Transgender Lesbian Dana McCallum Accused of Raping Lesbian Ex-Wife

Posted on Comments

Accused transgender lesbian rapist Dana McCallum.

Maybe this proves the radical feminists right. Even after they get rid of their penises, men are still men and all men are rapists:

A prominent advocate for transgender and women’s rights in the tech world has been charged with raping her wife, The San Francisco Examiner has learned.
Dana McCallum, a senior engineer at Twitter who speaks and writes about women’s and transgender rights and technology issues, was arrested Jan. 26 and booked into County Jail on suspicion of five felonies, according to the Sheriff’s Department.
McCallum, 31, whose legal name is Dana Contreras, was charged Jan. 29 with five felonies, including three counts of spousal rape, one count of false imprisonment and one count of domestic violence, according to the District Attorney’s Office. She has since pleaded not guilty. . . .
McCallum’s attorney, John Runfola, says the case is simply about money.
“I’m just disgusted that, you know, this is going on,” Runfola said. “Dana is an employee [at Twitter] and is about to come into a large amount of money. … This whole thing is about money.”
The couple had been separated, he said, but were still having sexual relations. McCallum served her wife with divorce papers the day before the incident, Runfola said.
The incident in question, according to Runfola, happened in a small condo in the Mission district when four teenagers were in the house.
“No one heard ‘rape’ or fighting or anything,” he said.

Uh, why were four teenagers at this couple’s “small condo in the Mission district”? But never mind that distraction: Exactly how does a transgender rape her estranged lesbian wife? Can a woman be “raped” by her partner’s surgically created simulacrum of a vagina? One suspects that a detailed account of “the incident in question” would be an exceptionally strange story. Speaking of which . . .

The Daily Mail notices that McCallum has published “the text of a talk I gave to Bloomington High School South’s gay-straight alliance in Indiana on April 24, 2013.” Because, yeah, talking to high school kids about your sex life is the thing you want to do a few months before you’re accused of raping your lesbian wife while four teenagers are in your condo.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

UPDATE: A bit of research reveals that @MadMelvina is @DanaDanger’s ex-wife. She is about 15 years older than McCallum, and fled an abusive marriage to her previous husband. At least one of the couple’s friends is siding with the ex against McCallum:

Some people have a “rescuer” tendency that leads them to get involved with damaged personalities. So if McCallum’s ex fled one abusive situation, only to end up in another (allegedly) abusive situation, this is perhaps predictable. Speaking of which . . .

TERFs = Trans Exclusive Radical Feminists, i.e., lesbian separatists who don’t want trannies in female-only spaces. Weird to find myself agreeing with them, however limited the agreement may be.

 

100 comments

  1. Maybe these crazy lesbo fems are right. Men remain men: pigs. Even when you invert their penises and cut their balls off.

    I had a dog like that, he humped everything he could even though he was fixed.

    Maybe it is because “Dana” is a ginger. You know how wild they are.

  2. So, being transgender does not allow one to ascend as high on the victim pyramid, so it becomes a lesbian. (Or, as the rest of us know it, a heterosexual guy.) I suppose the fact that it’s a ginger gives us a trifecta of oppression.

  6. Don’t forget that according to @taradublinrocks this is a loving community and all of these shenanigans are technically covered under the new ‘progressive’ definition of love.

  7. Poor ol’ transgenders don’t realize how poorly they fair on the LGBT hierarchy. Another example of useful idiots on the march to destruction.

  11. An appearance that identifies as a woman, man, female, male, intersex and/or any of the many sexual orientations or preferences, for whatever known or reasoned conditions and/or implicit disposition, may act in any number of ways that jibes, contradicts, opposes, conflates, obscures, extends, exaggerates, redefines, etc. a gender or sexual identity. Behavior and identity are not necessarily identical.

    Man, woman, female, male, intersex, hetereosexual, homosexual, bisexual, bi-curious, pansexual, asexual, pseudo-homosexual, lesbian, gay, queer, butche, femme, transexual, transgender, genderqueer, metrosexual, machosexual, transvestite, autosexual, homoflexible, heteroflexible, the varities of BDSM, androphilia, ephebophilia, gynophilia, teleiophilia, gerontophilia, pedophilia, nepiophilia, zoophilia and other paraphilias etc. are some of the possbile gender and sexual identifications, orientations, and attractions.

    The descriptive range and detail for these terms, both by self-identifiers and by others identifying, is considerable.

    I imagine that we can identify with any of these or none and do as we are in it or without it. It seems to me that most of us take such identifications for granted without examination and place these identifications on ourselves and others without a second thought with all the conditions that follow when doing so.

    It is wholly unnecessary to do so to go on. Our capabilities and incapabilities are enough to move along. Culture and societal creations are alterable.

  13. Mammals come in two types: male and female. “Identity” falls in the realm of psychology and /or people who need psychiatric help or spiritual counseling.

  15. I hope that Anamika has had “the last part he has to say on this matter”, as despite her verbiage she has contributed almost nothing. She may return to her ivory tower where no doubt a trail of sycophants may admire her postings. No tears now, okay.

  16. Indeed so!

    It occurs to me that one who chooses “gender identity” does so, for the leverage which is assumed to come with that choice.

    “Every cameo, implies an intaglio”

  17. It is wholly unnecessary to do so to go on. Our capabilities and incapabilities are enough to move along. Culture and societal creations are alterable.

    Gender identity is usually accomplished implicitly, below awareness, and nestled and entangled firmly in implicit dispositions and intricate conditioning. One aware enough to come to ‘choose’ a ‘gender identity,’ and to undergo adjustments in it and for it, especially if dispositions and conditioning have been revealed and followed with reconditioning, is surely of interest. Such a one undergoes an expansion or unleashing of capabilities as ‘revealer,’ ‘creator’ and ‘formatter’ of dispositions and conditioning and understands what they bring and what they deter. This can come in addition to the general capabilities of being a ‘reflector/reactor/formatted object’ of and by unexamined and taken for granted conditions The latter oftimes entails blind doing, rigid fixations, or complete enslavement to such dispositions and conditionings and the behavior that emerges when these arise.

    Inquiring carefully into one’s sexual and gender cameos, if one has them, and any corresponding intanglios can be of some use.

  18. I couldn’t make it past the headline, which was as impossible for my mind to comprehend as an M.C. Escher drawing.

  19. Yep, there’s something that just gives it away “her” picture. By which I mean, the operation was a total flub.

  22. Do we know the perp had surgery? Not all of them do. One of the more bizarre things I learned from reading fringe feminist blogs was how many of them keep the equipment and insist on giving it weird names like “ladystick.”

  23. The available testimony suggests a complete “transition,” but others have raised a similar point.

  26. I sometimes copy and save stories like this. I Keep them in a folder titled Genderal Confusion.

  27. So I actually saw this on the comment section of the SF Examiner. I think it’s instructive in helping to explain the level of derangement our society is dealing with here.

    Commenter #1: “Does this person have a penis or not? Seems a relevant fact not included.”

    Commenter #2: “Penises are NOT relevant. The alleged rapist may have a penis, but her penis IS feminine. This fact is much more important to understand than whether the female penis was used for raping a privileged cis woman. Please. Stop. You are a vaginist, and your words erase identities, and erasing someone’s identity is EXACTLY like killing them.”

    True story.

  28. Now, I grappled with the possibility that this might have been a sarcastic post. But there were people who supported it. Hence, the derangement.

  30. Reading comprehension, accurate representation, and text-based communication are acquired skills. Inexact imagination and imagery comes effortlessly with unconfirmed preconceptions.

  31. There is an indulgent cultural subset to whom that made perfect sense.

    The only bit I can even start to see is that forcible intercourse remains rape.

  33. Reading comprehension, accurate representation, and text-based communication are acquired skills. Inexact imagination and imagery comes effortlessly with unconfirmed preconceptions.

  35. Unlike trangbang68, in the context of the post replied to, I’m sure you must be able to understand the imagery of cameo/intaglio ‘pair’.

  36. Excuse me, but this is all just every so slightly confusing.

    A man, went through surgical genital mutilation voluntarily.

    Then, the newly, um, penis-less person began a relationship with an actual woman.

    And then that relationship went sour.

    And then the penis-less person sexually assaulted the woman.

    I am ever so confused why a man would have his sex organ removed and then enter into a sexual relationship with a woman. Why not simply keep your original equipment and enter into a relationship with a woman. It costs less and is probably less painful.

    Frankly, you have to be crazy to pay someone vast sums of money to mutilate your sexual organs, even in a sterile, surgical setting.

    But it is increasingly obvious that certain “movements” are made up of entirely crazy people. You just can’t be sane and say and do the things these people say and do.

  38. That comment was made by smokey, and I thought it was sarcastic. But yes, the other comments were just as strange. And there were thumb ups on it.

  39. I suppose… if what you mean is that the misery is from wanting something that you can’t have and then obsessing about it.

  41. How much LGBQT on LGBQT violence is not making it to the news? How much of these few stories are the lesbians and gays Othering the transfolk in order to retain the Victim profile?

  44. “It costs less and is probably less painful.”

    And besides, if pain is the objective, pretty much any typical divorce should do the trick.

  46. A long time ago when our host was still a Democrat I explained to him that liberal social policy doesn’t solve problems. It creates uglier problems. Here we have a good example. Yeah, these are good people. Anything goes and big surprise it’s a teen hangout. Human nature is what it is. And about the rape, hasn’t RSM shown us that to a feminist rape is more about explicit consent than what actually happened.

  50. Had a musician friend who was pre-op male trying to go full-surgery female. “She” linked a bunch of us to an online article describing her upcoming surgery.

    The guy undergoing surgery had enough ahh, …equipment for two guys. We’re all seeing the pics going various shades of “owww!” and “eeeew!” and most folks asked (including the women musicians) why give up something most guys would think of as a gift of nature.

    The answer is obvious, but “crazy as a bag of angry bees” just doesn’t seem to satisfy.

Comments are closed.