More #FreeKate Arguments: Want to Let Heather Wirth-Dalager Babysit Your Kids?

Posted on Comments

Kaitlyn Hunt’s got a fever, and
jailbait poontang is the only cure!

That’s really the core of the “Free Kate” argument and, again, if you watched yesterday’s hearing where Kate’s bail was revoked, you understand this argument carries no weight in Florida courts. Kaitlyn Hunt is guilty and belongs in jail, and the fact that prosecutors were willing to offer her a plea deal — even after her violations of the no-contact order were discovered — ought to be understood as a humane effort to avoid a trial that would require that the underage victim be compelled to testify about their sordid and perverse relationship.

No sane or decent person ever supported the “Free Kate” movement, and only the most indecent and insane fanatics continue to support Kaitlyn Hunt now that her deviant criminality has been demonstrated by evidence that Judge Pegg called “overwhelming.”

“Free Kate” supporters are amoral scum with no sense of shame, nor do they have any respect for law or understanding of basic logic. Where only bad arguments are possible — because all the good arguments are for Kaitlyn Hunt’s conviction — one becomes accustomed to dishonest blame-shifting. Heather Wirth-Dalager:

This is a variation of an argument “Free Kate” supporters have made for the past three months: The problem is not that Kaitlyn Hunt broke the law; the problem is that somebody called the cops.

Really, it’s just Thug Logic: “Snitches get stitches.”

The argument from Heather Wirth-Dalager is a bit more nuanced than that, but boiled down to its essence, that’s it:

I am curious what the teacher who violated these teenage girls privacy by announcing this relationship to the younger girls parents, kicked Kate of the team, and facilitated Kate being expelled from school is thinking now? . . . .

(My guess: She’s probably thinking you need to improve your punctuation and syntax.)

Sounds like a strong discrimination suit against the school district and this teacher personally due to these girls sexual orientation!!

(That required two exclamation marks!!)

Regardless of this ludicrous law that doesn’t protect kids in this age group, punishing someone for that in and of itself is simply wrong.  This isn’t just a case about same sex relationships, its discrimination and seems to hold some strong privacy violations as well, a doctor would be bound to privacy due to HIPPA Laws based on these girls ages, why does the school have the ability to release anything to the younger girls parents about Kate’s sexual orientation or about Kate at all? . . .

(Translation: “If a lesbian wants to play Spin the Dildo with your 14-year-old daughter, it is ‘discrimination’ and ‘privacy violations’ for anyone to tell you what’s going on, because ‘sexual orientation’ means that the law against having sex with 14-year-olds is ‘ludicrous.'” Does that argument make sense to you? If so, seek psychiatric help immediately.)

We need to remember these are CHILDREN even at 18 years old and still in high school, they do not carry the life experiences to understand ALL consequences of a relationship. . . .

(In case the double exclamation marks weren’t helping, now she’s going to CAPITALIZE random WORDS, and hope you don’t notice the inherent contradiction of her argument. Heather Wirth-Dalager thinks it’s OK for a 14-year-old to be having sex, and “ludicrous” that the law should forbid it. Yet at the same time, while she argues that minors deserve no legal protection against being sexually exploited by adults, she also argues that 18-year-olds are just children — CHILDREN — who are so naive they can’t be expected to understand consequences. Again, if her argument makes sense to you, seek psychiatric help immediately.)

These young girls will probably never trust an authority figure again in their lives and especially the younger girl who will have life long emotional damage from the actions of first the teacher/coach that they trusted, the school for punishing them for being individuals and their sexual orientation, her parents for trying to fore her out of a situation with someone she cared about, and then the law which is supposed to protect her and has grossly failed to do so.

Well, there you have it, eh? “Authentic frontier gibberish.”

Apparently, in Heather Wirth-Dalager’s demented mind, finger-sex in the school restroom toilet stall is just “being individuals.” Also, according to  Heather Wirth-Dalager, running away from home to spend the night satisfying the lusts of a dildo-wielding pervert doesn’t cause nearly as much “emotional damage” for a 14-year-old as having her tattoo-covered lesbian partner get arrested for her crimes.

Because “sexual orientation” and “privacy,” you see.

Also, if you ever decide to record a video of yourself masturbating and want to send it to a 15-year-old girl, Heather Wirth-Dalager would be OK with that. You’re just “being individuals,” right?

 

 


143 comments

  2. Heather Wirth-Dalager also needs to realize the teacher had a legal duty to report the crime to the police. The parental notification was important, but calling the police was a requirement. My wife is a teacher here in Texas and they are required by law to report all suspected cases of child abuse, sexual or otherwise, to the police and to the higher ups in the school. And an 18 year old Adult having sex with a 14 year old Child is most definitely sexual abuse. Otherwise the school and teacher will face criminal and civil sanctions.

  3. “Does that argument make sense to you? If so, seek psychiatric help immediately.”

    It does if you want to fuck children. Which is basically the point of all#FreeKate supporters.

  4. First thing first.

    There should be a law in Florida that outlaws poor paragraph structure. Having to read that bit of squirrel logic was bad enough, however the lack of punctuation, lack of indentation, and run on sentences was more then I can bear.

    Second issue, is the Free Kate seems in someways comparable the Fly-paper theories for the Middle East. I had no idea there were so many kooks out there, hitching their pyscho wagons to a truly terrible cause.

    I swear these guys will be arguing that if their dog humped your leg, it would consensual, and discriminatory if you shove the canine culprit off.

    Shithawks the lot of them!

  5. Heather Wirth-Dalager don’t NEED to REALIZE nuthin’, baby! She FEELS and that’s good enough for her!

  6. “There should be a law in Florida that outlaws poor paragraph structure.”

    No — a federal law!

  11. The teachers and school administration don’t have choices in this: if they become aware of the sexual abuse of a minor, they are required, by law, to report it.

    In fact, the teacher who informed the victim’s parents actually broke the law, because he was required to inform law enforcement as well, not just the parents.

  12. No, sorry, but no. Our federal government is far too deeply involved in areas in which it has no business, and grammar and sentence structure are the purview of the states, not the federal government. 🙂

  13. What is so shocking to me is how much public morality has changed in 50 years When I was a child Kate would have never made the news and would have been locked up for a long time. No one would defending her right to initiate
    a innocent child to the life of lesbian sex in a public bathroom

  17. I agree fully. The other aspect the Free Child Poon advocates seem to be missing is the parents of the victim.

    When a parent tells you to stay away from their child you stay away. Failure to do so places you grave danger of a wrathfull parent.

  18. From K-Bob’s Codex, number 11:

    The Internet Magnifies Insignificant Minorities

    The planet has over seven-billion people. If one person out of a million has four arms, that means about seven-thousand of them exist. If they all connect via the Internet, they go, “Hey, there’s like thousands of us! We’re probably a tenth of the population or something! We need Al Sharpton to get his idiot son in the White House to make us a privileged group, right away!”

    (I may have confused some groups in that dramatization. I’m pretty sure it’s the Muslim Brotherhood that thinks of the occupant of the oval office as Al Sharpton’s idiot son, and not the Gay Mafia, who thinks they are like ten percent of the population or something.)

    So these #FreeKate a-holes (who, as you wrote, basically want to fuck children) think they are a force to be reckoned with.

    They are sick, and could all fit into ought to be placed in one mental ward housing a few thousand.

  19. 18-year-olds are children to these people, but they think that the 14-year-old should be able to make adult decisions apart from her parents and more than one person has suggested emancipation. These people make no damn sense whatsoever.

  20. Yes. The concept you are referring to is that of mandated reporters. I used to be one when I worked with adults with developmental disabilities. I was expected to report any and all wrongdoing I knew about even outside of work. If I didn’t and it was discovered that I knew and said nothing, I could get in serious trouble.

  21. They don’t make any sense because they don’t utilize critical thinking skills [putting it mildly.] Every time I read their delusional comments on the Facebook “support” page, I question the percentage of the group who suffer from Antisocial Personality Disorder. The sociopathic behavior on there somewhat terrifies me.

  22. Ms Graves, you’ve said the younger girl is scared and confused feeling that this is all her fault. Who do you propose made her feel that way?

    Ms Graves, this claim that the younger girl consented to the sexual contact, isn’t this a result of the witness tampering you and your clients engaged in?

    Isn’t it the case now that any testimony the younger girl might have given in defense of your client is damaged goods now?

    Ms Graves, I’m afraid that the unscrupulous conduct of your client and her family after the first hearing as well as your own rather dubious handling of this matter has made anything the younger girl might testify to, other than the strict facts of the case, completely circumspect.

    You frigging idiot.

  27. ” ‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose
    it to mean — neither more nor less.’ ” — Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll

  30. Graves is an illiterate, incompetent, lying, condoning degenerate. She’s the perfect attorney for her equally despicable clients. She is an embarrassment to [most] defense attorneys (though I think she’s actually a ‘family’ attorney.) Without giving too much detail, I have worked closely with public defenders and defense attorneys and the vast majority do not condone the crimes, but seek to merely have fair administration of justice for clients. That said, this woman has hopped on the Hunt train of delusions while not-so-subtly villifying the victim in the process. And from I read, she’s now accusing the victim’s family of abuse? She’s gutter trash who needs to be disbarred.

  33. Actually, the teacher is a mandated reporter, and if anything, might get into trouble for failing to report abuse of a child by Kaitlyn Hunt to the police.

  35. I’m re-reading her post as we speak. She is 100% alleging abuse and the Kool-Aid followers are now speaking of the “abuse” as if it were fact. They are desperate.

    Here is it, verbatim:

    “… taken to a church that labels being gay a sin, has the Bible thrown at her, all of her thing in her room boxed up and taken from her, is apparently hit by her parents, and clearly yelled at for lying by her father in the presence of Detective Shepherd at the school in a subsequent interview.”

    I smell a defamation suit.

  37. So much stupid, so little time. I only note that Ms. Dangler, er Ms. Dalager is an idiot in spades. She has demonstrated conclusively in writing the failure of the government education apparatus. We owe her our thanks for that, at least. As for the “18 year olds don’t understand the consequences . . .” nonsense, whose fault is that? Some us told our children during their late teens that the adult rules apply, and that, in addition to parental discipline, they were now subject to the punishments described in the state criminal code for proscribed behavior. And by the way, the “they don’t understand” argument is a reason for the age of consent laws and other legal disabilities in the first instance, you moron.

Comments are closed.