Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus

Posted on Comments

“Feminism is the theory; lesbianism is the practice.”
— Ti-Grace Atkinson, 1971

“The political economy of socialist feminism establishes that, in contemporary society, women suffer a special form of exploitation and oppression.”
— Allison Jaggar, 1988

“Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.”
— Andrea Dworkin, 1989

Professional athletes can spawn with multiple baby mamas, and feminists have no word of complaint. Gay men hiring surrogates to breed children for them? Lesbians raising adopted child sex-change experiments? No problem, say the Womyn’s Studies majors. In response to the general plague of divorce and fatherlessness, the poverty-inducing epidemic of illegitimacy that replicates underclass misery, the collective reaction of the Official Women’s Movement is . . . crickets chirping.

However, let a normal couple of married Christians give birth to more than the standard 1.7 children, and they become the targets of seething rage and resentment from the feminist Left. You saw this attitude exemplified in the hysterical reaction to Sarah Palin who, by giving birth to five children, was made the object of fathomless hatred. “For many liberal women, Palin threatens their sexual identity, which is bound up with their politics,” as James Taranto observed.

It is this same feminist fanaticism that explains the hateful campaign against the Duggar family and their TV show, “19 Kids and Counting.” Dana Pico at First Street Journal remarks:

The Duggars are the “stars” of the TLC network reality series, 19 Kids and Counting. Predictably, our friends on the left hate them: see Jezebel and Jenna Karvunidis and Bitch Magazine (check out the comments!) and, of course! Amanda Marcotte. It’s pretty simple: if your choices aren’t their choices, then your choices are wrong, illegitimate, and societally harmful. It’s not like they are actually killing anyone, and the Duggars are self-supporting, taxpaying Americans; they aren’t on welfare.
RH Reality Check thinks that it’s horrible, horrible! that Mr Duggar referenced the Holocaust, and you know, I agree: Holocaust references by pro-life groups are inappropriate. After all, the Holocaust killed only six million people, and is nowhere in our abortuaries’ league when it comes to dealing out death.

It is shocking how fanatically devoted some people are to the “right” of abortion. Doug Hagin at Daley Gator explains:

I used to try to talk sense to pro-abortion people on message boards. . . . I found out they too believe it is a baby, and they revel in the “right” to destroy it. To them, a woman is not whole unless she can have her baby executed in the womb. How depraved are they? Well, consider many of the regularly compared unborn babies to parasites, and cancerous tumors, yes really.

Such unspeakable hatred toward human life is rooted in a radical ideology that views the culture and institutions of traditional morality and family life as part of an oppressive bourgeois capitalist system which they — the feminists — must destroy.

It is not just marriage and motherhood, but also religion, patriotism and all notions of virtue, honor and decency associated with those concepts which are the targets of cultural destruction by feminists and the larger radical movement to which feminists belong. You might think there is some reasonable limit to what feminists would endorse in pursuit of this agenda, but hate is irrational and radicalism knows no limit. So when a Canadian provincial government publishes “Children’s Sexual Behaviours: A Parent’s Guide,” which tells parents that it is “natural and healthy” for young children to “touch the ‘private parts’ of familiar adults” and to look at “nude pictures on the Internet, videos, magazines,” we get the expected reaction from feminists: Crickets chirping.

Why the silence? Because the Left is willing to “normalize pedophilia” as part of its “ongoing effort to rid the world of Judeo/Christian influences,” as Matt Ross says. The failure to understand the Left’s revolutionary ambitions leads to a sonambulant indifference to the Left’s declarations of its beliefs, its methods and its purposes.

“Childlike innocence is an invention of the bourgeoisie of early capitalism.”
— Olaf Stüben, German pedophile activist, 1981

While advocating the perverse, abnormal and deviant as “rights,” the Left simultaneously attacks the wholesome and decent, so a married Christian couple like the Duggars must be stigmatized as part of the Left’s larger project, which one of their leaders described as “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

Every day brings new headlines heralding the Left’s success at destroying the moral foundation of our nation’s culture.

Why Did a Public University Pay
Dan Savage to Talk About Sex?

That’s a good question: Why would the University of Oregon bring a notorious anti-Christian speaker like Dan Savage to campus?

Why not bring the Duggar family to campus instead?

MSNBC Guest: Abortionists Are
“Doing Wonderful, Important Work”

MSNBC would never say the Duggars are “doing wonderful, important work,” because the Duggars are Christians and MSNBC hates Jesus.

 

72 comments

  1. “Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.”

    This may be the stupidest thing ever said in the history of the human race, though many feminists and lefties have given it a lot of competition.

  4. If we assume that Ms. Dworkin is an atheist, the question becomes, given certain biological imperatives routinely accepted by the materialists which apply to both sexes, why she hates Science! so much.

  5. While liberals (thankfully) limit their breeding, the try and co-opt other people’s children via the public schools, and the media. If they can’t kill them outright, they’ll try to ruin them.

    I think the “M” in MSNBC stands for Moloch.

  6. At the root of the hatred of people like the Duggers or the Palins is the fact that those spewing the most bile at them are fundamentally unhappy with the lives they’ve chosen for themselves. The won’t admit it, of course, but why would anyone care how many children someone else has and supports? The only reason is that the Duggers, who represent those of us with happy marriages and larger families, demonstrate that the evangelism of the Marcottes of the world is bereft of truth. They are the particulars which disprove the Feminist generalizations several times over.

  7. “Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.”

    It’s amazing how someone can make a statement so absolutely 100% in defiance of reality, and still get treated with respect.

  9. She died several years back. She had shacked with a guy years ago (a gay man, according to her) and she went slowly to pieces. From everything of hers I saw, she hated science with a passion, although she would have denied it.

  10. Feminists may lie in fear of Republican Wombs, as long as said wombs belong to Conservative women. They live in terror of Conservative Christian couples however. Give enough time, and we would out reproduce them and own the country again. That time, however, is not going to be given to us. Christ is coming soon to put an end to the chaos Satan is doing his best to create, but not before he is allowed to create it.

  12. Why do I find myself thinking that it is not the number of children, but the status of an intact and self sufficient family?

  13. It was never the patriarchy oppressing women, it was biology. This is a fact. Pregnancy makes you physically vulnerable. You’re fat and awkward and slow. Nursing the baby ties you to the hearth. (And the hormone cascades make you emotional and, well, dumb.) When Revelation (I do believe, but please correct me) says woe to the woman who is pregnant or nursing in the end times… its not lying. I went through a natural disaster and evacuation from the other side of the globe with a 3 month old and I discovered the truth of that passage and praised God every moment that I *only* had a 3 month old, no toddlers as many women had, and had decided to nurse, as many women with babies hadn’t.

    I mention all of this to point out what I believe is the essential rational disconnect where needed equal rights for women went off the rails and turned into this mess of feminist illogic and societal destruction. Feminists *blamed* the patriarchy… but subconsciously they knew that the real enemy was the fetus. We still see it with this sick promotion of abortion… but it’s verbotten, really, to view pregnancy as debilitating in any way, even though anyone who’s done it knows that it severely impacts your ability to think and learn, saps your energy, and affects your decision making ability and reason. (An emotional hormone storm is a great time to make irrevocable decisions, not.) But feminism still all about the patriarchy hating women. The actual “problem” is never addressed, never considered, because it’s not a problem involving men, it’s a problem without an external foe. And no one likes a problem without an external foe.

    Absolutely, there is a fear of fecundity, a fear of wombs, a fear of reproduction, a fear of biology. But no one is honest about it. So there is the unthinking hatred toward Palin or the Duggars or anyone… you should have witnessed a few of the reactions I got when I was hugely pregnant with my third.

    But it’s still all about blaming men, and never mind being logically consistent… and refusing to take responsibility for sexual behavior or choices and BIOLOGY, and continuing to blame men while insisting that it’s not about the baby *at all* but about women being oppressed by men or someone hating women, something external, instead of an argument with your own womb.

  16. The double standard continues. Men are expendable workhorses who can do nothing but evil and women are precious flowers who can do no wrong.

  20. “… she hated science with a passion …”
    Should read ” … she hated with a passion …”
    I think your statement is true, however I think my revision more completely describes her.

  21. In their war against Western civilization, today’s liberals use three main attack vectors:-Attacking the family-Attacking private property-Attacking Christianity

    Know Your Adversary.

  22. Can someone explain to why dressing (or in this case undressing) as a professional horizontal give these women any kind of credibility

Comments are closed.