Harvard Feminists Lie About Rape

Posted on Comments

An anti-rape protest at Harvard University.

No honest, decent or moral young person would ever want to go near Harvard University, a corrupt and decadent institution run by depraved perverts. Harvard women are particularly notorious for their shameless promiscuity — one Harvard girl boasted of her “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on” — which is a major cause of sexually transmitted diseases in the Boston metro area.

“Boston residents ages 15 through 24 are almost four times
more likely to have Chlamydia than residents overall.
Among that age group, 70% of those diagnosed are female.”

Sex with Harvard girls is such a health risk it’s a wonder any man smart enough to get into Harvard would do it. Of course, most men who attend Harvard are gay, which may substantially lower their risk of chlamydia. However, some Harvard women still claim to be victims of rape:

The number of rapes reported by students at Harvard University’s Cambridge campus “nearly doubled” between 2013 & 2014, according to an article in school paper The Harvard Crimson. This alarming info comes via the new campus-security report from Harvard police, compiled as part of federal Clery Act requirements. But like so much related to campus rape numbers, this seemingly drastic increase isn’t nearly as alarming as some will make it out to be.
First, it’s important to consider concrete sexual assault numbers, which were still quite low. In 2014,33 instances of rape were reported to either campus police, university officials, or local law enforcement by students at Harvard’s main campus in Cambridge, and one rape was reported at Harvard’s Longwood campus. . . .. The number of rapes reported at Harvard last year is up from 17 incidents in 2013, and 24 in 2012.
But as Ashe Schow points out in the Washington Examiner, six of the 2014 rape reports — nearly 20 percent — were determined to be “unfounded,” i.e. “false or baseless.” This leaves us with just 28 credible rape reports at Harvard last year. . . .
In any event, with a population of about 21,000 students, Harvard University’s rape rate for 2014 was about 0.13 percent, or one in every 750 Harvard students.
The campus-crime report does not include a gender breakdown for rape victims, but let’s just assume for the sake of further extrapolation that all 28 were women. Roughly half the Harvard University student body is women. If we count both graduate and undergraduate students, that’s a rape rate of about 0.27 percent for female Harvard students, or one in every 375 Harvard women.
There are about 6,400 undergraduate students at Harvard, and about half are women as well. If we assume all the reported rape victims were undergraduate women — a not baseless assumption, considering only one incident of rape reported between 2012-2014 took place outside of a residence hall (though of course these aren’t exclusively undergrad housing) — that leaves us with a rape rate of about 0.88 percent.
In other words, this worst-case-scenario assumption means that about one in 114 female undergraduates reported rapes at Harvard last year.

You can read the whole thing. The fact that there were six false rape accusations — officially determined to be “unfounded . . . baseless” — at Harvard last year does not surprise anyone who knows anything about Harvard girls, whose dishonesty is as notorious as their promiscuity.

Still we must confront the shocking allegation that Harvard is now admitting heterosexual men who are willing to have sex with Harvard women despite the well-known risk of chlamydia infection.

This suggests either a serious mental health crisis in Cambridge, or else these Harvard students are using powerful mind-altering narcotics that deprive them of their capacity for rational thought. Perhaps they are getting high on ether. As a famous journalist once observed, “There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge.”

Whatever the explanation, any man accused of having sex with a Harvard woman should plead insanity, because he would have to be completely unhinged to do something as crazy as that.

P.S.: Tuesday will be my 56th birthday. Hit the freaking tip jar.





 

108 comments

  2. Yes. I don’t ruminate on it or anything, but it did damage my trust for women, and likely contributed to my remaining a childless bachelor. You can see how mad I still am about it two decades later.

    A false rape accusation is not a victimless crime.

  3. Who are “so cute” when they’re young — rape victims? Shameful, but hardly the worst thing you’ve typed.

    “..One reason why nearly twice as many rapes have been reported is
    likely because historically, fewer than ten percent of rapes ever get
    reported…”Thats folklore and unsupportable BY ITS VERY NATURE.

    I wish it weren’t true, but women and girls (and many men & boys) simply do NOT report their rapes and sexual assaults. If you think men and cops and people in general “hate rape”, they only do so in the abstract. Once there is a living, breathing victim trying to report her rape, she is instantly on trial before the detective has even started writing down her responses.

    District Attorneys do not take on any rape cases UNLESS there is a greater than 99% likelihood of winning. I have spoken to so many police detectives who have lamented the sheer volume of absolute rapists who will go free because the D.A. won’t pursue the case due to sketchy evidence, and they refuse to take the D.A.’s offer for a plea (because rapists know that unless the prosecution has absolutely undeniable evidence, s/he won’t even bother going to trial, so why take a plea?)

  4. Nice verbal at the start, finding a way to make me the ‘other” before you even start your reply. Straight out of Alinsky, did it give you a frisson of pleasure being able to somehow turn my barb against your juvenile posturing on rape into “oh look he thinks raping young girls is good”?

    Kindergarten level debating skills.

    ..”If you think men and cops and people in general “hate rape”, they only do so in the abstract.”..

    My sister in law has an open invitation from a number of members of my family to deliver the scum who raped her dead or alive, she has chosen to leave him alive. (serial rapist, in and out of prison for decades)
    This is the slime who did it.

    http://www.mako.org.au/gary_michael_narkle.html
    My copper mate ranks putting away rapists/paedos as one of his favourite parts of being a copper.

    ….

    “..I have spoken to so many police detectives who have lamented the sheer volume of absolute rapists who will go free because the D.A. won’t pursue the case due to sketchy evidence..”

    So what standard of evidence would you like to secure a conviction? Im genuinely curious as to how in your nirvana you would ensure rapists dont get off because of ‘sketchy evidence”.

    And in the end your defence of the 10% figure is “muh feels” and nothing more than anecdote.

    Id love every rape reported so some highly targeted policing could be brought to bear on rapists.

    Not reporting rape is an enabling action, one report filed but not prosecuted because the evidence is he said/she said is nothing (as far as a rapist is concerned), but if someone racks up 2-3 he said/she said then it will start to raise serious flags for the cops.

  5. It’s a shame you lap up the propaganda, but hey, that’s what a lot of men do. Can’t ask you to not be macho, can we? I mean, the boy’s club might call you a name if you ever admit something that they don’t approve of.

    Have a nice, ignorant life. You’re off to a magnificent start. Thanks so much for the “muh feels” comment, it cements how little reality you are capable of accepting.

  6. If you were falsely accused, does that mean all rape charges are also false? That “logic” may suit you, and it is also why so many men believe all rape charges are false. You are not just part of the problem — you are the majority of the problem.

    Your smarmy, dismissive blather would be enough to discredit all you say.

  7. The irony is your latest comment is literally “Muh feels”: The post.

    I also note you complete disengagement from any of the material posted above and the open invitation to explain how you would increase rape convictions.

    You want men to police each other over rape much more then you will end up with “macho mobs” because they are the ones who get shit done.

    Im pretty well betting your next post will be something about penis size or similar silly feminist push button insults.

  9. “Im pretty well betting your next post will be something about penis size or similar silly feminist push button insults.”
    ^^^ I know you’re pretty sure of that. That’s why I had decided to stop engaging your supbar mind; it simply will never improve, so why annoy myself with listening to your level, and why annoy you with asking you to care about someone other than your selfish self? That is a zero sum lose/lose.

  10. And here we have the next tactic all carefully set up by the ‘im not calling you a rape apologist directly BUT.. in the first sentence of your first response.”

    Self electing yourself to the position of to clever, to refined, and just…too…damn…caring to engage with actual arguments or positions which arent your own.

    Again, how would you increase the successful prosecutions for rape?

    Or is that too “subpar” a question for your majesty to engage with?

  11. Oh look one in 5 is apparently correct!!
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/study-1-in-5-campus-rape-reports-are-false/article/2573324

    “…It turns out the “one-in-five number” is correct, but it’s not the one-in-five the media are reporting. Harvard University released its sexual assault statistics as part of federal regulations, and it turns out 18.1 percent of reported rapes on campus are “unfounded,” defined by Harvard police as “any report of a crime that is found to be false or baseless.”…”

    So if only 10 of rapes are reported and there were (from wiki)

    “..According to United States Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, there were overall 191,670 victims of rape or sexual assault reported in 2005…”

    I multiply the reported incidence by 10 I get 1,916,700 rapes, of which 20% would be baseless meaning if you lowering of proof went ahead you would happily jail 383340 mainly men for crimes they didnt commit.

    Joseph Stalin just used my ouIja board to call you a cold hearted bitch.

  12. What a darned shame you had to sign out and come back with a guest (chicken) name. Worse is that you rattled off several commonly believed lies as though true.

    If you want to sign in and use your Disqus name, I’ll be happy to correct your falsehoods and the faulty methodology you no doubt used to get there. I suspect you would much rather hold onto your propagandic talking points rather than being forced to confront real numbers however.

  13. In the opinion of a pure psychopath, no doubt.

    You know what they say though — even though as many as 5% of those who allege rape are lying, it is a full 100% of rapists who lie.

    I’ve seen many of your vile and violent posts railing against women. Would you be happy if we lived in a reverse world where instead every true incident of rape was replaced with a true incidence of a man being kicked in his goods by a steel-toed Doc Martin boot? And all reports of men being kicked in his goods by steel-toed boots were treated as though his testes were asking for it? Because you know, if a man is walking around with no athletic cup, he clearly is quite open to the steel toe crushing his goods. *Many* men in fact pay a darned good amount of $$ to be so kicked, so we know that men enjoy it (but will be considered k!nky if they admit they love it, so most will lie and say they don’t love it so they won’t look k!nky or s|utty to their peers).*

    *JUST BECAUSE I know how you purposely twist things into things that were never said, I will nip that nonsense in the bud by stating clearly that I don’t want men to be kicked in their goods any more than YOU want women to be raeped. And you clearly want 1000 verifiable rapists to go free to create thousands more ruined lives. Great human being your parents raised.

  14. You willingly abrogate all claims to intelligence when you imply that the minority (false rape claims) outnumber the majority (real incidences of rape).

    That’s giving feminists even more ammunition against the stupidity of rape-deniers arguments.

  17. Didn’t read anything past ‘hon’.

    Anything following ‘hon’ is guaranteed to be the most moronic set of word salad in any discussion.

  18. That’s true. And it’s sad that, hoax or not, they got so many takers.
    .
    But I meant that objectively speaking, it isn’t unfortunate that someone was so easily able to get people of that mindset to demonstrate just how ridiculous they are.

  19. WORK AT HOME::Eran$97/HOUR…I just purchased themselves a McLaren F1 when I got my check for $19993 this past 4 weeks and just over 17 thousand lass month . this is really the nicest-work Ive had . I began this 10-months ago and straight away started making more than $97… p/h .learn the facts here now .
    kbg……..
    ???? http://GoogleCyberTechHomeJobsEmploymentDaily/get/chance/top…. ??????????????????????????????????????????

  22. You come in here peddling your Law Of The Excluded Middle fallacy and expect us to tae you seriously?

    This is me, laughing at you.

  23. I made no such implication, ignorant cretin. You, however, are apparently just fine with the harassment the Duke lacrosse team went through because one black woman decided she hated whitey.

  24. Says the ignorant feminist that never steps outside her hardcore leftist Community-Based Reality.

  25. You peddle the 1 in 5 lie and you have the unmitigated gall to talk about “propagandic taking points”?

    Pot, kettle, black.

  26. You’re apparently in competition to see how much leftist bogus tripe you can pack into one comment thread.

  28. And of course, the historical reference sails right over your pretty vacant head like the clouds sail over the ocean.

    “It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death.” — Maimonides, 12th century

    But he’s just a Dead White Male to you.

  29. Um, no, you poor dope — the saying is quite common amongst liberals and other people who don’t mind more victims piling up in society.

    But at least you got to make a completely false allegation of my being stupid. *Did that make you feel just a smidgen less impotent for half a second? Did it? Did it???

    * You got to call me a name based on absolutely nothing, so I figured I’d try your tactic right back at you. Unless of course all of your pent up vitriol is in fact due to a tragic level of impotence, for which I apologize. There could truly be no bigger tragedy in a man’s life. But hey, now that ObamaCare is going against God’s will by paying for your special blue pill, shouldn’t you be a LOT less himsterical?

  31. So of course I wake up earlier to find my inbox spammed with ad hominems and non sequiturs from this site.

    If your chronological age were the same as your maturity level, you could be legally aborted in 42 states. How is it that my ten year-olds are more adult than the proud, fact-free little name-callers on this poor site?

    It’s so-called “Republicans” like these that are going to ruin the 2016 election for the country. No sensible person will want to be affiliated with the buffoons on the right who display such utter contempt for women, gays, darker-than-lily-white-people, the poor, and pretty much everyone and everything else which doesn’t fit into your narrow parameters of a certain Reich we all are thinking of. GOOD JOB getting Hillary or Bernie or Biden elected come 2016, because even the most dyed-in-the-wool conservatives are turning away from the juvenile little circle jerk of hate that has taken over Reagan’s once-great party.

    Who’d have thought that the Left’s biggest favor would have come straight from the Right? Yep, your lot are handing the White House over to the Dem candidate with all of this scaring away of our former voters. You think we’re going to see a Republican or even a Conservative as President in this country EVER AGAIN without the votes of women, LGBTs, non-whites, the poor, the educated (educated people can’t stand this bully, insulting garbage of yours), or indeed anyone with a conscience? NOPE! The current “Right” wing has become so repellent in its hive mind of hate and bullying that no one else will support it on voting day.

    Again — congrats on that, losers (?? LITERALLY).

  32. 1. SJWs always lie.
    2. SJWs always double down.
    3. SJWs always project.

    Good job, demonstrating all three in one comment. I’m impressed.

  33. So much lying, doubling down and projection.

    GOOD JOB getting [Trump or Carson or Cruz] elected come 2016, because even the most dyed-in-the-wool [liberals] are turning away from the juvenile little circle jerk of hate that has taken over [FDR]’s once-great party.

  34. Soon. I believe that feminism laid the seeds of its own destruction by rejecting modesty and attempting thought control instead. They can wish for the return of chivalry and try to promote some weird hybrid, but that dog won’t hunt. Gen X is on the rise, and has no reason to pedestalize women.

  36. Hey, the whole I’m rubber, you’re glue thing likely works just fine where you spend your days, but once you make it past puberty it just makes you look stupid.

    (As is supported by each of your attempts to sound rational thus far.)

    Again, kudos to you and your ilk for guaranteeing we’ll never achieve another Republican nor Conservative in the White House. I, and many other conservatives, wish you didn’t have to make this happen.

  38. So, are you asking for information about setting up proper spam filters, or are you just upset that DISQUS is doing what you told it to do? Now, please understand that when you get a notice from DISQUS that I’ve responded to your plea for help, it doesn’t mean that I “spammed” you. it means you set up your profile so that DISQUS would send you an email when someone responds to you. You actually have control over that setting. Hope that helps!

  43. There is nothing irrational about calling out blatant projection, there is nothing wise about ignorance of the hatefulness of progressives, and there is nothing hateful about opposing their racist, sexist, heterophobic bigotry.

  44. “Always” is rhetoric. There are (rare) times when SJWs accidentally tell the truth, but they don’t even know when it happens, since they can’t tell the difference. It’s all narratude (narrative platitudes) with them.

    You talk just like them, and you apparently take offence at the well-established Three Laws of SJWs, so it’s reasonable to suppose that you are one.

  45. No one invited you here, idiot leftist troll, you came here and posted all on your own, no one pointed a gun at your head and demanded you post your blather here.

    Unless they did, in which case post a picture of it and I’ll put it right next to that famous National Lampoon cover.

  46. In your SJW Community-Based Reality, facts are myth and myths are facts.

    Begone until you develop a clue, idiot leftist troll.

  47. So you’re claiming ownership of a saying that’s at least 800 years old and was derived from Abraham arguing against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in the book of Genesis.

    Yeah, you’re dumb as a box of rocks, with apologies to both the rocks and the box for comparing them to you.

  49. I’ve never had a “set” of “salad” before…the concept fascinates me. Thanks, hon. …and I mean that in the most “not a set of word salad” imaginable.

Comments are closed.