FMJRA 2.0: Walking In The Shadow of The Big Man
Posted on | December 26, 2015 | 2 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
Rule 5 Sunday: Pre-Christmas Shopping Frenzy Edition
Animal Magnetism
Ninety Miles from Tyranny
A View from the Beach
Proof Positive
Batshit Crazy News
You’re Too ‘Empowered,’ Darling
The Pirate’s Cove
First Street Journal
FMJRA 2.0: Achtung Baby
The Pirate’s Cove
A View from the Beach
Batshit Crazy News
What Went Through The Moderator’s Mind At The #DemDebate
Batshit Crazy News
Off To The Side
Batshit Crazy News
The Feminist-Industrial Complex: Guilt and Queer Theory in Wisconsin
Something Fishy
Living In Anglo-America
Victims of ‘Cissexist Heteropatriarchy’
Dark Brightness
The Daley Gator
Batshit Crazy News
RETURN OF THE BRIDE OF THE SON OF THE BEAST OF LIVE AT FIVE 12.21.15 CONQUERS THE MARTIANS
Batshit Crazy News
The Feminist-Industrial Complex: Lesbians ‘Learning How to Scream’
Living In Anglo-America
First Street Journal
Batshit Crazy News
In The Mailbox, 12.22.15
Proof Positive
Batshit Crazy News
LIVE AT FIVE: 12.23.15
A View from the Beach
Proof Positive
Batshit Crazy News
The Elite Who Are Destroying America
First Street Journal
BlurBrain
Bruce Hanify
Batshit Crazy News
LIVE AT FIVE: 12.24.15
Proof Positive
The ‘Brilliant’ Fool McGeorge Bundy
Batshit Crazy News
Donkey Cartel, R.I.P.
Batshit Crazy News
‘Intense and Overwhelming Narcissism’
The Pirate’s Cove
Batshit Crazy News
Top linker this week:
- Batshit Crazy News (13)
Thanks to everyone for their linkagery!
Shop Amazon – Year End Deals on Magazines
Doxed Lives Matter
Posted on | December 26, 2015 | 32 Comments
Alonda Cano (@People4Alondra) says her critics are racist.
The tactic of “doxing” — publishing someone’s home address and other personal information on the Internet in order to expose them to harassment — was made notorious by hackers associated with the “Anonymous” conspiracy. Vox Day explains how “social justice warriors” (SJWs) use these scorched-earth tactics:
The fact is that SJWs are out to disqualify, discredit, and disemploy everyone who does not share their dedication to social justice ideals. . . . Cross them, even inadvertently, and they will attempt to destroy you, your career, and your family.
A Democrat in Minnesota has adopted this attitude:
A Minneapolis City Council member is drawing criticism for what some see as an effort to publicly shame constituents who objected to her involvement in Wednesday’s Black Lives Matter rally at the Mall of America and the airport.
Council Member Alondra Cano, who represents the Ninth Ward, has been accused of “doxing” — posting personal information about people who criticized her for supporting the Black Lives Matter events — on Twitter.
Stephen Dent, who said he had previously contributed to Cano’s campaign, wrote to her and told Cano she was unfit to serve on the council by “closing private property” and “supporting illegal actions.”
Cano then tweeted Dent’s email address and phone number to her roughly 2,000 followers.
“What she did to me and others put a huge chill on our democratic society,” Dent said in a phone interview early Thursday. “It has broken my trust with public officials in the city of Minneapolis.” . . .
Dent said that as a 62 year old gay man he understands discrimination and is sympathetic to the aims of Black Lives Matter but does not believe Cano should have been participating in the protests.
As for posting his cell phone and email address, “I understand the law allows her to do this. But what she did was unethical,” said Dent, who said he is an organizational psychologist and author. He said he has filed an ethics complaint with the city.
Via Memeorandum. More at Powerline, Gateway Pundit and Daily Caller.
‘Intense and Overwhelming Narcissism’
Posted on | December 25, 2015 | 78 Comments
Feminists coined the term “Peak Trans Moment” to describe the point at which they became disgusted with transgender ideology. One woman who related her experiences complained that transgender activists “expect to co-opt feminist time and attention away from their own issues to trans issues, and they expect it as their right.” Why aren’t transgender activists supportive of women?
Their intense and overwhelming narcissism won’t allow it, and anyway, they have no genuine concern for women, because women are nothing more than a sexual resource to them.
These are the same kind of men who transition, identify as a “lesbian”, and then immediately expect some kind of Welcome Wagon gift basket of sex for it.
In other words, the transgender movement is about selfishness and entitlement, and these misguided men in dresses exploit “feminism” as a means to recruit women to participate in their delusional fantasies. Having their counterfeit womanhood accepted by women is an essential part of the transgender fetish. Relating the story of “a very socially-awkward man who had never had a successful relationship with a woman” before deciding to “transition,” the feminist summarizes the psychology of what we might call Transgender Rage Syndrome:
They feel like failures as men; well, what is a woman to them but a failed man? Therefore they must be “women.” And being a woman is a life on easy mode according to them, so after they transition they start to get angry. Where is all of the constant fawning attention they were expecting? Where are the pajama parties and makeovers and shoe-shopping and cocktails with the “girls” that’s owed to them? Why are their expectations and needs not a constant priority with the women they meet?
This is an insightful analysis, but where did transgender activists get their ideas of using “gender” as a weapon to manipulate others? Where did this victimhood mentality originate? Oh, that’s right — feminism.
If “the personal is political,” as Carol Hanisch said, who can define the limits of this ideology? If radical feminism is just the rationalization of personal grievance — a means of converting hurt feelings into a political “cause” — then what kind of reactions would we expect, as the logical obverse, from men who “feel like failures as men”? A proliferation of perversity and insanity, perhaps?
Radical feminists are complaining about the unintended consequences of a social revolution they have deliberately fomented, but who is to blame for their failure to study history? They are quite like those Bolsheviks — Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Bukharin — who were later purged and murdered by Stalin. “The dictatorship of the proletariat” was a more brutal tyranny than the Tsarist regime. The Bolsheviks had endorsed the annihilation of the Romanovs, and had no legitimate defense when they themselves were targeted for annihilation in The Great Terror.
Those who invoke “social justice” and “equality” as the slogans of revolution seldom consider such sobering lessons of history. Other revolutionaries no less determined (and, in their own minds, no less well-intentioned) have been responsible for creating the most deadly nightmares in human history and many revolutionaries were killed by the monstrous dictatorships they helped create.
That a feminist revolution might have negative consequences for women — including feminists themselves — should have been obvious long ago. In 1995, Wellesley College economics professor Julie Matthaei (“a Marxist living in a modern-day commune in Cambridge”) published a treatise called “The Sexual Division of Labor, Sexuality, and Lesbian/Gay Liberation: Toward a Marxist-Feminist Analysis of Sexuality in U.S. Capitalism,” which is included in the 2007 textbook anthology Queer Economics edited by Joyce Jacobsen and Adam Zeller. Professor Mattaei argues (pp. 217-218):
The feminist movement of the 1970s and 1980s was closely linked to lesbianism. On the one hand, lesbians had a higher stake than heterosexual married women in accessing well-paid jobs, since lesbians did not have access to “family wages” through husbands. Furthermore, lesbians . . . were less fearful of losing their “womanhood” and attractiveness to men if they took on “men’s jobs” than were heterosexual women. Thus lesbians made up a disproportionate part of the ranks of feminists among all class and racial-ethnic groups. . . .
Furthermore, feminist analysis and the movement . . . have resulted in the “coming out” of many involved. First, feminists developed a critique of the sexual division of labor and of gender roles as being both restrictive to all and oppressive to women. Second, they directly criticized heterosexual marriage because of its subordination of women to men as unpaid servants and sexual objects. Third, many feminists put forth lesbianism as a viable alternative — even, some argued, the appropriate feminist choice, a form of resistance to patriarchy that is more symmetrical and egalitarian than heterosexuality. . . . Many of the leading early feminist theorists — such as Adrienne Rich, Andrea Dworkin, Gayle Rubin, Charlotte Bunch, Mary Daly, Audre Lorde, Barbara Smith, Cherrie Moraga, and Susan Griffin — were “out” lesbians. Fourth, feminism has brought like-minded women together as coparticipants in support and action groups, providing them with potential sexual/love partners.
In other words, feminist movement has encouraged women to challenge and even deviate from traditional gender roles; it has highlighted the oppressiveness of traditional heterosexuality, it has supported and even advocated lesbianism as an option for women; it has encouraged women to pursue “men’s” jobs . . . that allow them to survive economically without men; and it has brought women in close and cooperative contact with other like-minded women.
What this Marxist economist is saying, quite directly, is something that should be obvious to any intelligent student of the feminist movement, i.e., lesbians had a particular motive for attacking “men’s jobs” and “family wages,” and this economic motive explains why so many “early feminist theorists” were lesbians. However, if you do not share this lesbian-feminist hostility to “the oppressiveness of traditional heterosexuality,” then feminism’s attack on the economics of “family wages” becomes problematic. If you are a woman who hopes that your husband will be able to support you and your children on his salary alone — especially during the crucial period when your children are infants and toddlers — the feminist economic agenda is directly hostile to your interests. Feminist demands for “equality” amount to a demand (often justified by a rhetoric of “diversity”) that no man should ever be hired for “well-paid jobs” if any qualified female applicant is available. The economic agenda of feminism is about achieving “equality” through deliberate discrimination against males, and the preponderance of women in higher education (where female students are 57% of undergraduate enrollment) is just one example of how successful feminists have been in promoting anti-male discrimination.
Few critics of feminism ever pursue the subject to the theoretical level of analysis that Professor Matthaei provides, and thus never question the movement’s basic premise. Does “the sexual division of labor” in marriage really cause the “subordination of women to men as unpaid servants and sexual objects”? If so, doesn’t this suggest, as Professor Mattaei and others have argued, that feminist “equality” can only be achieved if women reject heterosexuality, per se?
Whatever your opinion of Professor Matthei’s analysis, such theories are widely accepted within academic feminism, and the question at issue is how men are likely to react when confronted by the consequences of these theories. Feminism’s success means that the economic basis of heterosexual relationships has been undermined, so that fewer men have sufficient income to support wives and children. The supply-and-demand mechanism of the marriage market has been drastically altered. Without “the sexual division of labor,” there is less basis for cooperative partnerships between men and women. In recent decades, the logic of marriage has been sabotaged by an ideological regime of androgynous “equality” that has the effect of fostering implacable hostility between men and women. Feminism demands destruction of the social order, and this predictably leads to the “war of all against all” (bellum omnium contra omnes) as Hobbes called it.
That many men have reacted badly to this should not surprise us. Most men do not understand feminism because most feminists are purposefully dishonest about what feminism really is and what they mean by “equality.” The ridiculous posture of Emma Watson as spokeswoman for the United Nations “He for She” campaign — telling men that feminism will actually help men, too — is typical of the deceptive propaganda about “equality” that the feminist movement employs. Feminists seek to confuse men and deceive them into supporting an anti-male movement, and many young men foolishly accept feminism’s “equality” rhetoric as if it were sincere.
One men’s rights activist (MRA) asked the question, “Why Is It Harder For Men To Challenge Their Sex Role Than It Has Been For Women?” We can answer this question quite easily: Failure is not attractive.
Women are attracted to successful men, and the competitive drive for success is therefore intrinsic to men’s “sex role.” Every attempt to escape this logic is doomed. The “very socially-awkward man who had never had a successful relationship with a woman” will find that pursuing a “transgender” delusion does not solve his problem. Winners win and losers lose and, ultimately, no political agenda can change this.
What are we to make of the spectacle of transgender weirdos with “no genuine concern for women,” whose bizarre fetishes are inspired by “intense and overwhelming narcissism”? Is it not true, in some sense, that these monsters have been created by feminists who “developed a critique . . . of gender roles”? It would be no trouble to cite the passages from Kate Millett’s Sexual Politics (1970), Shulamith Firestone’s The Dialectic of Sex (1970) and Andrea Dworkin’s Woman Hating (1974) which endorse the belief that there are no natural differences between men and women. If these feminist pioneers were correct, then why can’t a man be a woman? Or why shouldn’t feminists be expected to celebrate transgenderism as “a form of resistance to patriarchy”?
The false premises of feminist theory produce these contradictions, and yet feminists refuse to acknowledge or take responsibility for the problems that they themselves have caused. Feminists are dishonest, selfish and cruel. No feminist has ever actually believed in “equality,” a slogan they only invoke to legitimize their limitless hatred for men.
Feminism is irrational, because hate is always irrational.
Exactly how are feminists ranting about the oppressive patriarchy different from anti-Semites ranting about a Zionist conspiracy?
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 24, 2015
Donkey Cartel, R.I.P.
Posted on | December 24, 2015 | 58 Comments
Another promising young performance artist has been slain by social injustice and pistol fire, but mainly it was pistol fire:
Daquan Westbrook, a rapper with an extensive arrest record, has been identified as the man killed in an officer-involved shooting at Northlake Mall in Charlotte, North Carolina, on Christmas Eve.
Mr. Westbrook, 18, was a rapper who performed as “Donkey Cartel” and released a mixtape titled “Convicted Felon With a Weapon,” the cover of which shows him in a prison cell wearing an orange jumpsuit and making hand signs. . . .
Mr. Westbrook had a lengthy history of run-ins with the police, his record including at least 11 arrests since 2013, one of them related to the shooting of a 12-year-old boy.
According to the Charlotte Observer, the most recent arrests were in October and “were related to drugs, larceny and resisting arrest.”
A shoe store manager in the mall told CNN that the gunfight that prompted an off-duty officer to kill the gunman began when a group of people “ganged up” to attack a man.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief Kerr Putney said at a Thursday evening news conference that while he could not specifically say the shooting was gang-related, the altercation involved two groups with a history of feuding. . . .
The subjects involved all have a history of gun violence, he said.
Chief Putney said Mr. Westbrook was carrying a gun and pointed it at Officer Thomas Ferguson when the off-duty policeman tried to break up the fight, at which several shots were fired. Several guns were found at the scene, Chief Putney said.
The officer then killed Mr. Westbrook.
Merry Christmas and R.I.P., Donkey Cartel.
The ‘Brilliant’ Fool McGeorge Bundy
Posted on | December 24, 2015 | 53 Comments
Just yesterday, in describing the decadence of the Ivy League elite, I casually mentioned McGeorge Bundy, a Yale-educated policy “expert” in the JFK/LBJ administrations who played a prominent role in creating the Vietnam War debacle:
A descendant of the Boston Lowells on his mother’s side, a product of Groton, Yale and Skull and Bones, and a Harvard dean in his early 30’s, Mr. Bundy was the very personification of what the journalist David Halberstam, in the title of his 1969 book, labeled “The Best and the Brightest”: the well-born, confident intellectuals who led the nation into the quagmire of Vietnam.
After leaving Government in 1965, Mr. Bundy became president of the Ford Foundation, serving until 1979. He was then a professor of history at New York University for 10 years. In 1990, he joined the Carnegie Corporation of New York. He was chairman of its committee on reducing the danger of nuclear war and was its scholar-in-residence at the time of his death [in 1996].
“He was a man of notable brilliance, integrity and patriotic purpose,” said the historian Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., who served in the Kennedy White House with Mr. Bundy and counted him among his oldest friends.
McGeorge Bundy was a blundering fool. This cannot be repeated often enough. The “notable brilliance” of these “confident intellectuals” is always dangerous. McGeorge Bundy was a clever exponent of bad ideas, and the fact that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. was willing to praise such a fool tells you that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. was also a fool. Our understanding of history is warped by the tendency of liberals to protect each other’s reputations. Merely by supporting the Democrat Party and advocating liberal policies, any prominent fool can guarantee that he will be praised by the liberals who control academia and mainstream journalism. Only when you are aware of this bias and are always vigilantly on guard against pro-Democrat propaganda, can you read history critically, separating actual facts from liberal spin. But I digress . . .
After referencing Bundy in my discussion of the decadent elite Wednesday morning, I had no thought of following up, but late Wednesday night, while doing further research on radical feminism (checking the background of a Women’s Studies professor named Susan Hartmann), I stumbled onto a blog article titled “Explaining Patriarchal Funding of Feminism.” Included there was a link to a 2004 article by Kimberly Schuld, “How the Ford Foundation Created Women’s Studies”:
Women’s Studies professor and feminist author Susan M. Hartmann credits the Ford Foundation with being a substantive force that created the feminist movement. . . . It is safe to say that without the Ford Foundation, feminism would not have been successful in gaining such a strong foothold in academia, and by extension, politics. . . .
The first [Women’s Studies] program was established at San Diego State University for the 1969-70 school year and in 1970 there were approximately 100 women’s studies courses being offered at schools across the country. By 1971, more than 600 courses were being taught and by 1978 there were 301 full-fledged programs in operation. That number more than doubled to 621 programs by 1990.
In 1971, a group of feminists approached Ford president McGeorge Bundy with a request to involve itself in the feminist movement the way it had in the Civil Rights movement, essentially, creating it out of whole cloth. The result of those early discussions was a full-fledged women’s project to fund the small number of existing women’s advocacy organizations, and also to create a whole new field within academia known as “women’s studies.” In 1972, Ford announced the first $1 million national fellowship program for “faculty and doctoral dissertation research on the role of women in society and Women’s Studies broadly construed.” A 1996 article by Heather MacDonald reported that women’s studies programs had received $36 million between 1972-1992 from Ford and other foundations.
During a two-decade period, major foundations poured an average of $1.8 million annually into Women’s Studies programs, and the man who did the most to create this tax-exempt academic feminist boondoggle was none other than “brilliant” McGeorge Bundy.
Vietnam wasn’t the only quagmire he created, and perhaps not the worst. No ordinary fool can out-blunder a Yale-educated fool.
Excellent essay from @rsmccain "The Elite Who Are Destroying America"
https://t.co/2eKfv8rGfe
— M.Joseph Sheppard (@MJosephSheppard) December 23, 2015
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools …" https://t.co/cdkP3qkJJV @NorBdelta @instapundit
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 23, 2015
LIVE AT FIVE: 12.24.15
Posted on | December 24, 2015 | 9 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
IRAQI ASSAULT ON RAMADI STALLED BY DAESH DEFENSES

Iraqi troops carry the national flag as they patrol in a neighborhood in south Ramadi
General Sheghati says troops working to defuse mines, IEDs; Defense Ministry adviser says clearing may take 2-3 days
Iraqi forces evacuate civilians in Ramadi
Several Arrested In #Blacklivesmatter Protest At Minneapolis Airport
More dirtbags arrested in LA for blocking Highway 405
Rahul Gandhi Attacks PM Modi Over Azad Suspension
Demands probe into alleged cricket corruption, involvement of finance minister
POLITICS
Rand Paul Tweets Annual Festivus Airing Of Grievances

“I got a lot of problems with you people, and now you’re gonna hear about them!”
Homeland Security Gearing Up For Year-End Deportation Raids
Poll: Trump 21 Points Up On Cruz In National Poll
Chamber Of Commerce Challenges New EPA Ozone Standard In Court
Feds Seize Over $1 Million In Cash From Disgraced Mass. Pol’s Safe Deposit Boxes
WaPo Pulls Cartoon Depicting Cruz’ Daughters As Trained Monkeys
TX Gov Abbott Orders Non-Religious Nativity Scene Removed From Capitol Rotunda
Incoming Democrat Governor Pushes To Gut Louisiana Food Stamp Reforms
Defense Dept. Downplays Daesh Capabilities After Report Of Air Defense Missiles
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
U.S. Crude Rises In Asian Trade As Supplies Tighten, Exports Loom: WTI $37.74, Brent $37.60
Holiday Shoppers Love The Gift That’s Never Returned
Confidence Rises To Five-Month High As Americans Cheer Discounts
Hyatt Hotels Attacked With Payment-Card Stealing Malware
U.S. New Home Sales Weaker Than Forecast For November
Disney CEO’s Pay Drops Three Percent – To $45 Million
YouTube Lashes Out At T-Mobile For Throttling Data Streams
Struggle Over “Free Basics” Internet Service Escalates In India
ASUS To Ship Smartphones With AdBlock Plus Enabled By Default In 2016
Super Mario Galaxy Lands On The Wii U Virtual Console
Uncharted 4 Delayed To April 26
SPORTS
Warriors Handle Jazz, Remain Unbeaten At Home

Klay Thompson scores 20 for the Warriors
Utah fades in fourth quarter, falls 103-85
Is Kirk Cousins Worth A Big Contract For Redskins?
Mavs Edge Nyets In OT, 119-118
Saban: I Don’t Ever See Myself Leaving Alabama
Pelicans Snap Streak, Beat Blazers 115-89
Miesha Tate: Rousey’s Going To Fall To Holm Again
Thunder Rout Lakers At Home, 120-85
Nats Talking To Murphy, Kendrick About Second Base?
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
No, Courteney Cox And Will Arnett Aren’t Dating

Just friends, okay?
She’s still working on relationship with Snow Patrol rocker Johnny McDaid
Reality TV Star Teresa Giudice Released From Prison
Gary U.S. Bonds Rocks The Markets
Judge Forces Madonna’s Son To Spend The Holidays With Her
Charlie Sheen Vows To Cure AIDS
Another Trespasser Arrested At Chris Brown’s House
Jake Gyllenhaal’s “Mystery Woman” Revealed
Stacey Dash Goes To Police Over Twitter Hack – “I Won’t Be A Victim”
FOREIGNERS
Japan Court Clears Way To Restart Kansai Electric Reactors
Thai Court Sentences Migrants To Death For British backpackers’ Murder
Fire At Saudi Hospital Kills 25; 107 Injured
Christmas Celebrations Banned In Brunei, Somalia, Tajikistan
U.S. Embassy In Beijing Warns of Christmas Threats Against Westerners
Suspected Boko Haram Jihadis Attack Villages In Chad, Cameroon, And Niger
Violence Makes For A Solemn Christmas In Bethlehem
PM Cameron To Look Into U.S. Denial Of Entry To British Muslims
U.N. Security Council Endorses Libya Peace Deal, National Unity Government
Japan Approves Record Defense Budget As China Concern Grows
BLOGS & STUFF
EBL: Santa Paul
Louder With Crowder: A Thorough Rebuttal Of The Young Turks – Defending The Second Amendment
Doug Powers: A Presidency About Nothing – White House Steps Up Anti-Daesh Effort With Obama/Seinfeld Pairing
Twitchy: WaPo Makes Soldiers’ Deaths In Afghanistan All About Obama
American Power: British Muslim Denied Entry To U.S. Linked To Taliban, Al-Qaeda On Facebook
American Thinker: Psychological Warfare For Conservatives
Conservatives4Palin: Obamacare Officials Downplay Insurer Losses
Don Surber: My Christmas Gift To My Readers
Jammie Wearing Fools: Obama Celebrates “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, Fails To Mention Lesbian Air Force Officer Killed In Afghanistan
Joe For America: War On Christmas Continues – VA Tears Down Christmas Banner, Baby Jesus
JustOneMinute: They’re Not All Pajama Boys
Pamela Geller: FBI Sued For Civil Rights Violations For Surveilling Muslims Near San Bernardino
Protein Wisdom: Hillary Clinton Channels Garrison Keillor
Shot In The Dark: Alondra Cano Doxxes The Halls With Abuse of Power, Fa La La La La, La La La Lawless
STUMP: All I Want For Christmas Is For the 80% Myth To DIE
The Gateway Pundit: Trump Warns Hillary Against Playing #WarOnWomen And “Women Being Degraded” Card
The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler PSA With Bonus Caption Contest – Media Bleeps Schlonged?
The Lonely Conservative: Yes, Democrats Are Still Trying To Ruin Your Holiday
This Ain’t Hell: Daniel Chang Saving The World
Weasel Zippers: Why W Never Left Washington On Holiday Until The Day After Christmas
Mark Steyn: Schlong Of Schongs
Live At Five is taking Christmas and Boxing Day off, and will return Monday, December 28. The FMJRA will run as usual on Saturday and Rule 5 Sunday will also post in a somewhat timely manner. Merry Christmas!
Still #1 In Kindle Cold War Books – What Did You Do In The Cold War, Dad? – Still Just 99 Cents
Shop Amazon – Holiday Gift Cards
The Elite Who Are Destroying America
Posted on | December 23, 2015 | 111 Comments
The habits of America’s “meritocratic” elite are the subject of an American Interest blog post that includes the phrase “educational assortative mating” — i.e., Ivy Leaguers marrying Ivy Leaguers, generation after generation, so that the influential elite form a separate caste, with no familial ties to the rest of the nation, and no direct knowledge of how most Americans live or what most Americans believe.
Professor Glenn Reynolds (himself a Yale Law alumnus) sees this as evidence that our national aristocracy “is becoming increasingly inbred and stupid,” but perhaps a more important point is that our soi-disant “elite” are arrogant, lack the capacity for self-criticism, and refuse to recognize the possibility that intelligence is not synonymous with virtue. The simplest disproof of this Ivy League superstition about “meritocracy” is Ted Kaczynski, Harvard University, Class of 1962, but if that didn’t clinch it, there’s Barack Obama, Columbia University, Class of 1983. Very intelligent people can do very bad things. Even if we stipulate not merely their high IQs, but also their good intentions, it is still quite often the case that smart, well-meaning people turn out to be incompetent fools whose hubristic sense of their own superiority is a chief cause of their folly. Have none of these people read David Halberstam’s The Best and the Brightest? Or are they just too arrogant to understand the fundamental lesson? It wasn’t just the Vietnam War that the liberal elite bungled. They proved themselves at least as inept in domestic policy as they were in foreign affairs, but I digress . . .
Charles Murray deserves an apology. The phrase “assortative mating” is immediately recognizable to anyone who has read The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. In the first 125 pages of that book, Murray and his late co-author Richard Herrnstein described how the advent of universal standardized testing and nationwide recruiting by the Ivy League and other elite schools had created a sort of IQ segregation in American society. Yet this valuable insight was overlooked amid an absurd liberal temper tantrum. Herrnstein and Murray dared to talk about IQ and race and, as a result, they were falsely accused of being crypto-Nazis and advocates of eugenics. To accuse Herrnstein and Murray of racism is analogous, really, to saying that anyone who criticized U.S. policy in Vietnam under the direction of McGeorge Bundy (Yale, ’40) et al., was guilty of being “soft on Communism.” One could hate Communists and also believe that the liberals in charge of U.S. policy were idiots, just as one can despise racism while believing that liberal rhetoric about race and the policies resulting from this rhetoric are profoundly wrong. If voting for Democrats and pursuing liberal policies could solve America’s race problems, then Detroit would be Heaven on Earth, rather than the dangerous and bankrupt municipal catastrophe that it is.
The immaturity and selfishness of Ivy League students like Jerelyn “Who the F–k Hired You?” Luther should serve to remind us that the admissions committee at Yale is demonstrably incompetent to choose our nation’s leaders. The Ivy League is decadent and depraved.
The administration, faculty, students and alumni of Yale and Harvard are destroying America, and it does not matter whether they are doing this accidentally or on purpose. However, if the decades of disastrous policy inflicted on America by the elite were the result of incompetence, we might expect they would occasionally do something good or right, by accident. As it is, everything they do is bad and wrong.
The liberal elite consistently support policies directly opposite to America’s best interests. The excuse that they are well-meaning bunglers is implausible. Only active malice — anti-Americanism — can possibly explain how we have been betrayed so badly by these “leaders” whom elite universities have handpicked and indoctrinated.
The graduates of Harvard and Yale are America’s most dangerous enemies, carefully trained for their assigned roles in accomplishing our nation’s destruction. Americans can never possibly hate the elite as much as the elite hate America. Alger Hiss (Harvard Law, Class of ’29) could not be reached for comment.
LIVE AT FIVE: 12.23.15
Posted on | December 23, 2015 | 5 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 Nails The Landing
Falcon 9 sticks a perfect vertical landing after launching 11 ORBCOMM satellites, as God and Robert Heinlein intended
Air Force Personnel Killed In Suicide Bombing Attack
Most press attention dwells on “trailblazing” lesbian major
Trump Says “Schlonged” Comment Toward Clinton Not Vulgar
More whining from Hillary’s campaign about the #waronwomen
POLITICS
WaPo Pulls Cartoon Depicting Senator Cruz’ Daughters As Trained Monkeys

The cartoon, and the lame excuse for it
Editors post apology in place of cartoon
Senator Rubio slams Post for “disgusting” cartoon
Franklin Graham Leaves GOP Over Planned Parenthood Funding
Hillary’s Hispanic Outreach Triggers #notmyabuela Backlash
KY Governor Bevin Orders Clerks’ Signatures Removed From Marriage Licenses
County Judge Upholds Seattle’s “Gun Violence Tax”
Secret Service Agent Loses Gun, Badge, Handcuffs To Thief
State Department Whines Over Dominican Cardinal’s Mockery Of Gay Ambassador
Virginia Revokes Concealed Handgun Permit Reciprocity With 26 States
Planned Parenthood Hit With Federal Probe, Defunding In Utah
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
U.S. Crude Flips To Premium Over Brent; Markets Still Glutted: Brent $36.29, WTI $36.33
U.S. Economy Set To Grow Less Than 3% For Tenth Straight Year
Why You Should Buy The Men’s Version Of Most Products
Abercrombie & Fitch Names New President In Effort To Boost Sales
Haul For Starbucks Gift Cards Nears GDP Of Trinidad & Tobago
Disney Eyes Exit From Fusion As Venture Struggles
Google Trials Replacing Passwords With Smartphones
Bjork Launches Virtual Reality App For iPhone, iPad
New System Lets Self-driving Cars “Learn” Streets On The Fly
2015: Microsoft’s Biggest Year Ever?
Is This Battlefield 4 Easter Egg The Most Complex Ever?
SPORTS
Panthers Lead League With Ten Picks For Pro Bowl

Franchise record
Undefeated Panthers send five first-time picks to the Pro Bowl
Kobe Scores 31 As Lakers Rally To Beat Nuggets
Heat Blows 18-Point Lead, Falls To Pistons’ Bombs
Hapless Habs’ Skid Hits Five Against Wild
Warriors Even Odds To Repeat As NBA Champs
Panthers Edge Sens In Shootout, 2-1
New Nats Reliever Shawn Kelley: “The Horse Head Is Not Retired”
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Jennifer Lawrence Admits Toking Up Before The Oscars

Chaka, when the walls fell.
Admits pre-awards pot smoking, smooching Liam Hemsworth off-set during taping of Watch What Happens Live
Steve Harvey Invited Back To Host Miss Universe
Former Nickelodeon Star Busted For DUI
Nick Cage Returns Stolen Dinosaur Skull He Bought
Ben Affleck And Jennifer Garner To Spend Christmas Together – For The Kids
The Lost Boys Star Brooke McCarter Dead At 52
Gwen Stefani’s Kids Adore Her New BF Blake Shelton
FOREIGNERS
Zimbabwe Makes Chinese Yuan Legal Tender
Man Found Alive After Over Sixty Hours In China Landslide Rubble
Iraqi Forces Storm Downtown Ramadi In Bid To Eject ISIS
NZ Judge Approves Kim Dotcom’s Extradition To U.S.
Indian Parliament Passes Tough Juvenile Law: 16-18 Year Olds Can Now Be Tried For Rape, Murder
EU Gets One Million Migrants In 2015; Smugglers Turn Billion-Dollar Profit
Miss Spain Crowned Miss World
Japan Says Armed Chinese Coast Guard Ship Spotted Near Disputed Islands
Kenyan Muslims Defy Terrorist Demands To Give Up Christians In Bus Attack
Indian External Affairs Ministry Asks Students To Delay Travel To U.S. Until Recent Deportations Explained
BLOGS & STUFF
American Power: “Ultra-Conservative” Protests Against “Refujihadi” Invasion Of Europe
American Thinker: The Liberal Christmas From Hell
Conservatives4Palin: Jeff Sessions – Without Ted Cruz, Amnesty Would Have Passed In 2013
Don Surber: American Bacon Will Save China
Jammie Wearing Fools: Miss Puerto Rico Dares To Utter Opinions About Muslims, Gets Hammered For It
Joe For America: Bowe Bergdahl Facing Desertion Charges
JustOneMinute: Meanwhile, Back In The Lake Wobegon School District
Pamela Geller: Muslim “Refugees” In Italy Revolt Over Lack of Wi-Fi
Shot In The Dark: Un-Abeler To Compute
The Gateway Pundit: Somali Muslim Caught Smuggling Illegals Across U.S. Border
The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler PSA – Islamic State Is Very Islamic
This Ain’t Hell: “Tops In Blue” On Chopping Block
Weasel Zippers: San Bernardino Shooter Tashfeen Malik’s Visa Approved Despite Not Providing Required Information
Megan McArdle: Books That Don’t Feel Like Homework
Mark Steyn: Giuliani Talks To Steyn About 9/11…And Those Who Celebrated
What Did You Do In The War, Dad?
There Will Be War Volume X