Let’s begin by saying I’m not a fan of Donald Trump, personally or politically. The first time he spoke at CPAC, Trump made a lot of protectionist noise in regard to China that struck me as both ignorant and irresponsible. Protective tariffs are just bad economics, as every intelligent person has understood since Adam Smith made the case against mercantilism in The Wealth of Nations. Tariffs are taxes, and the purpose of taxation is to produce revenue for the government. A protective tariff, by contrast, is not intended to produce revenue, rather it is intended to reduce foreign trade, which tends to benefit manufacturing interests at the expense of consumers and agricultural interests. Protective tariffs are usually accompanied by a system of domestic subsidies and regulations that beget crony capitalism. Whatever our economic problems, protectionism is not the solution, and so Trump’s China-bashing anti-free-trade rhetoric was distasteful.
So I’ve never been a fan of Trump-as-politician, but what the Daily Beast has done is as distasteful as a protective tariff: Resurrected a two-decade-old claim by Trump’s ex-wife Ivana that he “raped” her in 1989. This claim was made in their divorce and published in a 1993 book.
So what? When a rich man’s wife divorces him, she always accuses him of awful things. It’s a shakedown: “Give me the money I want or I’ll drag your name through the mud and make an ugly spectacle of it.”
Who knows if it’s true? And who cares? Ivana got her money and Trump moved on with his life. It’s over. Ancient history.
This doesn’t mean I’m in favor of Trump’s candidacy, but there was no point in the Daily Beast dragging this old mess out now.
Juanita Broaddrick could not be reached for comment.
@davidjacksmith @g56yu @instapundit http://t.co/U1Mr0JCNGx
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) July 28, 2015
Actually, if you look at the sidebar, each category has detailed lists of every single person with their photo and links to relevant sources. the List Summaries page is just that, a summary.
In my personal experience, folks who go for the cheap, tawdry sex jokes are usually all the same. Thanks for confirming your progressive bona fides cuck.
Step One: Create an internet site filled with unsubstantiated assertions.
Step Two: Cite your own creation as authoritative on other websites.
Step Three: Bask in adulation of idiots.
It’s funny that you’re fond of a disparaging label using “cuck.” Were you perhaps cuckolded by a young African-American male, and that perhaps inspired your unrelenting hatred.
Ah, but there I go with another tawdry sex joke. I do apologize for going there when you’ve offered such well-reasoned, clearly not insane arguments throughout this thread.
Anyway, fare thee well. I’m sure you’ll continue to infest the comments until you get bored and head back to Stormfront to get some more talking points.
Cheerio-o!
If you followed the link, you would see that there is a list of every single person cited in the statistic. The background of every individual has been thoroughly researched and is free for anybody to look up.
I don’t understand why these people even claim to be “conservative”, they fanatically support Jewish progressives and marxists even more than actual progressives and marxists. Because “God’s chosen people” can do no wrong no matter how evil they are, and Christians most certainly can’t be God’s actual chosen people.
Why is everyone at this website obsessed with racism and white nationalism? I’ve never once been to stormfront in my life. Don’t you guys see how crazy you look when you call anyone who disagrees with your politics “racist”? You come off looking just like the looney liberals. And that is precisely why the designation “cuck” is so effective for outing RINOs. If the term “cuckservative” offends you, then you should join the democrat party. Its as simple as that. And stop calling people racists. You just end up looking like a liberal nutcase.
Yes, the leftist, progressive ADL.
That is why the term “cuck” is so powerful: it has the ability to expose the phonies who have infiltrated and taken over the Republican party and turned into an adjunct of Liberalism and service to Israel. That’s also why the cucks are so hysterical about being exposed. They are fakes; they know they are fakes; and they know deep down that they have more in common with leftists than they do with actual middle class Americans.
You’re one cucked up Muslim.
Awwew, it’s so precious. The two anti-Semitic nutcases are talking to each other now. You just kinda wanna tussle their hair, and then of course immediately wash your hands because you don’t want to get whatever VD is lurking on their persons.
Spoken like a…..well, you know.
You sound like every other liberal who screams “RACIST!!!” instead of forming an actual intelligent rebuttal. Two sides of the same coin.
Angry lesbians certainly made for more entertaining fodder than this gang.
It’s insane how accurate the “cuck” phenomenon applies to so-called “Judeo-Christians” who actually believe God prefers the Christ-hating Jews to his own Church. And they repeatedly ignore the fact that the modern-day Jews are descendants of the Talmudic Pharisees, who were Edomites/Caananites, while the Judeans and actual descents of biblical Israel all converted to Christianity.
You could not even get the number of Federal Reserve governors right, much less their ethnic background, and somehow we’re expected to believe your ‘sources’ have accurate biographical information and family histories on second and third echelon officials at JP Morgan Chase etc but they will not put their name to their research (or even a traceable pseudonym).
Many of them are just trapped in an information bubble. As soon as they get the right information, they wake up. Some of them anyway. People over 45 tend to be mindlocked in the Buckleyite paradigm. But the more these cucks have to face the facts – that the republican leadership is rampantly liberal and betrays middle Americans every chance it gets – hopefully, the more of them will start looking at the New Right. Keep up the fight, soldier!
Memo to the moderator: two more candidates for the banhammer.
But presumably you have no objection to right wingers who keep babbling about Hillary’s college dissertation on Saul Alinsky or her role in the Watergate investigation.
It’s amusing to see cuck’s fall prey to a liberal’s level of rebuttal when confronted with information they find upsetting, and scream “racist” like a bunch of little girls on Tumblr. Cucks’, indeed!
Now you’re arguing like a liberal!
Oh sorry, I thought conservatives loved usury-free, community-based economics, small business, self-reliance and local agriculture. I must be mistaken.
Also, Marx was Jewish.
How is mindlessly and repeatedly using the term “cuckservative” any different than what you’re whining about?
You don’t know a damned thing about evangelical Christianity, do you?
Why would anyone object to that? Hillary was sanctioned for ethical violations not long after the ink dried on her diploma. That was at the terminus of her congressional committee work. The woman’s been crooked her entire adult life.
Well, when you’re screaming about how inferior blacks and Jews are, and whining about how the white race is oppressed, then you’re a racist, by definition of the term. Don’t like it? Go pound sand.
I think it’s fair to say that those commenters explicitly stated their case, while you on the other hand (amongst others) screamed “racist”. or “white nationalist”, and got snarky like your typical Jezebel commenter instead of debating what was said. And to say the term “cuckservative”, is as shallow as calling someone racist, or sexist, is ridiculous, especially when the term is so very loaded.
But much more recent allegations against Trump can be dismissed as “ancient history”. Got it.
We call a spade a spade around here, idiot white nationalist.
Really? Are you serious? All these guys did was repeat the same talking points over and over again. They offered no reasonable or substantive arguments, and basically just ranted like typical “Angry Guy on the Internet” Poseurs. Obviously from your comments you’re just as intellectually vapid and incurious as them.
When your new FREEDOM party (or whatever it’s called) breaks 2%, make sure to send us a postcard. Buh bye.
You’re spouting the same dung that infested this site over the weekend, fool. They all were using the “cuck” signal term too.
Don’t like it? When you lie down with dogs, you get fleas.
What, her entire filthy career is golden because there are unsubstantiated claims against Trump made during a divorce proceeding?
Do try to be subtler with the ‘look-squirrel’s
You sound like the idiot white nationalists that invaded here over the weekend. Enjoy your posting ability while you can.
I think it’s fair to say that those commenters explicitly stated their
case, while you on the other hand (amongst others) screamed “racist”. or
“white nationalist”,
You’re not doing any thinking and you’re not capable of being fair. It was pointed out to one of them that his factual assertions were tommyrot from tainted sources and to the other that he was talking nonsense about foreign trade. The slide into stupid blather about the Jews hardly needed a response from us and was their initiative, not ours.
It’s like hearing noisy ducks quack at each other. The only people that understand them are each other.
How is that any different from attacking feminist ideology as inferior, and being called a misogynist, or sexist? And they didn’t call Jews “inferior”, and I didn’t see anyone even mention blacks.
Irony: complaining about “cheap, tawdry sex jokes” while repeatedly using a word whose sole origin is a cheap, tawdry sex joke.
You didn’t read very far into that 400-comment thread, did you?
As a Christian, I thank you.
Wombat will clean out the remainder of the fridge soon enough. He’s done excellent work so far.
You know what we don’t like? Antisemites masquerading as conservatives. That’s a major no-no.
“And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.” — Zechariah 12:10
Also, Marx was Jewish.
So was Jesus.
Guilty by association, huh? I also sound like every Christian ever for the first 1800 years of Christianity.
Amen.
“Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised,
barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all.
Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe
yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and
patience.” (Colossians 3:11-12)
Now you sound like Karl Rove. hate to break it to you: you’re the new RINO’s.
Only in your own mind.
Genesis 12:1-3 :
Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Jesus was a Judean, descendant of the twelve tribes of Israel. The Jews are descendants of the Talmudic Pharisees of Jesus’ time, who were descendants of Edomites and Canaanites. Jesus was crucified by the Talmudic Jews, not his own people.
“When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but rather that a riot was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this Man’s blood; see to that yourselves.” And all the people said, “His blood shall be on us and on our children!” Then he released Barabbas for them; but after having Jesus scourged, he handed Him over to be crucified.” – Matthew 27:24-26