Professor Kathleen Richardson wants to ban sex robots.
In the zero-sum-game worldview of feminism, anything that makes men happy is bad. Kathleen Richardson, a professor at De Montfort University in England, is afraid that having sex with robots will make men happy:
“Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on — how they will look, what roles they would play — are very disturbing indeed,” she told the BBC.
She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.
“We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,” she said.
Notice that Dr. Richardson is only worried about how these robots would affect “traditional” stereotypes of women, whereas stereotypes of men are evidently not at all “disturbing” to her. While I am also against robot sex — it’s just plain creepy — I might change my mind if scientists could program these robots to make sandwiches.
We wouldn’t want feminist professors to make sandwiches, would we?
That would be “very disturbing indeed.”
(Via Memeorandum.)
What? An ugly buffoon of a woman, who probably never felt the excitement of being the subject of a man’s attraction is against sex robots? A woman who probably never thought of developing a charming personality to make a man fall in love with her mind thinks women are just for sex? Look at her, she looks like a frog. She probably thinks the *only* reason she’s unlovable is because she’s not sexy at all. What decent sex robots will do, in my opinion, is weed out a lot of the men (and some women) from the dating scene – those looking just for the mechanical pleasure of fucking. We will have a bigger dating market of women than men, meaning women will have to compete for men’s attention. Basically, if it goes right, sex robots will improve the dating scene for men who don’t use them at all.
Naturally, women who can’t compete already are scared of the thought of being left out alone. Any one thing that may require women to compete is something these unfunny uglies will oppose.
So, let me get this straight. Female heterosexuality is a mere social construct and is unnatural for women and PIV is always rape. Thus, a segment of the male population decides that it wishes to avoid the constant harping by the feminist harridan Left by leaving women alone. This, however, is “disturbing.”
Got it.
As the professor has said: Once you go metal you’ll never settle. And looking at that scrunt, yeah… the sexbot wins. Probably a better conversationalist as well.
It is well-known, in certain circles, that manatees and robots have been at war for millennia, and this is just the latest front in that unending conflict–however, with the arrival of sex robots, the tide will decisively turn against the Gorgers, once and for all.
She wants to ban the development of sex toys for men? So presumably she’s wants to ban sex toys for women then.
Hmm. She’s upset that women will have competition.
So now we know what a monopolist says when she’s losing her market.
But… if we had quality sex robots (“yes, but if you want a really good one, you’ll have to learn a foreign language”) that would give men something to do other than all the constant raping and women-destroying were famous for.
Y’d think that’d be a Good Thing.
Actually… it’d probably be easier to build a robotic sandwich maker than one who could suitably mimic a convincing, willing and able woman.
You can have her vibrator when you pry it from her cold, dead hands.
Every year scientists and engineers are making advances in miniaturize sensors but there’s one aspect of this phenomenon to which a lot of enlighten people have given a good bit of thought. Is having sex with an ultra-realistic robot hooker cheating?
For my own part, yes and no. Do I look at that old robot on ‘Lost In Space’ waving its tentacular arms around and get all hot and bothered? No. Not hardly. Now when I look at the image of a polished chrome and flesh woman as painted by Hajime’ Sorayama, or Jeri Ryan playing the infamous borg, Seven-of-Nine on Star Trek Voyager? You better believe it! Just don’t tell my wife!
Done.
I was wondering why Julie Bindel wanted to ban porn in her internment camps for men. The I remembered that feminism is all about making men miserable and keeping them that way. Misery loves company!
With feminists detente is never an option.
As long as there was a shirt ironing feature that would double as a Reuben/grilled cheese/Cubano finisher.
Male happiness is worse than rape.
Wow, I thought feminists would love sex robots. They could program them to lie about raping them.
As a feminist, you’d be an evil genius.
They hate sex robots because the whole point of feminism is to prevent men from having sex. That robot sex is every bit as non-procreative as gay sex — which feminists seem not to mind quite as much — isn’t the point: if a robot can be made to look, smell and (ahem) feel like a woman, that makes men having sex with it intolerable.
Deep down, feminists want men only to have dirty, unpleasant sex — with mannish people who smell bad and have unwomanly voices.
Then I suppose anything that ‘inappropriately vibrates’ should also be outlawed.
Well, I can see why Professor Richardson might be displeased with the notion, because there will certainly be no sex robots made in her image!
However, I absolutely agree that these
masturbation machinessex robots who very much damage the relationships between real men and real women. Let’s face facts: most men mature primarily because that’s what’s required to have sex with real women.Remember: the Borg were organic/cybernetic blends, and the Doctor removed most of Seven of Nine’s Borg implants; we can see which implants he left in place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mRJiGR7ziA
If only a good sex android had been available for Elliot Rodger . . . .
Do all English feminists look like Jabba the Hutt mated with Zoey Deschanel?
[…] This Headline sums up the wonders of the current era: “Why Do Feminists Hate Sex Robots.” […]
That’s an impressive set of Borg implants.
The hysterical harpy would outlaw your washing machine…
google careers make $98 just in one hour……….Afterg an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 98 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online... three to five hours of work daly… Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…Payscale of $6k to $9k /a month… Just few hours of your free time, any kind of computer, elementary understanding of web and stable connection is what is required…….HERE I STARTED…look over here
~~~~cck…..
???? http://GoogleSpecialQualityJobsNetworksOnnetCenter/$98hourlycareers…. ???????????????????????????????????
So far as many people are concerned, “the relationships between real men and real women” are already dead and decomposing. The advent of sex robots is just a way of burying them for good.
Wow, she looks like she did a 100 yard dash in a 90 yard gym. 5 will get you 10 that she’s got some mechanical devices in her dresser that make her happy, but that’s cool though…..
Apparently, in the 24th Century, sex with androids is at least somewhat commonplace:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ev1ec0Z0GI
Well, every real woman is going to be concerned: how can a woman who is going to age compete with a sex android who looks like Rachel Emily Nichols at 22, and will always look like Miss Nichols at 22?
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y164/wteach/IAYS2/171_photo381d2348_zpswfepsnil.jpg
At first I thought the picture was of a sex robot.
Sex Robots would lower her already extremely low sexual value to men. Why would a man want a robot over a flesh and blood woman? Probably because the women available are mentally disturbed, like the woman in this article.
I am reminded of this bit from C.S. Lewis’ novel That Hideous Strength:
The Stranger mused for a few seconds; then, speaking in a slightly sing-song voice, he asked the following question:
“Who is called Sulva? What road does she walk ? Why is the womb barren on one side? Where are the cold marriages? ”
Ransom replied, “Sulva is she whom mortals call the Moon. She walks in the lowest sphere. Half of her orb is turned towards us and shares our curse. On this side the womb is barren and the marriages cold. There dwell an accursed people, full of pride and lust. There when a man takes a maiden in marriage
they do not lie together, but each lies with a cunningly fashioned image of the other, made to move and to be warm by devilish arts, for real flesh will not please them, they are so dainty (delicati) in their dreams of lust. Their real children they fabricate by vile arts in a secret place.”
I would not want to eat any sandwich made by a feminist. Because, poison. You know what I mean here?
And you know, for a bitter, ranting feminist, Prof. Richardson is not completely ugly. In fact, she kind of looks like an older, frumpier version of Danica McKellar.
That’s the main reason prostitution was outlawed.
I don’t particularly want men to have sex with robots, but unlike feminsts, I do want men to have sex with women, specifically with women they are married to and intend to someday have children with. Feminists do not want men to have sex with women, so what is their problem here?
Mr. Churchhill, if I were your wife, I would poison your tea.
If I were your husband, I would drink it.
In addition to being a heroic war leader, the man had the best comebacks ever.
Male gratification — in any form — is the #1 thing wrong with this world.
https://youtu.be/6yiBdO0LI3A
Hey, I remember you from an argument about birth control on The College Times.
Threatened by the competition?
Dana, I am going to guess you really like Rachel Emily Nichols (Rule 5 coming for you)
Looking at that picture reminded me that Robert Z’dar passed away earlier this year.
I am pretty sure (given your past posts) you wife knows you look. Nothing wrong with that…
Modern feminism only exists so that ugly women can pretend that they have a seat at the table, too.
Thanks Stacy.
My coffee went everywhere.
Think I’ll just leave this one alone. (-:
“While I am also against robot sex — it’s just plain creepy …”
Well, yes, sexbots are “creepy” (and pathetic).
At the same time, most people in the decadent West — of both sexes — are already using other people as though they were nothing more than sexbots.