Melissa McEwan channels her inner Dworkin:
This is the most basic, primitive, unapologetic misogyny: Dehumanizing a powerful woman by calling her a monster.
A devil. A witch. A beast. A castrating fiend.
What set her off on this moonbat rant? Evidently, Kurt Schlichter and Kevin Williamson said Mean Things About Hillary. Now, let’s quickly flash back to February 2007:
[Democrat presidential hopeful] John Edwards . . . hired Amanda Marcotte of the blog Pandagon to be his blogmaster and Melissa McEwan of Shakespeare’s Sister to be his online communications person. If personnel is policy, let’s just say those two hires reflect the Edwards campaign’s desire to be “Queen C—of F—k Mountain” and “F—k BushCo.”
It’s not exactly the winning populist message John-Boy was shooting for, I reckon, and bloggers on the right side of the aisle recognized that immediately. . . .
By Wednesday, the Edwards campaign was fighting push-back on the picks that were supposed to grant him great Netroots power. Marcotte and McEwan were slammed for being anti-Catholic, outside the mainstream, and just plain vulgar. Edwards fired the two bloggers. . . .
Read the whole thing. The suggestion that Melissa McEwan has credibility to criticize others for “dehumanizing” rhetoric is laughable, but I did mention she’s a feminist, didn’t I?
“Especially important is the warning to avoid conversations with the demon. . . . He is a liar. The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don’t listen to him. Remember that — do not listen.”
— The Exorcist (1973)
Feminists are Satan’s craven slaves. Do not listen to them.
UPDATE: Crazy? Who you calling crazy?
Melissa McEwan: Crazier Than She Looks? http://t.co/TLAX5kReeG @realmyiq2xu2 @KurtSchlichter @instapundit @KevinNR pic.twitter.com/Qhp2dTMQ0k
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) March 17, 2015
“Feminists are Satan’s craven slaves. Do not listen to them.”
Is there anything more to say on this topic?
Unfortunately, yes.
I object. While I may have referred to Her Majesty as a Priestess of Cthulhu, I fail to see what’s *dehumanizing* about that.
Is it dehumanizing to call a giraffe a giraffe?
If not, then it isn’t dehumanizing to call a ”A devil. A witch. A beast. A castrating fiend.” a ‘a devil, a witch, a beast, and a castrating fiend. Further more I’m pretty sure that those nouns fall far short of the full cast of characters that are Hillary Clinton.
It’s almost as if McEwan agrees that Hillary IS a monster, and is only saying that it’s kind of mean (“dehumanizing”) to point it out.
Amanda Marcotte in 2007. Good times, good times…
I notice she didn’t criticize Maureen Dowd’s recent column in the New York Times.
I wonder why?
Why does Hillary keep attacking women who are victimized and abused by her Patriarchial albino sex addict husband?
Because she thinks they are actually being “honored” by her Patriarchal albino sex addict husband?
Juts as WAG on my part. No charge for it.
I call Shrillary a “deleter”. Much in the vein of the cry “witch”. Sounds good that way. 😉
How could it be possible that McEwan might be crazier than she looks? Crazy like that is to the bone.
“Crazier Than She Looks?”
I’m gonna go with “No,” as I back away slowly. Nothing could be crazier than she looks.
I honestly don’t know. It’s a close call, to be sure.
Yes. http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=8182
Yes, indeed. http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=8371
I just reread Schlichter’s piece. Aside from the reference to Lovecraft, the criticism isn’t any worse than that leveled at G.W. Bush for eight years. Plus, he reserves a substantial amount of time for roasting Bill Clinton. It’s clear from the piece he’s taking on both Clintons, not just Hillary.
(I know. I know. Why am I complaining about feminist “intellectual” dishonesty, as if I’m surprised.)
She has crazy eyes.
Plus, I see that hair and I think of There’s Something About Mary, and I’m very…very…perplexed.
She is proof positive of Undeniable Truth #24
Hence the reason she honors Huma.
I’d agree if “unattractive” were changed to “insane lesbian”.
But then again, I suppose “unattractive” also includes more than one’s physical looks, so I guess it does apply.
Never mind. Carry on.
Wouldn’t one have to be human to begin with in order to be dehumanized? If so, in Hillary’s case, I think some DNA testing, and perhaps some genome mapping, might be in order. Depending upon what that shows, Chelsea’s kid might actually be genetically like Rosemary’s baby.
Yeah, I don’t see the big deal. He was viciously sarcastic, but he didn’t lie or cuss. It was lot more polite and less slanderous than the kinds of things that Obama supporters said about her in ’08.
BTW, if she does run, I guarantee that unless they’ve been purged, the Daily Kos archives will be a goldmine of landmines. A treasure trove of typewritten Tomahawk cruise missiles. A cesspool of crass criticism, a menagerie of slanderous memes… You will never find an unkinder garden of drunk (or high) schooling.
“…if she does run,”
it’s going to be ugly.
Did she just broadsplain my woman hatred?
I rather doubt Hillary has ever been close to the Esoteric Order of Dagon.
Citation please.
The verbal treatment Mr. Bush got for about six years in office, give or take a few months leads me to think that any “civility” coming from the left is a smokescreen to shut people up.
Her eyes are facing front. At this point, she’d be a lot more piscine in apperance.
Ha, plastic surgery, still not convinced.
Regarding the picture, I have two comments:
1. Bozhe moi, those lenses are thick.
2. Under other circumstances, I’d say Ms. McEwan had a terrible
case of bed head.
Hmmmm. My cat has similarly honored my couch.
Maybe she didn’t take the Third Oath.
It’s an old feminist tactic — they deliberately make themselves as ugly and unappealing as possible in their dress and manner, and then complain they ain’t gettin’ no respect. Now look at Hillary: her dirty and often uncombed hair, her terrible clothes set her right apart from any other woman in a position of authority. Not in a good way, either! Then she acts like the nastiest girl in the mean girls clique, and expects – no, *demands* treatment worthy of HRH Elizabeth II. She just never got the memo she’s only plain HRC and any glory days she might have had are over.
[…] Feminist Wonders: Why Do Christofascist Godbags Keep ‘Dehumanizing’ Hillary? […]
That’s HM Elizabeth II, thank you very much! :p
Incidentally, is it just me, or do genuine monarchs always seem far more personable and less arrogant than these leftist wannabees? It must be their sense of noblesse oblige or something.
Well, for a “powerful woman” Hill certainly seems to have a powerful attraction to the sauce
http://iotwreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/barfacea.jpg
From iOTWReport posted just a few hours ago
Really, if there was some other US SoS who wasn’t part of what Thomas Sowell called the Vision of The Anointed (ie: she’s a promoter of a worldview concocted out of fantasy impervious to any real-world considerations) how would the “journalists” treat pictures of our loaded leadership http://wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/drunkhilz3.jpg
Well, Mrs McEwan is heterosexual, so that’s a point in her favor.
Please! HRH stands for His (or Her) Royal Highness, which is used as the proper form of address to a prince or princess; the Queen is properly referred to as Her Majesty.
Please make a note of it.
Well, there’s an apparent contradiction in referring to Mrs Clinton as “a castrating fiend” and simultaneously claiming that Mr Clinton is a serial philanderer; if she had castrated him, he’d be unable to philander. 🙂
Thus, we must judge Mrs Clinton as Not Guilty on the charge of fiendishly castrating.
FTFY
I had a dog that would honor my leg like that too.
McEwen is lower down the food chain than MoDo. She hasn’t gotten the memo yet. It will take a while for all the minions to receive their marching orders, and then Hilary’s underbusment will be complete.
Diana Moon Glampers.
Can you imagine if Fauxcohantas gets in the race? How long could you stand to watch that debate?
Because she’s NOT a human but a Clintonian Free Roaming Vapor.
RAAAAACIST!!!
Snow’s melted here in the Midwest. Unfortunately, my dog left some deposits under the snow. I think I’ll hire Melissa McEwan to scare the stink off of it. Dang, that thing makes Bill the Cat look handsome.
I think that’s required for high level initiates. Do you think she’d stop at a low level?
In Alaska the snow lasts long enough for a different phenomenon. As the upper layers of snow melt, exposing dog c@rp on previous layers, the leavings actually cast enough shade to prevent the snow directly under them from melting as quickly as the surrounding snow.
The result? Turdstools!
Turdstools, a good name for Amanda Marcotte’s memoir.