The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

FMJRA 2.0: Strange News From Clark County

Posted on | April 30, 2016 | 24 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


Granted that I spent last weekend immersed in cosplayers and the greasy organizational details of running an anime convention, the strangest thing to happen that weekend was receiving an e-mail from the Clark County GOP informing me that I’d been chosen as a delegate to the state convention a fortnight from now in Reno. As those of you who follow me on Facebook are aware, this is pretty remarkable since my precinct is full of Trump supporters, and so I was only an alternate to the county convention. Evidently the number of Trumpkins willing to make the treacherous journey to the state convention was low, or the fix was in, since this Cruz supporter is now headed for Reno in a couple of weeks. I am leaning toward taking my laptop and blogging the convention on Friday and Saturday, and in the tradition of Stacy’s Shoe Leather Fund, I ask those so inclined to kick in a Tubman or two for Fear and Loathing in Reno.





Beware of Sex in the Social Media Age (Because the Internet Is Forever)
Batshit Crazy News

Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Harassment and the Enchanted Crocodiles of Feminism

 Batshit Crazy News

Feminists Demand Quotas for Award Nominations at Cannes Film Festival
Batshit Crazy News

Feminism: It’s About SCIENCE!
Trevor Loudon
Batshit Crazy News

What #GamerGate Should Teach Us (But @JesseSingal Refuses to Learn)
Batshit Crazy News

What Is This? Was #GamerGate About Fake Victims Faking Fake Harassment?
Batshit Crazy News

The ‘Oppression’ of the Elite
Batshit Crazy News

In The Mailbox: 04.27.16
Proof Positive
Batshit Crazy News
A View from the Beach

In The Mailbox: 04.28.16
Proof Positive
 Batshit Crazy News
A View from the Beach

Feminism Is a Synonym for ‘Shut Up’
Batshit Crazy News

Space Opera, Skulduggery, and a Stray Draftsman
Batshit Crazy News

In The Mailbox: 04.29.16
Proof Positive
Batshit Crazy News


Top linker:

  1.  Batshit Crazy News (12)


Thanks to everyone for their linkagery! The FMJRA and Rule 5 Sunday will continue on their usual schedule with the usual deadlines until further notice, which means you have about eight hours to get your submissions in to the Rule 5 Wombat mailbox for tomorrow’s Rule 5 Sunday Double-Dip Blue Shirt Special.


Shop Amazon – Mother’s Day Store
Shop Amazon – Grow Your Garden

Category: FMJRA Award

In The Mailbox: 04.29.16

Posted on | April 29, 2016 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Happy 75th Birthday Ann Margaret!
Da Tech Guy: The #Unexpectedly Chronicles – Boehner Picks Trump (and Hillary, Obama, And Bernie) Over Cruz
The Camp of the Saints: On Ted Cruz And The Restoration Of The Republic
Proof Positive: Could Someone Buy Poseur Donald Trump A Clue?
Michelle Malkin: Behold – Dems’ Open Borders Disease Hypocrisy
Twitchy: Carly Fiorina’s Perfect Response To Mike Tyson Endorsement
Shark Tank: Fundraiser For Crazy Cousin John Busted For Running Meth Lab


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: Hundreds Swarm SDSU President To Protest David Horowitz Freedom Center Anti-BDS Posters
American Thinker: Coulter vs. Coulter
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – Tied Up In Knots by Andrea Tantaros
Don Surber: Peggy Noonan Gets Trump
Jammie Wearing Fools: Of Course – “TruCon” Trump To Reach Out to Sanders Supporters
Joe For America: Academy Sports, Walmart To Gain As Target Loses 41 Million Customers
JustOneMinute: Obama On The Economy – Please Applaud
Pamela Geller: Kansas Defies Obama On Syrian Refugees
Shot In The Dark: This Is What A Majority Looks Like
STUMP: Memento Mori, or, Happy Birthday To Me
The Lonely Conservative: Doofus Hands Cruz Communist Manifesto To Sign, Cruz Agrees And Leaves A Message
The Quinton Report: Yale Names College For Bigot
This Ain’t Hell: Army Retains SFC Martland
Weasel Zippers: SCOTUS Denies Bid To Block Texas Voter ID Law
Megan McArdle: One Regulation Is Painless. A Million Of Them Hurt.


Shop Amazon – Mother’s Day Store
Hugo Nominee “Space Raptor Butt Invasion”

Category: Linkagery

Space Opera, Skulduggery, and a Stray Draftsman

Posted on | April 28, 2016 | 18 Comments

— by Wombat-socho

The end of tax season ate most the time I usually devote to reading, so it’s only been in the last couple of weeks that I’ve actually had any time to fire up the Kindle or thumb through a book off my (not nearly numerous enough) shelves. Finished Vaughn Heppner’s The Lost Colony first; it’s a decent enough sequel to the first three books in his “Lost Starship” series, even if it didn’t go where I thought it was going. Captain Maddox and the crew of the starship Victory are off to save humanity again, this time despite a force of infiltrating androids replacing humanity’s leaders, the machinations of the New Men, and the possibly lethal lures laid out by Professor Ludendorff. Good brain candy, and quite possibly better reading than at least one of the Hugo-nominated novels this year.

Speaking of which, the nominations are out, and our Supreme Dark Lord has some amusing things to say about them and the entirely predictable reactions by marginally talented hacks like John Scalzi. Also, links to an interview and Reddit AMA with Chuck Tingle, author of the Hugo-nominated “Space Raptor Butt Invasion”. Must be read to be believed. The International Lord of Hate had rather less to say, but as usual, he’s right. I’m not even going to speculate on how it’s going to turn out; I have better things to spend $50 on than a MidAmericon II membership, and with the Dragon Awards coming out, the Hugos are soon going to be as irrelevant to fandom and the SF market as (sadly) the Neffies.

Meanwhile, back at my Kindle, Marko Kloos’ fourth novel, Chains of Command, is out. I read most of it on the way up to Minneapolis, the remainder on the way back, and I’m giving serious thought to re-reading it this weekend. It is, of course, the latest volume in the “Frontlines” series, describing the war between -very recently united- humanity and the alien Lankies, who up to this point have been having it all their own way against the divided and technologically inferior monkey-boys. Our hero Andrew Grayson is bored, playing platoon sergeant for a basic training unit in the same base he originally trained at a lifetime ago, when he gets tapped for the special ops mission to end all special ops missions. You’ll recall that toward the end of the previous novel, a big chunk of the North American Commonwealth’s senior leadership (civilian and military) did a bunk to points unknown, taking a dozen combat ships and transports full of the leaders’ families? Seems the traitors’ bolthole’s been found, and a legend in the NAC special ops community wants Grayson to lead a platoon of Spaceborne Infantry troopers under his command to get those ships back for the impending invasion of Lanky-held Mars. It’s a similar theme to Heppner’s novel, but Kloos is a very different writer and this book goes in a very different direction. If you liked the first three “Frontlines” novels, you’re going to like this one too.

This week’s moldy oldie is Keith Laumer’s The Time Bender, recently republished for the Kindle by Hachette’s Gateway imprint. The Time Bender in question is Lafayette O’Leary, a draftsman whose dabbling in autohypnosis slides him from Colby Corners to Artesia, a pumpernickel principality with a dragon problem that the locals think O’Leary’s the man to solve.  Unfortunately for O’Leary, his propensity for coming unstuck in time and ability to tweak the local reality rapidly makes the dragon just one of many lethal problems he needs to solve. It’s a lighthearted fantasy, with occasional dark hints of what was to come in Dinosaur Beach, and the original DAW edition with the Kelly Freas cover is available if you don’t feel like buying e-books from Hachette.


Category: Books

Feminism Is a Synonym for ‘Shut Up’

Posted on | April 28, 2016 | 49 Comments

A major goal of feminism is to silence opposition. Because their ideology cannot withstand informed and articulate criticism, feminists therefore require a dishonest vocabulary of jargon that functions to disqualify and discredit their opponents. A man expressing disagreement with a feminist will invariably be accused of “sexism” or “misogyny,” and if he persists in his criticism, he will be accused of “harassment.” What these terms actually mean — other than as pejorative labels, deployed to smear the movement’s enemies — is seldom examined. It is quite often the case that men who ostensibly support feminism engage in abusive behavior toward women (e.g., Jian Ghomeshi), whereas men who oppose the movement are branded “misogynists” for no other reason than their willingness to state their criticism honestly and openly.

 

Do you see how Anita Sarkeesian deploys the term “harassment” here to suggest that any disagreement with her is harassment? The only reason anyone might dispute her “critique,” we are supposed to believe, is that those who disagree with her do not give “women the benefit of the doubt” — they are prejudiced against women — and therefore are engaged in “subtle harassment.” This rhetorical tactic is an implied threat, intended to intimidate any would-be critic of Sarkeesian, who will be accused of harassment if he does not enthusiastically agree with everything she says.

Feminists have used this kind of dishonest rhetoric for so long that it is seldom recognized as what it is, a propaganda tactic of psychological warfare. Consider, for example, the circular logic of “Lewis’ Law.” This was stated on Twitter by British feminist Helen Lewis in August 2012: “The comments on any article about feminism justify feminism.”

 

In other words, the way people respond to feminist arguments proves that feminist ideology is correct. The basic error of this is to assume that ignorant or offensive comments posted on an Internet article — expressions of “sexism,” which Ms. Lewis sees as justifying her cause — are representative of some larger social problem, rather than demonstrating something about the quality of Internet commenters. Suppose, for example, that Helen Lewis makes a particularly stupid argument that men find insulting, e.g., “Yes, there is one great contribution men can make to feminism: pick up a mop,” which was the headline on a Guardian column Ms. Lewis published in January. How you expect men to respond to such an insult? Do you think the average fellow, confronted with such a headline, will sit down and compose a thoughtful 700-word column in reply? Or do you expect him to say something rude about Ms. Lewis as a person? Does a rude comment prove anything?

 

The man who responds to Ms. Lewis’ arguments by making rude personal comments about her has proven nothing at all, but certainly his rudeness cannot be cited as evidence that her arguments are correct. Is feminism nothing but a movement to prevent men from saying rude things to women? Are feminists primarily concerned about courtesy? Is “mind your manners” the sum and essence of feminist ideology?

Perhaps Ms. Lewis should give her lectures on civility to the obstreperous feminists who heckled Christian Hoff Sommers during an event this week at the University of Massachusetts:

AMHERST — When three conservatives sought to speak about freedom of speech at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, they drew shouted insults, apparently from students at the state’s premier public university. . . .
Hoff Sommers [was] met with shouts of “racist” from members of the audience even before she spoke. Hoff Sommers, a Democrat and former professor of philosophy at Clark University in Worcester, is the author of numerous books, including “Who Stole Feminism?”, “The War Against Boys” and “One Nation Under Therapy.”
“Stop talking to us like children!” shouted one person from the audience as she tried to begin.
“Stop acting like a child and I will,” replied Hoff Sommers, who is now a resident scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington.
Throughout the evening, audience members interrupted speakers, accused panelists of being racist, yelled catcalls and insulted them while asking questions.

If you have seen video of this event, you know there was one particularly obnoxious female student who kept yelling rude things at the top of her lungs. Professor Sommers addressed her directly:

“I am here to provide some adult supervision. [heckler: “Racist!”] Calm down young lady. The correct word for contemporary Third Wave campus feminism is not cancer, but madness — utter madness.”

After further interruptions, Professor Sommers joked about the heckler, “I invited her here as a demonstration of utter madness.” Someone edited video of the heckler into a looped digital file:

Now, a man might respond to that video clip by remarking that the young woman is unattractive, and that would be a sexist thing to say. (How dare you objectify her with the male gaze?) Of course, the UMass student’s deranged tantrum would be no less offensive if she were good-looking. We have seen this in the case of “Free the Nipple” activist Tiernan Hebron — not a bad-looking woman, but hopelessly crazy, and using feminist rhetoric to rationalize her bizarre and self-destructive behavior.

Arguments must stand on their own merits, rather than being accepted or rejected on the basis of whether the people making the argument are attractive and well-mannered. We should not mistake good looks or good manners for evidence that someone is also wise and honest. And this is what is wrong with Lewis’ Law. People say rude things in Internet comments because this is just a quick and easy way for them to express disapproval. The problem with feminism is that, after more than 40 years of the movement’s increasing influence in our culture, there are very few educated and articulate people who are both (a) adequately qualified to criticize feminism and (b) in a position to publish such criticism.

The fact that my popular @rsmccain Twitter account was suspended after I was accused of “participating in targeted abuse,” shows why articulate critics of feminism are so few. Only because I am a freelance journalist with 30 years’ experience behind me — therefore not dependent on any editor’s approval and utterly unconcerned with damage to my future career prospects — have I been able to undertake the “Sex Trouble” project to research and explain radical feminism. Yet this has not prevented feminists from attempting to silence me by falsely accusing me of “harassment” or other malfeasance. Feminism’s hegemonic control of academia, as demonstrated by the psychotic behavior of UMass feminists when confronted by such critics as Professor Sommers, is a direct target of my research. Under the policies that now prevail on campus, no critic of feminism may be employed as a university professor. This means that our institutions of higher education are now engaged in ideological indoctrination, and every “educated” person is expected to embrace feminism. This has an enormous influence in the news media, where college education is a prerequisite to employment, so that no person skeptical of feminist ideology is likely to be employed as a reporter, editor or producer. To those employed in academia or journalism, feminists have a monopoly on truth, and all critics of feminism are simply ignorant.

Having thus gained control of both the education system and the dominant channels of public communication, feminists now become indignant whenever they encounter any direct expression of opposition: “How dare this person criticize me? This is misogyny! Harassment!”

“Truth is great and will prevail if left to herself . . . she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.”
— Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, 1786

Ideas Have Consequences, as Richard Weaver warned us, and if feminist ideas have harmful consequences, shouldn’t we be allowed to say so? When feminists are publicizing their herpes infections, can critics of feminism not even be allowed to say, “We told you so?”

 

Well, “slut-shaming” is impermissible, according to feminists. This means everyone is required to celebrate promiscuity as “liberation,” and never mind the devastating harms women experience as a result. Our daughters are expected to follow the advice of feminists like Jaclyn Friedman (“I’ve Gone Down and Dirty With Strangers”) and anyone who disapproves of such immoral hedonism is denounced as a misogynist.

Do proponents of good ideas need to silence their critics? Don’t we generally find that those who advocate bad ideas are most intolerant of opposition? Evil can never tolerate good and liars cannot stand the truth. This is why feminism is a synonym for “shut up.”





 


Category: Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 04.28.16

Posted on | April 28, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Feminists, SJWs Flip Out Over U. Washington Cheerleader Tryout Poster
Da Tech Guy: Donald Trump As Hal Chase
The Political Hat: The White Privilege Myth – In Academia, In The Military, And In Incessantly Idiotic Pop Music
Michelle Malkin: Beyonce’s Beehive Of Bombastic Buffoons
Twitchy: Get ‘Em While They’re Hot! Hillary Unveils Latest Fundraising Gimmick
Shark Tank: Rubio’s Push To Extend Venezuela Sanctions


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: New From David Horowitz – Progressive Racism
American Thinker: Stand Up To Left-Wing Activist Bullies
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – Allegiance By Kermit Roosevelt
Don Surber: ICE Releases 208 Murderers
Jammie Wearing Fools: Shocker – Black College Students Busted For Racist “White Power” Drawing
JustOneMinute: Obama Busted
Pamela Geller: Threats Of Throat-Slitting And Slaughter – Christian Persecution In Swedish Asylum Centers
Protein Wisdom: Scripps Students Say Hating White People Is Legitimate
Shot In The Dark: Like Protesting, But For Upper-Class Kenwood/Crocus Hill Matrons
STUMP: Stupidity Roundup – Funded Ratios And Racial Proportions
The Jawa Report: Netroots Guerrilla Marketers Take Down Bernie’s Facebook
The Lonely Conservative: Boehner Thinks Cruz Is “Lucifer” But Trump’s A Great Pal
The Quinton Report: George Takei’s Latest Slur
This Ain’t Hell: And The Hits Just Keep On Coming For The VA
Weasel Zippers: GDP 0.5%
Megan McArdle: Go Ahead, Make Your Own Cronut
Mark Steyn: Captain Quantum Says “I Got Nuttin'”


Shop Amazon Devices – $20 off Kindle Paperwhite

Category: Linkagery

In The Mailbox: 04.27.16

Posted on | April 27, 2016 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Hillary Clinton – Will The Veil Be Lifted?
Da Tech Guy: John Ruberry – Obama The Internationalist Sticks His Nose Into UK Politics
The Political Hat: Table Of Oppression And Privilege Revisited
Michelle Malkin: Never Believe A Hollywood Lib Threatening To Leave America
Twitchy: Professor POTUS Of “Pen And Phone” Fame Tries To Teach GOP Senators Supreme Court 101
Shark Tank: Corrine Brown Appeals Her Case To SCOTUS


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: ICYMI Yesterday – Andrea Tantaros’ Tied up In Knots
American Thinker: Minimum Wage, Maximum Stupidity
BLACKFIVE: War Hawk By James Rollins And Grant Blackwood
Don Surber: Klansmen For Clinton Rise Again
Jammie Wearing Fools: State Department Hid Key Clinton Benghazi E-mail From Judicial Watch
Joe For America: Michelle Obama’s War On Religious Freedom
JustOneMinute: The Desolation Of Smug
Pamela Geller: Muslim Migrant Sex Attacks Increase In Austria
Protein Wisdom: Federal Court Rules That Biological Sex Is A Myth
Shot In The Dark: Some Say A Man Ain’t Happy, Until A Man Truly Dies
STUMP: Public Pensions Roundup – What’s In Meep’s Mailbag?
The Jawa Report: Security Guards Stop Children From Singing National Anthem At 9/11 Memorial
The Lonely Conservative: Wisconsin Establishment Turns On Cruz In Delegate Selection
The Quinton Report: Baltimore Sun Finally Corrects Jack Mehoff Story
This Ain’t Hell: SP4 Jonathan Sweeney Saving The World
Weasel Zippers: EPA Continues To Implement Global Warming Plan Struck Down By Supremes
Megan McArdle: Social Security Or Savings? Um, Try A Little of Both
Mark Steyn: Steyn Versus The Big Climate Enforcers


Shop Amazon – Grow Your Garden
Shop Amazon – Mother’s Day Store

Category: Linkagery

The ‘Oppression’ of the Elite

Posted on | April 27, 2016 | 40 Comments

Scripps College is an elite private women’s school in California with an enrollment of fewer than 1,000 students who pay annual tuition of $49,152. Last summer, two Scripps students “spent approximately 500 hours creating a 217-page ‘Unofficial Scripps Survival Guide’ intended to help new students acclimate to the college,” and this publication included some remarkable claims:

The Scripps Survival Guide defines “White Privilege” as “the set of unearned benefits white people gain as a result of systematic racism and discrimination” that “benefits even those white people who are disadvantaged by other forms of institutionalized oppression like ableism, classism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia.”
The authors add that “asking people of color to educate us about racism,” “asking people of color to absolve us of our guilt,” and “identifying the ways that we are engaging in the perpetuation of white supremacy” are all things that “we need to stop doing right now.” In a section titled “Dear white students,” they elaborate that “[r]everse racism cannot exist because white people maintain power over people of color” and “because there are no institutions that were founded with the intention of discriminating against white people on the basis of their skin [color].” . . .
[C]reating segregated safe spaces is simply “the least we can do” for non-white students.
“Anger is a legitimate response to oppression,” the authors state in their letter to white people, “as is sadness, fear, frustration, exhaustion, and a general distaste or hatred of white people.”

(Hat-tip: Instapundit.) An obvious question: Exactly how much “oppression” can any girl suffer at an elite college like Scripps? Isn’t the very fact that she is enrolled at such a ritzy school testimony to her privileged status? Or is Scripps College awarding full scholarships to underprivileged and downtrodden girls from underclass backgrounds? Are many girls coming “straight outta Compton” to Scripps? And are the other students — the rich girls spending Daddy’s money to the tune of $49,152 a year — so invested in “white supremacy” that “people of color” feel “fear” and “hatred” in their presence? Here’s more:

Jocelyn Gardner ’17 remembers being a bit overwhelmed by orientation as a first-year. “It was hard to absorb everything,” she recalls.
Now Scripps students have an extra resource to help them acclimate to campus life. The first-ever Unofficial Scripps College Survival Guide, a 217-page manual spearheaded by Gardner, is available on The Scripps Voice website. . . .
The idea for the unofficial guide originated with a small group of Scripps students in spring 2015; Gardner, the mental health columnist at The Scripps Voice, began leading the project over the summer. Her roommate, Lucienne Altman-Newell ’17, edited the guide. . . .
“It can take a long time to adjust to a new environment,” Altman-Newell observes. “We want to make sure that first-years have all of the information they need in one place and help them feel like they are already at home here.”

Ms. Gardner and Ms. Altman-Newell, wringing their little hands over “people of color” oppressed by “the perpetuation of white supremacy,” there in their enclave in sunny Southern California, for $49,152 a year.

Scripps College: Teaching Rich Girls to Hate Daddy Since 1926!

 

Category: Education

What Is This? Was #GamerGate About Fake Victims Faking Fake Harassment?

Posted on | April 27, 2016 | 22 Comments

Allum Bokhari at Breitbart:

Was Zoe Quinn GamerGate all along? Or, at least, its so-called “harassing” element — those who were accused of sending anonymous death threats and abuse to the feminist video games designer?
That’s the conclusion drawn by SpliceToday contributor Todd Seavey, after an extraordinary week in which Candace Owens, the founder of an anti-cyberbullying project, accused Quinn and her longtime feminist ally Randi Harper, of instigating a “cyber-terrorist” mob against her.
It should come as no surprise if Harper were involved with online hate-mobs. As Breitbart has highlighted in the past, the feminist web campaigner — who, amazingly, also claims to be an “anti-abuse” activist — has left a trail of victims in her wake around the web. Numerous individuals, ranging from data scientist Chris Von Csefalvay to tech mogul Vivek Wadhwa, have faced massive, coordinated attack campaigns from anonymous Internet users after tangling with Harper. In Csefalvay’s case, these extended to death and rape threats against both him and his wife.
Yet the involvement of Quinn, who has a (slightly) less notorious reputation than Harper, is interesting. For those who missed last year’s GamerGate controversy, Quinn is a feminist video games designer who claims to be one of the foremost victims of online abuse: the target of a year-long campaign of anonymous harassment that she claims “ruined her life.”
As a result of this alleged abuse — for which no-one has been arrested, and has never been traced back to a real person — Quinn has received thousands of dollars in donations from sympathetic users of the crowdfunding site Patreon. She also secured a book deal to write about her ordeal at the hands of anonymous internet meanies, and, despite remaining unpublished, Hollywood executives already want to adapt it into a movie — starring Scarlett Johansson.
Quinn was even invited to the United Nations to discuss her tribulations.
If that’s victimhood, I wonder what its opposite looks like.

Hmmmm. Todd Seavey’s column at SpliceToday:

One unfortunate thing about the battles between online feminists (such as Zoe Quinn) and online anti-feminists (such as the #GamerGate movement) is that explaining them always gets so complicated, in part due to the use of online aliases and fakery. The truth is unlikely to be followed by any normal, sane person who isn’t obsessed with the details.
So here’s the one-paragraph version of the latest (and it’s still longer than one might wish): It appears online feminist Zoe Quinn doesn’t just fake harassment against herself (as was long suspected) but, far more creepily, actively harasses other people. And not just any people but specifically those dedicated to exposing anonymous online harassers—most likely because that would expose Quinn and many of her cronies.

This is a stunning accusation, but not an unreasonable deduction from what happened to Candace Owen and Social Autopsy, evidently targeted by Quinn and Randi Harper for a smear campaign when it appeared that Social Autopsy might rival the Quinn/Harper project Crash Override. If what has been alleged in that incident is true, then Quinn and Harper are certainly willing to use online fakery to attack their enemies, and the possibility that much of the “harassment” attributed to #GamerGate was actually fake — perpetrated by anti-#GamerGate activists in a sort of digital Reichstag fire — is not really all that farfetched.

SJWs Always Lie, as someone has pointed out.

We shall monitor these developments . . .

 


Category: Conspiracy Theories
« go back — keep looking »