Clueless Constitutional Commenter Klein: Is That A Nose In Front Of Your Face?

by Smitty

I crashed at the end of the first paragraph from Ezra Goober:

Over the next 18 months, the Environmental Protection Agency will finalize a flurry of new rules to curb pollution from coal-fired power plants. Mercury, smog, ozone, greenhouse gases, water intake, coal ash—it’s all getting regulated. And, not surprisingly, some lawmakers are grumbling.

I’ll give you one more ‘graph for context:

Industry groups such the Edison Electric Institute, which represents investor-owned utilities, and the American Legislative Exchange Council have dubbed the coming rules “EPA’s Regulatory Train Wreck.” The regulations, they say, will cost utilities up to $129 billion and force them to retire one-fifth of coal capacity. Given that coal provides 45 percent of the country’s power, that means higher electric bills, more blackouts and fewer jobs. The doomsday scenario has alarmed Republicans in the House, who have been scrambling to block the measures. Environmental groups retort that the rules will bring sizeable public health benefits, and that industry groups have been exaggerating the costs of environmental regulations since they were first created.

So what is missing?

Recall Article 1 Section 1:

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States

What’s not obvious is how Congress creates an EPA, and we’re left with ‘lawmakers are grumbling’. In a representative Democracy, those lawmakers should, well, make laws. If the people grumble, the lawmakers get voted out on their ear.

The Iron Law of Bureaucracy applies. The over-arching question of our time is not how to prevent the Executive from hyper-extending itself. That joint has already been tortured beyond recognition. The question is how were going to re-set that Executive joint, and constrain it with public diligence to operating within its proper, Executive range of motion.

This blog calls for courageous candidates who will begin removing federal bureaucracies outright. Just send those fat-cat GS dudes packing. I’ve seen some of those slugs moving from meeting to meeting, lost in an acronym-driven PowerPoint daze. While the Left spews hate on corporations and their jets, bear in mind that the threat is the self-entitled homo bureaucratus slug, who will emerge from torpor quickly to address threats to funding.

Can’t figure out whether Klein just isn’t very bright, and misses the point, or is very bright, and paid to run interference for these creeps who threaten the health of the country.

Does Rand Simberg Contradict Himself?

by Smitty (via Ed Driscoll)

I just don’t understand this, in the context of questioning whether WWII ended the Depression:

. . .there was rationing of food and goods on the home front. The real reason that we recovered was that once the war was on, FDR was too distracted by it to continue to tinker with the economy

I’ve read Amity Shlaes, but the more the topic of the Depression vs. WWII comes up, the less clarity there seems to be. How did wartime rationing not count as economic tinkering?

As with the beginning and the end of Creation, this seems to be a topic of the size and complexity that those inclined to argument can arrive at almost any desired conclusion. Simberg’s analysis doesn’t seem to include the larger 20th Century truth that what we saw was a conflict that began with the October Revolution and ended with Perestroika. WWII, Korea, and Vietnam were the decreasingly less brutal outbursts of tension. My point here is that the economic effects of WWII with respect to the Depression occurred in a Cold War context; the boys did not come home from Japan and Germany. There was no traditional U.S. beating of swords into plowshares. Rather, Bretton Woods and the National Security Act of 1947 altered the question significantly enough to obviate it.

So, while by no means coming out as a supporter of FDR, crack-head Keynsian Economics, or historical ignorance, the least-worst answer to the question of whether WWII ended the Depression might be: *yawn*.

1 In 5 U.S. Web Sites Are Powered By WordPress

by Smitty

This blog, on the strength of a decision by Lead Über Design Decision/Integration Technical Engineer (LUDDITE) Robert Stacy McCain, migrated from Blogger to WordPress a couple of years back. We’re in good company, apparently. 22% of U.S. web sites are using it.

Once that call was made, a query among the other cool kids, including Jimmie Bise, led us to the hosting services of Silver Logic. This has proven an excellent relationship. I suspect I’m one of SL’s more demanding customers, knowing just enough of the technical aspects of the MySQL back end to be dangerous. It is great to be stuck halfway around the world, need a bit of specific technical support just to be able to blog at all, and get it promptly. Blogging is a mighty fine addiction, and SL has been a great resource.

Even if you’re not hooked enough to need your own hosting, keep blogging. We stand in the tradition with the pamphleteers who drove the Revolution. Now our federal government has become as odious and unrepresentative today as the British Parliament was then. If we do not apply pressure to restore life, liberty, and the pursuit of debt-free happiness to subsequent generations, who will? Barney Frank? John McCain? Nancy Pelosi? Lindsey Graham? Harry Reid?

WaPoo Goober Who Was Unsure Of Constitution’s Age, Real Sure NYT-noid Story Slamming Tea Party Is, Like, Kosher

by Smitty

What beliefs predict A Tea Partier? This is Ezra Klein’s title for regurgitating a slur from the gray, room temperature lady.

So what do Tea Partiers have in common? They are overwhelmingly white, but even compared to other white Republicans, they had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do.

More important, they were disproportionately social conservatives in 2006 — opposing abortion, for example — and still are today.

Restated, Tea Partiers are post-racial and anti-murder. Because those are somehow bad things.
Klein makes a feint at responsibility:

Perhaps there’s some reason to disbelieve [the NYT] data.

Well, for starters, Ezra, it is quoted by a known propaganda-monger–YOU.

Tell you what, Ezra: when the Tea Parties crank up the peaceful protests next year, let’s have your scrawny self on down to meet the shockingly well-informed lumpen proletariat. You’re going to be shocked and awed to discover that they are nice, relaxed; focused in their indignation.

I suspect that you are a coward, Ezra. Physically, intellectually, morally. I don’t think you’re packing the gear to come out and discover, first hand, the truth that would shatter the falsehoods you peddle. And I want to be wrong in my theory. I want to meet you at a Tea Party, apologize personally, celebrate liberty, protest liberal fascism, and then buy you dinner. I’m guessing you’re a two-legged rabbit, but willing to look past that and become a decent acquaintance. Real friendship  is something you can’t presume.

Give it some thought.

‘Cold-Blooded Kindness’ By Barbara Oakley: A Provocative Read

by Smitty

Barbara Oakley’s book, “Cold-Blooded Kindness” is an excellent read for those with the courage to have their ideas challenged. The subject matter is disturbing. Carole Alden murdered Marty Sessions. After that, the case sinks into a modern swamp of ambiguity. The killer, victim, and setting are straight out of Jerry Springer.

In reviewing the biography of Carole Alden, Oakley discovered she had been exposed both to dangerous medications and serious illness in utero. Throughout her childhood, Alden expressed significant artisitc talent, and notable altruistic love, both of animals and humans. Into her teenage years, Alden exhibited behavior that occasionally, could be characterized as rebellious. Continue reading ‘Cold-Blooded Kindness’ By Barbara Oakley: A Provocative Read →

The Seasteading Concept Is All Fun And Games Until Reality Intrudes

by Smitty (via Althouse)

The idea is for these countries to start from scratch–free from the laws, regulations, and moral codes of any existing place.

Ocean Engineering ain’t beanbag, but it can be done. The only way this has much of a chance is if it goes Swiss, and does a lot of very discreet wealth handling for people who need such services. Also, it has to support port calls from pretty much every navy afloat.

Why? Security is the chief concern. Past natural disasters, the main predator for this idea will be other countries which are envious of the prosperity. Are you a petty megalomaniac who was snubbed by a Seasteading leader? Get yourself a diesel-electric boat and slide a torpedo into it. Cheap, anonymous retribution. Even the mere threat of such will trigger the clanging sound of sphincters slamming shut.

Real Suicides of Beverly Hills

Russell Armstrong, whose wife Taylor was a star of the Bravo network reality show Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, apparently committed suicide Monday, reportedly hanging himself in the bedroom of his lavish home on Mulholland Drive. He was 47 years old.

Armstrong’s wife filed for divorce last month, accusing him of abuse. The Associated Press did a video interview last week with two of Brooke’s co-stars:

Imagine the trauma of having your divorce become a plot-point for a reality show. Life is hard enough without having your personal humiliation serve as primetime ratings fodder for a cable network. Perhaps now Taylor Armstrong can get a new series: Real Widows of Beverly Hills.

The Wrongness of Krugman

Kevin Williamson disassembles the Nobel Prize-winning Keynesian:

Paul Krugman continues his campaign to discredit the economic success of Texas, and, as usual, he is none too particular about the facts . . .
A booming population leads to growth in jobs. But there is another half to that equation: A booming economy, and the jobs that go with it, leads to population growth. Texas has added millions of people and millions of jobs in the past decade; New York, and many other struggling states, added virtually none of either. And it is not about the weather or other non-economic factors: People are not leaving California for Texas because Houston has a more pleasant climate (try it in August), or leaving New York because of the superior cultural amenities to be found in Nacogdoches and Lubbock. People are moving from the collapsing states into the expanding states because there is work to be had, and opportunity. . . .

Read the whole thing. Like all Keynesians, Krugman is adept at cherry-picking data to fit his own narrative and then attempting to discredit antagonists by claiming that they are the ones engaged in special pleading.