Headline at the Daily Caller:
What Did Oklahoma Do To Incur
The Wrath Of Satan And His Minions?
The news is bizarre: The Oklahoma City Civic Center Music Hall will be the site of a Black Mass event in September, sponsored by the “Dakhma of Angra Mainyu,” a satanic cult led by Adam Daniel.
In an e-mail to Aleteia.com, Daniel said the Black Mass is planned as “a defiant act to show the Catholics that Satanism will stand up and fight for our religious rights.” Other than worship of Beelzebub, what “religious rights” does Daniel have in mind?
Dakhma of Angra Mainyu is about freedom from any religion that chooses to bind you to some type of dogma [that] forces you to restrain your natural animal instincts. . . .
Choose Angra Mainyu, and become a natural animal of flesh once again.
Hmmm. So it’s about becoming “a natural animal of flesh.” Would it surprise you to learn that, according to KWTV, Adam Daniel is a registered sex offender who reportedly had an “inappropriate relationship” with a female inmate when he worked as a prison guard?
If you’re waiting for feminists to denounce this satanic pervert for “rape culture,” you’ll be waiting until Hell freezes over.
You would think Satan would prefer San Francisco or Boston.
Then again, that Jud Fry in Oklahoma was pretty creepy and could be satanic.
This makes me long for the days of witch burning.
I wonder if any of these doofuses own dogs? If so, do they allow their dogs to be “natural animals of the flesh?”
They mostly are dogs.
Satanism is like distilled out all the bat shit crazy from Ayn Rand’s Objectivism, mixed it some adolescent outrage, and then drank shots of it all night.
It always amuses me when people mischaracterize religion as “binding you” or “forcing you” to do anything. There are plenty of even Christian religions whose tenets are more of a buffet than they are hard and fast rules. Religions that adhere to strict spiritual rules are not about forcing you to supress yourself. They are about teaching you to have control over yourself so that you aren’t chained down by yourself. Which is better: to have the ability and self-respect to say no to things like drugs, alcohol, porn, etc., or to just give in and end up a slave to your addiction (which is where you will end up if your outlook on life is that you are going to do what you want, when you want and damn the consequences).
I always see Christianity as a balance. You mess up all week, then go to church on Sunday and get readjusted; reminded that you should be a better person. (I had a Buick like that: needed to have its carburetor adjusted every damned weekend.)
Satanism says, “Do whatever you want to do.” It never is counter to your desires, so it’s no balance.
And yes, it’s also bat-sh*t crazy.
I go the other way with it. I always see Objectivism as Satanism with its clothes on.
I’m having a hard time differentiating Satanism and Atheism, both of which seem to run on the same assumption that you should do whatever you want. I guess the defining difference would be Satanists have Satan at the center of their religion, where Atheists tend to worship science, but I still have to wonder if there aren’t more than a few Satanists who aren’t Atheists simply because they see venerating Satan as an easy way to rile up the more reactionary Christians.
That is not a bad way to describe it. I am an Ayn Rand fan (of sorts) but a lot of her Objectivism was of the devil!
Satanists embrace being contrary to Christians (hence the Satanism). Atheists are very similar in their own passive aggressive way.
And why do you think Antone Levay used to live on California St. In San Fran until his death.
Black house, used to walk his two lions in the neighborhood in the 60’s, we al thought he was just weird and out for attention.
Only if she weighs as much as a duck…
[…] TOM: The Devil in Oklahoma (and surprise, a registered sex offender involved too) […]
Well now he is in Hell, with his “Lord.” How do you think that is working out for him?
I don’t know how deaths working out for him, but if he is in hell I’m pleased ; )
And some not so passive aggressive.
This isn’t about worship.
It’s about playing the system and provoking reactions.
Which some varieties of Satanism do teach, unfortunately.
That’s pretty spot on, and mixed with some Nietzsche. You are incorrect though in your assumption that Satanism(I’m talking Lavey, or Atheistic Satanism)says “Do whatever you want”. It does not advocate harming others, or being self destructive. The freedom comes from not adhering to, or obeying Christian, or Puritanical morals about sex, drugs, alcohol, which in the Satanic view is counterproductive, unnatural, and repressive. Satanism is undoubtedly a hedonic philosophy, but always within reason, and never to cause harm to other people. If you consider yourself an intelligent, and open minded person(doubting the latter)read the Satanic bible, and then you’ll have an idea of what Satanism is about and can make a real appraisal of it, and not one based on fear, or what you’ve heard.
He rejected Christ, so that’s where he is. Alas, for him.
I think we can pretty much bet the entire universe that things are as bucolic as he thought it would be. Contra Dante , Satan doesn’t rule in hell and has no say as to its livability.
Why is he a pervert again? Because he had a relationship with an inmate while he was a CO? Well, none of us know the details of said relationship, and running afoul of the law in a matter like that, doesn’t necessarily means something malicious, or wrong happened.
Many Atheists worship, but it is Scientism, not science. When you see the statement “that’s settle science” you know you have an adherent to Scientism on your hands.
In Lavey Satanism, the most well known, and mainstream form, there is no actual Devil, and it is atheistic. It does not advocate “do whatever you want” though, and doesnt condone harming yourself, or other people. What it does say is that people have desires, and to deny them because of Christian morality, which is horseshit, is counter productive, and foolish.
Another way to spot Scientism is when they shout “Luddite!” because you dared to say that some new gadget might be a bad idea.
So here we are with science shattering our ability to maintain private lives and people are merely adjusting their ethics instead of refusing the science.
Soon they’ll realize they’ve not gone far enough and they’ll have to HATE the idea of privacy. Unable to have privacy (like the fox and the grapes) they’ll lash out against the very idea and go into full “anonymity is for evil people” mode.
Satan may not rule in Hell, but I am sure he is not a good roommate.
I have no problem with Satanists, per se, provided they are not screwing with my rights I have no problem with them living their own lives as they deem fit. I find Satanist beliefs reactionary and mostly derivative of libertarian sources and the “Satan” stuff just intended to provoke outrage. To me it is just childish and shallow.
Actually it does. He was in a position of coercive power over the female inmate. It is against the law, as well as most peoples’ moral tenants, to use a position of power to coerce sex or anything else from someone in a subordinate position..
I know the law, but that’s my point. We don’t know if he coerced her into sex by using his position, or if she coerced him into sex to both get laid while locked up, and hence make her time a bit easier, and to get special privileges. A woman’s pussy is one of the best weapons she has in such a situation, and it wouldn’t be outlandish if she used it. For all we know they had a perfectly consensual relationship, and ran afoul of what implies legal “consent”. yeah, yeah, save your breath, and repeating the letter of the law to me. I get it. It just doesn’t always matter.
Let us stipulate that, as you say, she used her genitals to either coerce him or to satisfy her own lusts.
He still committed wrong because he was morally obligated by the position he held not to engage in sexual activity with one of his charges.
Satanists would be the last group of people to infringe on your rights. And yes, Satan is definitely a tool used to provoke, but at the same time, it, along with the upside pentagram, and Baphomet, is a powerful symbol, and fills the adherent with power. And even in Lavey Satanism there is a ritualistic, occult aspect to it like Golden Dawn, or Chaos magick, and requires intent. It’s not childish, and shallow though, and has it’s purpose. Being a Christian, or conservative, or both, it’s not really much of a shock that you would believe that.
Wow, wonderful ideology! Either accept our icon without question, or go to hell! That doesnt sound like a cult or anything! it actually sounds like life under Kim Jong Un, Adolph Hitler, Stalin, or any other dictator throughout history.
I get it, he shouldn’t have done what they told him not to do. whatever…
Yeah, seems pretty clear that you do not actually “get” it. “Whatever…”
Oh, no, I get it moron. YOU don’t get it. Your piss-ant morality only exists on paper, and in that tiny head of yours.
Lavey: I am sorry, I am still not going to support Obama.
And on that note, you’re done here.
You Ideologues NEVER address the argument.
Too bad for you. You can tell Christ that when you stand before him for judgment. And you will do so, like it or not.
Alas, he’s still on a very long leash and is loose in the earth.
I sure will. And what is he going to do then? Hold you at gunpoint, and say “worship me, or burn for all eternity?” he sounds like Xerxes in the movie 300. Basically what we have is a tyrant ruling the universe who demands obedience, and worship, or punishment. Wow! Awesome! With that in mind,Lucifer sounds he had a really good reason for doing what he did. And maybe the whole hell thing is overblown. Sounds to me like all the best people are down there too, and heaven is filled with chronic authoritarian, bores, likes you. it seems to me that Jesus has been used as a way to get people to obey the CHURCH, and not much else. Either that or the gnostics are right, and the earth really is under the control of a nasty, mean, demiurge that we call God.
[…] The Devil in Oklahoma: Satanic Ritual Promoted by Registered Sex Offender […]
For people like yourself he is going to show you why you are being condemned, then you will be condemned. There will be no defense. You will scream and cry, but he is still going to say “depart, I never knew you.”
God does not care what kind of god you have created in your mind, including the Gnostic’s demiurge.
No one is going to hell for their sin. They will go to hell because they rejected God’s provision for sin. Some, like yourself, are even aggressive in your rejection.
So, yes, it’s turn or burn. You’ve selected burn. I pity you, but that’s a choice that is self inflicted.
[…] The Devil in Oklahoma: Satanic Ritual Promoted by Registered Sex Offender […]
You might take a closer look there at what you are saying. You claim not to judge, but you threaten people with being judged.
Personally I prefer Christians when they aren’t spouting hellfire in the name of a god of love.
The threat is not mine, it is God’s. I am warning of judgment to come. What they do with the warning is up to them.
I really don’t care what you think of me, but knowing what is ahead it would be irresponsible to not give out the warning.
All you’re really doing is making a great case for the inconsistencies inherit in religion, and by extension totalitarianism, and that Christian beliefs should be purged. And don’t tell me that you don’t get a sadistic thrill over people not agreeing with you suffering. you’re a despicable group.
Of course the threat is yours. You chose to invoke the wrath, now you try to hide from the responsibility.
Can’t you see that in a few sentences you did more to prove their case than they did?
And you still claim to do this in the name of a greater love.
Religion is totalitarianism?
You might want to rethink that.
Especially if you are calling for beliefs to be purged.
“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.” Matthew 7:13-14
“Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away. And there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books. The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works. Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire. Revelation 20:11-15
Care to run that by me again?
The only thing you manage to do in cases of this nature is demonstrate that you are a minimally educated man because you have no biblical knowledge. I warn, I do not threaten. I warn of the wrath to come and of the way to escape it. All you can manage to do is pooh pooh and accuse.
Hell is real, and rejection of Christ makes that your eternal destination. What you think of me is utterly irrelevant.
The only inconsistencies are between your ears. Christ came to pay the price for sin so you could be forgiven and not spend eternity separated from Him, the source of life. If that is inconsistent, or tyrannical, then I submit that you are completely ignorant of either consistency or tyranny.
It comes down this: turn, or burn. You’ll go to hell for your rejection of the way of life which is only through Christ.
A religion that claims either do it my way or suffer eternal damnation is totalitarianism. it would be common sense to purge such a belief system.