Harvard alumnus declares that getting into Harvard is no big deal, at least for poor white kids:
People who are plausible admission candidates at Harvard and don’t quite make the cut end up at Columbia or Penn. People who don’t get into Berkeley go to UCLA. And they all end up fine. There’s just absolutely no need to cry for someone who got into Bryn Mawr instead of Wellesley thanks to affirmative action or legacy preference or structural bias in the SAT or anything else. This is a made-up social problem. . . .
If you were to start writing a list of the problems faced by poor people in the United States of America you’d run out of paper long before you got to elite university admissions policies.
Strangely enough, I agree with Yglesia as to these facts. Why, therefore, did Jesse Jackson lead protest marches against Proposition 209? Why, as a general rule, do liberals rush to the barricades to defend affirmative action programs for minorities, if such programs are a response to “a made-up social problem” and if admission to elite universities doesn’t actually help the supposed beneficiaries?
And isn’t it strange that Yglesias is making such arguments now, when we have a black president with a bachelor’s degree from Columbia and a law degree from Harvard?
Only the best and brightest go to Harvard.
Only the best and brightest go to Harvard.
Only the best and brightest go to Harvard.
This argument is actually stolen from Thomas Sowell, who used it against affirmative action.
This argument is actually stolen from Thomas Sowell, who used it against affirmative action.
This argument is actually stolen from Thomas Sowell, who used it against affirmative action.
Yglesias is the finest argument I can imagine for firing the entire faculty of Harvard and turning the property over to charity. A shallower, more inept and economically illiterate “Progressive” would be hard to find.
Yglesias is the finest argument I can imagine for firing the entire faculty of Harvard and turning the property over to charity. A shallower, more inept and economically illiterate “Progressive” would be hard to find.
Posted over at Ygleias’s’s’s site:
“Matt, you’re right that this isn’t a problem for the country. It’s a problem for the insular, provincial Ivy League schools, turning out supposed leaders for this country who have no first-hand experience of vast portions of it except for those “representative” elements cherry-picked for them by the admissions bureaucrats.
I recall being lectured at a rally by a self-professed Harvard grad from the New York publishing scene whose every argument was prefaced by “Well I went to Harvard…” but who didn’t know the difference between World Wars One and Two…”
Posted over at Ygleias’s’s’s site:
“Matt, you’re right that this isn’t a problem for the country. It’s a problem for the insular, provincial Ivy League schools, turning out supposed leaders for this country who have no first-hand experience of vast portions of it except for those “representative” elements cherry-picked for them by the admissions bureaucrats.
I recall being lectured at a rally by a self-professed Harvard grad from the New York publishing scene whose every argument was prefaced by “Well I went to Harvard…” but who didn’t know the difference between World Wars One and Two…”
Posted over at Ygleias’s’s’s site:
“Matt, you’re right that this isn’t a problem for the country. It’s a problem for the insular, provincial Ivy League schools, turning out supposed leaders for this country who have no first-hand experience of vast portions of it except for those “representative” elements cherry-picked for them by the admissions bureaucrats.
I recall being lectured at a rally by a self-professed Harvard grad from the New York publishing scene whose every argument was prefaced by “Well I went to Harvard…” but who didn’t know the difference between World Wars One and Two…”
[…] Matthew Yglesias: ‘Got Mine, Jack’ […]