Kate Sloan (@Girly_Juice) is an example of what I mean when I say every feminist’s ideal boyfriend is a Hitachi Magic Wand. She describes herself as a “Cis queer kinky poly femme feminist.” Also, she’s Canadian, which is another good reason to avoid Canada, as if you needed any more.
Feminism is an anti-male hate movement. Everyone understands this, except for those pathetic masochists who call themselves “male feminists.” No feminist ever dated a man except to obtain the sadistic revenge of humiliating the men she dates. The only way a feminist ever looks at a male is down. To be male is to be inferior, according to feminist theory, and so in her every interaction with a male, the feminist is merely giving him the opportunity to prove his inferiority. Like every other feminist, Kate Sloan habitually mocks and demeans males, which was the point of her recent column with this headline:
The Dangers Of Dating Faux-Feminist Men
What is a “faux-feminist” man? Basically any heterosexual man who thinks of himself as a feminist. If you are male, Kate Sloan hates you, and in feminist discourse, heterosexuality is a synonym for oppression.
In her column, Kate Sloan begins by describing her vindictive humiliation of “a passably nice boy I’d met on Tinder.” She uses the pseudonym “Liam” for this boy, and describes him as “smart, funny, creative, interesting, and a terrific cuddler.” This is obviously false, because (a) there are no “nice boys” on Tinder, and (b) any man who would date Kate Sloan can’t be very smart. No man with an IQ above room temperature would ever speak to a queer feminist, especially not a Canadian queer feminist. Do I even have to explain this? Or would it be sufficient to point out that Kate Sloan’s web site has page after page of dildo reviews?
Look, pal, if you want to date a vibrator connoisseur like Kate Sloan, don’t let me stop you. However, even in 2016 there are still plenty of women who actually like normal sex with human males, and maybe you should consider trying to find one of those instead. Also, queer feminist Kate Sloan helpfully includes a naked picture of herself on her “About” page, if you need any further incentive to avoid her completely.
Why would a “nice boy” want to interrupt Kate Sloan’s solitary pursuit of battery-operated fun? Oh, I almost forgot — you’re a “male feminist.” Or at least you thought you were until you dated Kate Sloan, and then she deliberately started a pointless argument about movies:
I wanted, so badly, to give him the benefit of the doubt. I wanted him to cede that Hollywood’s misogyny is a bad thing, or even a real thing. But he didn’t acknowledge any of that. . . . He kept walking and holding my hand, like nothing had changed.
Struggling to keep my voice even, I told him, “If you don’t see gender injustice in the world, it’s because you’re a straight, white, able-bodied cis dude, and you’re blinded to those things by your privilege.”
“Oh, here we go,” he snapped, his veneer of cool condescension bending at last. “Men aren’t more privileged than women. Different people have different levels of privilege depending on what’s going on in their lives. For example, in divorce courts –”
That’s when I let go of his hand. Actually, it would be more accurate to say that I threw his hand away from me like it was a rotting rat corpse I’d found behind the couch. “Nope,” I barked. “I can’t have this conversation with you. I’m going to get too mad at you and we are going to break up if we have this conversation.”
That night, I went home and texted my four closest friends: three ardently feminist women and one dude who I considered a pretty solid ally. “Do I have to break up with him?” I implored after explaining the situation. All three women immediately blew up my phone with all-caps yeses. . . .
I’d assumed he was a feminist because, in my mind, any good and decent man would be. My experiences up til then had mostly confirmed this. But in Liam’s case, being a good and decent man wasn’t enough, if he didn’t also believe in the systemic struggles women face. . . .
You can read the rest of that, but ask yourself this: Why would any “good and decent man” date Kate Sloan, who is neither good nor decent? Perhaps a Venn diagram would be helpful in understanding this.
You see that these are non-intersecting sets. However “passably nice” this guy she met on Tinder may have been, he wasn’t good or decent, or else he would not have dated a Canadian queer feminist like Kate Sloan.
Her experiences led her to an existential crisis:
What does it mean for a man to be truly feminist? Is that even possible, or is a man only ever, at best, a feminist ally and a recovering misogynist? . . .
For feminist women, dating men can feel like a lose-lose proposition. Either you settle for someone who invalidates your politics and therefore your personhood, or you gamble on a man who claims to support your cause but may or may not actually give a s–t.
Heterosexual feminism is impossible. It’s a “lose-lose proposition,” because feminists hate men with such white-hot intensity that no man could ever hate himself enough to qualify as a “male feminist.” Why even talk to Kate Sloan? A feminist never wants to hear a word any man has to say, because men are always wrong about everything.
No intelligent man would waste time talking to Kate Sloan. Just let her stay home alone with her collection of dildos and vibrators. But maybe you’re not an intelligent man. Maybe you’re so stupid that even if I told you not to click here to see a photo of Kate Sloan with her, uh, equipment, you’d click it anyway, despite my warning that you can never un-see it.
If they aren’t, then someone who obsesses about her dildo collection certainly is.
Which raises the question since I am sure sure can describe her toys from memory.
Can she describe all her lovers?
The word is much too big for him.
Facts, and reality, are just hateful.
I doubt Devo would claim them either.
BUT, if you were to click that Amazon link, you’d be in just as much trouble as if you were to “Google” it.
I’m sure that everyone that posts here is already on the NSA watch list.
“Again, I can solve differential equations,….”
Well, right there is your problem! You’re overthinking things again. It’s just classical Physics of the Hi Skool variety. No big words or equations required.
There are things you are better off not knowing. 8 years ago I discovered the meaning of the term “MILF,” and have been sorry since that I accidentally learned.
I’ve used that one a time or two. Here is one of those places, as I recall.
Ignorance is bliss, I guess, especially with new words you learn on the internet.
You could think of them as personal secretaries, lol.
It might stun the lady to find out that in successful marriages the couple do NOT agree on everything. They might even vote differently. In fact, it is highly unlikely that any two people will agree perfectly on everything in life. That you could still be friends with people you don’t agree with perfectly would be impossible to understand for her. And what about when one changes one’s mind about something? unpossible!!
You’ve got that right!! I suggest she try it and find out. Probably has a sex toy that would do the drilling!
Lol I have two cats and two dogs becuase dogs aren’t cats and cats aren’t dogs
“Queers for Palestine” is cognitive dissonance writ large.
Heh.
Good to see you, hope you’re doing well.
[…] Vox Day schools a commentator in logic. Because one heresy needs to be disciplined out of the church it does not mean that it is the only heresy or indeed the heresy du jour. There is a logical fail here: I would agree with Vox. The feminists reject the trinity, the need for salvation, the cross and our salvation. For they need to have men take the sins they project upon them. […]
Evidence of laudable intent (a.k.a virtue signalling) is what too many people use to validate their self worth. It’s so much easier and fun to march in an “End World Hunger” rally than to volunteer three nights a week at a soup kitchen.
Just for fun, next time one of these special snowflakes starts berating you because of your privilege, challenge them to a personal virtue auction. Explain that personal virtue is measured in terms of what you personally have done to improve the lives of the less fortunate/privileged.
I like to open the bidding with “On my last business trip I brought home single use hotel soaps and shampoos and donated them to a local homeless shelter.”
Dollars to donuts they can’t think of anything to top something as small and trivial as that!
All “massage tools” are assumed to have more than one purpose. And if they have some sort of warming element, it’s a dead cert.
However, shockingly, there’s one that works quite well for calf cramps, and since I both run and do martial arts, it’s a God-send. But I freely admit that I blush like a rose when I buy replacements.
It’s not just the Moro Islamic Liberation Front anymore!
I empathize. Every piece in this series has me cringing for women.
That, or a suicide note.
Nice list!
I will say that “sustainability”, when used as a financial concept, has some validity. The rest? Not so much.
Look for the woman with the really happy dog. She’s probably got it right, just hasn’t got a man.
Dog park is a great place for friendships, anyway.
Oh, I really hope not. That would be so inappropriate as to be tragic.
Good Lord… “At a restaurant, I stuff my pockets with condiment packets to hand to the homeless outside!”
Hell, just tell them how much you gave to charity last year and ask how it compares to their donations.
Oh, you must be one of Jeanette’s online stalkers.
Hi! How’s that deranged obsession working out for ya?
This is how pathetic I am… that particular hypothetical (I hope like Hell it’s a hypothetical) has never occurred to me.
I am a disgrace to the patriarchy.
Why do you say “massage tool?” That’s so demeaning. Call him Ramon, like his mother did.
That’s how I discovered what it meant when someone else used it. I asked what their post had to do with the Moros. I was a bit abashed at the response.
Especially when the term originates in porn.
Dang talk about cheap and worthless “kindness”. How hard is it to have a baggies wth a top shelf TV dinner, a can of fruit and a can of veggies on hand for the homeless?
When I was dating I always took my golden on my first date.
That takes away time and resources from building the giant papier mache head of… whoever the next Republican President will be.
Because so long as people elect Republicans we will have homeless people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGaXiUHI-Og
Make sure that the cans are pop-tops..
My favorite us of the acronym comes from Iowahawk, who described Gaia as “the ultimate MILF.”
I like “acolytes” better.
Okay, I don’t believe in Freud.
But maybe she does…
They are I keep two in my car to give to the homeless. When it is cooler I sually include a small candy bar.
Ah. Well, for one thing, it’s powerful enough to work just fine through external stimulation, e.g. of the little man in the boat. For another, there are aftermarket attachments.
I recently read an account by a young woman of using Pokemon GO to meet the kind of men that aren’t on Tinder — which I thought was clever until I googled it just now to find the article again, and discovered that she was just putting established theory into practice.
After. Market. Attachments. Which means, not OEM.
No way am I going to touch that statement with a ten-foot pole.
According to her twitter, he didn’t have a high sex drive like hers and he didn’t particularly care for receiving oral sex and inserting either fingers or sex toys in her vagina on a daily basis or more often than that. He was more into going out and doing things together and getting to know each other better. Sounds like a terrible non-feminist!!
If anyone is still commenting on his gem, I would value some opinions from men and women. When thinking you may be having sex with a woman you’ve been seeing, do you expect to be doing the “act” with fingers and/or sex toy penetration as sexual intercourse? Of course the man will be rewarded with oral sex. It doesn’t seem very intimate to me if it’s someone you have feelings for. You know, “okay, use this dildo to screw me”?
But what if one of the dogs really, really feels that he’s a cat? I denounce your canine transphobia!
As I’ve heard it said:
“Love is a matter of chemistry, sex is a matter of physics.”
My cat Zette has something to say about that!
https://youtu.be/RXT49tC5vZ8
My only comment is that RSM still believes that there are women out there who do not, at heart, practice the same anti-male hate and manipulation that the more vocal and obvious “Feminists” do.
Sorry Robert. I understand you have married well and love your wife and have created a partnership that is a showcase of how it should be done but the majority of women are not like your wife.
They are more like the “Feminists” than they or anyone else wants to admit. Oh, they’re not as vocal or radical or outspoken about it as the radicals but they are actually more dangerous. It’s they who vote for passage of anti-male laws and it’s they who twist our young men into the girly men we see so commonly today. It’s they who continue to spread the ideas and philosophy of male/female equality that is destroying Western Civilization. They’re like moderate Muslims. Who don’t go on jihad (until they do) and who claim and appear to practice a kinder more sane version of Islam but who would vote for Sharia in a heartbeat and consider “honor killings” and “genital mutilation” a fundamental right of right thinking Muslims. (just that they don’t DO it themselves. YET)
Take a look at most of the women’s movement stretching back decades and you can see that the leaders were always more radical but it’s the rank and file and their relentless pursuit of their anti-male anti-life anti-reality ideas that have succeeded and are succeeding in destroying men’s lives and as their ideas become forced on us, destroying the culture and the civilization of the Western World.
It’s as Mao said, the Guerilla fighter must have the support of the masses. They are the ocean he swims in. If they do not cooperate, the guerrilla fighter cannot succeed.
Thus success indicates that they have more support than they seem to have. And their supporters are more subtle about their support.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/07/14/helen-gurley-brown-very-singular-girl/
Because she looks like someone used her head for a door prop.