The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

‘Misogyny’! If You RT This, Will @CCriadoPerez Report Your Account?

Posted on | December 11, 2013 | 44 Comments

Probably not, but you never know, and while I generally have zero sympathy for Anonymous, this news is rather troubling:

More than 30 Anonymous-related Twitter accounts, including @Anon_Central, one of the largest with over 150,000 followers, have been suspended by Twitter following a campaign of misogynist abuse aimed at feminist campaigners on the social network.
The four women, Labour MP Stella Creasy, Times columnist Caitlin Moran, freelance journalist Caroline Criado-Perez and campaigner Hannah Curtis, were all named in a document shared by the largest anonymous Twitter account, @YourAnonNews, which claimed that “mentioning these accounts can result in suspension and possible scrutiny for future accounts.” It also claimed that “Perez and Creasy appear to have some direct line to Twitter to get accounts suspended sooner.”
Criado-Perez, who has been the subject of campaigns of misogynist abuse before, says that those claims are nonsense. “I certainly don’t have the power to ban accounts, but I do report accounts that send threats and harass me,” she said. “Sometimes they get suspended and sometimes they don’t.
“I don’t bother reporting accounts that just call me a cunt, which is what they seem to think. Just ones that are directly threatening or are inciting harassment, like the Anonymous accounts have been.”

It’s nice to have this promise from Caroline Criado-Perez that you are free to call her the c-word without fear of being reported, eh?

I have no idea how @Anon_Central got suspended, but using “Twitter gulag” tactics to silence opposition by falsely claiming harassment is a continuing concern and, given the essentially totalitarian impulse of feminism, is this claim by Anonymous really surprising?

Guardian columnist Emer O’Toole seems to justify the bannings:

At the same time that the “PayPal14” face felony charges in California for involvement in an Anonymous DDoS campaign in support of WikiLeaks, other Anonymous cells are using their hacktivist energies against feminists who report misogynist harassment on Twitter. . . .
In one document, an Anonymous cell names four women as having “pull” in getting Twitter accounts suspended; two feminist activist groups are also criticised, despite having no such power. This hints that the Anonymous cell’s problem is not feminists with influence over Twitter per se, but the feminist goal of changing attitudes to gendered hate speech. And herein lies a delicate tension: what, for some Anonymous cells, constitutes feminazis instigating an evil Trollocaust against free speech, I understand as activists working with an awareness that rape and harassment don’t happen in a vacuum, but in a cultural climate in which it is OK to intimidate women sexually.

Uh, “the feminist goal of changing attitudes to gendered hate speech“?

What can this possibly mean, except perhaps, “Be nice to girls”?

In case Emer O’Toole, Caroline Criado-Perez and other feminists haven’t noticed, conservative women online are subjected to some of the most hateful language imaginable. You could ask Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Dana Loesch or Katie Pavlich about this.

But perhaps the question you need to be asking is, “Why does Anonymous seem to have a misogyny problem?”

An answer to that question may be as simple as taking a nice long look at the mug shots of the “PayPal 14” (click image to enlarge):

Twelve of the 14 accused hackers (86%) are male, and what a lovely bunch of fellows, eh? Between the “Living in Mom’s Basement” boys and the “Smoked Too Much Weed” weirdos, you get the general idea that maybe they haven’t enjoyed very active social lives.

Also, notice five of them have the silly “hipster goatee” look.

Of the 12 male suspects, how many of them would you guess have wives and children and mortgages and other adult responsibilities?

It’s a self-selection factor, see? Kinda like the sexual assault problem with the “Occupy” movement: Who wants to camp out in a city park with a bunch of smelly anarchist losers? Chicks don’t dig that scene, and the kind of guys who are attracted to anarchist demonstrations . . . Well, maybe they haven’t enjoyed very active social lives.

This observable pattern may also explain why feminists seem so angry all the time: They’re always hanging out with guys on the Left, who are mostly a bunch of wimps, geeks and freaks. If those creeps were your available choices, wouldn’t you be angry, too?

 


Category: Feminism

Women: Is It Possible You’re Entirely Too Self-Conscious and Judgmental?

Posted on | December 11, 2013 | 61 Comments

Julie Eckert has written an article for Verily magazine called “The Care and Keeping of Online Personas” which is interesting in what it unwittingly conveys about the female worldview, namely their innate concern about courtesy, relationships and “popularity.”

This girlish concern for social status is something I’ve noticed since I was in elementary school. Among boys, social status is basically a matter of physical dominance: The big guys shove everybody else around, and if you’re not the biggest kid on the playground, your safety is dependent in large measure on having buddies, belonging to a gang of friends, being part of what is basically a self-defense league.

Male relationships therefore tend to be utilitarian alliances. You have your old buddies and best friends, but these friendships are absent a lot of the emotional fuss and bother that typify female friendships, because that kind of drama-queen act — the backstabbing and gossip and the “Mean Girls”-style cliqueish exclusion — would quickly be settled by physical violence among guys. Courtesy among men is basically a matter of (a) being careful not to piss off a stranger who might decide to kick your ass, and (b) being loyal to your friends, so you can count on having back-up if a fight does break out.

Female relationship are more complex and nuanced and inscrutable, and there’s always that whole “Pretty and Popular Club” thing: Keeping score of who’s friends with who, and who’s not friends with who, and did you see the hideous dress that slut Tiffany wore?

Please, ladies: Don’t give us guys any lectures about “equality,” as if we haven’t seen how you constantly scheme to enhance your own social status relative to other women, and as if we haven’t heard the workplace complaints of women about their female managers, who are in many case brutal tyrants to their female subordinates.

Anyway, Julie Eckert offers many excellent tips about maintaining decorum in the world of social media, but in a way that makes me ask: “Are women thinking way too hard about this stuff?” That is to say, have the real-life status games women play transferred themselves to the online world, where the related phenomena of judgmentalism (toward others) and self-consciousness (about how one is perceived by others) are now applied to social media?

“OMG! Did you see Tiffany’s new avatar? Isn’t it horrible? And did you see how she was tweeting to Josh? What a low-rent tramp!”

Realizing I’m at risk of sounding like Professor Henry Higgins — “Why can’t a woman be more like a man?” — I also realize there’s no point trying to change human nature. Women are women.

Follow Julie Eckert on Twitter.

 

Category: Culture, Feminism

Shorter Ryan: I’m Gonna Kick Tomorrow

Posted on | December 11, 2013 | 39 Comments

by Smitty

It maybe be that Paul Ryan sincerely believes that Congress is EVER going to reduce spending of its own volition. In the same vein, Obama has stated that he believes his own BS. Gently as it can be put, Paul, CONSERVATIVES DO NOT. We don’t believe Obama. While some might be swayed by you confident tones, the last time a Congress successfully bound a subsequent Congress was when the follow-on Congress borrowed more money, not when that future Congress actually cut spending. All I can say is that, sometimes, you need to step away from the problem to gain some perspective.
Erick Erickson calls this budget deal the BOHICA Act of 2013.

I am old enough to remember when the GOP said not to worry about it caving on Obamacare funding because, by God, it would hold the line on sequestration.
Hell, that was a month ago.
Amazing how much can change in a month. Congressman Paul Ryan and Senator Patty Murray have decided to give up the last thing the GOP was fighting for — spending restraint. “Don’t worry,” Paul Ryan says with his boyish charm designed to induce sweats and heart palpitations among conservatives, “it’s only a little less restrained.”
The budget deal puts discretionary spending over $1 trillion, which is higher than the sequestration deal of 2011, which was at $967. This is, in fact, a spending increase.
It funds Obamacare.

It gets worse as you read RedState from there.
New rule: all talk of future spending cuts is rejected, in advance, as pure hooey. Don’t bother with it, Paul. No amount of poker face, boyish good looks, and irresistible masculine charm can sell something we know is fundamentally not gonna happen. Peddle those wares to a more gullible audience.
Going with this Jane’s Addiction cut, since “Been Caught Stealing” is probably too pejorative, if also more accurate.

Category: Budget

A Scoop That Was Not a Scoop: The ‘Spying on Gamers’ Story Is Old News

Posted on | December 11, 2013 | 20 Comments

You perhaps saw the headlines:

Spies Infiltrate a Fantasy Realm of Online Games
— New York Times

Xbox Live among game services targeted
by US and UK spy agencies
— The Guardian

World of Spycraft: NSA and CIA Spied in Online Games
— Pro Publica

Don’t believe the Greenwald/Snowden media fanboy hype, says Paul Hair at The Security and Culture Intelligencer:

Virtual worlds interest the Intelligence Community (IC). That’s the news coming from the latest leak of classified material that’s part of the Russian-backed subversion and espionage operation that Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, and the Media continue conducting against the U.S.
But this “news” isn’t news at all.
The New York Times, ProPublica, and The Guardian published their latest stories as if they were revealing to the world that virtual worlds interest the IC. They failed to make clear that the IC has long acknowledged the basic (and unclassified) information regarding its interest in virtual worlds.
The online version of WIRED published, “U.S. Spies Want to Find Terrorists in World of Warcraft,” during February 2008. WIRED published its story based on unclassified information that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) published about its data mining activity. A version of that data mining report remains available on the ODNI website.
Furthermore, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA—a component of the ODNI) explicitly acknowledges its interest in virtual worlds with an entire program about it. The program and related documents are readily available to everyone. The specific program is called, “Reynard,” and one of the documents is a 50-page, “Reynard Proposers Day,” PDF that provides a wealth of information.

How is it that a program which was first reported by Wired more than five years ago should suddenly be treated as front-page news?

Many of my blogger friends on the Right have joined the media’s breathless enthusiasm for Edward Snowden’s leaks: “Obama’s spying on us! Big government out of control!” Excuse me for courting unpopularity by dissenting from that viewpoint. The work done by our intelligence agencies is both necessary and necessarily secretive, and we seem to be entering an era like the mid-1970s, when Watergate-era revelations created a widespread hostility toward the CIA, the FBI and the entire concept of “national security.”

I’m one of the few journalists who has consistently regarded Snowden skeptically. See my June article at Viral Read, “Who Is Edward Snowden? Background on NSA Leaker Emerges.”

America has real enemies, and don’t expect me to applaud the willful disclosure of the classified means by which we keep track of America’s enemies. It is one thing to denounce specific abuses — which, admittedly, the government tried to conceal — but there is no need to buy into the mindset of the Left, which cheers every new “leak” because the leaks hurt America and the Left hates America. Paul Hair again:

It also remains to be seen if politicians, pundits, bloggers, private citizens, alternative media outlets, the tech industry, and gamers will begin to examine the motives and veracity of Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, and the Media as they continue conducting a Russian-backed subversion and espionage campaign against the U.S.

You can follow Paul Hair on Twitter.

 


Category: Journalism

LIVE AT FIVE: 12.11.13

Posted on | December 11, 2013 | 9 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
Budget Deal Averts Shutdown, Cuts Federal Workforce

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sena. Patty Murray (D-WA)

Budget replaces $63 billion in sequestration cuts with more targeted savings, more fees


BJP, AAP Prepare For Another Round Of Elections
Neither party has majority in Delhi; neither will budge from Opposition


GM No Longer Government Motors
Feds sell off last of GM shares, take $10.5 billion loss



POLITICS
Rep. Steve Stockman To Challenge Sen. Cornyn In 2014 Primary

And in this corner…

Tea Party favorite going after Cornyn after latter undermined Ted Cruz on Obamacare

Poll: Obama Gets No Credit From Majority As Economy “Improves”


White House Gun Control Push Loses Steam As Newtown Anniversary Approaches

NY Court Won’t Compel Reporter To Testify, Boosting Shield Law

Local Meth Laws Illegal, Tennessee AG Says

Former Clinton Aide John Podesta To Join Obama White House



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Brent, WTI Converge As US Crude Inventories Fall: NYMEX $98.41, Brent $109.26
Wall Street Exhales As Volcker Rule Seen Sparing Market-Making
GM To End Production In Australia, New Zealand
Asian Stocks Down On Prospect Of Fed Stimulus Cut
S&P 500 Slips From Record High
Lucky Brand Apparel Sold For $225 Million
Windows “Threshold” Leaks Point To Return Of Start Menu
Ubuntu Touch OS Wins First Smartphone Partner
Twitter Adds Photos To Direct Messages For Mobile, Web
Google Chromecast Gets Ten New Apps
Nokia Moves Ahead With Plans For Low-End Android Phone



SPORTS
Paul George Leads Pacers’ Second-Half Rally To Beat The Heat

Paul George is guarded by LeBron James

15 of his 17 points came in second half of Pacers’ 90-84 win


Is The Angels/Snakes/White Sox Trade A Menage A Blah?

Ovechkin Scores Four As Caps Edge Bolts 6-5


With Latest Mack Brown News, Let The Saban To Texas Rumors Begin

Knicks Lose Again, Thumped 109-94 By Cavs

Blue Jackets Tip Devils With Last-Minute Goal

Forty Favorite College Cheerleaders Of 2013

Rockies Trade Two To A’s For Brett Anderson

Kings Score Six, Shut Out Habs

Cubs Interested In Nationals’ Storen, Clippard?



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Rhymes With Possum…And With Awesome

Emmy Rossum

The Esquire interview.


Kate Winslet: It’s A Boy

Demi Lovato On Her Past Drug Use: Couldn’t Go More Than An Hour Without Cocaine

Justin Bieber Being A Jackass Down Under

Bette Midler To Play Mae West In HBO Biopic

Tom Cruise Developing Another Jack Reacher Movie


NBC Gets Boost From “The Sound Of Music”, Considering Follow-Up

 Victoria Justice Breaks Up With BF Ryan Rothman

Madonna’s Daughter Lourdes Stars In High School Production Of “Grease”

Britney Spears Talks Pregnancy Sex, Defends The Unspeakable Armenian

Julia Roberts Expecting A Lot Of Pregnancy Questions

Paris Hilton’s Brother Giving NYPD No Cooperation In Alleged Lohan-Linked Attack

Adam Shankman Checks Into Rehab

Angelina Jolie’s Plane Grounded By FAA

Carol Lawrence Returns To NYC



FOREIGNERS
South Africa Overlooked At Mandela’s Funeral
Ukrainian Police Clash With Protesters In Kiev
Uruguay Okays First National Market For Legalized Pot
India’s Supreme Court Reinstates Ban On Gay Sex
Thai Protesters Claim Authority Over Government
Senator Schumer Bucks Secretary Kerry, White House; Will Call For Tougher Iran Sanctions
President Of Firm Responsible For Defective Breast Implants Gets Four Years
Japan Aims To Expand, Revive ASEAN Swaps At Weekend Summit
Uneasy PRC Hopes For Stability, Friendly Relations With Norks After Recent Purge
Us Pins Hopes On India To Persuade Karzai To Sign Pact



BLOGS & STUFF
The Looking Spoon: As If Obama’s Handshake With Raul Castro Wasn’t Bad Enough…
Michelle Malkin: Two Big Announcements – Book Deal And Twitchy Deal!
Twitchy: Truth-Boom! Brit Hume Crushes Obamacare With One Question, Devastating Answer
American Power: Vulgarity – The New Normal
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, December 10
Jammie Wearing Fools: Panetta Revealed Classified Info To “Zero Dark Thirty” Filmmaker
JustOneMinute: Income Taxes, Excluding Social Security And Medicare
Pat Dollard: Leo Tyrrell Loses His Mind On Hannity
Protein Wisdom: I Can’t
Shot In The Dark: A Memorial To Remember
The Jawa Report: Air Force Band’s Flash Mob Concert At The Air & Space Museum
The Lonely Conservative: Bipartisan Budget Deal Does Nothing To Solve Budget Problem
This Ain’t Hell: To Be…Or To Do?
Megan McArdle: GM’s First Female CEO Has An Incentive Problem


Category: Live at Five

Have You Forgotten?

Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 60 Comments

It’s weird how easy it is to forget things. My wife and I just watched the documentary Hating Breitbart together, and the pivotal centerpiece of the movie is the claim by Rep. Andre Carson, Indiana Democrat, that Tea Party activists shouted the n-word at him and other members of the Black Congressional Caucus. Have you forgotten?

That was March 2010. What was the occasion?

Oh, yeah: It was the day of the final congressional vote on ObamaCare, and the Tea Party crowd at the Capitol was shouting, “Kill the bill!”

Andrew Breitbart offered a reward of $10,000 — subsequently raised to $20,000 and then to $100,000 — for anyone who could produce evidence that anyone shouted the n-word that day. Nobody ever collected the reward, because the narrative was a lie.

Breitbart pointed out that there was a “sea of New Media” outside the Capitol that day. Everybody had video cameras or cell-phone cameras going, and if anyone actually had shouted the n-word, certainly someone would have collected that reward.

Nobody ever did. More than three years have gone by. Now ObamaCare is law, and very unpopular, and one of the biggest lies of our time — that the Tea Party’s opposition to ObamaCare was motivated by racism — has been conclusively debunked by the shameful silence of the Democrats who could not produce the proof of their lie.

Oh, but the Democrats never apologized, did they?

The media never apologized, did they?

And what has the passage of ObamaCare meant to America?

“If you’re covered and you like your insurance, you can
keep it,” said Congressman Gary Peters in August 2009.
Gary Peters made that pitch knowing it was false, and
it cost at least 225,000 people in Michigan their
health care. Despite these facts, Gary Peters
has refused to admit his deception or
apologize to the people he hurt.

That’s just one Democrat in Michigan, but is true of all Democrats everywhere. They rammed ObamaCare through Congress on a party-line vote. Not a single Republican voted for the bill. The Democrats and their media allies lied and lied and then lied some more.

And they’re still lying now.

President Obama just brought John Podesta onto the White House staff. Andrew Breitbart despised John Podesta — if you have seen Hating Breitbart, you know how much he hated him. But maybe you’ve forgotten that there ever was a guy named Andrew Breitbart.

You can buy Hating Breitbart now.

It would be a wonderful Christmas gift for your kids.

 

Category: Andrew Breitbart, Health Care

Ryan Almost Blows The Reform Trumpet On The Budget

Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 30 Comments

by Smitty

Former GOP VP candidate and all-around Centrist got out the Kazoo of Compromise in attempting to sell his budget deal with Senator Patty Murray:

“In divided government, you don’t always get what you want,” he said. “We eliminate waste. We stop sending checks to criminals. We cut corporate welfare. We start making real changes to these autopilot programs that are the real drivers of our debt.” Twice, he was asked how he would defend the plan to Republicans in the House and to conservative groups.
Answer one: “As a conservative, I think this is a step in the right direction. The deficit will go down more if we pass this than if we did nothing.”
Answer two: “As a conservative, I deal with the situation as it exists. I deal with the way things are, not the way I may want them to be. I’m not going to go a mile in the direction I want to go, but I’ll take a few steps.”

And later:

The condemnations would roll in from the various good-government groups that had been demanding entitlement cuts, and from the conservatives who had attacked the idea of a budget that broke the spending caps. But first, Murray and Ryan shook hands.

For example, Senator Rubio:

“We need a government with less debt and an economy with more good paying jobs, and this budget fails to accomplish both goals, making it harder for more Americans to achieve the American Dream. Instead, this budget continues Washington’s irresponsible budgeting decisions by spending more money than the government takes in and placing additional financial burdens on everyday Americans.
“In the short run, this budget also cancels earlier spending reductions, instead of making some tough decisions about how to tackle our long-term fiscal challenges caused by runaway Washington spending. I voted against sequestration because of its effect on key programs, including the defense budget, but higher spending and more revenue are not the appropriate ways to address that problem.
“The American people should not be asked to choose between a strong military and responsible budgets that encourage job creation and reduce debt. They deserve better than this.”

Maybe Ryan just needs to study some Zappa, and get some of that tenor saxophone in his system, for better justice:
Here is the link to a summary of the deal:

FEDERAL CIVILIAN AND MILITARY RETIREMENT

Federal Retirement

These sections increase federal-employee contributions to their retirement programs by 1.3
percentage points. The proposal affects new employees hired after December 31, 2013 with
less than five years of service.

Annual adjustment of retired pay and retainer pay amounts for retired members of the
Armed Forces under age 62

This provision modifies the annual cost-of-living adjustment for working-age military retirees by
making the adjustments equal to inflation minus one percent. This change would be gradually 3

phased in, with no change for the current year, a 0.25 percent decrease in December 2014, and
a 0.5 percent decrease in December 2015. This would not affect service members who retired
because of disability or injury. Service members would never see a reduction in benefits from
one year to the next.

Awesome. The military reserve retirement I haven’t got yet will gradually evaporate, even as I sneak up on it. Glad I’m not actually including that pension in my retirement planning.

Update: Ryan has an actual interview with Mark Levin on the topic.

Category: Budget

‘Teacher of the Year’ Learns a Tough Lesson: Always Take the Plea Bargain

Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 47 Comments

Ethel Anderson, 31, was once voted “Teacher of the Year” in Riverside, Florida. You might have thought that when prosecutors offered her a 15-year-sentence, the former language arts teacher at Mango Elementary would have known it was the best she could hope for:

A female teacher found guilty of having sex with a 12-year-old student has been sentenced to 38 years in prison . . .
Judge Chet Tharpe told Anderson in court that she manipulated the boy’s parents into believing he was safe and groomed the child for sex.
Anderson was charged with nine counts of molesting a student after it was discovered that she was having sex with a boy who was 12-years-old at the time. . . .
Anderson had denied the charges but her victim, now 14, took the stand in September to testify that the alleged abuse started four or five weeks into their tutoring sessions when she would kiss him and perform oral sex on him in her home.
He told the court: ‘I felt like she was a girlfriend, I loved her and she said that I was her boyfriend and she loved me.
‘She would rub on my legs, kiss on my ears, neck and stuff like that… We would tongue kiss.’ . . .
[T]he boy’s mother showed no signs of forgiveness.
‘Anger and hatred don’t even begin to explain how I feel about what you took from my son,’ the boy’s mother said in a statement read at the sentencing by prosecutors.
‘His innocence is lost forever.’

Thirty-eight years. Could have been just 15 years, if she had taken the plea deal, but the “Teacher of the Year” just wasn’t very smart.

 


Category: Crime, Education, Sex
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin