by Smitty
At some point of critical mass, PJTV should grow its own studio and start another phase of bulldozing the entrenched dreck. So subscribe to them, and bring that day closer.
"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler
by Smitty
At some point of critical mass, PJTV should grow its own studio and start another phase of bulldozing the entrenched dreck. So subscribe to them, and bring that day closer.
So says Professor Glenn Reynolds, in not quite so many words. The Christian Science Monitor cites certain predictable sources to gin up speculation that the Pentagon shooter was motivated by “right-wing extremism,” but . . . eh, not so much:
Internet research shows that the guy was a 9/11 Truther and an anti-Bush nut case.
So much for the SPLC-hyped Libertarian Militia Menace, I suppose. But what about the Lower Glennbeckistan Tea Party Lynch Mob? Again, not so much:
“Teabaggers” aren’t typically associated with antipathy to the military, but don’t underestimate the conclusion-drawing power of Frank Rich when he’s crashing on deadline.
Frank Rich and Frank Schaeffer: Frankly Kooky!
More at Michelle Malkin, Left Coast Rebel, Outside The Beltway, Moonbattery, Gateway Pundit, Jules Crittenden, The Jawa Report and Riehl World View.
UPDATE: Gabriel Malor at AOSHQ shares a disdain for “the practice of associating killers and crazy people with either the Left or the Right” — a disdain being expressed by several others on the ‘sphere, too. (Even one of Sully’s henchpeople gets in on that action today. If Sully himself had been on blog duty, he no doubt would have blamed Sarah Palin’s uterus.)
The problem with giving the Left a free pass on this kind of stuff is that the Left is so relentless in blaming the the Right for all the world’s evils, both specific and general.
Less than eight hours after Gabriel refused to point fingers for the Pentagon shooting, he was shocked to discover that the British Guardian had used a photo of a Klan rally to illustrate an article about the Tea Party movement. (Three guesses as to who is the main source for that article smearing Glenn Beck — and your first two don’t count.)
If you don’t understand the strategic advantage that the Left gains by continually hyping their scary stories about the threat of “right-wing extremism,” you are a worse fool than Patrick Bedell’s ideological BFF — Rosie “Fire Can’t Melt Steel” O’Donnell:
FURTHER READING:
While working on my taxes (trying to figure my mileage for 2009) I’ve had the TV in my basement office tuned to MSNBC. Unless Rachel Maddow and her cohorts are hallucinating, the most important story in the world is . . .
Republicans are desperate! Obama and his health-care plan are overwhelmingly popular! Crazy right-wingers are going psycho with fear!
Meanwhile, no less a Democratic Party loyalist than Howard Dean is saying that Democrats who vote for Obama’s health-care plan are doomed beyond hope of redemption. And Democratic incumbents are retiring faster than you can say “unwanted advances toward a junior male staffer.”
The spectacle of Maddow & Co. whistling past the political graveyard is amusing, but it’s not helping me finish this tax stuff. My wife is going to be angry if I don’t get it done, and soon, and that’s what’s driving me psycho with fear . . .
UPDATE: For those who were wondering, I finished the mileage calculations and so my psycho-fear of Mrs. Other McCain has now subsided.
Also, if you’re one of the people who hit the tip jar to help fund my travels during 2009, thank you very, very much. I’m now actually considering a sort of “Victory Lap” road trip in a few weeks to celebrate the past year’s successes, meet up with some friends and do some campaign coverage. Our good friend Barbara Espinosa lives in Arizona (where a certain crazy cousin of mine thinks he’s too young for retirement), and I’m thinking I might stop in Kansas City to see my buddy Nathan Cossey en route.
This expedition could even go all the way to California, where JSF at Valley of the Shadow has been soliciting my interest lately. The itinerary is sketchy at this point, but once I pay back the rental-car company for that deer I hit in Tupper Lake while covering the Hoffman campaign . . .
Well, I just got off the phone with Smitty, who sees the insane genius factor involved. The route could be something like this: Columbus, Ohio; St. Louis, Mo.; Kansas City, Mo.; Austin, Texas; Phoenix, Ariz.; Las Vegas, Nev.; and Los Angeles, Calif. That’s 3,357 miles.
The return trip would involve a swing through the South — I’d like to see Pat Austin in Shreveport and visit some folks in Alabama, Georgia and Florida– and the total mileage could exceed 7,000 miles. All 7,000 of those miles would be tax-deductible as legitimate business expenses.
Hit the tip jar, folks. This might be even more fun than NY-23 or the Scott Brown campaign. As long as I don’t hit another deer . . .
Mock fearmongering or fearmonger mocking? We report, you deride.
Speaking of fearmongers deserving of mockery . . . Charles Johnson.
Allahpundit mocks Dylan Ratigan, whose performance prompts Dan Riehl to ask, “What is he, some kind of Olbermann wannabe?” and prompts Professor Reynolds to reflect:
One of [Ratigan’s] producers called to ask me to be on his show last week but I declined, in part because I’d never heard of him. (I also don’t like it when people I don’t know call my cellphone, though to be fair, he probably got the number out of the computer from when I used to work for MSNBC).
MSNBC wasn’t always the National Moonbat Broadcasting Company. Heck, I remember when Ann Coulter was a regular over there.
Believe It Or Not!
Dangerous extremist militias taking over America? The Southern Poverty Law Center reports “an astonishing 363 new Patriot groups appeared in 2009, with the totals going from 149 groups (including 42 militias) to 512 (127 of them militias) – a 244% jump” from 2008.
OK, so let’s ask a question: How does the SPLC get these numbers? Do a “find” search on the their list of “Patriot” groups and you discover:
According to the SPLC’s math, then, state-by-state representation of these four organizations count as 184 “Patriot groups” — 36 percent of the SPLC’s total. Let’s ask a few more questions:
After some quick Googling, I picked up the phone:
“We the People” appears to be generally libertarian in orientation: 2004 Libertarian Party candidate Michael Badnarik addressed the group’s 2009 “Constitutional Convention,” and [founder Robert] Schultz himself was a guest (along with libertarian figures like Reason magazine editor Nick Gillespie and Rep. Ron Paul) on an August 2009 broadcast of Judge Andrew Napolitano’s Fox News TV program.
After finding the Web site of the Alabama chapter of “We the People,” I phoned Huntsville resident Lesha Martin, one of the members listed on the site. Is “We the People” some kind of violent militia-type outfit?
“Good heavens, no,” said Ms. Martin, an admirer of Ron Paul who described herself as devoted to individual freedom and “resurrecting the Constitution.”
How many peaceful citizens like Lesha Martin are lumped together to create the “grim and alarming portrait . . . of extremist organizations” presented by the SPLC?
Of course, we cannot rule out the possibility that some of these groups are unwittingly harboring wannabe terrorists — short-wave wackos building pipe-bombs or stockpiling AK-47 ammo in their garages — but the claim of an “astonishing” increase in dangerous extremism looks very much like the kind of irresponsible exaggeration we’ve come to expect from The Church of Morris Dees. And of course, MSNBC books the SPLC’s Mark Potok, who gleefully uses this report to smear the Tea Party movement:
I don’t deny that there are kooks in America or that some of those kooks are dangerous, but the SPLC purposely hypes this kind of hysteria — using dubious statistics to inflate the numbers — for their own lucrative aggrandizement.
UPDATE: Is Rhode Island a Klan stronghold? Professor William Jacobson is skeptical of the SPLC’s claim.
UPDATE II: Jesse Walker of Reason magazine:
The Southern Poverty Law Center . . .would paint a box of Wheaties as an extremist threat if it thought that would help it raise money . . . To illustrate how dangerous these groups are, the Center cites some recent arrests of right-wing figures for planning or carrying out violent attacks. But it doesn’t demonstrate that any of the arrestees were a part of the Patriot milieu, and indeed it includes some cases involving racist skinheads, who are another movement entirely.
As far as the SPLC is concerned . . . skinheads and Birchers and Glenn Beck fans are all tied together in one big ball of scary. The group delights in finding tenuous ties between the tendencies it tracks, then describing its discoveries in as ominous a tone as possible.
A fool and his money are soon parted. Morris Dees was finance director of the George McGovern 1972 presidential campaign and figured out that hyping the “right-wing extremist” threat was a surefire strategy for separating those particular fools from their money.
For nearly 30 years, Dees and his crew have been working the same formula: Send scary letters to rich liberals, suggesting that if they don’t send the SPLC a check today, the brownshirts will be goose-stepping down Main Street tomorrow.
A former New York Times “strategy analyst” attempts to create a left-wing clone of the Tea Party movement and — surprise! — gets gushy write-ups from both the New York Times and the Washington Post.
Professor William Jacobson exposes Annabel Park for the deceptive phony she is.
Remind me of this the next time Nancy Pelosi starts slinging around her “Astroturf” accusations. You can bet Annabel Park will never be smeared by Frank Rich.
Via Memeorandum, more at Hot Air, Commentary, Left Coast Rebel, The Lonely Conservative, JustOneMinute, American Power, The Jawa Report and Another Black Conservative.
There are rumors and denials that CBS is trying to recruit CNN’s Anderson Cooper as a replacement for Katie Couric, who’s been stuck in the Nielsen ratings basement almost from the moment of her “Evening News” debut.
A Cooper-for-Couric switch would not significantly alter the traditional liberal slant at CBS. However, the utter flop of Couric as anchor is a thumb in the eye of feminism, so at least we have that to celebrate.
Not that Anderson Cooper is the personification of manliness or anything. If manliness is what CBS wants, they should try Rachel Maddow.
“Barbara Espinosa must be doing a victory lap right now,” Da Tech Guy writes in reporting on how MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” battered John McCain today for claiming former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke “misled” him into supporting the 2008 Wall Street bailout.
Remember that on Sept. 24, 2008 — the day Crazy Cousin John announced he would suspend his campaign and fly to D.C. to push for the bailout — my initial reaction was “Holy Crap! . . . This is insane.” Two weeks later, many Republicans excoriated me for publishing an Oct. 7 American Spectator column entited, “How John McCain Lost,” that bluntly stated the obvious:
John McCain lost the election Sept. 24 and Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States. Nothing that is likely to happen between now and Nov. 4 can change this outcome. . . .
[B]y siding with the president on an issue that voters identified as favoritism toward Wall Street, the Republican cemented in the public mind a message that Team Obama had been promoting for months: A vote for McCain would mean a third term for George W. Bush. . . .
It was McCain’s outspoken support for the unpopular bailout — a big-government intervention incompatible with conservative economic philosophy — that handed the election to Obama. The bailout failed as politics and, as evidenced by Monday’s selloff on Wall Street, it also failed as policy.
McCain has no one but himself to blame for his own failure of judgment, and his attempt to scapegoat others is pure political cowardice. If Bernanke and Paulson were liars, wasn’t it McCain’s responsibility as a statesman to inform himself of their untrustworthy character and to question their advice? It’s time to rid the U.S. Senate of the one man most responsible for the Obama presidency.
Enjoy your retirement, cuz!
MORE READING: