To the Reader Who Bought Two SeaGate External Hard Drives From Amazon
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 3 Comments
Thanks! When I occasionally check the Amazon Associates sales report, I always find out we’ve sold some item I never even knew Amazon offered. So when I saw someone had bought the Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex Desk 2 TB FireWire 800 USB 2.0 External Hard Drive for Mac STBC2000101 — two of them, at $168.98 each — my first thought was, “What the heck is this gizmo?”
Ultimately, I don’t even need to know. As long as you know what you want, Amazon will sell it to you, and when you shop through our Amazon Associates links, you get great low prices, free Super Saver shipping on most orders over $25, and I get a commission. I originally thought of Amazon as an online bookstore, and I’m pleased to see we’ve recently sold multiple copies of Andrew Breitbart’s book, Righteous Indignation — including the Kindle edition — but we’ve also sold stuff I never knew Amazon sold, including a two-month supply of Sensa Natural Weight-Loss products.
Lots of great bargains for you, lots of shameless profit opportunities for me — how perfectly capitalistic is that, huh? Obama hates it when you shop our Amazon links. And if Obama hates it, it must be good, so shop Amazon today!
A Whiter Shade Of GOPale
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 18 Comments
by Smitty
And so it was that later
as McCotter told his tale
Smitty’s face, at first just ghostly,
turned a whiter shade of GOPale
McCotter laments at length at Ricochet, and I excerpt:
“I want to shout, but I can’t hardly speak”
Presently, Rock-n-Roll Reaganites are in exile on Lame Street. Bored in the conservative media establishment’s cultural gutters; beset by crony capitalism’s billionaire beggars; and bewildered by the fervid hucksters of “Cliff’s Notes” Constitutionalism, Rock-n-Roll Reaganites possess the same prospects for a return to cultural relevance as does Alex P. Keaton’s alter ego’s flick, Poison Ivy.In today’s twitter-splintered parlance: “WTF?”
“It’s all mesmerized, all that inside me”
To understand what went recently wrong, we must examine what went initially right, so to speak.
In 1980, the long simmering conservative movement boiled over with Reagan’s election. The only President who made a living in the arts (and served as an elected union leader), Reagan deftly melded his political and theatrical sensibilities and timing throughout his Presidency; and ensured conservatism retained the virtues that sustained it during its rise to political and cultural prominence. Creative, entrepreneurial, impish, rebellious and, above all, rooted in the shared experiences of Americans, conservatism was called the “counter-counter-culture” – a testament its clear and present threat and ultimate transcendence of the politically and culturally dominant liberalism.
“Headed for the overload”
But nothing undoes like excess. Insensate to the cultural counter-stroke that was the Baby-Boomer Bill Clinton’s Presidency, in the aftermath of the 1994 “Republican Revolution” and the 2004 Presidential re-election of George W. Bush, the GOP hubristically declared it had attained a “permanent majority.” This was akin to Keith Richards saying he was completely straight. Dismissive of the late Andrew Breitbart’s dictum that “culture is downstream from politics”; rapt with their power and perks; and absent inspiration and vision, the flush Republican “leadership” contented itself with living off the fumes of the Reagan Revolution and wallowing in the mire of pork barrel politics and lame managerial talking points. Good times.
Read the whole thing. I’m a tremendous fan of McCotter; I think he’s one of the straighter shooters in the Progressive Pride parade. The crux of his argument seems to be the intersection of “Cliff’s Notes” Constitutionalism and Rock-n-Roll Reaganites.
The article works well as a retrospective of sorts. McCotter begins with “the idea that conservatism was once hip is as hard to imagine as 4% unemployment rates and the Flock of Seagulls selling records. But, alas, ’tis true.” And now there is this chorus of “Cliff’s Notes” Constitutionalists who look at the debt, the deficit-sans-budget, and the GOP and, indeed, float a “WTF?”
And so we’re making up for the education deficit, on Twitter, in blogs, at Tea Party gatherings. Regan, for all his gifts, could no more unwind a century of Progressivism than he could cheat the Iron Law of Bureaucracy. The cancer that is Progressivism has struck back with a vengeance over the last decade.
One could lament, put on some Floyd, and commence to get potted. We could bicker and argue over ‘oo betrayed their Constitutional oath more than ‘oo. The only thing that really matters, Rep. McCotter, is liberty. Everything undertaken has to be about liberty. More concretely, the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Progressivism is not Constitutionally well-founded. All of these nanny-state safety net programs that are not proper federal tasks Really. Have. To. Go.
Like geriatric rockers owning up to their tiny todgers, the GOP elite needs to come clean about just how utterly filthy, immoral, and untrustworthy the government has become. The pig’s lips have rotted away, and will accept no more lipstick. Honesty is going to mean a few careers go under the bus. Deal with it. When history judges, it’s better to be in the Bonhoeffer column than the other one.
There is a general notion that this era is coming to a close, hopefully too violent on a grand scale. But we have to get past the nadir for the slope of liberty to become positive again.
Bristol Palin Blogs!
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 29 Comments
by Smitty
And, instantly, becomes more important than “warmly conformly” Meghan McCain. See, Meghan: if you show some moral courage, despite life’s adversities, you too could eventually be worthy of respect.
via Haemet
See also Insty and The Camp of the Saints.
Update: linked at Daily Pundit
Is Newt’s Campaign Bankrupt?
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 17 Comments
An article at National Journal about Obama’s $45 million February fundraising haul mentions a fact I’ve repeatedly emphasized:
Obama’s numbers soundly trumped his GOP rivals in February fundraising. Mitt Romney brought in about $11.5 million, whereas Rick Santorum and Ron Paul brought in roughly $9 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Newt Gingrich has not released his February totals yet.
If it was good news, we would have heard about it by now. Just got off the phone with the Federal Election Commission press office, which confirmed that the Feburary FEC reports are due Tuesday.
As of Jan. 31, the Gingrich campaign’s net balance — cash-on-hand of $1,788,590, minus debts of $1,726,085 — was just $62,505. February was an uninterrupted series of defeats for Gingrich. After losing Nevada Feb. 4, he was third in Colorado and fourth in Minnesota (Feb. 7), fourth in Maine (Feb. 11), then third in Arizona and fourth in Michigan (Feb. 28).
It is therefore likely that Newt’s financial situation in February deteriorated significantly from the less-than-ideal situation in January, when Gingrich raised just $5.5 million while spending $16.4 million.
What will we learn when the FEC posts the February reports tomorrow? We don’t know, but if the Gingrich campaign didn’t put the brakes on its $16-million-a-month January “burn rate” soon enough, it’s likely the FEC report will show the campaign ended February with a negative balance — more debt than cash-on-hand.
The silence from Team Newt hints that the red ink might be very deep.
#Occupy Sympathizer Who Tweeted About Killing Cops: Meet Rusty Braxton
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 12 Comments
As previously noted, when police shut down Saturday’s Occupy protest in New York, a Twitter user with the handle “smackema1” sent a message: “We wont make a difference if we dont kill a cop or 2.” After it was announced that a criminal investigation of the threat had been undertaken, the New York Daily News located the 23-year-old punk:
“I’m not a cop hater,” Rusty Braxton told the Daily News as the police continued to investigate Saturday’s ugly online remark.
“I don’t want any cops killed. They’re doing their job. They’re civil servants.”
Braxton, of Oviedo, Fla., sent the tweet from his hometown during Saturday’s six-month anniversary protest at Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park.
“We wont make a difference if we dont kill a cop or 2,” the restaurant manager wrote.
His Facebook page contains photographs of guns and he said in his Twitter feed that he has permits for a Mossberg shotgun and a Smith & Wesson pistol. . . .
He says he’s never been to New York or attended an Occupy protest.
But he admitted the actions of police sometimes makes him angry.
“When I see the police throw people down and push people, I get upset,” he said.
Oviedo is about 20 miles from downtown Orlando. Why this young Florida restaurant manager would be watching a livestream of the Occupy protests and urging violence against cops, I don’t know.
Braxton’s only previous criminal record was a juvenile dope bust. David Martosko of the Daily Caller had a Twitter exchange with Braxton and reports that Braxton’s account has since been deleted.
In his Twitter feed, Braxton’s spelling, grammar and punctuation were abysmal. So he’s a semi-literate dopehead who hates cops — which is to say, a typical product of the public-education system.
If Tyranny Moves Slowly Enough, Then Americans Might Not Notice
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 18 Comments
by Smitty
Prof. Jacobson at Legal Insurrection:
HR 347 was recently signed into law by President Obama. This statute had wide support amongst both parties of Congress. In essence, it criminalizes disruptive behavior upon government grounds, at specially designated national events (Super Bowl, nominating conventions, etc.) and anywhere that Secret Service is protecting “any” person. Obviously, the goal of this law is to enhance the ability of the Secret Service to protect those persons it is charged to do so; but in extending this power, this law eviscerates the citizens’ rights to assemble and petition under the First Amendment.
The major flaw in this law is it vests too much discretion with the executive branch – Secret Service – in cordoning off public venues in order to carry out their protective services function. Ignore their dictates and become a criminal. This expanded authority will eventually run afoul of the First Amendment; the question remains if the First Amendment will be protected by the courts.
I submit that the issue here is that the federal government in general, and the Presidency in particular, has become too powerful. Separation of powers, inexorably and unexpectedly collapses upward to DC and inward to the Executive.
I’m sure that our GOP candidates will identify the need to reverse this decline in liberty, and equal protection under the law, and set about doing specific things to unwind the ills of the last century. Because it is as though we are engaged in a decades-long fight to the death to preserve the founding ideals of the country.
Redistribute Power, Not Wealth
Jonah Goldberg On Voter ID
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 13 Comments
by Smitty
Jonah Goldberg explores among the more egregious examples of Lefty doublethink:
Republicans across the country are pushing for voter I.D. laws. They want to limit the frequency and opportunities for voter fraud. Democrats claim, reasonably perhaps, that Republicans are making a bigger deal out of voter fraud than the evidence supports. Attorney General Eric Holder, who recently blocked Texas’ voter I.D. reforms, calls the movement a “solution to a problem that doesn’t exist.”
Right or wrong, that’s a claim worth investigating and debating. But unfortunately, for whatever reason, that argument isn’t working as a political tool. So he and others ascribe racism to those who want to add voting to the long list of things that require a photo I.D. Everywhere you look or listen, you hear about the return of Jim Crow these days. Left-wing activist groups have started using the twitter hashtag #waronvoting. Al Sharpton has gotten all riled up. The chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee has said that Republicans “want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws.” Neo-segregation, it seems, is bursting out all over the place.
Never mind that there’s little evidence that photo I.D. requirements suppress turnout. Indeed, turnout in states has increased after requirements have been implemented (though I’m not one of those people who thinks turnout in and of itself is a good thing). In Indiana and Georgia, as the Wall Street Journal recently noted, lawsuits from the usual liberal legal chop shops were thrown out when they couldn’t produce a single person who’d actually been denied the right to vote by the I.D. rules. The upshot being that this bears no resemblance whatsoever to Jim Crow, which was about far more than just voting anyway. Oh, and don’t forget that the accusation of racism is a disgusting, gutter-level, smear designed to bully people where persuasion hasn’t even been tried.
Read the whole thing. There really isn’t much to add, except to wonder just how much of the Progressive decay of our society is already attributable to the Left tampering with elections. That’s sort of a cost-free speculation on my part, but the fundamental point is this: our elections have got to be strengthened. More people have to educate themselves and participate in politics. We cannot permit the Left to complete its demolition of our electoral system.
Update: much more at The Rio Norte Line and KatyPundit.
#OccupyResoluteDesk Conducts A War On Women?
Posted on | March 19, 2012 | 4 Comments
by Smitty
I guess it’s OK, since BHO predominantly targets Good Conservative [word that rhymes with ‘riches’]:
via HotAir
Update: linked at The Lonely Conservative, who has more analysis.
Update II: also under siege: Nice Deb.
« go back — keep looking »