‘Homo Rapiens’: Anti-PIV RadFem Goes Total Moonbat on Climate Change

Posted on Comments

There are times when, in studying feminist theory, I start to think, “Hey, maybe they’re onto something here.” A bedrock conservative, unshakable in his patriarchal heteronormative christofascist worldview, can read the really hard-core feminists and glean insights into the fundamental psychosexual dynamic of male dominance, appreciating women’s experience within this dynamic.

However, just when you start thinking that maybe radical feminism has, by a sort of intellectual circumnavigation, approached some important truths about human nature, you are forced to confront the alternative hypothesis: They’re just crazy as hell.

Yes, Radical Wind — the wacko feminist whose rant “PIV is always rape, OK?” inspired widespread mockery – has done it again.

This time, the radfem encounters a climate-change doomsayer who namechecks Mary Daly (oh, she loves her some Mary Daly) and contemplates “Near Term Human Extinction (NTHE)”:

The major cause of this extinction will be that the global warming and melting of the ice has triggered a series of feedback loops of toxic gas emissions such as methane and carbon dioxide which were trapped in the soils and underwaters of the earth by the ice and frost. These feedback loops have already started, are now unstoppable and life on earth is already on its way to extinction. No technology can stop this — especially since male technology is part of the problem and their use and fabrication will only emit more greenhouse gases. Even if men’s system collapsed now, if all men died and we returned back to stone age, it is unstoppable. Unprecedented levels of methane and carbone dioxide have already been released into the atmosphere because of the warming and the more gas is emitted, the more the planet heats because of the greenhouse effects of the gas, and the more gas is emitted again. Once the air is too intoxicated plants will start dying too and if all or most plants die together, all the carbon dioxyde they sequestered will be released too, which only further intoxicates the air. There will simply be no more oxygen to breathe . . .

DOOMED! WE’RE ALL DOOMED! HOPELESSLY DOOMED!

Now, you might think: “What’s left to say, then?” After all, if this process is “unstoppable,” all political discourse about it is futile. Hey, we humans had a nice 5,000-year run, building the civilization that will ultimately — and perhaps very soon — destroy the planet. Now turn out the lights, the party’s over. Adios, amigos. Right?

Wrong. For as long as oxygen remains on the planet — and this planet-destroying civilization provides her with an Internet connection — the radical feminist must continue blaming the patriarchy:

I’ve known all along that patriarchy would collapse. It confirms what we have been hearing more or less explicitly for some time now. It also confirms some visions that women have shared with me. I myself have been saying it out loud for a while, that men’s system will collapse, maybe not so much online. My only question was whether men would destroy the rest of us in their demise or if some of us would survive. We now have the answer. It appears that men will take everything away with them.
Men, homo rapiens, you scum, you filth. There is no word to describe the extent of your evil, you are pure evil, pure lechery. I hate you, how I hate you. In the 250,000 years of your rotten, defunct existence, you have managed to kill 5 million years of life on earth. . . .
The unstoppable death-machine has always only been orchestrated by the homo rapiens. By men. YOU. Women are not and have never been responsible for the atrocities committed by men, for men’s global industrial rape and death system. By lying and deceiving you are continuing to be part of the problem, because you are masking the fact that the obvious solution all the time, long before the extinction of all life was impending, was to depopulate the earth of males or to reduce them to manageable levels again — only by doing so would have men’s patriarchal and industrial necrophilic sado-system come to an end without destroying the rest of life.

“Homo rapiens . . . men’s global industrial rape and death system.”

Keep talking sexy like that, and I might buy you a drink.

Hey, did I mention it’s National Offend a Feminist Week?

 
UPDATE (Smitty): Welcome, Instapundit readers!
 





 

202 comments

  1. Is it seriously too much to ask that these nutballs – environmentalists and feminists alike – learn basic biology? Environmentalists are apparently unaware that plants demand CO2 in order to survive. And feminists still apparently think that us women would have had a hunky-dory past 250,000 years if only there were no men. I was completely unaware that 250,000 years ago women had the scientific acumen to create life sans men and that men all got together and decided they’d show those upstart women and pushed the self-destruct button (because really, what self-respecting futuristic lab doesn’t have a self-destruct button?). Clearly I have been left out of the loop and, as a woman, I demand I be given access to the super-duper-maxi-secret history of the world that only seems to live in the heads of whacko feminists.

  2. I’m not quite sure why this decided to show up as a reply to you, Evi. It was supposed to be its own comment. Weird.

  6. “Unprecedented levels of methane and carbone dioxide have already been released into the atmosphere”

    Holy smoke! Unprecedented?!? Carbone?!? I’m guessing Witchy hasn’t heard of the evil male science of geology. There have been plenty of times in Earth’s history when CO2 levels were much higher than they are now, and life thrived.

    But then, she does boast that she doesn’t like numbers, which is the same thing as saying she doesn’t like facts:

    http://witchwind.wordpress.com/2014/04/17/the-thing-i-dont-like-about-numbers/

    But she doesn’t limit her scorn to mere facts. No sirree–I mean, ma’am! Logic comes in for a beating too:

    “but I believed, as Mary Daly did, that some of us could survive the impending doom, and hoped the next generation of survivors would only be females.”

    Boys and girls, can you see the wee tiny minor flaw in this plan for the human race surviving impending doom? Maybe scary Mary’s research was based on watching the all-female dinosaurs in Jurassic Park laying eggs and noting Jeff Goldblum’s highly scientific observation about chaos theory… something something… nature finds a way?

    You’ve got to admit though, like a lot of batshit insane people she can coin an arresting phrase when she wants to:

    “industrial necrophilic sado-system”

    Helter skelter! I love that! It’s so metal.

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to get back to the rapin’ and the killin’. Mother Earth aint gonna murder herself, is she?

    And after that, I’m gonna take my enormous rapey man-penis into space to oppress some alien chicks, Shatner-style. There’s a reason space rockets are all phallicky.

  7. Or she *did* go to the prom, but John Travolta poured a bucket of pigs blood over her and everybody laughed.

  8. Within a few years the entire planet would be like the most depressing episode of The Golden Girls ever. Worse even than the one where they spent the night at a homeless shelter and learned it was all Ronald Reagan’s fault.

    Thank you for being a friend, Witchy Wind.

  14. Penis in vagina, OMG

    F. U. C. K. I. N. G.

    First comes Dick then comes Mary

    Look out sperm that vagina’s too HAIRY.

  16. “Men’s patriarchal and industrial necrophilic sado-system come to an end without destroying the rest of life.” Hahahaha. This freak makes up words and phrases as she goes along. interesting, such a pathetically small intellect.

  17. Mmm Hmm, just how, pray tell, will you repopulate the planet with only females? Oh, that’s right, that “manageable” population of males, doomed to be housed in barns and hooked to a milking machine to fill all those millions of turkey basters …

  18. At least she’s a self-limiting trend. I can’t imagine the pretzel logic it would require for her to rationalize breeding.

  20. Well no wonder she is a loon she is one of those Goddess loving feminist neo-pagans (she worship at the alter of her refection, paganism is simply narcissism repackaged)

  21. I collect old Anti-suffragism cartoons here are a few. It’s remarkable just how accurate their predations were

  22. Here is a view of the dilemmas facing the modern woman. The unhappiness involved in moving away from home and love is written on the woman’s face, and yet children and marriage are choices at the very bottom of the stairway.

  23. 1.
    The women on the right is “Britannia”, the symbol of England. She is
    exposing feminism for what it is–destruction of the family, destruction
    of man and woman. Some irony is displayed in using a female symbol to
    expose feminism. Why did the artist not choose a male symbol for
    unmasking? I think it goes to point out how much power women
    really have. Not only is a female symbol used to represent an entire
    country, but it shows that women have the power to unmask feminism and
    expose a fellow sister for what she is. While a man can do the same
    thing, it doesn’t carry the same weight, because that is what men are
    supposed to do or so it goes. The true feminist here, if one must use
    the term, is Britannia. Britannia represents what a strong women should
    be. She does not hide behind a mask. She is a woman of “power and
    unity”. On the other hand, using Britannia could also just have been
    the natural option as a way to represent the country, being this was a
    national issue.

    2. The man/woman/boy/girl kneeling are bound
    together by a banner that says, “Loyalty-Harmony”. They are either
    brother/sister or husband/wife and thus as a whole they symbolize the
    family. Their kneeling in a prayerful style suggests that they are
    reaching out to God. The man/boy on one knee perhaps symbolizes marriage
    (proposal). It could also symbolize in general the loyalty and harmony
    between the sexes and feminism attempts to mess with such a balance.

    3. The unmasked woman is wearing a headband that says “feminist”.The
    mask that Britannia took off shows a young, pleasant looking woman.
    What’s under the mask is another story. Here we see what the idea of
    feminism really looks like-angry, bitter, sinister. It is to show that
    what looks like an innocent, sweet, woman can in fact have ulterior
    motives, via feminism. A wolf in sheep’s clothing. The feminist is also
    about to cut the banner of “Loyalty-Harmony”, that symbolizes family,
    etc. She looks disgruntled that “Britannia” has exposed her true self
    and has caught her in the act of cutting the banner.

  24. The anti-suffragist activists argued that suffrage would destroy the American
    family and that suffrage was part of a larger effort of some women to destroy all sexual
    differences.

    What do you know they were right!

  29. Can someone post a list of male technology and a list of female technology? Is there any female technology?

    I’m serious. Have the feminists sorted this out?

  30. Much as I would like this deranged loony-toon to hang around long enough to see how profoundly stupid and ignorant her worldview is, I’m still comforted by the knowledge she’ll have offed herself long before then.

  32. “radical wind
    blowing through female outerspace”

    That’s very interesting. Male technology, female outerspace. Clearly, this woman is living in an alternate reality.

    I wonder if this woman has thought about the fact that without male there would be no female. Not just in the sense that our species is propagated sexually. But there would be no “dick receptacles” if not for the existence of dicks.

    This woman owes her very identity and the nature of her “female outerspace” alternate reality to the existence of men. I guess that would be very painful to think about, if she were capable of thinking.

  36. I’m pretty sure that’s one of those “learn the hard way” things.

    At least, it is if you played music for too many years.

  44. “She” deserves kudos for “Homo rapiens,” that’s a good one.

    But the line “My only question was whether men would destroy the rest of us in their demise or if some of us would survive.” tends to make me lean back towards the Elaborate Hoax Theory of radical wind.

  45. They are now making “feminist porn” which avoids traditional porn’s fixation on the male point of view, male orgasms, contrived scenarios, and bad acting. Apparently the fem version is focused on the female point of view, ignores the male except to eat him when it is over, contrived scenarios, and bad acting.

    I want to say you can’t make this stuff up but maybe you could, if you were really disturbed or something. http://bbc.in/1l5YJ4N

  46. My mother always said I’d regret not going to the prom. I thought that was a crock when she said it (and still do) but apparently some stupid high school dance really can ruin a person’s life if they don’t go.

  48. That’s because there’s nothing left for the equity crew to fight for. They’ve won their battles.

  49. IIRC, the Influenza Epidemic was pretty gender-specific. It disproportionately killed young men.

    But then, what doesn’t?

Comments are closed.