Media Covers for #FreeKate While Her Supporters Attack the Victim’s Parents

Posted on Comments

Jailbait Kate: Her crazy supporters will do anything for her.

This CNN story about the Kaitlyn Hunt case doesn’t mention that the age of consent is 16 in Florida until the 13th paragraph:

Gay Florida teen Kaitlyn Hunt sent back
to jail over explicit texts, images

The headline conveys a misleading impression of the case, and although the article includes most of the relevant facts, it is clearly intended to generate sympathy for the criminal:

The court hearing Tuesday was graphic and, for Hunt, emotional. She held a tissue in her handcuffed hands that she repeatedly used to wipe tears from her eyes. The proceeding marked the latest turn in a story that first captured the nation’s attention months ago.
Hunt’s family says the relationship was consensual, with their lawyer claiming authorities wouldn’t have gone after her if it had involved a male and a female instead of two teenage girls.

Exactly why should we give a damn what this criminal pervert, her raunchy parents and their worthless lawyer say about the case?

Arguments made by the World’s Worst Lawyer™ Julia Graves in her statement today demonized the family of Kaitlyn Hunt’s victim:

“[The younger girl is] taken to a church that labels being gay a sin, has the Bible thrown at her, all of her thing in her room boxed up and taken from her, is apparently hit by her parents, and clearly yelled at for lying by her father in the presence of Detective Shepherd at the school in a subsequent interview.”

This has been the Hunt family’s strategy from Day One — blame the victim and her family. In her May 17 Facebook post, Kaitlyn’s mother Kelley Hunt Smith named the victim’s parents nine times and smeared them as being “full of hate and bigotry.” And the post by Kaitlyn’s lawyer, alleging abuse by the parents of the victim, seems to have been a signal for Kaitlyn’s supporters to attack:

Perhaps you thought it was rhetorical overkill when I called Kaitlyn’s supporters “amoral scum with no sense of shame,” but do you see the twisted worldview of these people? Do you see how they admire everything despicable and despise everything admirable?

The family that raises a tattoo-covered foul-mouthed hoodlum (“Beat her f–king ass, Emily! Beat her ass! Get that bitch!”) are a family that has love “in abundance.” No one can be judgmental toward the parents who let Kaitlyn bring a runaway 14-year-old to their house for a lesbian sex romp where they “put their fingers inside of each other’s vaginas, put their mouths on each other’s vaginas, and both of them used a vibrator on each other to insert it in each other’s vaginas.” That’s perfectly OK and it would be wrong to call such a family “creepy” or something.

No, there is nothing remotely suspicious about a father like Steven R. Hunt Jr. (Booking #2012-00001721) and everyone must praise a mother like Kelley Hunt Smith who sends text messages telling her daughter’s victim to “delete EVERYTHING.”

Instead, according to the “Free Kate” crowd, what needs to be investigated — the family that should be condemned for “abuse” and accused of having “zero good intentions” — are the parents who objected to their 14-year-old daughter getting dildoed by Steve and Kelley’s perverted criminal offspring. You know, the one who likes to send masturbation videos of herself to minors?

That’s the way people think, see, if they’re the kind of amoral scum with no sense of shame who support “Free Kate.”

Do I hate these scum too much? No.

It’s impossible to hate them as much as they deserve to be hated.

 

153 comments

  2. “Intergenerational intimacy” is an academic term… I, myself, prefer the good old-fashioned term pederasty!!

  4. Wonder if there are any images of the underage girl on any computers in the Hunt house. That would be possession of child pornography.

  6. Just an aside, I always get weirded out by your profile image, LN, because when I see it, I feel that if I were to move side to side, it would change like those holographic stickers.

  9. Yeah but pretty much everything gays do ends up running in circles once there’s enough of them in the club…

  14. “Her opinion is ignored by the State,” Graves said. The girl has been “interrogated by the Sheriff’s Department, taken to a church that labels being gay a sin, has the Bible thrown at her, all of her things in her room boxed up and taken from her, is apparently hit by her parents, and clearly yelled at for lying by her father in the presence of Detective Shepherd at the school in a subsequent interview.”

    Graves remarks have no bearing on her client’s case. Defamatory comments of this nature demonstrate the desperation of Kaitlyn’s situation. And not once has she said that her client was in love with the victim. Ms Graves is grasping at straws looking for some traction. She is clueless.

  15. Why are your children still in a government indoctrination center? Seriously. We could solve this nonsense if a few million more people pulled their kids from “schools.”

  23. You guys ever hear the song “Jailbait” by Andre Williams? This is going to be Kates life.

    I’m running
    Yes before it’s too late
    Trying to get away
    From that jail bait
    It’s a rough temptation
    But a common invitation
    And a good association
    But a quick elimination
    That will take you out of circulation
    Yes I’m talking about that
    Younger generation
    So take my advice fellas
    For goodness sake
    15 — 16– 17–
    That’s jailbait
    Now they swear that they’re in love
    That you and her by the stars above
    And she’s looking mighty good
    Just like a young girl should
    We try to tell you no
    And let that young girl go
    But you, you know it all
    You have yourself a ball
    And now it is too late
    As you look from cell number 8
    I tried to tell you mate
    17 and a half
    Is still jailbait
    So tomorrow’s today
    For the trial of jailbait
    And this you watch and see
    The young girl will go free
    And you’ll get 1 to 3
    So after those she walks
    To another man she talks
    Before you can count from 1 to 8
    Another man in for jailbait

    Please Mr. Judge
    You just let me go this time
    I won’t mess with those young girls no more
    I swear I won’t bother them no more Mr. Judge
    I ain’t gonna bother none 15
    I ain’t gonna bother none 16
    I ain’t gonna bother none 17
    I ain’t gonna mess with none 18
    I’m gonna leave some of those twenty one alone too
    I’m gonna get me a girl about fourty-two
    If you just believe what I say
    And let me go Mr. Judge
    Give me a break Mr. Judge
    Please Mr. Judge

  24. There could be incriminating emails, who knows? The more you have the more likely you can get the perp to cop a plea.

    Doesn’t the offending dildo need to be bagged and tagged?

  27. Which is part of why I ask about whatever device (cellphone, I’d imagine) Kate used. Any pictures/video she took of the girl would be on it. Any pics/video the girl took would be easy to find on the iPod, even if they were “deleted.”

  29. That is a very, very good question! My first reaction would be to assert that such a thing is just not possible as a matter of essential anatomy and physiology… But then I should be forced to the conclusion that I just simply do not know!

    I DO know what a lesbian brings to a second date, however:

    A U-Haul truck!

  31. Talking about feelings is good. I’d like to talk with some of these liberal propaganda vendors about their feelings.

    Can you feel your legs? How about now?

    How do you feel about organ donation? How about now?

  33. There is no victim. Once you trade 20k texts with someone, even after all the trouble the relationship caused in the first place, you can no longer be called a “victim”. I guarantee the “victim” doesn’t even consider herself a victim. And i don’t want to hear the same old tired crap about her being 15 years old and legally not allowed to consent. The age difference between her and Hunt is like 4 years so give it a rest. She’s no more a “child” then Hunt is and is a willing participant in the relationship.

  34. Yeah, there’s an moral equivalent between a consensual relationship between two teenagers with a difference of 3 plus years in age and an adult male, pissing on his own vows, abusing his power, and molesting an actual pre-teen. Nice to see right wingers keep apologizing for rapist priests because they’re Catholics. FUCK YOU!

  35. There is no victim.

    The law disagrees.

    you can no longer be called a “victim”

    The law disagrees.

    She’s no more a “child” then Hunt

    The law disagrees.

    And i don’t want to hear the same old tired crap about her being 15 years old and legally not allowed to consent.

    She’s 15 now, was 14, and was legally not able to consent.

  36. who the hell does that “attorney” think she is? A 19 y/o man having sex with a 15 y/o highschool girl would be prosecuted … and it happens ALL THE TIME, even in lefty California. I know, I work at a DA office and this stuff is very clear … under 16 and more than 3 years difference in age.

Comments are closed.