The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Elena Kagan’s Bold, Refreshing, Courageous Heterosexuality

Posted on | May 12, 2010 | 40 Comments

Y’know, when you have to get your friends to leak it, as if divulging a dirty little secret . . .

Elena Kagan is not a lesbian, one of her best friends told POLITICO Tuesday night, responding to persistent rumors and innuendo about the Supreme Court nominee’s personal life.
“I’ve known her for most of her adult life and I know she’s straight,” said Sarah Walzer, Kagan’s roommate in law school and a close friend since then. “She dated men when we were in law school, we talked about men — who in our class was cute, who she would like to date, all of those things. She definitely dated when she was in D.C. after law school, when she was in Chicago – and she just didn’t find the right person. However, she definitely enjoys penis. Totally into it.  Can’t get enough. Honest.” . . .

Maybe I added something at the end there. And the headline of the day award goes to Comedy Central:

Elena Kagan to Become Only 112th
Heterosexual to Serve on Supreme Court

This is good news indeed for Andrew Sullivan, who is ecstatic to learn that Kagan shares his love of penis. It’s also good news for Kagan’s left-wing critics, who are now free to hate her without fear of inciting homophobia.

Kagan’s uncanny resemblance to Harvey Lembeck spared her the worst possible humiliation. If she was kinda hot, the AOSHQ morons would have demanded video proof of her sexual preference.

Category: Gays, Sex, Supreme Court

Comments

40 Responses to “Elena Kagan’s Bold, Refreshing, Courageous Heterosexuality”

  1. Lipton T. Bagg
    May 12th, 2010 @ 6:45 pm

    Actually, what makes the issue of Elena’s sexuality a great story is that those on the right really aren’t bird-dogging the issue like the MSM is. So now, the White House Propaganda Office is stumbling over its own feet to ensure no one in the MSM refers to Elena as a lesbian.

    Personally, I’m more concerned about her complete lack of judicial experience and her written words which make her feel and sound more like an activist and nihilist than pragmatic juror than her personal plumbing preference.

    Not to mention her view on the 2nd Amendment which appears more “The Right To Seize and Destroy You Arms” than “Right To Bear Arms”…

    And, in an amusing turn of events, Viewed From The Right have discovered that Kagan once worked in New York under an assumed name – Pat!

    http://viewedfromtheright.blogspot.com/2010/05/its-elena.html

  2. Lipton T. Bagg
    May 12th, 2010 @ 1:45 pm

    Actually, what makes the issue of Elena’s sexuality a great story is that those on the right really aren’t bird-dogging the issue like the MSM is. So now, the White House Propaganda Office is stumbling over its own feet to ensure no one in the MSM refers to Elena as a lesbian.

    Personally, I’m more concerned about her complete lack of judicial experience and her written words which make her feel and sound more like an activist and nihilist than pragmatic juror than her personal plumbing preference.

    Not to mention her view on the 2nd Amendment which appears more “The Right To Seize and Destroy You Arms” than “Right To Bear Arms”…

    And, in an amusing turn of events, Viewed From The Right have discovered that Kagan once worked in New York under an assumed name – Pat!

    http://viewedfromtheright.blogspot.com/2010/05/its-elena.html

  3. ThomasD
    May 12th, 2010 @ 6:59 pm

    We still have no evidence of heterosexuality.

    We merely have assertions that, should she be presented with a bona-fide offer, and conditional upon her acceptance of such offer, that she would be willing to enter into a mutual relationship with a qualified male of the human species, for the specific purpose of obtaining sexual gratification.

    Said relationship… bla-blah, bla-blahh, bla-blahhh.

  4. ThomasD
    May 12th, 2010 @ 1:59 pm

    We still have no evidence of heterosexuality.

    We merely have assertions that, should she be presented with a bona-fide offer, and conditional upon her acceptance of such offer, that she would be willing to enter into a mutual relationship with a qualified male of the human species, for the specific purpose of obtaining sexual gratification.

    Said relationship… bla-blah, bla-blahh, bla-blahhh.

  5. Dave C
    May 12th, 2010 @ 7:13 pm

    Eliot Spitzer claims she’s straight as well.. He never dated her because she wasn’t a hooker who would let him strangler her while he neared climax…

  6. Dave C
    May 12th, 2010 @ 2:13 pm

    Eliot Spitzer claims she’s straight as well.. He never dated her because she wasn’t a hooker who would let him strangler her while he neared climax…

  7. DaTechGuy
    May 12th, 2010 @ 7:18 pm

    30 years ago I had a friend who I thought might be gay. Of course we didn’t have the internet back then so since I was curious I tried an amazing method that I’ve heard reporters have used for years on various matters.

    I asked him.

    He said “yes”

    Much to the shock of the left, I said OK and we’ve gone on being friends and remain so today.

    The fact that the administration has gotten the vapors over this issue as have some gay rights groups is both amusing and self serving.

    Frankly I’d ask her the question directly or if a person wants to be more discreet do the following:

    1. Ask her if she believes that the first openly gay or lesbian nominee would be a cause for celebration.

    2. Then ask if she would care to declare her sexual orientation. If she declined to answer then it should be respected. If she answers then we should take whatever answer she gives at her word.

    That should take the issue totally off the table one way or the other, but I suspect the administration WANTS the issue on the table in this way, but that’s just my opinion.

    Any nominee by this president is likely to be “unacceptable” politically to conservatives so I don’t expect better the question is this. Are her positions so outrageous that she needs to be opposed full bore.

  8. DaTechGuy
    May 12th, 2010 @ 2:18 pm

    30 years ago I had a friend who I thought might be gay. Of course we didn’t have the internet back then so since I was curious I tried an amazing method that I’ve heard reporters have used for years on various matters.

    I asked him.

    He said “yes”

    Much to the shock of the left, I said OK and we’ve gone on being friends and remain so today.

    The fact that the administration has gotten the vapors over this issue as have some gay rights groups is both amusing and self serving.

    Frankly I’d ask her the question directly or if a person wants to be more discreet do the following:

    1. Ask her if she believes that the first openly gay or lesbian nominee would be a cause for celebration.

    2. Then ask if she would care to declare her sexual orientation. If she declined to answer then it should be respected. If she answers then we should take whatever answer she gives at her word.

    That should take the issue totally off the table one way or the other, but I suspect the administration WANTS the issue on the table in this way, but that’s just my opinion.

    Any nominee by this president is likely to be “unacceptable” politically to conservatives so I don’t expect better the question is this. Are her positions so outrageous that she needs to be opposed full bore.

  9. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 7:42 pm

    Stop the lies, she has a committed relationship with two gentlemen. Ben & Jerry.

    It is none of your business.

  10. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 2:42 pm

    Stop the lies, she has a committed relationship with two gentlemen. Ben & Jerry.

    It is none of your business.

  11. The Mexican
    May 12th, 2010 @ 7:55 pm

    To embrace the gay agenda is to embrace marxism.

  12. The Mexican
    May 12th, 2010 @ 2:55 pm

    To embrace the gay agenda is to embrace marxism.

  13. Rich Fader
    May 12th, 2010 @ 8:17 pm

    “Maybe I added something at the end there.”

    That’s what she said….

  14. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 8:17 pm

    Certainly not all gays are marxist. There are plenty of free market fiscally conservative individuals who happen to like (argue nurture or nature) sex with the same gender. It is an overstatement to call the gay agenda marxist.

    But there are many promoting the gay agenda who are anti democratic progressives who share a lot of similarities with marxists.

  15. Rich Fader
    May 12th, 2010 @ 3:17 pm

    “Maybe I added something at the end there.”

    That’s what she said….

  16. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 3:17 pm

    Certainly not all gays are marxist. There are plenty of free market fiscally conservative individuals who happen to like (argue nurture or nature) sex with the same gender. It is an overstatement to call the gay agenda marxist.

    But there are many promoting the gay agenda who are anti democratic progressives who share a lot of similarities with marxists.

  17. Roxeanne de Luca
    May 12th, 2010 @ 8:42 pm

    There goes my chance to bed a Supreme Court Justice.

  18. Roxeanne de Luca
    May 12th, 2010 @ 3:42 pm

    There goes my chance to bed a Supreme Court Justice.

  19. Jeff
    May 12th, 2010 @ 8:43 pm

    Great, she’s not a lesbian … not that there would be anything wrong with that … the problem is that now we don’t have anything to talk about because she is so unqualified to be a Supreme that there is nothing to debate …

    talk about a face made for radio …

  20. Jeff
    May 12th, 2010 @ 3:43 pm

    Great, she’s not a lesbian … not that there would be anything wrong with that … the problem is that now we don’t have anything to talk about because she is so unqualified to be a Supreme that there is nothing to debate …

    talk about a face made for radio …

  21. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 8:54 pm

    Roxeanne, there is always Sotomayor, and given the choice of a “hot” Latina from the Bronx or an intellectual Jew from the Upper West Side (think of John Podhortez) the choice is clear.

  22. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 3:54 pm

    Roxeanne, there is always Sotomayor, and given the choice of a “hot” Latina from the Bronx or an intellectual Jew from the Upper West Side (think of John Podhortez) the choice is clear.

  23. Bob Belvedere
    May 12th, 2010 @ 9:15 pm

    Roxe: I hear that Alyssia Milano may be nominated next time ’round.

  24. Bob Belvedere
    May 12th, 2010 @ 4:15 pm

    Roxe: I hear that Alyssia Milano may be nominated next time ’round.

  25. ak4mc (McGehee)
    May 12th, 2010 @ 9:23 pm

    She’s straight!? Ew.

  26. ak4mc (McGehee)
    May 12th, 2010 @ 4:23 pm

    She’s straight!? Ew.

  27. Roxeanne de Luca
    May 12th, 2010 @ 9:28 pm

    Sotomayor is a Yankees fan, no?

  28. Roxeanne de Luca
    May 12th, 2010 @ 4:28 pm

    Sotomayor is a Yankees fan, no?

  29. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 10:11 pm

    Bob, Everyone loves Alyssia!

    Roxe, I think Sotomayor is a Yankees fan. Yeah, that is always trouble.

  30. Joe
    May 12th, 2010 @ 5:11 pm

    Bob, Everyone loves Alyssia!

    Roxe, I think Sotomayor is a Yankees fan. Yeah, that is always trouble.

  31. FenelonSpoke
    May 12th, 2010 @ 10:51 pm

    I couldn’t care less about her sexual orientation or her looks. Given the judges on there now, nobody is a good looking with the exception perhaps of Roberts, and people who have to go there with little jokes just sound-well sophomoric

  32. FenelonSpoke
    May 12th, 2010 @ 5:51 pm

    I couldn’t care less about her sexual orientation or her looks. Given the judges on there now, nobody is a good looking with the exception perhaps of Roberts, and people who have to go there with little jokes just sound-well sophomoric

  33. JeffS
    May 12th, 2010 @ 11:35 pm

    However, she definitely enjoys penis. Totally into it. Can’t get enough. Honest. . . .

    Regardless of her sexual orientation or political beliefs, this is TEE! EM! EYE!

    IMHO.

  34. JeffS
    May 12th, 2010 @ 6:35 pm

    However, she definitely enjoys penis. Totally into it. Can’t get enough. Honest. . . .

    Regardless of her sexual orientation or political beliefs, this is TEE! EM! EYE!

    IMHO.

  35. ak4mc (McGehee)
    May 13th, 2010 @ 12:20 am

    Spokey, nobody has to go there — but for those of us who think Kagan is Obama’s answer to Harriet Miers, delving into substance just seems a waste of effort.

  36. ak4mc (McGehee)
    May 12th, 2010 @ 7:20 pm

    Spokey, nobody has to go there — but for those of us who think Kagan is Obama’s answer to Harriet Miers, delving into substance just seems a waste of effort.

  37. Who Is Elena Kagan? « The Camp Of The Saints
    May 12th, 2010 @ 7:57 pm

    […] -Stacy McCain’s latest postings on the subject have been enlightening, informative, and enjoyable. […]

  38. Mrs. Kissell
    May 13th, 2010 @ 4:20 am

    Well, queers have a look and she has it.

  39. Mrs. Kissell
    May 12th, 2010 @ 11:20 pm

    Well, queers have a look and she has it.

  40. The St. Angilbert Press » Busy, busy…getting bought is like that
    May 19th, 2010 @ 11:00 am

    […] a day, observes that yet another guy named Mohammed has been arrested for terrorism. He also links this bit of comic gold: “Elena Kagan to Become Only 112th Heterosexual to Serve on Supreme […]