The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Digital Fire Sale: ‘Get Woke, Go Broke’ Wiping Out SJW Online Media

Posted on | December 5, 2018 | Comments Off on Digital Fire Sale: ‘Get Woke, Go Broke’ Wiping Out SJW Online Media

Making “social justice” part of your business model is never a good idea, and some startling numbers are starting to come out:

It was around this time last year that things were starting to look a little dicey for the media industry’s once breathlessly-hyped digital unicorns. Both BuzzFeed and Vice made news for substantially missing their revenue targets. Mashable was sold at a dramatic price reduction. Vox Media was forced to terminate 5 percent of its workforce. . . .
A year later, the challenges have hardly abated. Mic canned the majority of its staff last week as part of a last-resort sale to Bustle for about $5 million — $95 million less than its previous valuation. Vice, under turnaround C.E.O. Nancy Dubuc, is in the process of trimming its 3,000-person global headcount by 15 percent, according to The Wall Street Journal, which reported Vice’s losses at more than $50 million in 2018. At Refinery29, 10 percent of the workforce received pink slips this fall. BuzzFeed’s Jonah Peretti recently floated in the pages of The New York Times the quixotic notion of a multi-company merger between BuzzFeed, Vice, Vox Media, Group Nine Media, and Refinery29, as a means to rival the Facebook-Google ad duopoly.

Whoa — Vice is losing $1 million a week? That’s insane. And did you know (I didn’t) that Mic had raised $60 million in investment capital? But the founders Chris Altchek and Jake Horowitz “couldn’t find a business model” to pay the bills for their “millennial-focused news company,” so they sold for just $5 million. Just three years ago, they had a vodka company sponsoring their private party at a swanky Chelsea nightclub, but then Facebook changed its algorithm and the clickbait traffic evaporated, so no more hoverboards in the office, eh?

(Hat-tip: Instapundit.)



 

Category: Media Bias

Buzzword Alert: ‘Neoliberalism’

Posted on | December 4, 2018 | Comments Off on Buzzword Alert: ‘Neoliberalism’

Over the weekend, transgender activists sent out a hoax email falsely claiming that radical feminist Meghan Murphy had cancelled her scheduled Jan. 10 talk at the Vancouver Public Library. Some Canadian outlets were deceived by that email, didn’t bother checking with either Murphy or the library, and ran with the false story.

While I was at Ms. Murphy’s Feminist Current website checking that story, I noticed they had published an article by British academic Heather Brunskell-Evans entitled “A neoliberal concept of freedom has allowed gender identity ideology to take hold,” which begins thus:

Neoliberalism is the political philosophy (of the left and the right) that was developed in the West during the 1980s as populist “common-sense.” It has several problems:

1) It regards the individual as an autonomous agent, primarily motivated by self-interest;
2) It tells us the unregulated free-market economy alleviates social inequalities;
3) It describes personal freedom in terms of the individual’s ability to “choose” in a market place of choices.

What is wrong with this neoliberal, economistic view of the human being? It is reductive. As well as being individual agents, human beings are also located in psychological, social, and political contexts that render our autonomy and inter-relationship with others more complex than such an ideology allows.

Permit me to register my protest against this word, which was coined in the past 15 or 20 years by the progressive Left (the kind of people who take Noam Chomsky seriously) as analogous to “neoconservative.” The purpose of the word “neoliberal” is to discredit anyone on the Left who would compromise with the Right. People who use this word mean to say that if you are not an outright socialist, you are a “neoliberal.”

Professor Brunskell-Evans is British, as I say, and so her perspective on political ideology reflects British realities, which are structurally different than the American situation. Their Tories are not the same as our Republicans, nor is Labour the same as our Democrats, and Britain does not have America’s profusion of independent organizations (e.g., Heritage, AEI, Cato) influencing their political debate.

In particular, it’s worth noting, the British had nothing comparable to our Religious Right, which exercised such a powerful influence on the conservative movement from the 1970s onward. One might observe that Christian conservative influence in our political life has waned in the past decade, but you cannot disregard this as a source of difference between America and Britain politics. Our conservatives are more religious than their conservatives, and this matters in ways large and small. Now, let’s quote some of Professor Brunskell-Evans’s article:

The 1990s saw a fierce backlash against the radical feminist critique of patriarchy. Society, we were told, had reached a stage of “post feminism,” and we could all rest easy because the feminist movement’s demands had now been met. The Spice Girls became the epitome of young women’s newfound, individualized sexual empowerment. Feminism became a dirty word, conjuring up a spectre of miserable, sexually starved, repressed women who hated men. My students at Goldsmiths College (one of the first universities unequivocally committed to understanding sex and gender through the lens of Queer Theory, and now the proud UK hotbed of the latter), revealed an actual revulsion towards the “F word.” Any suggestion that the equality laws and the sexual freedoms from which they benefited were brought about by feminist activism and our refusal to be bound by sexist gender roles was met with disavowal. They confidently derided any suggestion that second wave feminists were sexual freedom fighters.
Transgender ideology is an outcome of the meteoric rise of Queer Theory which, contrary to the claims of trans activists, does not reject biological essentialism, but reifies it by simply reversing the order: It asserts that binary sex — being female or male — is socially “assigned,” not a biological fact; in contrast gender — an individual’s feeling of “femininity” or “masculinity” — is said to be pre-social, emerging from the inner being. This ideology has no human scientific basis and overrides simple facts.

Well, yes, ma’am, we agree that transgender ideology is nonsense, but your account of what happened to feminism reflects a view from inside academia, rather than what was happening in the real world, where feminism never possessed the sort of institutional authority it wields on university campuses. It is wrong to say there was “backlash” against feminism in the 1990s because, in the world outside academia, no one with any common sense ever doubted that feminists actually were (and still are) miserable repressed women who hate men. The form that feminism took during the 1990s, the marketing coup of “sex-positive feminism” as a message of “empowerment,” was best represented by Nina Burleigh’s comment on the Lewinsky scandal:

“I’d be happy to give [Bill Clinton] a blow job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal. I think American women should be lining up with their Presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.”

Nina Burleigh was not the only feminist who believed that the Clinton presidency, and the Democrat Party more generally, was the only thing preventing “the theocracy” from outlawing abortion. Feminism’s alignment with the Democrats was rooted in the idea that abortion is women’s most important right — the holy sacrament of the Church of Liberalism, as Ann Coulter remarked in her book Godless. And this fanatical delusion never could have taken hold were it not for the way the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision circumnavigated the political process to impose legalized abortion on the nation.

Let’s be clear about this: If abortion is not wrong, nothing is wrong.

There is no way one can endorse infanticide and then claim the authority to lecture others about moral rights and wrongs — and this has been the fundamental error of feminism. Whether or not abortion is legal, it is always wrong, and while the law may compel us to tolerate this evil, a free people can never be forced to endorse abortion or forbidden to criticize it.

Feminists have sought to stigmatize and silence their critics and now that the shoe is on the other foot, with transgender activists seeking to stigmatize and silence feminist, who has the moral authority to referee this internecine dispute among progressives?

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply . . .”
— Genesis 1:27-28 (KJV)

Feminists will not be able to defeat the transgender cult without the aid of Christians who believe that the categories male and female are the work of the Creator, who had a purpose in mind for His creation. Unless we have respect for the purpose of sexual differences (i.e., the “be fruitful and multiply” part of that formula), how are we to claim any moral high ground in such matters? If there is no God, and thus no purpose to our existence — if human life has no moral meaning or value, so that abortion is a “right” — who are we to deny transgender activists the authority to impose their own meanings, and to silence their critics?

Feminists now confront an existential crisis. If “Hailey Heartless” is a woman and “Zinnia Jones” is a woman, why can’t they assert their authority to define feminism in their own terms? If the definition of “woman” is now to be altered by political compulsion, then it becomes nearly impossible to speak of “women’s rights” in any meaningful way.



 

 

Category: Abortion, Sex Trouble, The Transgender Cult

Late Night With In The Mailbox: 12.03.18

Posted on | December 4, 2018 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: The Blaze & CRTV Join Forces – But Where’s Cary Katz? also, Why Does The GOPe Let Democrats Malign Them And Then Years Later Pretend We’re All Friends?
Twitchy: William Shatner’s Got News For You If You Think “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” Is Misogynistic
Louder With Crowder: How To Tweet Like Alexandria Occasional Cortex In Five Easy Steps

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Encouraging Courageous Women, also, Jordanetics – A Journey Into The Mind Of Humanity’s Greatest Thinker
American Power: Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves To Death, also, Jean Raspail, The Camp Of The Saints
American Thinker: Is The FBI Raiding Whistleblowers’ Homes To Protect Robert Mueller?
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Monday
BattleSwarm: George H.W. Bush – Passing Reactions Roundup
CDR Salamander: Russia, Ukraine, & The Challenge For The West
Da Tech Guy: Forward To Detroit, also, The Coming Schism In The Church
Don Surber: Clintons On Sale 90% Off, also, Some French Police Join Yellow Jackets Protest
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries, also, Claims Must Be Filed In Person
The Geller Report: Paris On Lockdown, also, Islamic Group’s NYC New Year’s Threat
Hogewash: Life After Twitter, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Hollywood In Toto: Why Hasn’t Twitter Banned These Celebrities?
JustOneMinute: Bush The Elder Joins Barbara, also, Is Paris Burning?
Legal Insurrection: Bill & Hillary’s National Tour Features Seas Of Empty Seats, also, Sanders Supporters Already Working To “Draft Bernie” For 2020
The PanAm Post: Maduro Reportedly Requested Mexican Asylum For Top Chavista Officials
Power Line: Youth Smoking Plummeted With Advent Of Vaping, also, Notes On The Cohen Plea
Shark Tank: Florida Lawmakers Condemn Cuban Regime As “Mais Medicos” Sue
Shot In The Dark: Fet Ish
STUMP: STUMP Ephemera
The Jawa Report: Fatwa This! All She Wanted Was a Pepsi Edition
The Political Hat: The Digital Panopticon – From Red China’s Social Credit To New York & The Second Amendment
This Ain’t Hell: The Peasants Are Rioting In Paris, also, U.S. Fifth Fleet Commander Found Dead In Bahrain
Victory Girls: Pelosi & Ilhan Omar Want 181-Year-Old Headgear Ban Dropped Because Hijabs
Volokh Conspiracy: Court Throws Out Season Ticket Holder’s Lawsuit Over Anthem Protests
Weasel Zippers: Academic Claims Phrases Like “Bring Home The Bacon” Will Go Out Of Fashion To Avoid Offending Vegans, also, Tijuana Mayor Says Caravan Organizers Should Be Arrested
Mark Steyn: Going Down In Historeee…, also, Last Tango In Paris


Twelve Days Of Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals

Category: Linkagery

‘Too Late to Save the University’?

Posted on | December 3, 2018 | Comments Off on ‘Too Late to Save the University’?

 

Azusa Pacific University (APU) began as the Training School for Christian Workers, and in 1939 was renamed Pacific Bible College. It was until recently the largest evangelical Christian university on the West Coast, but it seems the salt has lost its savour, so to speak. One of the few Christians remaining on the APU faculty, Professor Barbara Harrington, has written a letter to the university’s Board of Trustees, explaining that “students are exposed to radical beliefs that deride and malign traditional Biblical Christianity,” with predictable results:

Before long, the students espouse errant ideological trends that leave them isolated from the community, embittered against Christian faith and values, and approaching the world with a raised fist and angry slogans instead of an open heart and saving truth. These students gradually become unteachable, and they leave APU in a much worse state then they were in when they arrived. I have had students confront me in class asserting that, “There is no such thing as masculine or feminine.” I had another lovely young student transform from loving Jesus and her Christian faith when she came to APU, to becoming a sneering, bitter self-declared “queer womynist” who now sees Christianity as the most divisive and pernicious influence in human history.

The crisis at Azusa Pacific keeps getting worse:

Two members of the board of trustees of a major evangelical Christian liberal arts university have resigned, contending the institution has “drifted” from its foundation and mission, and now is at odds with its written policies, statement of faith and the Bible itself.
Raleigh Washington, a prominent pastor known for his leadership of the Promise Keeper’s men’s movement, and Dave Dias, a Sacramento-area business executive, submitted letters of resignation on Wednesday to the board of trustees of Azusa Pacific University in Southern California. . . .
Washington, a trustee for 15 years, wrote that he had constantly confronted the board over the previous six years with abundant evidence that the administration and a substantial portion of the faculty were promoting a progressive ideology that clashed with the institution’s statement of faith and core principles.
He charged that the board has failed in its responsibility to hold leadership accountable and has become “complicit in this disobedient behavior.” . . .
“After fervent prayer and with integrity of heart, I cannot continue to be a part of these violations of God’s word,” he wrote. “I fear the spiritual consequences of this lack of correction and discipline.” . . .
Washington said the bottom line is that the board is overseeing an administration and faculty “who in their practice as well as their teaching blatantly violate Christian biblical precepts.” . . .
Dias, who had served on the board since 2004, said in his letter of resignation he “cannot support the obvious and intentional ‘mission drift’ and departure from the sound, Orthodoxy and Theological foundation for which APU was founded.”
“Although APU policies speak eloquently to remaining steadfast on these issues, actual university practices and an overwhelming amount of evidence dictate otherwise,” he said.
Dias said he’s leaving because the board “has refused to take the immediate, decisive, appropriate and necessary steps to remain fully committed to its founding principles.”
“My solemn fear is that it may be too late to save the university,” he said.

Embracing “social justice” hasn’t helped APU’s bottom line:

In emails to faculty, President Jon Wallace said top university leaders were surprised by the school’s debt, which includes $17 million from the 2017-18 fiscal year, a projected $20-million loss for this fiscal year and an additional $61 million in unpaid bonds. In response to the newly projected $20-million loss, the university has put a freeze on hiring, eliminated retirement plan contributions, canceled a scheduled employee raise and reduced benefits, according to the emails.

“Get woke, go broke.”



 

Category: Education

‘It’s Like Undermining What Our Generation Is Trying to Do’

Posted on | December 3, 2018 | 1 Comment

The Ivy League Is Decadent and Depraved:

Columbia University students invited Saturday Night Live comedian Nimesh Patel to perform on campus this weekend, then cut his mic and kicked him off stage after he allegedly made “rude” and “offensive” jokes.
The debacle happened Saturday night at cultureSHOCK, an event dedicated to celebrating Asian and Pacific Islander culture. . . .
Patel allegedly made numerous “offensive” jokes, including about how being a gay black man isn’t a choice since “no one looks in the mirror and thinks, ‘this black thing is too easy, let me just add another thing to it.’” . . .
Halfway through his skit, organizers jumped on stage, stole the mic, denounced Patel’s jokes, and asked him to wrap up his set. Patel pushed back, and said he was exposing students to ideas that could be found “in the real world.”
Students then cut his mic and kicked him off stage.

Mentioning “the real world” on campus was Patel gravest sin:

For Sofia Jao, BC ‘22, problems with the performance resided not in the set, but with Patel’s closing remarks.
“I really dislike when people who are older say that our generation needs to be exposed to the real world. Obviously the world is not a safe space but just accepting that it’s not and continuing to perpetuate the un-safeness of it… is saying that it can’t be changed,” said Jao. “When older generations say you need to stop being so sensitive, it’s like undermining what our generation is trying to do in accepting others and making it safer.”

Sweetheart, when my father was your age, he was fighting the Wehrmacht. And you realize, don’t you, it’s not just “older generations” who are sick of your overprivileged Ivy League “safe space” nonsense? Like, there are 18-year-olds — right now, this very minute — going through basic training at Parris Island and Fort Benning. There are plenty of people in the world with worse problems than having to listen to “offensive” jokes, and maybe if you had some real problems to worry about, you’d understand how silly you actually are. As it is, perhaps you should consider how fortunate you are to be at Columbia University (annual cost of attendance $73,446 including room and board) and stop your pathetic whining about “what our generation is trying to do.”



 

Category: The Ivy League Is Depraved and Decadent

The New Rules: AVOID ALL WOMEN!

Posted on | December 3, 2018 | 1 Comment

If you are male in the #MeToo era, every woman in the workplace is your enemy. Feminism’s goal is to destroy the careers of all men. There is only only one way for a man to be safe from this danger:

No more dinners with female colleagues. Don’t sit next to them on flights. Book hotel rooms on different floors. Avoid one-on-one meetings.
In fact, as a wealth adviser put it, just hiring a woman these days is “an unknown risk.” What if she took something he said the wrong way?
Across Wall Street, men are adopting controversial strategies for the #MeToo era and, in the process, making life even harder for women. . . .
Interviews with more than 30 senior executives suggest many are spooked by #MeToo and struggling to cope. “It’s creating a sense of walking on eggshells,” said David Bahnsen, a former managing director at Morgan Stanley who’s now an independent adviser overseeing more than $1.5 billion. . . .
Now, more than a year into the #MeToo movement — with its devastating revelations of harassment and abuse in Hollywood, Silicon Valley and beyond — Wall Street risks becoming more of a boy’s club, rather than less of one.
“Women are grasping for ideas on how to deal with it, because it is affecting our careers,” said Karen Elinski, president of the Financial Women’s Association and a senior vice president at Wells Fargo & Co. “It’s a real loss.”
There’s a danger, too, for companies that fail to squash the isolating backlash and don’t take steps to have top managers be open about the issue and make it safe for everyone to discuss it, said Stephen Zweig, an employment attorney with FordHarrison.
“If men avoid working or traveling with women alone, or stop mentoring women for fear of being accused of sexual harassment,” he said, “those men are going to back out of a sexual harassment complaint and right into a sex discrimination complaint.”

Before a woman can file a discrimination complaint against a man, however, first she has to learn his name. She can’t accuse you of harassment or discrimination is she doesn’t know who you are. So the goal for men now is to be invisible at work — drift into the office silently, like a ghost, hurry to your cubicle, never speak to anyone more than is absolutely necessary, then sneak out when the day is over.



 

Category: Sex Trouble

Rule 5 Sunday: Happy Hanukkah!

Posted on | December 2, 2018 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

We used to have a saying in the Cold War Army that certain women were so hot they made fatigues look good, and I don’t think there’s any doubt that former IDF soldier Gal Gadot, better known these days as the actress who plays Wonder Woman, is one of those women. Here’s a pic of her from her draftee days making IDF fatigues look hot.

Gal Gadot before she became famous.

First to light ’em up this week is Ninety Miles From Tyranny with Hot Pick of the Late Night, The 90 Miles Mystery Box Episode #454, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns. Animal Magnetism gives us Rule Five Gun Confiscation Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon.

EBL’s holiday herd includes Amy Winehouse, The Front Runner, Thanksgiving Rule 5, Marvelous Mrs. Maisel Season 1 Recap, Alexandra DeSanctis,  and Lucy Walters, Etc.

A View From The Beach delivers with The New Face of FBI, Missy Peregrym, Russiagate: It Turns Out Lying to Congress is Illegal After All, “Meximelt”, Surrounded by Russiagate, Ashley Judd Under Fire From Fellow Sex Workers, Russiagate Sturm und Drang, Feminist Sex Bots to Demand Small Talk, Consent, Rita Ora Out of Sync in New York, Getting to the Heart of the Matter, Did Low CO2 Kill the African Megafauna?, She Helped that Problem Just by Walking Back Out and Ring Around the Russiagate.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Amy Motta, his Vintage Babe is Fay McKenzie, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Victoria’s Secret. At Dustbury, it’s Samantha Bond and Janelle Monae.

Thanks to everyone for the luscious linkagery!

Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women

Category: Rule 5

‘The Bible and the Belt’

Posted on | December 2, 2018 | Comments Off on ‘The Bible and the Belt’

 

The University of Alabama won the SEC football title Saturday night. If you listen to this week’s episode of The Other Podcast, you’ll find me interrupting the political commentary to give updates. It was a huge gut-check for the Crimson Tide. The undefeated national champions trailed 28-14 before Tua Tagovailoa threw a 51-yard touchdown pass to Jaylen Waddle with three minutes left in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter, Tagovailoa was injured and had to leave the game. Jalen Hurts came in at quarterback and led a drive that ended with a 10-yard TD pass to Jerry Jeudy to tie the game at 28-28. On Georgia’s next possession, the Bulldogs failed to convert a fourth down on a fake punt, surrendering the ball to Alabama at midfield with three minutes left. Hurts then led the game-winning drive, scoring on a 15-yard touchdown run.

A win is a win, even a come-from-behind win that induces cardiac trauma, and leaves your starting quarterback gimped up with a bad ankle. Tagovailoa will have four weeks to recover from his injury before the Tide’s Dec. 29 national championship playoff game (probably against Oklahoma), and Jalen Hurts was awesome, as Tagovailoa acknowledged after the game: “You guys have seen Jalen do this numerous times. For him to get his opportunity again, I am happy for him, and the team is happy for him as well, for him to step in and do what he did.”

Before Saturday’s game, however, there was controversy:

ESPN’s College GameDay aired a feature on Saturday that seemed ready to tell the story of Tagovailoa’s family life in Hawaii and the road to Tuscaloosa. Instead, it made for a disturbing viewing experience as Tua’s father, Galu, detailed how be molded Tua into a football star with a “Bible and the belt” philosophy.
Early in the story, Galu discussed how he forced Tua to throw lefty despite his son being right-hand dominant. The reason: Galu was a lefty.
Tua said his father’s strict discipline applied to both school and sports. When Tom Rinaldi followed up for clarification on what he meant, the Alabama quarterback said the “belt was involved” when he threw an interception or failed to get a certain grade.
“Two things in a Tagovailoa is your faith and your discipline. It’s simple,” Gula said, laughing.
“He means the Bible and the belt. You gotta work, son. You gotta do better. The evaluation from dad is the most honest,” his mother, Diane, added.
The feature also shed light on how Tua ended up at Alabama. Gula made the decision. Regardless of what Tua favored, he said his father had the final say.

The revelation that the Alabama quarterback’s family believes in corporal punishment evidently shocked some viewers, but how do you think championship athletes are made, anyway? Football is not a game for weaklings. Becoming the best quarterback in the country — Tua threw for 3,189 yards and 36 touchdowns during the regular season — doesn’t just happen accidentally, you know. Someone should do an interview of NFL Hall of Fame members and ask, “Did you father ever spank you with a belt?” My guess is that at least 90% would answer yes, and they wouldn’t even think it was controversial. That’s just the way it was.

Old-fashioned good parenting — “your faith and your discipline,” as Gula Tagovailoa said — may seem “disturbing” to some sports writers, but they’re not the ones playing in the championship game, are they?

Here, watch the 5-minute video and judge for yourself:

 

Gula Tagovailoa: “You want the best for your kids. I felt the best was USC, because a lot of great players came out of there. I felt like, man, maybe Tua can be a part of that. But when Alabama called, it just changed everything.”
Diane Tagovailoa: “Nobody gets an offer from the University of Alabama who lives in Hawaii. So it was like, wow, is this really true? Is this really happening?”
Gula Tagovailoa: “I was like, all right. You want to go big? Let’s do it big. You want to go compete? Alabama’s where it’s at.”

Yes, sir, Mr. Tagovailoa — and thank you for raising such a fine son!

“Every ’Bama man’s behind you, hit your stride!”

(Hat-tip: Kirby McCain on Twitter.)



 

Category: Alabama, Football
« go back — keep looking »