday:

Accused sex offender Kaitlyn Hunt will appear in a Florida courtroom Tuesday for a hearing on charges that she violated terms of her pretrial release by contacting the underage girl with whom she is accused of having an illegal lesbian affair. In a motion filed Thursday in Indian River County, prosecutors said Hunt, 19, sent “lewd” photos and a pornographic video of herself masturbating to the younger girl. . . .
Hunt has remained free on $5,000 bond since her arrest, but at a hearing scheduled for Tuesday in Vero Beach, prosecutors will present evidence to Circuit Court Judge Robert Pegg that Hunt has violated terms of her release. Prosecutors from state attorney Bruce Colton‘s office are expected to argue that Hunt’s bond should be revoked and she should be jailed until her trial, which had been scheduled for September, but has since been postponed. . . .

You can read the whole story at Viral Read. The question in the headline is prompted by what Ken Shepherd wrote at NewsBusters:

[Prosecutors’ account of how Hunt violated the no-contact order] if proved true in court, shows that Hunt is obsessed with her victim, that she is exhibiting predatory behavior, and that she is attempting to obstruct justice by pressuring her victim into silence.

How does someone get that messed up? What happened to Kaitlyn Hunt to turn her into a sociopathic sex freak? And in other news:

You can look this guy up. Every case I’ve found so far, William Korman’s client has been (a) a pervert, and (b) guilty.

 

240 comments

  4. I agree I figured it was offered because they knew 1) it would be turned down or 2) Kate could not abide with the terms and would end up in jail

  5. But she is severely mentally ill. However to plea insanity she would have to claim she was incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong.

  6. How about: lollygagging.

    I saw that one in reference to Trayvon Martin. A trial watcher on a message board said that Martin shouldn’t have been “lollygagging”. Of course only about 4 people knew what it meant. Everyone else thought it was a sexual reference and started chewing the guy out. It didn’t help that I kept laughing my ass off and re-typing the word over and over again. The last time I had heard that word spoken was when I was 10 years old and my grandmother demanded that I stop doing it.

    I have now decided that I’m bringing that word back.

  9. This is the thing…the prosecution constructed the plea so that it would be turned down (ie: felony count). And look at the felony charge itself. It’s weak tea. But the most telling part of all…not one word of protest from the victim’s parents about this SWEET deal for Kate. Not one peep. If I were them, I would be pissed.

    That tells me, the SA was planning to nail Hunt to the wall and the victim’s parents were told in advance. After everything the Hunts put this family through and then to commit additional felonies? I suspect the SA needed to do a little PR with this plea offer and then release a bond revocation request that would tell the world what a felonious sex offender Hunt is. And what a criminal conspirator her mother is.

  10. According to the report I read, the SA said that plea deal #2 was offered and rejected in July. They went to court with it in the past week to file it to preclude lack of notice as a possible issue on appeal. So, they knew what had been going on when they filed with the court. The day after, the Hunt’s predictably had another pity party (accompanied with lots of heart icons), the trap slammed shut. She should have taken the original plea deal, but now we know she was still molesting and threatening the minor.

  12. I was wondering about the victim’s parents, too. This explains it. But here is a big question: if the parents, the SA, and the LEOs knew this was still going on, how could they allow Kate to continue to have sexual contact with the victim?

  13. I don’t have an answer for that. Unless they were finding ways of getting around the adults. And then they got busted again two weeks ago. Getting busted is a running theme with Kate.

  14. “State Attorney Bruce Colton said Thursday that the plea deal offered to now-19-year-old Sebastian River High School graduate Kaitlyn Hunt was offered in July – not the day before his office filed a notice of violation of her pre-trial release conditions.
    ….
    Colton said his office wanted on record the plea deal offered back in July. Having it as part of the record would prevent Hunt from filing an appeal – if later convicted on sex charges –based on her not having been notified of the plea deal.”
    http://tinyurl.com/mtm6ebx

  15. You know, that actually makes sense. At one point I thought I had read the plea had been offered earlier, but I couldn’t find the reference that I saw. So I just assumed that I had been mistaken.

  16. That makes the Sheriff’s investigative timeline more reasonable, but it still doesn’t answer your question. I can’t believe the victim’s parents didn’t inform the Sheriff’s office or the DA on May 21st when they found out Hunt had been contacting their daughter. They had to have known. And they had to have known for at least 6 weeks before the plea offer.

    Now I still suspect that plea offer was never genuine. But what were they doing during June and July when they were investigating Kate on these new charges? Were they attempting all to stop the activity?

  18. “Ace finally weighed in on this case…”

    The Ace who promotes homosexuality and porn, that turd called Ace (of Spades HQ) ? And who has this homosexual Gabriel Malor posting on his blog, as part of his “staff”?

    Ace is just another sexuality pig, who is much more liberal than conservative regarding the culture wars – certainly more than Obama – and who only promotes the GOP because he’s a rabid, deranged hawk with no ethics.

  19. If only Kaytlin Hunt were running for office in California, she could seriously take over Pelosi’s job – I mean, the voter support would be there!

  20. And she already blew that one. She admitted that she knew that having sex with the minor was wrong, but she did it anyway because the girl looked “older.” What a cluster. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire, and I’ll bet Indian River High has a lot of iPhones with naked kid pics on them.

  21. The problem is the bigoted haters who don’t understand that when the APA declares homosexuality is normal, there’s nothing more to discuss. Because normal.

  22. All of you who think Kate is a predator is WRONG! This is a consensual relationship. This is clearly a Romeo & Juliet case. The now 15 year old knows what she is doing and is old enough to consent to sex.

    This is not predatory behavior, it’s two girls who want to be in a relationship. If the younger girls parents had just let things be, she may have left Kate. But what is forbidden is what we want most.

    Educate yourselves – don’t buy into the lies about sex offenders. And people Do have addictions to sex, evident in porn. There is no chemical dependency but there is a need to look. Those with these problems and sometimes act out, don’t need prison time – they need help.

    In CA, an annual report shows that those previously convicted of a sex offence that when released only 1.9% of that population commits another sex offense. 83% is due to parole violations (which are so stringent that you or I would have difficulty of adhearing).
    This is nothing more than a modern day witch hunt. At the rate it’s going, everyone will know someone on the registry. We need to be concerned about the true threats, not Romeo & Juliet cases or someone making a mistake and condeem them for exsorbant prison terms.

  24. Sweetie, people who are commenting here ARE informed, and that’s your problem isn’t it? By the way, Romeo didn’t have sex with Juliet until AFTER they were married. Oh, and they both died.

  25. Oh, I see, pedophilia and sexual exploitation of minors is OK, because the child or tween says yes!
    Witch hunt of the lesbian pedophiles! GLAAD and NAMBLA are being persecuted and bullied – they can’t even sexually molest and exploit kids freely and consensually in Florida! It’s like Pedophile Kristalnacht… the poor persecuted lesbian pedophile turds and their supporters! I’m wringing my hands here…

  27. Fuck off assclown. YOU and your sick, like-minded associates are a large part of the reason our social contract is in the toilet.

    DING
    You have just won an express ticket on the Hades Express. Enjoy the heat!

  28. According to the APA, sexually abusing kids is OK if the abuser is a) homosexual, b) happy, c) has a job, d) engages in other societal activities. Because normal.

  30. “But the most telling part of all…not one word of protest from the victim’s parents “

    OTOH, I’ve not seen them mentioned at all after the original hatefest against them, when they first came out in a silly notion that their side of the story would be listened to impartially.

  31. All of you who think Kate is a predator is WRONG!

    What about statutory rapist?
    Perjurer?
    Violator of bond conditions?
    Tampering with witness testimonier?

    Cause I think she’s those things now, and even if she wasn’t a “predator” I’d be good with some consequences for those.

    This is nothing more than a modern day witch hunt.

    Yes, it is. You should be ashamed of your hate towards the Smith’s – including blaming them for the rapes of their daughter.

  32. What part of “minors cannot consent” is soooo difficult for you, and your pedophilia-supporting ilk, to get through your thick skulls?!

    The “Romeo and Juliet” crap, along with the “consensual” nonsense, are simply lies that continue to be perpetuated by those who find facts and laws inconvenient to the overall perverted agenda.

    Those of you who support this vile and illegal activity want our kids. Along with Kate’s victim’s parents, many, many of us are refusing to let you have them. Shame on you for calling evil good.

  33. “The now 15 year old knows what she is doing and is old enough to consent to sex. ”
    And thus, parental authority is eliminated because the “Enlightened,” of whom you no doubt modestly include yourself, have determined that humans who are incapable of supporting themselves, consenting to medical treatment, signing a contract or voting in an election, are somehow capable of analyzing the ramifications of a sexual relationship? Your credentials for making this assertion are what, precisely?
    I ask the same question I always ask. Where is the line to be drawn? Is there any age where you would say, “no?” Any line you would not cross? If so, why do you draw the line at that location? The fact of the matter is, you wish to eliminate all lines, eliminate all taboos and eliminate all morals, the better to have your way with those children and adolescents who are incapable of realizing they are being used for the twisted gratification of adults.

  34. What if the victim’s parents had the IPod all along and handed it over to the police? In other words, what if Kate’s been texting the authorities instead of the victim?

  35. Actually dickweed, it’s a Juliet and Juliet case where one of the participants is underage, therefore against the law.. .

  47. To most of her fanbase it won’t matter what excuses she uses in her attempt to go free – ‘by any means necessary’ and all that. Mark Levin said it right in a different context [Friday’s Hannity show][my wording]: the Left In America has been practicing Nullification for decades.

Comments are closed.