OMG! @ParisHilton Gets Wrongly Tagged ‘H8R’ for Talking About Gay Sex

Posted on Comments

Paris Hilton: So Rich, She Don’t Need You

Political Correctness requires that no one ever say anything to hurt the feelings of Designated Victim Groups, and even mega-celebrities are not exempt from this stupid rule:

Paris Hilton has been caught on tape making homophobic and derogatory statements about gay men who have random sex with strangers even stating “most of them probably have AIDS.” . . .
[A] spokesperson for Hilton said:
“Paris Hilton’s comments were to express that it is dangerous for anyone to have unprotected sex that could lead to a life threatening disease. The conversation became heated, after a close gay friend told her in a cab ride, a story about a gay man who has AIDS and is knowingly having unprotected sex. He also discussed a website that encourages random sex by gay men with strangers. As she was being shown the website her comments were in reference to those people promoting themselves on the site. . . . Paris Hilton is a huge supporter of the gay community and would never purposefully make any negative statements about anyone’s sexual orientation.”
On the audio Paris says at one point: “Gay guys are the horniest people in the world. They’re disgusting. Dude, most of them probably have AIDS.”
The heiress was in Manhattan for New York Fashion Week and in the early morning hours of Friday, September 7, Paris’ remarks were caught on tape by a cab driver, when her pal, who is an openly gay male model, is heard in the audio clip describing Grindr, an app that gay men use to locate other gay men for hookups.

A few relevant factual reference points:

  1. In describing men who hook up with complete strangers via the Internet, Paris said “most of them probably have AIDS.”
  2. This was not offered as a scientifically valid estimate, but a rather common-sense health concern, related to the promiscuous behavior described.
  3. Butt-fucking isn’t healthy. Excuse the blunt language, boys and girls, but the rectum is not a sexual organ. It is foul and unsanitary, and if you have some kind of weird obsessive-compulsive fetish about doing it in the hiney-hole, you need to seek help.
  4. Yes, Point 3 applies equally to you hetero guys who, to satisfy your porn-influenced kinky craving, coerce or cajole your girlfriends into taking it up the poop chute.
  5. The Gay Thought Police who are trying to turn Paris Hilton into a latter-day Anita Bryant, merely for expressing a revulsion at the promiscuous indulgence in anonymous sex, are engaged in a form of dishonest fascistic propaganda.
  6. Attempting to take a single de-contextualized comment and turn it into evidence of “hate” — to define people according to selective distortion — is probably not going to endear you to any honest person who has hitherto been your ally.
  7. Paris Hilton has so much money she doesn’t need to kowtow to political pressure groups, and if she’s being nice to gay people, it’s not because she can be blackmailed. Even if she never again appeared on TV, she’s still richer than you.

You people need to get a life, stop harassing @ParisHilton and — please! — seek help for your weird hiney-hole fetish.

53 comments

  2. Unprotected anal sex with strangers is an incredibly messed up practice. It spreads misery and I can’t imagine the psychological toll.

    Find a partner for life and stick with them. Why is the wisdom of this plan lost on so many people? Is it some kind of instant gratification bug that has infected the rest of our society? I don’t even see the gratification point. How many times do you have sex with strangers before the novelty wears off and you realize you’re lonely?

    What a sad world we’re in.

  5. More proof that lefties are stupid. And I target lefties because they are the ones quickest to the draw when it comes to zeroing in on H8Rs.

    What surprises me is that Paris Hilton displays a modicum of common sense, unlike the suicidal nut jobs who are — in more than a metaphorical sense — sticking their dicks into a meat grinder.

    Good on her.

  8. Back in the mid-80’s the BBC aired a documentary on homosexuality where an NHS doctor pointed out that gays are uncommonly subject to a wide range of gastrointestinal ailments compared to the general population.

    Can’t imagine there’s a connection.

  10. Stacy, thank you for standing up for real women.

    I cannot fathom what would induce a heterosexual man to ask his ladyfriend, wife, girlfriend, or one-night stand to take it up the butt, but a lot of men think that this is acceptable, and that women who don’t are “repressed” or “need to be persuaded.”

    Well, I do know why men do that – people like Dan Savage who insist that women ought to subject themselves to the same prison-inmate style of sexual relations that gay men routinely engage in. Probably has something to do with wanting the rest of the world to be as miserable as he is.

  12. Anal sex, even with your exclusive partner, is still dangerous.
    Think of what the body expels through there, such as viruses, parasites, poisons, etc.; hell, a chemo patient passes their treatments through the glory hole.

  14. Biology — as in reproduction — seems to think so. At least the mechanics are more compatible.

    But that depends on where the little peeter has already been. And what has been in the pee-hole before the little peeter started his very own voyage of discovery.

  15. Sigh.

    Anal sex – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In 1992, a study conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that only 26% of men 18 to 59 and 20% of women 18 to 59 had engaged in heterosexual anal sex; a similar 2005 survey (also conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) found a rising incidence of anal sex relations in the American heterosexual population. The survey showed that 40% of men and 35% of women between 25 and 44 had engaged in heterosexual anal sex.

    In terms of overall numbers of survey respondents, seven times as many women as gay men said that they engaged in anal intercourse, with this figure reflecting the larger heterosexual population size.

    Well, I guess all these straight butt pokers are doomed. Or something.

  16. Oh come on. She hates teh gays and you know it. She’s surrounded by them and she doesn’t like them on little bit. Whatever, get over it and let’s all move on. Including teh gays. OK?

  18. Yep. Someone out there has found a way to enjoy themselves. Someone better run around with their hair on fire screaming about it. Can’t have that now, can we?

  19. ”
    seven times as many women as gay men said that they engaged in anal intercourse, with this figure reflecting the larger heterosexual population size.”

    Wait… that’s just because there are a lot more heteros? This statistic is meaningless without knowing the proportions.

    But it’s a free country. If people agree to engage in anal sex, aware or the risks, that’s absolutely none of my business. But there are a lot of risks and it’s not a bad idea to help others be aware of them.

    I think there is a more obvious design to how sex should work that has a lot more going for it.

  21. Face reality you homophobe. Tom Jefferson – gay. Stonewall Jackson – gay. Robert E. Lee – Gay. Col Sanders – gay. Your whole Southern way of life is a kinda fag-dom based on butt sex. You can’t accept it, so you go after Gays trying to stop H8 speech. We’re on to you McCain.

    P.S. Paris needs to talk less and post more sex videos.

  22. You’re saying that a fair number of heterosexuals like anal sex? When Stacy concedes that a fair number of heterosexuals like anal sex?

    What’s your point, again?

  27. Apparently, having an opinion based on FACTS or repeating the FACTS renders one liable to be called a ______-phobe (and or racist)

    I have an idea, let’s consolidate the ad hominem attack labels.

    From now on just add -phobe to whatever victim/minority/alleged target you are attempting to deify.

    Examples: no more cries of “racist” it’s now melaninophobe
    If you say anything that a protected group decides has hurt their feelings then you get the label.

    this will make it easier for the journalists (and I use the word loosely) to phone in their “reporting”.

    and now back to your ongoing meme. . . .

  29. I’m tempted to ban both of them for aggravated assault on the English language and ignorance of human anatomy.

  33. He conceded that? Where, exactly? He said something about perverted guys forcing their girlfriends to engage in the act, when the stats indicate the women are almost equally complicit. I didn’t see anything about “a fair number,’ though.

    As to my point: That number turns out to be rather large. RSM just labeled “40% of men and 35% of women between 25 and 44” (probably higher now, given how many folks are trying to avoid having kids in this lousy economy), or 16,427,600 men and 14,373,450 women as “hav[ing] some kind of weird obsessive-compulsive fetish about doing it in the hiney-hole, [and needing] to seek help.”

    Thirty million “perverts?” Some may consider that a compelling position, but I’m not one of them.

  36. Actually, unprotected back-door breaking-and-entering, while dangerous to the insertor, is a MUCH greater infection risk to the insertee (exceeded perhaps only by sharing an IV needle). Not that the insertor is safe, as Yasser Arafat (y”sh) learned when he was dying from AIDS.

    And yes, this applies equally to homo- and heterosexuals, if statistically corrected for promiscuity level.

  37. “had engaged”: how many of those tried it once or twice out of curiosity (especially considering the tireless propaganda for it in s3x columns and “straight” pr0n), and how many engage in this practice at least semi-regularly?

    That’s the same debate as the percentages of homosexual experience. Especially among women, the CDC found that the percentage that had had at least one homosexual encounter was WAY higher (for white women, about 3x) than the about 4% total that self-identify as “gay”/lesbian or bisexual. How many of those are just teenage girls who fooled around with another girl once, decided it wasn’t their thing, and never returned to the practice?

  38. There are LOTS of things that are dangerous but that I don’t want the government forbidding, as long as no bystanders are threatened.
    Which is one reason I oppose the nanny state, because eventually either the taxpayer gets to foot the bill for the consequences of irresponsible behaviors (be it s3xual, drugs, alcohol, gluttony, dangerous sports, smoking,…) or the nanny state gets to take away your freedom.
    The secretive “Zombie” gave this actually as the best argument against 0bamacare.

  41. Who was it for several years wouldn’t treat Wikipedia cites as valid on his blog, especially on politically charged subjects?

    Bill, there is a huge difference between a society taking a position that something is undesireable, and the government taking that position LEGALLY and putting people in jail for it. As for your so-called statistics, it really does get back to that question your mother asked you as a child: “If all your friends / classmates jumped off a cliff, would you follow them?”

    If so, have at it. I’m pretty sure there’s a charity (probably run by icky Xtianists, maybe even donated to by me) that will try to put your ass back together. Just don’t expect the government to make sure I donate every April 15th.

  44. I’m skeptical of that study. My experience is limited to NYC and Los Angeles, but I don’t remember seeing the lines outside the “straight baths”.

    Don’t remember seeing any straight baths for that matter, except for the alter kockers in Sheepshead Bay and Brighton Beach…

  45. It’s my business when it’s seen as “normal” and changes what other heterosexual men as of their wives, girlfriends, or whatever, when I or my friends could be that wife or girlfriend.

  49. The problem I have with things like this is: where do you draw the line?

    Anal sex is bad, but oral and vaginal sex is ok?

    Anal and oral sex is bad, vaginal only?

    Missionary position only?

    No sex other than for procreation?

    There are a million places one could draw the line here. Which one is right? Are any of them right?

Comments are closed.