The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

The #SanBernardino Massacre

Posted on | December 2, 2015 | 37 Comments

Everybody’s been watching this story develop live on TV:

At least 14 people were dead and another 17 injured in a shooting Wednesday in San Bernardino, California, when multiple gunmen who were heavily armed and “on a mission” opened fire during a function at a center for people with developmental disabilities, police said.
Up to three shooters opened fire around 11 a.m. at the Inland Regional Center, armed with long guns and “came prepared to do what they did as if they were on a mission,” San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said.
The shooting lasted for just “a few minutes” before the suspects, who remained on the loose, may have fled the scene in what Burguan described as a “dark color SUV.” Police have no identification information about the suspects and have not identified a motive.

It is being reported that police killed two of the suspects and that a third suspect escaped on foot, but everything else is sketchy. The motive is the big mystery at this point.

UPDATE: The Los Angeles Times reports:

The shooters, who carried long guns and wore masks and camouflage clothing, opened fire on a holiday party being held by county employees, federal law enforcement sources and a witness told the Los Angeles Times.
An altercation between people attending the gathering may have sparked the assault. A federal law enforcement source said that one of the shooters may have left the party after getting into an argument and returned with one or two armed companions.
The shooting took place in a large conference room on the grounds of the Inland Regional Center, which serves people with developmental disabilities in Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

UPDATE II: Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik Named in #SanBernardino Shooting

 

In The Mailbox: 12.02.15

Posted on | December 2, 2015 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: The Mile High Loser Club
Da Tech Guy: Grifters Know College Endowments Are Where The Money Is
First Street Journal: There’s Something Wrong With This News Story!
The Camp of the Saints: The Left And The Mentally Ill – A Band Of Lunatic Brothers
The Political Hat: A Feminist Epistemology Of Mathematics
Michelle Malkin: Deadly DC – The Land Of No Consequences
Twitchy: Martin O’Malley Already Blaming San Bernardino Shooting On The NRA


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: ISIS Prevents Civilians From Fleeing Ramadi
American Thinker: Israel Beware
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – Cheney One By James Rosen
Conservatives4Palin: Governor Palin Reflects On Her “Toughest Year So Far”
Don Surber: Cutting A Deal With Democrats Costs A Company $500 Million
Jammie Wearing Fools: Democrat Warns Obama’s Incompetence Could Drag Us Into “Devastating Nuclear War”
Joe For America: Law Enforcement Advises To Arm Yourself Against Incoming Religion Of Peace “Refugees”
JustOneMinute: Contrasting Headlines
Pamela Geller: Portland Christmas Tree Bombing Plot By American Muslim Could Have Killed 25,000
Protein Wisdom: Two Weeks After 130 Die In Paris Attack, Obama Proclaims Mass Shootings Only Happen In America
Shot In The Dark: Does Anyone Remember…
The Gateway Pundit: Judge Allows Student Back On Campus After He Threatened To Murder 16 Whites
The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler PSA – Welcome To Bumf**k Egypt
The Lonely Conservative: The Latest On Hillary’s Document Dump
This Ain’t Hell: LGEN Flynn – ISIS Was Ignored Because Of Election Year Narrative
Weasel Zippers: DEVELOPING – Twelve Dead In San Bernardino Shooting – Suspect Named Farooq Saeed
Megan McArdle: “Ban Smoking” Means “Evict Defiant Smokers”
Mark Steyn: The Offset Jet Set


Shop Amazon Fashion – Holiday Gift Guide

Dear @Clementine_Ford …

Posted on | December 2, 2015 | 69 Comments

 

Let’s play a game, you and me. Call it, “Yours and Mine.”

You are in Australia (yours) and I am in America (mine).

You are female (yours) and I am male (mine).

You are a “progressive” (yours) and I am conservative (mine).

It would be a simple gambit, as an opening move in Yours and Mine, for me to say that Australia’s progressive women are all idiots, sluts, dykes, fat, ugly, etc. In response, your move would be to say that American conservative men are all racist, sexist, homophobic theocrats, etc. Let’s skip that, eh? I stipulate, arguendo, that you can out-hate me, and that you excel in accusing anyone who disagrees with you of mala fides. Never has anyone directly criticized Clementine Ford who was not presumed guilty of “misogyny” or some other such Thought Crime.

This mode of discourse — whereby feminists seek to discredit and thus effectively silence all opposition by encouraging the belief that anyone who opposes feminist ideology is not merely wrong, but also evil — is rhetorically dishonest. It is a propaganda tactic, a method of sophistry, and if schools still taught basic logic and rhetoric, I daresay you would be the target of much more effective and devastating criticism than having Michale Nolan call you a “slut”:

A SYDNEY man as been fired from his job as a hotel manager after calling popular feminist writer and commentator Clementine Ford a ‘sl**’ on Facebook.
On Friday, Ms Ford shared a screenshot of her interaction with Michael Nolan with her 80,000 Facebook followers and tagged Mr Nolan’s employer Meriton Apartments in the post.
“I wonder if the folks over at Meriton Apartments are aware that a man listing himself as a supervisor for their business likes to leave comments on women’s Facebook pages calling them sl**s. I wonder if they are also aware that he is a racist,” she wrote. Mr Nolan has posted several racist jokes and memes on his personal Facebook page.
In a statement to Ms Ford, Meriton Apartments said they do not condone Mr Nolan’s behaviour and he has since been let go from his job.
“Michael Nolan was removed from the Meriton site on Saturday 28th November pending an investigation, and as of 2:30pm today 30th November 2015, he no longer works for the Meriton Group,” the statement read. . . .
Ms Ford says she hopes speaking out against online misogyny will reduce the chance of other women receiving abuse online.
“These men don’t get to just go around leaving these kinds of comments and attempting to degrade women just for the hell of it,” she wrote on Facbook last week.
“Why should they get away with it? Why should there be no consequences at all for them? Why should I put up with that?
“There are basically no consequences for men who behave like this, so we have to start making consequences for them.” . . .

Well, you have now defended yourself at some length, but can you answer this: How is the identity-politics mentality of feminism not merely a species of special pleading? Many years ago, to amuse myself, I had fun with idiots on Usenet groups who supposed that a Civil War history forum was a suitable place to impugn the Sacred Honor of Our Fallen Heroes. To choose one side of an argument, and then to unload upon one’s antagonist all the rhetorical ammunition at hand, is a fine sport. Pompously serious fellows like Mark Pitcavage, Ph.D., did not enjoy the way I played the game, but it is not my purpose here to refight those arguments, Ms. Ford. Rather, I recount that ancient Usenet quarrel to explain to you that special pleading in the War of Ideas — arguing vociferously on behalf of one’s own particular tribe — is a phenomenon quite familiar to me. And the problem of our age is this: Certain special pleaders have succeeded in convincing the intelligentsia that their special pleading is synonymous with social justice.

There in Australia, for example, I suppose that Aboriginal Rights is considered by your intelligentsia to be a Holy Crusade. Considering that I have never visited Australia and know next to nothing about your aborigines, I’m sure I could not be fairly accused of hating them. Maybe the aborigines are all fine upstanding citizens, and maybe progressives like yourself are correct to suspect prejudice lurks in the hearts of those ordinary working-class people in Australia who roll their eyes when the media Down Under begin lecturing them (as I imagine the media is prone to do) about the Tragic Plight of the Oppressed Aborigines. Or perhaps, on other occasions, the eye-rolling of ordinary Australians is in reaction to the latest iteration of another theme, the Aboriginal Success Story: “Look here at this fine fellow who, having overcome poverty and prejudice, now has achieved some wonderful thing.”

Such media exercises are not truly journalism, but rather evangelism. This kind of “reporting” is didactic and tendentious and, despite the supposed ignorance of the ordinary Australian at whom such journalistic sermons are preached, the truck driver in Brisbane who sees these Morality Tales of Aboriginal Oppression recognizes he is being lectured, guilt-tripped by well-educated media types who think they are better than him. These moralistic media preachers, in Australia as everywhere else, presume themselves fit to tell the rest of us what to think.

Whatever the Controversial Issue may be this week — immigration or education, poverty or disease, climate change or sexual harassment — it’s always the same thing. Our Moral Superiors™ feel a constant duty to instruct us in the Correct Attitude, as if we are unruly schoolchildren who need to be told for the umpteenth time How to Play Well With Others.

Damn you. Damn you all, and damn your smug sense of superiority.

This, I think, is what Michael Nolan was attempting to express when he went on Facebook to call you a “slut,” Ms. Ford.

What are the everyday problems of Michael Nolan’s life? I don’t know, any more than I know anything about the plight of the Australian aborigines. At a distance of 10,000 miles from Sydney, I cannot hope to inquire among Mr. Nolan’s family, friends and acquaintances to ascertain his general character and reputation, nor to learn what sort of difficulties and hardships he might be dealing with.

What I do know is this: No one amongst Australia’s intellectual class — a class to which you, Clementine Ford, quite prominently belong — gives a damn about Mr. Nolan or anyone like him. The ordinary Australian, who works all day to pay his or her bills, rates so low in the estimation of elitists like yourself that you cannot even be bothered to notice that such people exist, except in those cases where your sadistic impulses compel you to publicly shame and humiliate some fellow like Mr. Nolan whose existence offends you: “Who is this despicable slob who thinks he can say rude things to us and get away with it?” Feminism is always a lecture and never a dialogue. So it is with any other issue that attracts the enthusiasm of the intellectual elite. Our Moral Superiors™ will tell us what to think, and we are expected to praise them for this.

Damn you, and damn your expectations. Damn you all to Hell.

So, Ms. Ford, this is how we play the game of Yours and Mine. Here on my blog, I accuse you of arrogance and sophistry, and you are free to answer this accusation however and wherever you wish.

But you won’t, will you? No, it is beneath the dignity of Clementine Ford to address such an accusation as this from a lowly peon like me. You will pretend that there is no one on the planet who has seen through your transparent charade of superiority. For to acknowledge me — someone who has spotted your intellectual hustle as the shabby trick it is — would call attention to the general question of your own authority as an Arbiter of Correct Thinking. Who are you, ma’am, to tell us what we are allowed to think? What makes you so much better than the rest of us? Where is the proof of your extraordinary virtue, that qualifies you to stand in the pulpit, to condemn everyone else as sinners, and demand that we accept the Gospel of Progressive Salvation?

Damn you, Clementine Ford, and damn your claim to “journalism.” You are selfish and dishonest and, more importantly, you are a vengeful sadist who craves power to punish and humiliate others.

You are a very bad person — you are wicked, evil, corrupt, consumed by your own depravity — and anyone who admires you is a deluded fool. But though I publish this accusation in hope that the whole world will read it, so that they may condemn you as a cruel bully and a cunning liar, I do not expect any answer from you, because that is not how people like you play the game. No, what you seek to do is to dictate the rules of the game, and to decide who is allowed to play, so that You always win and They always lose, and then you and your buddies gather around to congratulate yourselves on how fabulously clever you are.

Damn you, Clementine Ford, and damn all your friends, too.

Game over. Thanks for playing Yours and Mine.

Robert Stacy McCain

 

+ + + + +

This is part of my continuing Sex Trouble series on radical feminism, a project funded by readers in response to the Five Most Important Words in the English Language:

HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!

Whatever you give — $5, $10, $20 — is most sincerely appreciated.




 

In The Mailbox: 12.01.15

Posted on | December 1, 2015 | 4 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: The Architect Back In The Game?
Da Tech Guy: Flashback – John Brown Raid Blamed On Hateful Abolitionist Rhetoric
Michelle Malkin: Self-Congratulatory Climate Warriors Kick Off COP21 In The Most Costly Refrigerator Box of All Time
Twitchy: Guy Benson Fact-Checks Sally Kohn – Bonus – Sally Calls “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” A Mistake


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: Islamic Jihadists Reach Out To “Refugees” In Germany
American Thinker: The Real Scandal(s) Behind The Muslim MU Hair-Dragger
Conservatives4Palin: Obamacare Crumbling Before Our Eyes
Don Surber: Former Intel Chief On Islamic State’s Rise – “We Weren’t Paying Attention”
Jammie Wearing Fools: Clueless Obama On Colorado Springs Shootings – “This Just Doesn’t Happen In Other Countries”
Joe For America: CNN No Longer Even Trying To Hide Their Lies
JustOneMinute: Misquote And Mock
Pamela Geller: Putin Accuses Turkey Of Shooting Down Russian Plane To Defend ISIS Oil Supplies
Protein Wisdom: Eight Killed, Twenty Wounded Over Thanksgiving
Shot In The Dark: Just Curious
The Gateway Pundit: Obama Confident Next President Will Be Democrat – “I’m Confident In Wisdom Of The American People”
The Jawa Report: Imperial Good News – Mohammed Mahmoud Is Dead, Jim!
The Lonely Conservative: Former Top NY Dem Found Guilty On All Counts
This Ain’t Hell: White House To Send More Troops Into Combat Against ISIS
Weasel Zippers: No, Ted Cruz Did Not Say The Colorado Springs Shooter Was A Transgendered Leftist
Megan McArdle: Winning The Driverless Car Wars
Mark Steyn: House Calls For Jihadists


12 Days of Deals – TV, Video, Audio

In The Mailbox: 11.30.15

Posted on | November 30, 2015 | 6 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: GOPe Panic
American Irony: The Liberal Insult Generator
The Political Hat: Modern Educayshun
Doug Powers: Former NYC Mayor With Multiple Mansions And Jets Calls Ted Cruz “Crazy” For Not Accepting Climate Change “Reality”
Twitchy: Oklahoma Wesleyan President Applauded For Wake-Up Call to Special Snowflakes


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: Oxford U. Women’s Rugby Team Strips Down For Charity
American Thinker: Islam, Rape, And The Fate Of Western Women
Conservatives4Palin: The Curious Case Of Black Advocates And MSM Hate For Dr. Ben Carson
Don Surber: If Abortion Is A Right, Why Can’t CNN Say It?
Jammie Wearing Fools: In Effort To Fight So-Called Climate Change, Obama Recycles Dire Predictions
Joe For America: Rahm Emanuel Should Resign Now
JustOneMinute: The Most Transparent Administration EVER!
Pamela Geller: Police – U. Missouri Professor Beat Teenage Relative For Not Wearing Hijab
Protein Wisdom: And As 2015 Draws To A Close, We Have Another Darwin Award Nominee! Congrats California!
Shot In The Dark: Komissar Kim Norton, MkKarthyist
The Gateway Pundit: 14,000 Illegal Immigrants Disappear From Sweden Without A Trace
The Jawa Report: Um Jihadi Not Proud
The Lonely Conservative: Good News – Judge Rules Against Teenager’s Global Warming Lawsuit
This Ain’t Hell: Gun Control And The Colorado Springs Shooting
Weasel Zippers: More Than A Year After His Death, Michael Brown Lies Without A Headstone
Megan McArdle: What Really Scares Helicopter Parents
Mark Steyn: Premature Explodiation


12 Days of Deals – Office Products

The Feminist Fear Factor

Posted on | November 30, 2015 | 71 Comments

Feminists @JaclynF, @PennyRed, @AmandaMarcotte know you fear them!

The blogger at Dark Brightness has a post describing the “politicization of phobia” as a Nigerian email scam. He links me — thanks! — and also links Vox Day quoting Jack Donovan:

Progressives only have one good trick, and men keep falling for it.
They keep calling you a coward, so that you’ll do or say whatever they want to prove that you are not a coward.
If they want you to accept a group of outsiders, they call you a xenophobe to dismiss any rational concerns you might have about the motivations of strangers. . . .
If you reject any demand made by any woman, you’re “just afraid of a strong woman.” This accusation has been repeated so many times that a substantial portion of the population actually seems to believe that men are at the very core of their being constitutionally terrified by any woman with “attitude.” . . .

You can read the whole thing. The claim that critics of feminism are afraid of “strong women” is as easy to disprove as this: Have you ever met my wife? Or, have you ever seen my wife angry? Trust me, you don’t want to see her angry. Yet my wife is also cheerful, kind-hearted and generous, whereas feminists are resentful, cruel and selfish — they are simply bad people, which is why everybody hates feminism. It is a shabby hustle, a three-card monte game, for unhappy women to claim that their anti-social personality traits are actually virtues.

Feminists routinely engage in moral reversals, psychological projections, and self-serving rationalizations. The woman whose hostile, domineering, my-way-or-the-highway attitude makes her unpopular — she had few friends in childhood and, as an adult, is often alienated from her parents and siblings — resorts to the flattering rationalization that she is “strong,” and that others are envious or fearful of her strength. Similarly, a feminist will rationalize her promiscuity as “empowering” and claim that anyone who disapproves of such whorishness is envious or fearful of women’s sexual power. Perhaps the greatest of these fraudulent tropes, however, is the feminist’s claim that her membership in an identity-politics groupthink mob — the True Believer in a Mass Movement rigidly defined by a collectivist ideology — proves how independent-minded she is! What is most insulting about feminist tactics (which very much resemble DARVO Syndrome) is their arrogant assumption that the rest of us are so stupid we can’t see through their bogus intellectual three-card monte hustle.

An experimental suggestion: Go on Twitter and send a link to this post to a prominent feminist — Jaclyn Friedman, Laurie Penny, Amanda Marcotte, et al. — and ask her to respond to it. Does she deny that the feminist movement is a three-card monte hustle wherein unhappy women use reversals, projections and rationalizations to explain their own misery, to justify their own anti-social traits and to excuse their own failures by shifting blame to others? In other words, impugn her motives, just as feminists do to their critics — whom they invariably accuse of “misogyny” and other such Thought Crimes — and see if she is willing and able to defend herself against accusations of intellectual fraud.

Good luck with your experiment. After the feminist blocks you on Twitter, you might try logging out of your account and checking her timeline to see if she’s complaining about “harassment,” which is a feminist synonym for criticism. Feminism is always a lecture and never a dialogue. The feminist is a totalitarian, who is never willing to debate her critics, but instead always seeks to silence her critics.

It is entirely rational to fear feminism, as anyone must fear the sound of jackboots marching through streets covered in broken glass.

Opposition to feminism is not a result of ignorance, but of knowledge, arising not from an irrational “phobia,” but from an understanding of what deceitful monsters feminists truly are.

+ + + + +

My research into radical feminism is funded by readers in response to the Five Most Important Words in the English Language:

HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!

Whatever you give — $5, $10, $20 — is most sincerely appreciated.





 

Rule 5 Sunday: Them Ain’t Turkeys, Them Are Ducks

Posted on | November 29, 2015 | 10 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

As promised, the post-Thanksgiving Rule 5 Sunday contains no turkeys (well, none that I know of, though EBL may have tucked a few mutants into her links) but instead a fine collection of pulchritudinous Ducks, namely the young ladies of the University of Oregon’s cheerleading squad. As usual, many of the links below lead to pages that may be NSFW; the management is not responsible for any ill effects on your relationships, employment, or wrist joints caused by clicking on those links at the wrong time – or at any time, for that matter.

Possibly the only women in western Oregon without visible tattoos or piercings.

Leading off this week is Politically Incorrect Conservative, who serves up Rule 5 Texas BBQ style, and also second helpings. Goodstuff chips in with Diana Rigg and the golden age of futurism with Sharon Stone. At Ninety Miles from Tyranny, it’s Morning Mistress, Hot Pick of the Late Night (with bonus beautiful gals!) and Girls with Guns; second helpings were also served up: Morning Mistress (Patriotic Double Trouble!), Hot Pick of the Late Night, and more Girls With Guns. Animal Magnetism had Rule 5 Friday I and II (has atlatl content), as well as the Saturday Gingermageddon with extra ginger. The Last Tradition serves up Eva Marcille, Gigi Hadid, Emanuela De Palma, and Anna Lynne McCord. First Street Journal proclaims Vive le France! and carries on with the Marseillaise.

EBL’s herd this week includes Judy Garland, Ella Fitzgerald, Yoga, Shirley Jones, Melissa Rauch, the late Sabra Kesinovic, Katherine Timpf, Okie Cheerleaders, and Rosemary Clooney.

A View from the Beach brings us Another Fish Monger – Luiza BarrosThe Ginger Terror ThreatBroomstraw Controversy Roils Curling World“Bartender”Wednesday WakeupGone Fishing. . .Misremembering the 90sInterpol Chief Commits HeresyCan the Redskins Defrock the Saints?“Wherever Is Your Heart”, Holy Cannoli – Elisabetta CanalisJeggings?Have a Good Thanksgiving!I Just Hope This Doesn’t Affect Clothing SalesFalse AdvertisingSci-Fi Sweety Hit With Alimony and Child SupportHow Sarah Palin Made Adele a StarCan the Redskins Defang the Panthers?, and “Crossing Muddy Waters”.

Postaldog returns with a double dose of Maitland Ward, Lizzy Cundy, Rose McGowan, Kendall Jenner, and Melissa Reeves.

Soylent Siberia serves up your weekly coffee creamer at the Bistro D’Bodaciousness, Monday Motivationer Easy Rider, Tuesday Titillation Indira, Humpday Hawtness Rachel, Vintage Fursday Classic Monique, Latent Lingerie with Cocktails, T-GIF Friday, Weekender Clam Buffet, and Bath Night with Leonard’s Lesbians. For an encore, Military Bearing, Monday Motivationer Penthouse View, Tuesday Titillation, Humpday Hawtness Kimber, Have A Soylent Thanksgiving!, Latent Lingerie, and Weekender Archetype.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babes were Paulette Goddard and Hope Solo, his Vintage Babes were Ingrid Pitt and a squad of seven, Sex in Advertising was covered by Elsa Pataky and Marilyn Monroe, plus the obligatory 49ers cheerleaders for the bye week and week 12! At Dustbury, it was Mary Nolan, Taraji Henson, Rakul Preet Singh, and Chase Kennedy.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery! Dealine to submit links to the Rule 5 Wombat mailbox for next week’s Rule 5 roundup is midnight on Saturday, December 5.


Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop

Is @Moloch_God Really Leading #SMOD & Cthulhu In The 2016 Apocalypse Race?

Posted on | November 29, 2015 | 17 Comments

by Smitty

The apocalyptic candidate scene has been roiled by recent news events and polling, with SMOD and Cthulhu suffering brutal, senseless damage to their support. SMOD campaign manager Magnus McCrater was doing a minor version of that sweet meteor’s meltdown with the news of the new apocalyptic candidate, Moloch: “What is this cheap piece of human manufacture, this Moloch? How can a candidate focus on the votes of people that are denied legal status of any sort, much less the vote?”

Cthulhu’s campaign was equally derisive, we think, if High Priest Mephistopheles von Badenworsen is to be understood. By anyone sane: “Oh, sure, you fools can get a piece of the rock [SMOD], and you can dally with the iron stove that eats kids [Moloch], but rest assured, Cthulhu will devour all of you, body, mind, and soul! Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn! Ahahahahahah!”

What, precisely, are they worried about? A recent Spew poll in Iowa shows that the comparatively young candidate Moloch, only being as old as recorded history, surging in popularity, with:
Moloch: 31%
SMOD: 29%
Cthulhu: 22%
SMBH: 3%
Undecided, but committed to nihilism in general: 15%

Cutting open a few voters to look at the steaming internals, the reasons were as messy as the entrails:

  • Moloch has a strong track record of delivering death, with well over 50 million slain since Roe v. Wade in 1973. Piled on top of a heap of small human parts at his Planned Parenthood altars, Moloch has found turning name recognition into support a trivial exercise.
  • Cthulhu is as old as time. SMOD is thought to be relatively young on the geologic time scale. The SMBH, while malevolent on a galactic scale, is mostly a talking point for astrophysicists who’ve suffered bad divorces. Moloch, then is the O’Malley of the doomsday set. (We should note that the Doomsday Machine, itself, is rumored to be courted by more than one campaign in a Vice Presidential/cleanup role.)
  • The SMOD’s tragectory is still being recalculated; it’s by no means certain that The Asteroid can make the inaugural, especially with that little wedgie and the flying saucers shooting at it.
  • Meanwhile, Cthulhu’s High Priest states that Cthulhu’s Atrocity Accounting staff is still quibbling over American involvement in destabilizing the Middle East. At issue is whether that means ISIS atrocities can be counted in the overall senseless destruction needed to wrest Cthulhu from his malevolent dreaming in time to campaign. Supporters retaining a modicum of sanity are starting to wonder if Cthulhu is in it to win it in 2016, or merely offering a diabolical tease.

This blog, while previously a staunch Cthulhu supporter (lesser evils being such a bore) has shifted support to Moloch:

« go backkeep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin