The Left’s Race Baiting Is Bewildering If You Argue Rationally
Posted on | November 24, 2012 | 29 Comments
by Smitty
A taste of Jonah Goldberg in the New York Post
Racial slander is like duct tape: There’s no limit to what you can do with it.
But can you imagine how much worse it will get if Republicans actually do reach out to black community (as they should)?
One of the points of racial slander is to signal that only liberal policies are guaranteed to be non-racist (even when such policies were forged with racist intent, like the Davis-Bacon Act). This is why the Congressional Black Caucus insists on calling itself the “conscience of the Congress.”
That’s why policies like school choice are routinely denounced as racist, even though they’re largely aimed at improving the lives of inner-city blacks trapped in bad schools. Teachers unions don’t like school choice, ergo, it’s racist.
The United States is founded upon an Enlightenment approach to rational argument. The myopic genius of the Left has been to rediscover purely hormonal populism, and turn it into political power.
The $16T question is: how do you fight that? Rational argument is predicated upon both parties arguing in good faith. The Left seems to argue from the standpoint of bogging down honest discussion, and running out the clock. Meanwhile, votes are bought on the side with ‘free stuff’, and the Left continues to build the entitled mob.
How do you argue with that? Are there any teachers other than time and pain for these Lefties?
via Insty

Pingback: Abortion Rate is Down In Spite of Obama and LINKS!
Pingback: Jackie Wellfonder - Raging Against the Rhetoric – Irrationality and Race Baiting
Pingback: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove
Pingback: From around the blogroll « THE FIRST STREET JOURNAL.
Pingback: FMJRA 2.0: A Day Late And A Dollar Short : The Other McCain