Kaitlyn Hunt’s got a fever, and
jailbait poontang is the only cure!
That’s really the core of the “Free Kate” argument and, again, if you watched yesterday’s hearing where Kate’s bail was revoked, you understand this argument carries no weight in Florida courts. Kaitlyn Hunt is guilty and belongs in jail, and the fact that prosecutors were willing to offer her a plea deal — even after her violations of the no-contact order were discovered — ought to be understood as a humane effort to avoid a trial that would require that the underage victim be compelled to testify about their sordid and perverse relationship.
No sane or decent person ever supported the “Free Kate” movement, and only the most indecent and insane fanatics continue to support Kaitlyn Hunt now that her deviant criminality has been demonstrated by evidence that Judge Pegg called “overwhelming.”
“Free Kate” supporters are amoral scum with no sense of shame, nor do they have any respect for law or understanding of basic logic. Where only bad arguments are possible — because all the good arguments are for Kaitlyn Hunt’s conviction — one becomes accustomed to dishonest blame-shifting. Heather Wirth-Dalager:
This is a variation of an argument “Free Kate” supporters have made for the past three months: The problem is not that Kaitlyn Hunt broke the law; the problem is that somebody called the cops.
Really, it’s just Thug Logic: “Snitches get stitches.”
The argument from Heather Wirth-Dalager is a bit more nuanced than that, but boiled down to its essence, that’s it:
I am curious what the teacher who violated these teenage girls privacy by announcing this relationship to the younger girls parents, kicked Kate of the team, and facilitated Kate being expelled from school is thinking now? . . . .
(My guess: She’s probably thinking you need to improve your punctuation and syntax.)
Sounds like a strong discrimination suit against the school district and this teacher personally due to these girls sexual orientation!!
(That required two exclamation marks!!)
Regardless of this ludicrous law that doesn’t protect kids in this age group, punishing someone for that in and of itself is simply wrong. This isn’t just a case about same sex relationships, its discrimination and seems to hold some strong privacy violations as well, a doctor would be bound to privacy due to HIPPA Laws based on these girls ages, why does the school have the ability to release anything to the younger girls parents about Kate’s sexual orientation or about Kate at all? . . .
(Translation: “If a lesbian wants to play Spin the Dildo with your 14-year-old daughter, it is ‘discrimination’ and ‘privacy violations’ for anyone to tell you what’s going on, because ‘sexual orientation’ means that the law against having sex with 14-year-olds is ‘ludicrous.'” Does that argument make sense to you? If so, seek psychiatric help immediately.)
We need to remember these are CHILDREN even at 18 years old and still in high school, they do not carry the life experiences to understand ALL consequences of a relationship. . . .
(In case the double exclamation marks weren’t helping, now she’s going to CAPITALIZE random WORDS, and hope you don’t notice the inherent contradiction of her argument. Heather Wirth-Dalager thinks it’s OK for a 14-year-old to be having sex, and “ludicrous” that the law should forbid it. Yet at the same time, while she argues that minors deserve no legal protection against being sexually exploited by adults, she also argues that 18-year-olds are just children — CHILDREN — who are so naive they can’t be expected to understand consequences. Again, if her argument makes sense to you, seek psychiatric help immediately.)
These young girls will probably never trust an authority figure again in their lives and especially the younger girl who will have life long emotional damage from the actions of first the teacher/coach that they trusted, the school for punishing them for being individuals and their sexual orientation, her parents for trying to fore her out of a situation with someone she cared about, and then the law which is supposed to protect her and has grossly failed to do so.
Well, there you have it, eh? “Authentic frontier gibberish.”
Apparently, in Heather Wirth-Dalager’s demented mind, finger-sex in the school restroom toilet stall is just “being individuals.” Also, according to Heather Wirth-Dalager, running away from home to spend the night satisfying the lusts of a dildo-wielding pervert doesn’t cause nearly as much “emotional damage” for a 14-year-old as having her tattoo-covered lesbian partner get arrested for her crimes.
Because “sexual orientation” and “privacy,” you see.
Also, if you ever decide to record a video of yourself masturbating and want to send it to a 15-year-old girl, Heather Wirth-Dalager would be OK with that. You’re just “being individuals,” right?
Since we don’t know what the “Pure” referred to….
Yeah. All I managed to do was dump some Flurescein in the school fountain. Fortunately the statute of limitations expired on that long ago.
Hey, I don’t care if she’s on the North, South, East, or West side of the jail.
So seeing this pattern of behavior from the Hunt clan, the smearing of the victim and her family. The veiled treats by the attorney.
Understanding that the minor child couldn’t consent but yielded to the older girl’s advances. With all we’ve seen of the Hunt’s behavior doesn’t it seem likely that the minor’s compliance was the result of duress?
I don’t think HWD wants to fuck children. She wants to inhabit a fantasy land where all the sex is hot and consensual, and love blooms forever between high school children. Who are, despite being children, mature and responsible enough to have sex without making a mess of their emotions and their lives.
Or something.
She’s not really thinking it through.
Exactly. The 14 year old was threatened if she talked, and rewarded with sex and acceptance if she lied or kept quiet. Textbook manipulation and grooming.
Aside: This story seems to be the gift that keeps on giving for your blog traffic. [Smiley Thing]
And, of course, subsequent to the discovery of the relationship, it has continued with both the perpetrator and her adult enablers out in front of God and everyone. How people do not see this behavior by the Hunts and now their lawyer for what it is, is astounding.
Yes. This explains, in part, why TEEN romance novels and books like “50 Shades of Gray” are big sellers to the soccer mom set.
She would have made the news.
It just wouldn’t have been a celebration.
Thank you for painting a fuller picture of what is going on: there is a community of people putting pressure on a 14 year old girl to shut up and literally be a sex toy for an adult. It is disgusting beyond belief.
No, I’m pretty sure it’s my book posts and Smitty’s humor. /deadpan
Paging Little Miss Attila to the thread…
Well I do come here for both of those reason as well. Crime stories are worth reading, but a good book is a damn site more enjoyable.
No, please, we have enough scum and villainy in these parts already. We’re full up. May I suggest Detroit?
That Hunt’s attorney, an officer of the court, openly engaging in intimation. There seems to be no limits on how low these people are willing to go.
Suggestion approved!
*Shudder*
I had the misfortune to read half a chapter over a seat-companion’s shoulder on the train a few months ago. I don’t mind erotica, but this was really, really amateur erotica, clumsy and clunky and crude.
Why it’s a best-seller is a bit of a mystery.
A universal law? Why restrict the benefits of such a wonderful regime to merely these United States?
“Anyone lived in a pretty how town
With up-so-floating many bells down”
That’s why.
I’m trying to think of a much stronger word than “disgusting”. Revolting, perhaps? Unhuman? Damnable?
Take your pick; they all fit…
Suspect, not circumspect.
You did better than me – I couldn’t get through a paragraph. I like classic erotica, but this was amateur, Fabio-like, trashy romance.
OMG. Priceless!!!
Er, I’d yell at a kid for lying, too.
Agreed. I’m more concerned with the attorney alleging physical abuse. I can only hope the victim is not being abused.
You monster!
Wake.
If she was being “abused” then the action to be taken is not to post on FaceBook, but to call the police. DCF.
That’s her role, her job and her duty. Since she’s not done that, you can infer from that how “abusive” she truly believes the Smith’s conduct to be.
Do you really think we wouldn’t know all about it?
I do not believe the victim is being abused.
Dear God, how is it possible for someone to actually think like this and then to bring themselves to write down the chaos of their mind?
Can we, perhaps, invite Heather here for a bit of a chat?
Me, too!
That’s Cardinal Pointist, that is!
No love for East, South, Southeast?
I think the left considers any sort of parental discipline as abuse.
So dear old Kaitlyn should have manual labor imposed upon her? No argument from me.
Sounds like a job for the Mohel.
I never commented on my feelings on parental discipline and don’t plan to. What’s with you rigidly throwing everyone into the same category? Yes, I lean left, which is irrelevant to my feelings on Kaitlyn Hunt’s behavior and criminal activity.
Yep, exactly. I don’t believe a word that comes out of that woman’s mouth.
I suspected as much.
I don’t believe she is either.
Scum and villainy? Mos Eisley, maybe?
RT @rsmccain: Would You Let a #FreeKate Supporter Babysit Your Kids? http://t.co/AdLirMMUlW | @Laura_PH @Jeanette_Runyon @sjreidhead @NASCA…
Apparently, she was married to Otis the drunk.
As per my previous, I apologize for generalizing – a crime both sides are continuously guilty of. None of my replies to which you have elected to take personal umbrage was a reply to a comment of yours. So it’s your choice and right to take offense.
I have the deepest respect for your participation here but by nature of the forum, you can pretty much expect a comment or two that is specifically intended to rile those of the left persuasion. It’s the nature of the beast.
Too late. The place has literally gone to the dogs.
I don’t believe I’d have told that.
I’m going to back carefully away, as I see guy humor starting.
No worries – you’re absolutely correct – it is the nature of the beast, especially considering the forum I’m on. My ideologies are all over the place, so naturally I don’t fit in on any forum, but I throw my thoughts out there regardless of the response.
and if you’re strong enough to voice an opinion in a hostile environment and stick to your guns, you’ll only get respect (along with a few veiled barbs!).