Schocker: 26-Year-Old Guy Willing to Have Sex With Creepy Old Shep Smith

Posted on Comments

Supposedly the point of this big Gawker “exclusive” is that Shep Smith — who works at the eee-evil Fox News — is gay. But that is certainly not surprising to anyone who’s ever seen the Drama Queen of Afternoon News in action. Here’s a headline I ran in May 2012:

Fox News Closet Case (Who’s Not Fooling
Anybody) Declares GOP Opponents of Gay
Marriage ‘On the Wrong Side of History’

So, no, it’s not “news” that Shep Smith is gay.

What is news is that a reasonably attractive 26-year-old guy named Giovanni “Gio” Graziano was willing to have intimate contact with that scrawny orange-skinned 49-year-old anchor-thing.

All together now: Eee-eww, gross!

It’s not necessarily homophobia to feel an overpowering sense of nausea at the mental image of Shep’s squealing paroxysms of erotic ecstasy while getting sodomized by his studly boy toy.

Our deepest sympathy to the Graziano family.

 

68 comments

  3. Well something had to be willing to take one for the team. Several times.

    But seriously, who DIDN’T know he was a hershy highwayman?

  12. Truth is the best disinfectant. Every person who has a homosexual or bisexual problem needs to be outed.

    Like most pedophiles, adulterers and swingers, many LGBTs want to keep in the “closet” so that their conscience doesn’t bother them. They want to be sexuality pigs and not feel guilty. Being held accountable by decent society bothers them.

    When LGBTs pretending to be normal and respectable by lying that they are decent heterosexuals, they need to be exposed.

    The more exposure, the better.

  13. What is news is that a reasonably attractive 26-year-old guy named Giovanni “Gio” Graziano was willing to have intimate contact with that scrawny orange-skinned 49-year-old anchor-thing.
    ==============
    Why? for LGBTs, nothing is perverted. They think homosexuality is normal, including with older people, teens (Kaitlyn Hunt), children (Sandusky), and even babies (James Rennie and Frank Lombard, for ex.).

    That’s not to mention their HIV and syphillis spreading, all the domestic violence, the molestations of teens, the unwelcome advances they continuously make to heterosexuals adults, just for starters.

    What might be news here, although sort of old, is that Fox News is perhaps the biggest CINO example in the MSM.

    Pretty soon they’ll be showing homosexual soft porn and continue to claim to be a “conservative” channel.

    Fox is a good example of how (corruptly) liberal so many conservatives are!

  14. If they are consenting adults, why is it anyone else’s business?

    Do I want to hear about it? Not particularly. But there are a whole bunch of heterosexual celebrities I don’t want to hear about either.

  15. Is Mr Smith homosexual? I neither know nor care, and I don’t watch his show on Fox.

    He is a professional newscaster, and if he is either homosexual or normal — wording chosen quite deliberately — I do not care, as long as he is not breaking the law. I don’t care that Anderson Cooper — another newscaster I don’t watch — is homosexual.

    The only ones that bother me are the professional homosexuals, the ones who make their sexual orientation their be-all-and-end-all, the ones who have to throw it up in our faces and tell us that we must approve, damn it, or we’re evil homophobes. I have a real problem with people who tell me that their private lives are none of my business and then proceed to try to make it my business.

  16. It’s more conservatives in the mist style reporting. Liberals like to criticize Fox News, but they never watch it, and just assume that there’s no way such a horrible reactionary tool of the heteropatriarchy would employ someone who was gay. So they don’t understand that everyone already had Shep figured out.

    And they assume that once it gets out there a lynch mob will form (of course, some may try, like Alessandra) and they can talk about that. No doubt the collective shrug on the right will perplex them.

    They don’t realize there are much better reasons to dislike Shep than anything he does off camera.

  17. I disagree: if it’s none of their business what my wife and I do, it’s none of my business what they do, as long as they are doing so only among consenting adults.

  18. As for being “decent,” to me a decent neighbor is one who cuts his lawn, picks up his trash, parks in his own spaces, and maintains his house within neighborhood standards. If he’s drunk and disorderly or loud and obnoxious outside, he’s a bum regardless of his sexual preferences.

    I don’t see much reason for homosexuals to “come out,” in that people’s friends already know with whom their friends are sleeping, and if you aren’t close enough to someone to be his friend, then it’s none of your business with whom he’s sleeping.

  23. I will offer a dissent. To the extent that Shep Smith is addled by sexual disorders, he has elected not to make a public point of it and to go about his business without reference to it. To disclose someone’s defects without just cause is detraction and a matter for the confessional.

    It should be the rule and not the exception that people do not make public confessionals. To the extent that he has an occult interest in the issue at hand, Smith should avoid public commentary on certain issues.

    With regard to the tale at hand, I am not sure anyone has remarked that the supposed witnesses are unreliable. One of them (if aspects of this are true) has reasons to injure Smith and none of them are all that privy to the specs of any friendship that may exist between Smith and this other fellow.

    If the scene in said bar went down as described, it is appalling. Very few people treat service workers that badly.

  24. Associations with large age gaps are quite unremarkable among homosexual men and (if I am not mistaken) tend to incorporate a certain sort of subcultural mentoring.

    Since Smith is not notably decrepit, I am not sure why RSM elects to emphasize this point bar for the fun of it.

  25. The failure of Liberalism (nihilism) to condemn lust is no less attractive to conservatives than to liberals (myself included, I’m ashamed to admit.) Moth, candle, flame, some assembly reqrd.

  26. Agreed.

    Not to say it is a matter of indifference, but people’s occult shortcomings do not need to be broadcast on television. It is only an issue of there are esoteric conflicts of interest. Smith and Cooper could avoid those problems with story selection and having third parties vetting any on-air remarks. They do not need to make a public point of anything. Also, exposures to serve the political interests of Barney Frank or Dan Savage or Michelangelo Signorile are nothing short of appalling. If we had a decent society, those three men would be untouchables.

  30. I’m less offended by Shep’s backing up the plumbing than I am by his lack of professionalism (e.g., Katrina et al.

  31. It should be the rule and not the exception that people do not make public confessionals.

    ==========
    This is exactly what perverts want: no accountability for anything in their perverted mind.

    Why should he pretend to be heterosexual when he is not? Why do you need everyone who is perverted to lie?

    Furthermore, the more perverted someone is, and the more power they have, the more they fit the right profile to do harm to others and get away with it – especially because people like you want everything that stinks covered up.

    Just a blanket of lies all the time.

    That’s a very unhealthy society – and it’s largely what we have now.

  32. You do not appear to have noticed that the gay lobby has been promoting self-exposure since around about 1969. As late as 1989, Michelangelo Signorile’s adventures in public disclosure of the homosexuality of people who did not want any public attention was considered outre if not downright malicious by mainstream opinion in gayworld (e.g. The Village Voice). Now it is S.O.P. and considered a means of punishing people who do not take orders.

  33. One other point. The man is a newscaster. He is not ‘pretending’ to do much other than read the news and comment on it. Ordinarily you would assume he was normal because of the preponderance of normal men in the population.

    You are expecting him to go out of his way to reveal to viewers his off camera recreations. That is just not reasonable.

Comments are closed.