Texas Teacher Heather Packwood Had Lesbian Sex With Teen Girl, Police Say

In February we reported that a female teacher had been fired from New Braunfels Christian Academy in the midst of a sex crime investigation involving accusations that she had molested a female student. Police at that time had not yet named the accused teacher. Now, however, she has been charged with multiple felonies:

A former math teacher at New Braunfels Christian Academy was arrested Wednesday months after allegations surfaced that she had ongoing inappropriate sexual relations with a former female student.
Heather Lynn Packwood, 25, turned herself into the Comal County Sheriff’s Office on Wednesday, New Braunfels Police spokesman David Ferguson said Thursday.
The Bulverde resident was charged with improper relationship between educator and student, sexual performance of a child and sexual assault of a child, according to Comal County Jail records. She is currently being held in the jail on a $40,000 bond. . . .
The alleged offenses began around January 2012 when the teacher moved into the victim’s home, Christopherson said. The victim’s family tasked the teacher with taking care of their children while they were away and taking them to school.
The female teacher and the victim apparently shared a room, [New Braunfels Police Lt. Craig] Christopherson said in February.
It’s unclear how long the relations lasted. The former student told her family about the alleged abuse on Feb. 13, according to Christopherson.

(Hat-tip: Kirby McCain on Twitter.) While feminists dishonestly hype bogus statistics and phony stories to create the false impression that male college students are responsible for a campus “rape epidemic,” feminists refuse to acknowledge reports of sex crimes against girls committed by lesbian teachers, because the existence of such crimes contradicts feminism’s theory which (a) condemns all males as collaborators in the oppression of women, and (b) identifies traditional social norms, including “compulsory heterosexuality,” as institutional structures of patriarchal oppression. Once we recognize that the traditional family and its associated customs provide the best hope for human happiness — Haven in a Heartless World, as Christopher Lasch called it — we must reject feminism as a hateful and selfish ideology that destroys happiness.

It’s National Offend a Feminist Week. Be happy — because feminists hate happiness — and be thankful you’re not one of them.




 

31 comments

  1. I’m shocked, shocked! that a teacher would have betrayed her trust, and the trust of the parents in letting her move into the house.

  2. Loving families give the children an unfair advantage in life. Therefore, in the name of equality marriage and family must be destroyed.

  3. Not only that, but an intact family is more resistant to state interference, so marriage must also be destroyed in the name of statism.

  4. She is currently being held in the jail on a $40,000 bond. . . .

    One of my pet peeves. When someone is charged with a crime, there is a bail amount set, the payment of which allows the defendant to leave jail until the trial and which is forfeited if the defendant doesn’t show up. A bond is a method of paying bail where a surety guarantees the payment and makes sure the defendant shows up. Surety bonds are typically ten percent of the total amount paid to the surety (bondsman). That’s for people who don’t have $40K lying around.

    She’s being held in lieu of posting a bond for bail or paying the bail amount in cash. One can be released “on bond” (or paying the bail amount). In lieu of that, one guarantees one’s attendance at trial by sitting in jail.

    Carry on.

  5. Yes, and more work-place deaths for women, more imprisonment and capital punishment for women, because equality

    Women as a group deserve the opportunity to die at a rate that is equal to the rate at which men as a group die. The differences between men and women are socially constructed and unjust, so in a just world , men and women would be incarcerated at the same rates.

    No egalitarian could possibly argue with that.

  6. Not only that, but an intact family is more apt to be upwardly mobile, so marriage must be destroyed in the name of liberal mind and behavior control.*

    *Of course, it could be argued that this is also statism, but if I did so, I wouldn’t be able to add a “not only that”.

  7. Change her name to Steely Dan. The band got their name from a dildo in “Naked Lunch”

  8. You don’t have to be a genius to figure out lesbian feminism would over prosecute, over charge and over criminalize male on female sexual assault while ignoring or even decriminalizing lesbian adult on child assaults.

    Gender feminist disregard for law via privilege and punching up theory is no secret. These are decrepit barbarians who have probably done more to present a case against women voting than anyone has for 100 years.

  9. They should be front-line shock troops in the military in an affirmative action initiative to even out male casualties. They have about a million deaths to go. For all of modern feminism’s talk of entitlement, it is a swinery of unearned entitlements. Which one of these shits ever had to sign up for the draft?

  10. There have been tentative attempts at that already, under the guise of “helping confused teens ‘work out’ their sexuality,” because, of course, the Christo-fascist parents are too stodgy and judgmental. That’s why GLSEN and its political allies are so keen to get into the schools.

  11. Well the hetero-patriarchy wasn’t involved until the charges were laid, so it could probably be considered good rape.

  12. My, how the time flies. Seems like only a few weeks ago we were in the middle of NOAFW.

    Can we have a round of laudinum to get in the mood?

  13. See, Heather Lynn? If you had just made me a sandwich, instead of eating them all yourself and getting uppity, you wouldn’t BE in this mess, now would you?

Comments are closed.