The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Nice Reputation, Jesse

Posted on | July 30, 2014 | 30 Comments

Ace of Spades calls Jesse Ventura a “conspiracy-addled asshole” and he could have added “selfish,” “dishonest” and “vindictive” to that description without fear of being sued for defamation. The reaction to Ventura’s suing a Navy SEAL’s widow for $1.8 million is ironic: Ventura claimed that his reputation was harmed by Chris Kyle’s book; yet Ventura has inflicted more harm on his own reputation by suing than Kyle ever could have imagined inflicting on Ventura.

Having some direct experience with conspiracy-addled assholes who file lawsuits, and having been a journalist for more than 25 years before convicted bomber Brett Kimberlin had the unmitigated gall to claim I had “defamed” him, let me point out something that is being generally overlooked in the reaction to the verdict in Ventura v. Kyle.

Jesse Ventura’s opposition to the Iraq War, and his paranoid views about the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, are a matter of public record, as Noah Rothman says at Hot Air:

Ventura is a noted conspiracy theorist whose kneejerk impulse [is] to blame the American government for everything from the 9/11 attacks, to the raid on the Osama bin Laden compound, to the JFK assassination has netted him frequent appearances on networks like Russia Today.

One can describe Ventura thus, on the basis of information plainly in evidence, without having defamed him. And to voice negative judgments on Ventura’s character — to call him a “kook,” a “crackpot” or a “bully” — is merely to express one’s opinion formed on the basis of readily available information about Ventura, who is a public figure per the Supreme Court’s Sullivan standard.

Quod erat demonstrandum.

How, then, did Ventura prevail in court against Kyle? We can blame the judge and the jury and call the verdict a travesty, yet there is one element of Kyle’s case any newspaper editor would immediately spot as a vulnerability: He asserted private knowledge.

This is a line that no smart journalist would ever cross: To claim to know something bad about somebody, a private fact otherwise unknown, on the basis of information not publicly available.

Any reporter could publish a story about the conflict between Ventura and Kyle — the alleged barroom confrontation at the heart of this lawsuit — and write that Kyle says X, Y and Z happened, including Ventura’s denials that any such confrontation occurred, without fear that his reporting could be construed as libelous.

Kyle’s problem was that, if his altercation with Ventura actually occurred, it was not a matter of public record. Nobody called the cops; there was no police report filed. In fact, it appears that Kyle’s editors at Harper Collins recognized the potential liability involved in publishing that anecdote, so that Kyle’s book referred to Ventura as “scruff face.” It was only in subsequent media interviews that Kyle himself said that Ventura was the subject of the anecdote, and thus the truth or falsehood of Kyle’s version of events — his claim that Ventura said vile things, and that he knocked Ventura down — was central to the defamation lawsuit.

The statements that Kyle attributed to Ventura are certainly consistent with Ventura’s general hostility to the Bush administration and its policies in Iraq. One can easily believe that if Kyle and Ventura got into a quarrel at a bar — and, it is important to note, Ventura does not deny that he was in that bar on the night in question — that Kyle would have taken a swing at Ventura, and it is plausible that the young man in his vigorous prime could have knocked down the older man with a single punch. However, to say that Kyle’s anecdote is credible is a different thing than saying it is provably true. And so it was arguably an unwise risk for Kyle to describe this alleged event as a fact — to assert private knowledge.

All that being said, I do not believe this case was correctly decided. In a defamation case, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knowingly or recklessly published a falsehood. Based on what has been reported of the trial, Ventura and his witnesses cast doubt on Kyle’s story, but did not disprove it, as witnesses for the defense testified that Kyle told the truth.

If lawyers for Kyle’s estate appeal the case, I feel they have a good chance to overturn the verdict. Meanwhile, we are just days away from the next hearing in the Maryland case of Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., in which the Perjuring Pro Se Pipsqueak is suing me and four co-defendants for $1 million. The prayers and continued financial support of readers are most earnestly solicited.





 

Category: R.S. McCain School of Journalism, The Kimberlin Files

LIVE AT FIVE: 07.30.14

Posted on | July 30, 2014 | 9 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
IDF Smashes Symbols Of Hamas Rule

Al-Aqsa TV & radio station under fire by IDF


Gaza’s sole power plant knocked out
Rockets found at UNRWA school for third time
Hamas: No cease-fire without lifting of blockade
Al-Aqsa TV, radio station destroyed by IDF strikes



Top Doctor Dies From Ebola After Treating Dozens
Scientists Struggle To Make Ebola Vaccines, Treatments

Fighting Cuts Off Access To Ukraine Crash Site
US: No evidence Russia trying to help end fighting in Ukraine



POLITICS
Rare Blue Falcon Spotted Outside St. Paul, MN Courthouse

Pretty much says it all.

Jesse Ventura awarded $1.8 million in “American Sniper” defamation case


E-Mails Show White House Adviser Intervened On Obamacare Bailout After Industry Appeals


Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down Mississippi Anti-Abortion Law

“Crush” Bombshell Rocks Opening Of McDonnell Corruption Trial

Senate Bill Would End NSA Phone Records Collection

Senate Passes Highway Funding Bill, Returns It To House With Changes

Immigration Rage Festers On All Sides



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Eases As Traders Await US Stockpile Reports: WTI $100.91, Brent $107.38
NLRB Ties McDonald’s To Labor Complaints Against Franchisees
Federal Reserves Expected To Make Sixth Reduction In Bond Purchases At This Week’s Auction
Twitter Assuages Growth Concerns, Stock Rises 35%
Wall Street Wavers Ahead Of Economic Data
Dollar Bulls In Charge Ahead Of GDP, Fed Tests
BlackBerry Focuses On Security For The Enterprise
OKCupid Experiments May Violate FTC Deceptive Practices Rule
FCC Chairman Tells Time Warner Cable: Bring Back The Dodgers
Netflix Agrees To Pay AT&T To Ensure Smoother Downloads
Microsoft’s WinPhone Dilemma: Sell Cheap Phones Or Great Cameras?



SPORTS
Vin Scully To Return For 66th Season With Dodgers In 2015

Scully throws the ceremonial first pitch to Sandy Koufax on April 4

Longest tenure of any broadcaster with one team in sports history

Denny Hamlin & Team Hit With Major Penalties – Which Will Have Minor Impact

Manny Machado Wins It For O’s In 12th With Sayonara Homer

Qualls Blows Save, Game In 9th As Astros Fall To A’s 7-4

Royals Offense Goes Limp, Twins Win 2-1

Hamels Strong As Phillies Blank Mets 6-0

Liriano Wins Again As Bucs Top Giants 3-1

M’s Offense Delivers, Tribe Falls 5-2

Pale Hose Hammer Tigers With Seven-Run 7th

Alvarez Outduels Strasburg As Fish Blank Nats 3-0



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Martha Stewart: Blake Lively’s Decision To Become Lifestyle Guru “Stupid”

“Isn’t that…what friends are for?
(That’s what friends are for!)”
Martha & Blake acting all chummy in NYC

“Why would you want to be me if you could be an actress?”


Maksim Chmerkovskiy Hanging Up His Dancing Shoes


Sarah Drew Expecting Second Child


J.R. Ramirez To Play Wildcat On “Arrow” Season 3


James Garner’s Cause Of Death – Massive Heart Attack

Bryan Singer’s Accuser Dropped By Lawyer Amid Reports Of $100K Settlement

Beverly Hills Cops School Condo Residents On Bieber Trouble

Zoe Saldana Poses Nude For Women’s Health UK Before Pregnancy News

“Revenge” Casts “S.H.I.E.L.D.” Siren In Recurring Season 4 Role

Legendary Studios Wants Joe Cornish For “Skull Island”

Sherri Shepherd Straps In For “Ride Along 2” After Exit From “The View”

Audrina Patridge, Corey Bohan Split After Five Years

Lady Gaga Belts Out Impromptu Performance After Bennett Show

Orlando Bloom Takes Swing At Bieber In Ibiza



FOREIGNERS
As Sanctions Pile Up, Russians’ Alarm Grows Over Putin Tactics
Red China’s Big Bust Shocks The Nation
After Iraq, Indian Nurses Stuck In Libya Pose Fresh Worry For Modi Government
Clashes In Sinkiang Leave Dozens Dead
In Rare Move, Canada Accuses Chinese Of Trying To Hack Government Site
Genocide Trial Begins For Aging Khmer Rouge Leaders
Turkish Court Arrests 11 More Police in Wiretap Probe
Cameron Unveils Benefit Curbs For EU Migrants Coming To UK
Rural Votes, Old Traumas Drive India’s WTO Brinksmanship
Iraq Lays Claim To Tanker Of Kurdish Oil In Texas Court



BLOGS & STUFF
Doug Powers: Obama’s Economic Patriotism Means We Rise Or Fall Together…Probably Mostly Fall
Twitchy: “Lone Survivor” Marcus Luttrell’s Facebook Page Mocks Ventura
American Power: Illegal Aliens From Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka Caught Entering Texas From New Mexico
American Thinker: Government Is Destroying Our Standard Of Living
BLACKFIVE: Don’t Take The Widow’s Money, Jesse
Conservatives4Palin: Laura Ingraham, Tea Party Giant Killer, Eyes Her Next Scalp
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, July 29
Jammie Wearing Fool: Democrats Can’t Stop Talking About Impeaching President Obama
Joe For America: Islamic Purging Of Christianity
JustOneMinute: Financing Al Qaeda
Protein Wisdom: More 2008 Flashbacks – What Obama Is And What The Future Holds
Shot In The Dark: Pick Your Poison
STUMP: Public Pensions Watch – Tell The Actuaries What You Want To Know
The Gateway Pundit: Nancy Pelosi – “Qataris Have Told Me Hamas Is A Humanitarian Organization”
The Jawa Report: Ramadan Bombathon 2014 Scorecard
The Lonely Conservative: Some Opponents Of EPA’s Clean Power Plan Barred From Testifying
This Ain’t Hell: Ventura Wins $1.8 Million From Kyle’s Widow
Weasel Zippers: Hamas Using Bunker Beneath Gaza’s Largest Hospital As Main Command Center
Megan McArdle: Self-Control Makes For Savvy Saving


Read this book yet? Just $1.99 – or free with Amazon Prime!

Category: Uncategorized

Missing Teen Found Alive; Was Kidnapped by ‘Sexual Deviant’

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 23 Comments

Police say Nathaniel Kibby (left) kidnapped Abigail Hernandez (right).

Nobody who knew Nat Kibby was surprised when he was charged with kidnapping teenager Abby Hernandez. Kibby, 34, was a sadistic “sexual deviant” as a teenager. He was expelled from high school after assaulting a girl, and was suspected of phoning in bomb threats to the school. A former classmate described Kibby to the Conway Daily Sun:

“This has been a pattern for Nat for 20 years. He’s been a sexual deviant — he was a talented sketch artist who always obsessed about girls with dark hair and drew them with their hands tied behind their backs. . . .
[Randy] Waldron recalled in 1992 on his first day in sixth grade at John Fuller School, he met Kibby for the first time. The encounter did not go well.
“He took me out into Whitaker Woods and beat the crap out of me,” Waldron said and that led to Kibby being suspended from school, but the violence didn’t stop.
“He was brilliant, a brilliant person with a vocabulary out of this world,” Waldron recalled. “Pardon my expression but he was a ‘bad bastard.’ There was a time where I was afraid to ride the school bus because of Nat, he just terrorized me. . . .
Waldron said Hernandez matches the images Kibby used to sketch.
“It was always a dark haired girl and it was always in bondage,” he said.
“I’m 33 years old now and I’m dumbfounded,” Waldron added. “He’s the kid of my nightmares. . . . This was his destiny he was going to do something like this. He was sadistic — this kid was rotten to the core.”

Another former classmate remembered Kibby as a “punk” who was “always in trouble” and “messed up.” You will perhaps not be surprised to learn that (a) Kibby once spent time in the psychiatric unit of the state prison, (b) last year, Kibby pleaded guilty to marijuana possession, and (c) he once described himself as an “objectivist libertarian.”

In other words, your typical Ron Paul voter.

It’s difficult to believe a weirdo like Nat Kibby was running around loose after all these years, just as it is difficult to understand why he wasn’t immediately a suspect when 14-year-old Abby Hernandez disappeared last October. Everyone was relieved when somehow the teenager managed to escape — few details of the case have been revealed by authorities — and Kibby was arraigned Thursday:

Kidnapped teen Abigail Hernandez trained a stare on her accused captor on Tuesday as he was held on $1 million bail at an arraignment even though prosecutors provided no details of the crime.
Nathaniel Kibby, 34, did not enter a plea and did not object to the high bail, which will keep him behind bars until an Aug. 12 probable cause hearing.
Abigail, 15, sat calmly with family members during the brief hearing, feet away from Kibby, who was wearing an orange jail jumpsuit and had his hands shackled.
Kibby, who has a lengthy criminal history and was arrested on assault and trespassing charges in March, is charged with one felony count of kidnapping. Affidavits outlining the case against him were sealed, to the dismay of his public defender, Jesse Friedman.
“Mr. Kibby is entitled constitutionally to this information,” Friedman said. . . .
Abigail vanished Oct. 9 while walking home from Kennett High School in Conway, New Hampshire, and returned a week ago under mysterious circumstances.
Little information about Abigail’s kidnapping, captivity or release has emerged, but NBC-owned station NECN quoted sources as saying she was locked up in a container on Kibby’s trailer-park lot in Gorham.

How many stories like this — an atrocity committed by a weirdo who should have been in prison or a psych ward — do we have to read?

 

Category: Crime

Head ‘Sploding Tweet Of The Day

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 19 Comments

by Smitty

For reasons of safety, I must put this Yglesias tweet below the fold:
Read more

Category: humor

Being an Atheist Is Bad. Being an Obnoxious Atheist Is Worse.

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 76 Comments

Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) is inarguably obnoxious:

Prominent atheist and professional provocateur Richard Dawkins has sparked a fierce debate on Twitter after he classified certain types of rape and paedophilia as “worse” and milder than others.
“Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think,” Dawkins tweeted on Tuesday morning.
He had earlier tweeted: “X is bad. Y is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of X, go away and don’t come back until you’ve learned how to think logically.”
He followed it up with: “Mild pedophilia is bad. Violent pedophilia is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of mild pedophilia, go away and learn how to think.”

Am I the only one who notices that Dawkins was not merely demonstrating a logical principle, but that both of his examples were attempts to diminish the wrongness of sexual crimes? That is to say, if he had merely wished to demonstrate the principle, he could have said, “Armed robbery is bad. Murder is worse,” etc. But he didn’t do that, did he? No, it is specifically in the area of sex offenses that The Great Darwinian insists that we must learn to see gradations of moral relativity.

He insists that we mere mortals have misunderstood his genius.

 

Category: Science, Sex

Woman’s Harassment Lawsuit Claims Yahoo Executive Is Lesbian Predator

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 36 Comments

Maria Zhang (left) and her accuser Nan Shi (right).

If women never lie about rape, as feminists have been lecturing us for decades, who are we supposed to believe when a woman claims that her lesbian boss subjected her to sexual harassment?

A high-ranking executive at Yahoo is being sued by an ex-employee on charges of sexual harassment . . .
The high-ranking executive being accused, Maria Zhang, plays a key role in Yahoo’s mobile content development efforts.
The complainant, Nan Shi, was working as a software designer at Yahoo, and says she was repeatedly coerced by Zhang into having “oral and digital sex.” Shi says she was terminated after she later refused Zhang’s advances.
Shi filed her sexual harassment lawsuit [July 11], naming Yahoo as a defendant and charging Zhang with sexual-harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful termination. . . .
Shi moved into Yahoo temporary housing (under orders from Zhang, she says), and Zhang soon moved in with her, the attorney said. It was then that the alleged harassment took place.
“While staying with Plaintiff, Zhang coerced Plaintiff to have oral and digital sex with her on multiple occasions against her will, even after Plaintiff told her she did not want to have sex,” the complaint alleges.
“Zhang told Plaintiff she would have a bright future at Yahoo if she had sex with her. She also stated she could take away everything from her including her job, stocks, and future if she did not do what she wanted.”
Speaking to the [San Jose] Mercury News . . . Shi said:
“I was in a deep sleep one morning, sleeping on the sofa because she had taken my bed, when she came in without clothes on, crawled into my blanket, and woke me up, hugging me, kissing my face and neck,” Shi said. “I woke up and got scared; I was shocked. I said, what are you doing? She said she’d liked me a long time, but I didn’t feel the same toward her. I said come on, we’re friends; I love you as a person, but not as a lover.”

In response, Zhang has not merely denied Shi’s accusation, but has filed a countersuit against her accuser:

Zhang says Shi fabricated the whole story.
According to Zhang, Shi had been an underperformer and received negative performance evaluations from two other managers.
Zhang claims that Shi went to HR to complain about her and other managers when it became clear that Shi’s job was in danger. But Zhang said that HR found Shi’s claims to be unsubstantiated.
Yahoo planned to fire Shi, Zhang claims. But as a last-ditch effort to save her job, Shi again went to HR [i.e., Yahoo’s human resources department], alleging Zhang forced her to have sex in return for favorable treatment. But Shi was “unable to provide a single piece of evidence” in support of her claim. Zhang says HR found that none of her correspondence with Shi indicated any sexual relationship.
Yahoo terminated Shi on July 11, after the investigation was closed.
Because Yahoo held up her termination for several months while investigating her sexual harassment claim, Zhang says Shi received “hundreds of thousands of dollars” in stock and salary that she otherwise would not have taken home.

Translation: “That ugly bitch is a lazy, money-grubbing liar.”

Now, I’m not a lawyer and I am certainly not in a position to judge the truth of the claims involved here. However, it seems to me that Zhang’s account of events — if it had been offered by any male defendant in a sexual harassment case — would be denounced by feminists as “blaming the victim” because, of course, women never lie about rape. Also, while denying any sexual involvement with Shi, Zhang apparently does not deny that she is gay.

Maybe Zhang should accuse Shi of being a homophobe who is trying to destroy her for being a lesbian. Zhang could be an LGBT hero, courageously fighting for her rights, yadda yadda yadda.

Maggie Quale of Huffington Post writes:

Occurrences of same-sex harassment are rare, even less than the rate of men reporting sexual harassment cases against women. However that number is on the rise. The EEOC says claims have doubled in the last five years. But you likely haven’t heard about them. . . .
One thing is crystal clear: same-sex abuse isn’t taken seriously. Despite how far the U.S. is moving forward with recognizing equality in same-sex relationships, parenting and employment rights, the notion of two people of the same sex harassing or abusing one another is considered a joke.
In fact, you’ll notice that nowhere in any of the reports has the term “rape” been used. Not once. Now imagine if a male boss had forced his female employee to have sex or risk losing her job — would that be rape?

Not only is the word “rape” never used by the media in cases like these, the words “lesbian” or “gay” are never used. Why?

In slightly related news, Cosmopolitian magazine is now offering readers gay sex advice. Cosmo goes lesbo? Yeah, that was predictable.

 

Category: Feminism, Gays

An Ill-Advised Apology

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 23 Comments

The NFL suspended a player named Ray Rice because of domestic violence. On ESPN, analyst Stephen Smith was discussing the case and, after saying that there is never a reason for a man to be violent with women, Smith said that he had also personally advised women not to do anything to “provoke” a man to violence.

The feminist covens went into Indignant Outrage Mode over Smith’s remark, and yesterday Smith was compelled to grovel on air:

“On Friday, speaking right here on ‘First Take’ on the subject of domestic violence, I made what can only amount to the most egregious error of my career,” Smith said in a low-key taped segment before the show shifted over to its typical debate format. “My words came across that it is somehow a woman’s fault. This was not my intent. It is not what I was trying to say.” . . .
“To say what I actually said was foolish is an understatement. To say I was wrong is obvious. To apologize — to say I’m sorry — doesn’t do the matter it’s proper justice, to be quite honest,” Smith said. “But I do sincerely apologize.”

This is another sad example of the harmful impact of feminism’s totalitarian impulse to suppress dissent. Anyone who has seriously studied domestic violence knows that, in many cases, bad relationships are characterized by toxic emotions on both sides. You’ve got two people with uncontrollable tempers — often drugs or alcohol are involved, and often one or both partners were raised in households where abuse and violence were a problem — and when they get into an argument, the argument turns into a physical fight.

Doesn’t anybody watch C*O*P*S? The police show up in response to a domestic disturbance call, and they encounter the scruffy tattooed brute and his foul-mouthed tattooed live-in girlfriend.

Both of them are bad drunk, and the police have to question them separately to try to figure out what actually  happened: How did it start? Who hit who? Each partner points the finger of blame at the other, and the police have to sort out the evidence and testimony. Has one or the other partner got a bruise or a busted lip? Does one of them admit doing something that can be considered assault?

Most of the time, it’s the guy who gets handcuffed and put in the back of the patrol car, but as you watch these  C*O*P*S episodes — unedited, unstaged — quite often your sympathy for the female victim is tempered by the fact that (a) she had, after all, chosen to move in with this wretched boyfriend, and (b) she’s not exactly a meek and helpless type. She’s drunk, she’s got a Marlboro hanging out of her mouth, and she’s cussing like a sailor. Lowlife women have a habit of gravitating toward lowlife men, and the fact that their relationships are fraught with ugly violence is an unfortunate but predictable reality. It is what it is.

So, after saying that men should never hit women, Stephen Smith said something about telling women — I get the idea he was speaking of the advice he had given his own daughters — they should not do “anything to provoke wrong actions,” and the feminist covens decided he needed to be burned at the stake. But what was he really saying?

Or rather, what did he actually mean to say?

“Boys never hit girls” is something my wife and I have drilled into our children’s heads. We have two daughters and four sons, and there are no exceptions to the rule. Our son-in-law would not dare hit our daughter, and she would never put up with it. A man hitting a woman is simply intolerable. Period. And I’ve advised my sons, in regard to their own relationships, that if you ever feel like you’re about to lose your temper with a woman, just leave — walk out.

This rule against boys hitting girls, however, should not be understood as giving girls permission to abuse boys. Having dated a few bad-tempered females back in the day — The Psycho Girlfriend From Hell — I know what it’s like to deal with women who mistake kindness for weakness. She gets mad and starts calling you every name in the book, she’s throwing things at you, she’s hitting you, and the thought crosses your mind: “Does she actually want me to hit her back? Is this what she was raised with? She psychologically needs a physical confrontation?”

Well, there’s a reason they’re ex-girlfriends. Like I say, a man can always just walk away and leave.  But I think that what Stephen Smith was trying to say on ESPN, discussing the advice he had given his own female relatives, is: DON’T BE THAT WOMAN.

Don’t be the woman who is always having some kind of emotional drama and turning every disagreement into a screaming match. This kind of advice isn’t “victim blaming” — Smith wasn’t saying that any woman deserves to be hit — it’s just common sense.

Feminists hate common sense. And the pressure that compelled Smith to apologize is just another example of feminism’s totalitarian tendency to stifle free discussion of controversial issues.

Finally, as to the Ray Rice case: I hadn’t paid any attention to it, but when I asked my wife to read this post — just to make sure I wasn’t offending the only woman whose opinion actually matters — she said, “Have you seen that video? He knocked her out!” And she said, “He’d be six feet under if he had ever done anything like that to me. If I didn’t kill him, my brothers would kill him.”

Exactly. That’s the Domestic Violence Prevention Policy we endorse.

 

Category: Feminism, Sports

The Gaza War Continues

Posted on | July 29, 2014 | 12 Comments

No ceasefire:

Israel will press its air and ground offensive in the Gaza Strip, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday, preparing his country for a longer and bloodier campaign and dashing hopes that the three-week-old conflict would end soon.
Rebuffing appeals from President Obama, the United Nations and others for an immediate cease-fire, Netanyahu said in a televised address, “We will not finish the mission, we will not finish the operation, without neutralizing the tunnels” through which Hamas fighters have sought to infiltrate Israel. The tunnels, he said, “have the sole purpose of destroying our citizens, killing our children.”
Israel’s antagonist, the Islamist militant organization Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, continued to unleash deadly mortar and rocket fire, triggering air raid sirens across Israel.

Still haven’t heard back from the Nobel Peace Prize committee.

 

Category: Islam, Israel, Military, Terrorism
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin