Alleged Pederast Harry Reid Disregards Senate Rules, and Also Craves Boy Flesh

You’ve probably forgotten the Harry Reid pederasty scandal of 2012, because the lamestream media refused to cover the accusations. There was certainly as much evidence for that as for Harry Reid’s claim that Mitt Romney evaded paying income tax — an accusation that Reid insisted Romney must disprove — and I don’t remember Harry ever proving he is not sexually interested in young boys, so by his standards of logic, it’s fair to say Harry Reid is a pederast.

Now the alleged deviant Harry Reid has stricken down the Senate rules:

After years of threats and warnings, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and his Democratic majority on Thursday executed the “nuclear option” to eliminate the filibuster for executive branch and judicial nominees, except for the Supreme Court.

Drew M. at Ace of Spades explains:

This is going to result in all out partisan warfare in the Senate. Democrats complain fillibusters slow the Senate down but requiring a vote on everything and not agreeing to any unanimous consent requests will grind it to a halt. . . .
Reid is a lying hypocrite who is trying to change the subject from the damage that ObamaCare is causing across the country.

The Senate has adjourned, and Harry Reid will now return to his home state to meet with his constituents and fellate teenage boys.

Allegedly.

 

135 comments

  1. A bit more on who is making the allegations and what they know… that is, if we can’t have the identification of who are the alleged victims of the homosexual statutory rape(s)

  2. No, the point is that Reid accused Romney of not paying federal taxes for over ten years, and when challenged said that the burden of proof was upon Romney.
    Get it? Make a bogus charge,and then insist that the victim prove it false? That’s how the burden of proof works in Harry Reid’s world.
    Therefore, since Reid has not proven that he is not a pederast then ipso facto he must be one. QthehellED.

  3. Ah, so since Byrd only “used to be” the Kleagle (IIRC?) the slate is clean? If being dead washes away the stain of being a Klansman, then why has Jefferson’s name been erased from so many high schools?

  4. both parties were racist, m0r0n; don’t you know ANY American history?; today’s GOP are the old southern dems, dummy; google Dixiecrats–were you home schooled in a meth lab or something?

  5. lol Conservatives are such cowards and fear mongerers: they are afraid of everyone voting and are constantly suppressing the vote under some bogus voter fraud theory; they are afraid of gay people getting married or serving in the military; they are afraid of bringing terrorists to super max prisons in the US from which no one has ever escaped; they are afraid of the boy scouts letting gay kids in; they are afraid of everyone voting and are constantly suppressing the vote under some bogus voter fraud theory; they are afraid of letting students vote at their universities; they are afraid of women having the right to choose; they even are afraid of women getting contraception [the real issue actually is a women’s agency and control over their bodies];; they are afraid of mandating gun purchasers to undergo background checks for crazy people and terrorists; they are afraid of people smoking pot; they are afraid of climate change being real and contradicting their beloved Bible; they are afraid of legitimate campaign reform; they are afraid of Muslims; they are afraid of blacks; they are afraid of atheists; they are afraid of hippies; they are afraid of socialists; they are afraid of immigration reform leading to citizenship because they are afraid of– name whatever reason; they are probably still afraid of monsters under their beds; they are just rank cowards and keep making things up to be afraid of..

  6. And how many of those changes took away major minority rights? Since you don’t go into the details, I’m guessing the number there is zero.

  7. you need to git sum larnin bout Merica, finny whiny; and get your ocd re content adjusted…is that clear enough?

  8. If we were in a court of law, you couldn’t be convicted of having intelligence, troll.

    Take remedial English, idiot.

  9. you poor baggers; I feel bad for you; life as you knew it is fini:

    you should have listened to the old hippie poet,”Because something is happening here

    But you don’t know what it is

    Do you, Mister Jones ?” How does it feel to be Mr. Jones, finrod?

  10. Thanks for your cogent and devastating rebuttal.

    Yours is the superior intellect. Alittle tip, though – use more capital letters next time. That’s how you really slam the logic home.

Comments are closed.