Kaitlyn Hunt: Obsessed Lesbian Predator?

Posted on Comments

A hearing has been scheduled Tuesday:

Accused sex offender Kaitlyn Hunt will appear in a Florida courtroom Tuesday for a hearing on charges that she violated terms of her pretrial release by contacting the underage girl with whom she is accused of having an illegal lesbian affair. In a motion filed Thursday in Indian River County, prosecutors said Hunt, 19, sent “lewd” photos and a pornographic video of herself masturbating to the younger girl. . . .
Hunt has remained free on $5,000 bond since her arrest, but at a hearing scheduled for Tuesday in Vero Beach, prosecutors will present evidence to Circuit Court Judge Robert Pegg that Hunt has violated terms of her release. Prosecutors from state attorney Bruce Colton‘s office are expected to argue that Hunt’s bond should be revoked and she should be jailed until her trial, which had been scheduled for September, but has since been postponed. . . .

You can read the whole story at Viral Read. The question in the headline is prompted by what Ken Shepherd wrote at NewsBusters:

[Prosecutors’ account of how Hunt violated the no-contact order] if proved true in court, shows that Hunt is obsessed with her victim, that she is exhibiting predatory behavior, and that she is attempting to obstruct justice by pressuring her victim into silence.

How does someone get that messed up? What happened to Kaitlyn Hunt to turn her into a sociopathic sex freak? And in other news:

You can look this guy up. Every case I’ve found so far, William Korman’s client has been (a) a pervert, and (b) guilty.

 

240 comments

  3. This is what the homosexual activists want — and why this case is so important! For here, they shall establish that (“gay”) children have the “right” to learn proper homosexual behaviour from their elders!

  4. I don’t Twitter. At all.

    But I’ll take your word for it and say this demonstrates exactly how victimized the _victim_ is. Literally nobody on the Hunt’s side/family cares at _all_ about her, her family, or her future.

  6. Kate and her mother are gonna need it. Because I just ran the numbers on the charges. It’s bad. I’m posting in just a minute.

  9. What is disturbing is that she continues to blame the victim’s parents. It’s all their fault Kate fingered their 14 year old child and they got upset about it. Another aspect of this that is rife with hypocrisy: A 19 year old woman is a “girl” and a “child.” Right. Except when it comes to having sex, voting, and the right to have an abortion. Then it’s, “I am woman, here me roar.”

  10. Ok guys, here’s the rundown on Kate’s charges and potential charges:

    Lewd and Lascivious Battery
    2nd Degree Felony
    Up to 15 Years Per Count
    At Least 4 Counts (to date)

    Transmission of Lewd and Lascivious Material to a Minor
    3rd Degree Felony
    Up to 5 Years Per Count
    More than 25 Counts (to date)

    Witness Harassment and/or Tampering
    1st Degree Felony (conditional on the underlying initial 2nd Degree Felony)
    Up to 30 Years Per Count
    At Least 4 Counts (to date)

    Kelley Hunt
    1st Degree Felony (conditional on the underlying initial 2nd Degree Felony)
    Up to 30 Years Per Count
    At Least 1 Count (to date)

    I’ve excluded the 20,000 text messages allegation because it will simply be treated as a bond violation. I’ve also excluded the drug allegation for the same reason.

    Obviously, the Hunt women will not go to prison for the times listed above. This is merely Florida Criminal Statutes and Sentencing guidelines.

  12. Thank you for doing this. Something interesting that I picked up on in the bond revocation document was a text from the victim to Kate. See para. 16, where the victim talks about someone seeing them in the bathroom “when we would do stuff.” If I recall correctly, the original confession and charging docs indicate that that happened only once, but this text suggests that it may have been habitual.

  13. And as I’ve said, how much you want to bet that there are pics of the minor, not to mention a bunch of other girls at that high school?

  15. That’s why I have the caveat (to date) put on these charges.

    So far…up to 305 years. I anticipate she could face much more than that.

  16. I understood you to mean that you were excluding the intimate contact that took place after Kate was arrested and out on bond. Do you think the SA will go back and add additional counts for activity that occurred before Kate was arrested?

  17. Also, Para 16 refers to the initial “illicit contact”. However, I suspect you are correct and we will find out that there are witnesses or “image” evidence of the minor child.

    If this is the case…I expect Hunt to do at least 20 years.

  21. And by making the victim’s parents the bad guys in this scenario, they can then justify in their own minds all attempts to subvert both the law and the other parent’s God-given parental authority. This is one of the most insidious aspects of this thing. It is part and parcel of the Progressive wish to destroy the traditional nuclear family and the authority which comes with it. We now live in an age where those parents who attempt to enforce discipline and morals are maligned. Instead, a “consensus” of worthies is sought to override the teachings within the home. And with the advent of electronic media and communications, our homes are no longer castles providing protection for our children from the evils outside. Instead, not only is the enemy at the gates, he is in our living rooms and bedrooms, as well, without our knowledge or consent.

  22. Actually, I don’t think the SA can take the deal as it is…not at this point. Not anymore. Certainly not after this document has hit the public.

    Also, the Sheriffs department is still conducting an investigation into these new charges, which are technically separate crimes. Hunt will have to go to prison this time.

  23. If a plea deal is extended considering the new evidence suggested in the affidavit merely to get rid of the case/circus, the prosecutor will be doing a disservice to the law, the community and to all parents who try to rear their children in conformance with moral standards. If a deal is offered, I hope it includes jail time and SO registration to at least, provide some support and validation to the victim’s parents.

  25. Agreed. I think what would make cutting any deal at this point without real jail time a bitter pill are the subornation/witness tampering allegations. Hey, it’s one thing to be molesting kids, but it’s an entirely different thing to be illegally undermining the prosecution’s case.

  26. “the prosecutor will be doing a disservice to the law, the community and to all parents”

    Sure.

    Still, I’m not a betting man, but I’d put money on that being the outcome.

  27. The witness tampering bit and sending pornography to a minor…well they can’t just sweep those under the rug.

  28. She sent pornography to a minor. More than 25 counts. Even Florida won’t go there. I think she’s done.

  29. You’re looking at it from an outsider’s perspective.

    The SA wants to be done with this – the latest sweetheart deal – no jail time, no SO registry – was absurdly lenient. And so far, the “public” is still mostly on the Hunt’s PR’s feed more so than the truth.

    I agree that if *I* were the SA, we’d be damning the LGBT torpedoes and going full speed ahead – or so I say not knowing how backlogged or underwater they are, and this has got to be eating a disproportionate amount of their time.

    So I’m betting they’ll say “Yannow, we’ll take that deal” and the SA will see the light at the end of the tunnel and say “Deal!”

  31. I wasn’t criticizing your reasoning. Rather, I wished to highlight the unintended consequences of getting rid of a case just because it’s become a circus. It’s a victory of sorts for the Hunts, while subverting justice and the rights of the victim. The young girl doesn’t realize it yet, perhaps, but she will be dealing with this the rest of her life.

  33. This is the America of our progressive betters. All that does is qualify her to run for Mayor of New York.

  34. Well, I should not have read this early. Suffice it to say, my blood is boiling. We’re talking weapons-grade imbecility in that post. While I’m tempted to give it the “full Fisk,” I only state to Ms. Sims, “Who the “F” are you to presume to give parenting advice to anyone regarding their child?” The fact that she even entertains such thoughts is even more disturbing than posting that drivel on the interwebs.

  35. If she tries to plead some kind of mental defect/insanity/what have you as an excuse, what will that say to her devoted homo/pedo fanbase?

  36. If you follow what her defenders say after each new revelation, facts won’t matter. They will spin some fantasy about it, like Kimberlin supporters do about him.

  38. bet0001970 – what are your thoughts on the fact that the texting, illicit meetings, etc., have been going on for 5 months under the nose of the prosecution and LEOs? It appears they found out only because an alleged new girlfriend of Kate’s reported what was going on. How could they be so clueless in such a high profile case?

  39. A while ago, I saw the parents on TV and in the news briefly. They said that they warned Kate to stop and they tried to keep her away. Then Kate got their child to meet her and run away together. The parents felt they had no choice but to go to the police when their daughter disappeared.
    But after they came forward to try to fight the #FreeKate propaganda, the family was apparently threatened and withdrew from view for safety concerns. (I don’t know how accurate this is, but that’s what I have seen else where.)
    I can certainly understand that if you have an underage child that has been abused in such fashion, the circus that Kate’s family is running would be dangerous to the whole family of the victim and any friends that she may not have already lost.
    And since Kate has reportedly taken steps to get around the parents, judges and anyone else that tries to tell her,”No”, short of moving with no forwarding address left behind, how do you stop a determined sociopath?

  40. Sorry, I was waiting for a response from someone I insulted on McCain’s twitter feed.

    Ok…uh…Actually, that may be a rumor. If you read the affidavit, in Para 15, the SA states that on May 21, 2013, Hunt learned that the victim had disclosed to her parents that she had been communicating with Hunt through Julia Gilmore.

    Now, the exact circumstances of that confession are unknown. Did Kate’s girlfriend go to the victim’s parents and inform them of Kate’s contact with their daughter, precipitating a confrontation? Or did the victim’s parents simply suspect that something was amiss?

    Either way, I think the Sheriffs’ office has known all along. Does it really make sense, that the victim’s parents would have kept secret the knowledge of the May 21st contact from the Sheriffs or the DA?

    They probably launched an investigation by June 1st. In July or first of August they knew they had more time, because the trial had been postponed indefinitely. So in mid-August, the DA decided to offer another plea to Hunt, knowing full well they had the high hand. If Hunt turned this plea down, they send her to prison.

    I’m starting to wonder if this last plea offer was just a public CYA move on the SA’s part. They knew Mother Hunt would turn it down and that would allow them to go in and burn them both. Which may have been their wish from the beginning. It almost makes sense. But then, I’m not gonna predict anything with case anymore. Except that I think Floridians will flip the f’k out about those porn pics being sent to a minor.

    You have to admit…the Hunts turning down that second plea deal worked out pretty well for the prosecution.

  41. Well, it happens. Kate’s iPod scheme apparently worked pretty well. What you should be concerned about is the fact that mom Kelley (if not others) knew about the scheme as early as 24 days after it began. Kate left the iPod in the girl’s locker on March 1 and Kelley was already telling the girl to destroy evidence and lie to the court on March 25. After that, the illegal contact continued apparently with Kelley’s knowledge and approval.

  44. She is so self-deluded. She will never get a clue. Even when she’s sitting in jail in the cell next to her daughter, she will be convinced that she’s above the law.

Comments are closed.