The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Good-Bye, @MegynKelly

Posted on | January 4, 2017 | 2 Comments

 

Did you make the smart move? That’s the question that occurs to most Fox News viewers who have watched your meteoric ascent, as they consider your switch to NBC. Surely the network that hired you would not have done so if they thought you were a conservative. NBC News is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party. It is the network of Chris Matthews and Chuck Todd and Rachel Maddow. NBC is anti-Christian and pro-Islam, anti-family and pro-abortion, anti-cop and pro-“Black Lives Matter.” The partisan and ideological biases at NBC News are so blatantly obvious that it is impossible to imagine that you, Ms. Kelly, could be permitted to broadcast anything there that would deviate from the network’s Democrat/“progressive” agenda. But anyway . . .

 

“Bill hated her” — I laughed when I read that quote from an unnamed Fox News host in Gabriel Sherman’s article. Yes, and we hate Bill O’Reilly, a guy who’s been the “face” of Fox News for way too long. Why did Roger Ailes invest so heavily in making O’Reilly the tentpole of the network, the signature of the Fox News brand? It never made sense to me. Veteran news guys like Brit Hume and Brett Baier are the best thing on the network, and in terms of opinionated conservatism, Sean Hannity is more watchable. Yet year after year, O’Reilly has remained entrenched in his 8 p.m. time slot as the centerpiece of the Fox News identity, and I could seldom stand to watch more than a few minutes of The O’Reilly Factor.

“Personnel is policy,” as the Reaganites said, and the Ailes-era staffing decisions at Fox News seemed to reflect a commitment to a particular style of Republican political messaging, namely the old Al D’Amato Long Island GOP machine and its Art Finklestein-engineered attack strategy. Attracting a large viewership in the outer suburbs of New York City made sense, as a business strategy for Fox News, and the demographics of that audience meant that having an Irish Catholic guy from Long Island as the 8 p.m. anchor also made sense. But once the network had established its national influence, didn’t Fox News limit its audience by having this snide and smarmy egotist as its most famous face?

 

Well, The Kelly Files was a counter-balance to that problem, but the gigantic ego  of Bill O’Reilly — and the network’s investment in his ego — could not be effectively counter-balanced, and so, good-bye, Megyn:

For Kelly, the jump from a primetime perch at Fox to a multifaceted role at NBC carries a high degree of risk. She’ll be giving up the most loyal audience in cable news for new set of platforms that she’ll have to largely build herself. At NBC, Kelly will anchor an Oprah-like daytime show, launch a new Sunday night news magazine, and contribute to the network’s political coverage. The track record for talented anchors launching daytime programs hasn’t been good (see: Katie Couric, Meredith Vieira, Anderson Cooper), and no Fox News star has successfully crossed over to the mainstream before.

My hunch, Ms. Kelly, is that you will simply disappear. The partisan Democrats who run NBC News have no interest in your success. What they have done is to hire you away from Fox News in order to damage their rival, and to neutralize whatever personal influence you may have had in terms of undermining liberalism’s hegemonic control of the news media. You are now another highly-paid puppet whose strings are controlled by the executives at 30 Rock, and if you fail at NBC — if your daytime show is a ratings flop — those executives will have no problem paying out your contract while limiting your airtime to occasional appearances as a Meet the Press panelist.

 

Of course, I’ve been wrong before. A month before Election Day, I declared that the devastation of Trump’s accumulating scandals meant he couldn’t possibly win and, if I was wrong about that, maybe I’m also wrong about your career prospects at NBC News. How could you succeed?

  1. Be pro-life — The pro-abortion bias is arguably the most toxic aspect of the media’s liberal agenda. Obviously, NBC News isn’t going to let you use their airtime to promote the pro-life perspective in any blatant way, but there will be times when your decisions could have a subtle yet important influence. “Therefore choose life.”
  2. Be anti-Hollywood — My old friend Andrew Breitbart and I used to argue about which was more wicked, Hollywood or D.C. Having spent so long dealing with the two-faced backstabbing scoundrels in Washington, I was certain that D.C. was the most evil place on the planet, but Andrew was unconvinced. “No, trust me, Hollywood is worse,” he’d say, before regaling me with tales about the selfish coke-addicted perverts who run the entertainment industry. If you, Ms. Kelly, were to use your NBC daytime show to expose some of the shocking decadence of Hollywood, this would be a tremendous public service and, I suspect, would make you unique among major network news personalities.
  3. Be patriotic — What was the secret of Trump’s victory, really? First, “build a wall,” and second, “Make America great again.” This simple old-fashioned patriotism proved so popular that 63 million American voters were willing to overlook every negative aspect of Trump’s personality and politics. Maybe your NBC audience would find it refreshing to encounter a daytime show where the U.S. military and our nation’s law-enforcement officers are recognized for their heroic service to our country. Flag-waving Mom-and-apple-pie patriotism is a “brand” whose value has been unappreciated by the liberal media establishment, and you might enjoy surprising success at NBC if you make this a core theme of your new show.

Network TV stars don’t ask for my advice, and I offer it unsolicited only because it seems to me there is too much an echo-chamber mentality in the major media. People inside the news industry can never be objective about the industry and its problems. Unable to step outside the echo chamber, and unwilling to listen to anyone who isn’t part of the industry — what do they know, those stupid people who merely watch TV? — the media’s hive-mind generates a sort of impenetrable force-field that prevents insiders from seeing their industry’s problems objectively.

Maybe you, Ms. Kelly, can be an exception to that rule.

 

(Via Memeorandum.)



 

 

Category: Fox News, Media Bias, MSNBC, NBC

In The Mailbox: 01.03.17

Posted on | January 3, 2017 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
BattleSwarm: Interview With James Quintero On The Texas Municipal Pension Debt Crisis
EBL: Is Me-Again Kelly Off To NBC?
Michelle Malkin: The Rot Is Deep – The Corrupt EB-5 Immigration Racket You’re Not Hearing About
Twitchy: “I’m So Tired Of Islam Being Coddled” – Jenna Jameson Unleashes Twitter Hell On “Triggered Snowflakes”
Louder With Crowder: Tucker Carlson Schools Smug College Student Threatening Violence Because of Trump


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Fan Boys
American Power: USC Beats Penn State In Rose Bowl
American Thinker: The Lame Duck Restraint Act
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily News
Da Tech Guy: Eight Years Later, The NYT Is Still Looking For Instapundit Readers
Don Surber: President Trump Gets Ford To Make A U-Turn In Mexico
Dustbury: Download A Thin Mint
Jammie Wearing Fools: Fake News Update – No Russian Involvement With Vermont Utility
Joe For America: Netanyahu’s UN Revenge – America’s Response Is Inevitable
Power Line: Watch The New Yorker Crash And Burn
Shark Tank: Trump Wants To Repeal A Lot Of Obamacare On Day 1
Shot In The Dark: Layers And Layers Of Gatekeepers, Part MMMLXVII
STUMP: Setting The Stage For 2017 – Looking At Social Security
The Geller Report: Exclusive AFDI Video – Columbia University Students Support Female Genital Mutilation, Want Planned Parenthood To Fund It
The Jawa Report: Remember When Assad Allowed Al-Qaeda Passage And Lived To Regret It?
The Political Hat: North Carolina And Democracy
This Ain’t Hell: Tuesday Morning Feelgood Stories
Weasel Zippers: Poll Says 52% Of Dems Believe Russia Tampered With Vote Totals To Elect Trump, also, Over 1500 Refugees Diagnosed With Active TB Since 2012, Three Times Number Previously Reported
Mark Steyn: A Judicial Assault On The First Amendment


Today’s Digital Deals
Shop Amazon Warehouse Deals – Deep Discounts on Open-box and Used Kitchen Gadgets

Category: Linkagery

‘Madness Takes Its Toll’

Posted on | January 3, 2017 | 1 Comment

 

The Rocky Horror Campus Feminism Show:

A students’ union is discouraging its members from using the pronouns ‘he’ and ‘she’, to avoid assumptions being made as to how people identify.
Sussex University students’ union has released a gender inclusive language policy, which applies to all its meetings, radio broadcasts, communications, societies and elections.
The policy states that preferred pronouns should be stated at the beginning of every meeting, regardless of whether they have been stated at previous meetings, and that gender neutral language should be used when the pronoun is not known.
The policy continues: ‘In situations where introductions are not appropriate or where an individual has not directly stated their pronouns, gender-neutral language should be used to refer to them, and no assumptions should be made based on presentation or appearance.

(Via Memeorandum.) Let’s do the Time Warp again.

 

 

Category: Education, Sex Trouble

Tranny ‘Feminist’ @RileyJayDennis Is Here to Educate You About Science

Posted on | January 2, 2017 | 3 Comments

 

Justin Dennis, a/k/a Riley J. Dennis, is a transgender activist who describes himself/“herself” as an “intersectional feminist” who is “also super queer (transfeminine lesbian to be specific).” Justin/Riley become notorious in November after he/“she” declared it is “discriminatory” for anyone not to want to date him/“her.” Being normal is now a hate crime, according to the Cult of Social Justice to which Justin/Riley belongs.

“Riley J. Dennis is a polyamorous, atheist, gender non-binary transwoman . . . educating people on the nuances of gender, sexuality, and intersectional feminism.”
— Everyday Feminism

See? You’re ignorant about “nuances of gender,” which is why you need “educating” by “a polyamorous, atheist, gender non-binary transwoman.”

“Hillary is our only option to prevent a Trump presidency. That’s the only reason I really needed.”
— Justin “Riley J.” Dennis, Oct. 30, 2016

Did I mention he/“she” is a Democrat? Because, of course he/“she” is. If you want your kids to be polyamorous gender non-binary atheist intersectional feminists like Riley J. Dennis, vote Democrat.

Getting the endorsement of Justin/Riley didn’t help Hillary Clinton with blue-collar voters in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, but this doesn’t mean the election has caused Justin/Riley to reconsider his/“her” political ideology. In fact, he/“she” just released a new video explaining why there is no need to debate Trump supporters because Trump supporters are Nazis, and “not worthy of being debated”:

“And I know we’re always talking about how divided we’ve become as a country and how partisan, but I don’t think the answer is reaching across the aisle and shaking hands with a Nazi, because that’s exactly what this new administration is being filled with. Trump’s cabinet is already full of white nationalists. These are people who are openly misogynistic and anti-Semitic . . . The ‘alt-right’ people he surrounds himself with are modern-day neo-Nazis. . . . Because people tweet me or comment on my videos or something saying, ‘Ah, you won’t debate this idea. It’s because you’re afraid you’re gonna lose.’ . . . That’s not a logical conclusion to come to when someone doesn’t want to debate you. There’s like a million-and-a-half reasons someone might not want to debate you, but one of those might be, you just don’t have a valid viewpoint and you’re not worthy of being debated.”

 

See? If you disagree with Justin/Riley, that means “you just don’t have a valid viewpoint,” which means he/“she” doesn’t have to debate you.

You may wonder what makes Justin/Riley an expert qualified to determine what is or is not a “valid viewpoint.” Well, in addition to being a super queer transfeminine lesbian as well as a polyamorous, atheist, gender non-binary transwoman, Justin/Riley is also a recent graduate of Whittier College, where the annual tuition is $44,574, plus $12,902 room and board. Because your parents didn’t spend $57,476 a year to send you to a private liberal arts college, you obviously are too stupid to understand what words like “valid” and “viewpoint” mean.

Even though I didn’t attend prestigious Whittier College, I did ace Principles of Logic at Jacksonville (Ala.) State University, and I understand what a false analogy looks like, and I also know a straw man fallacy when I see one, so let’s quote some more Riley J. Dennis, OK?

“There are people living today, in 2016, who honestly believe that the Earth is flat. Now the thing is, those people are allowed to have that opinion. . . . But that doesn’t mean that that opinion is valid or that it should be part of our modern discourse. . . .”

(Can you guess where Justin/Riley is going with this?)

“Because I think we can all accept . . . that the Earth is not flat, the Earth is round. We live in a solar system, we orbit around the sun. And these are just basic facts that we have to accept because we know them to be true there’s a lot of scientific evidence. . . .”

(In addition to being a straw man — because no flat-earthers are actually arguing with Justin/Riley — he/“she” is also setting up a standard trick we can call the Progress Fallacy: “Here is this provably wrong idea that people held in the past, and therefore, all ideas from the past can be disregarded as invalid.” Except, of course, that the scientific method itself is based on very old ideas, dating to ancient Greece. Now, back to Justin/Riley and “modern discourse.”)

“Let’s take climate change, for example. There is a ton of scientific evidence for climate change, and yet there are still people who deny it, and we’re supposed to treat them like they have a valid argument, but they don’t, because the science is in and we know that climate change is happening. . . .”

(Except, of course, that the actual argument is about anthropogenic global warming [AGW], and it has been shown that the proponents of this claim have falsified “evidence” and disregarded alternative explanations for the observable changes in global temperatures. AGW proponents have engaged in fear-mongering and enlisted government authority to gain funding for themselves and to deny funding for their scientific critics. But please, Justin/Riley, continue to educate us.)

“Compromise is not always a good thing. One one side, we have people saying that LGBT-plus people deserve respect, should be treated equally under the law, and should be protected from discrimination. And on the other side, we have people saying that LGBT-plus should be denied their basic human rights and not be treated equally under the law.”

Here we arrive at the destination — the conclusion, the payoff — of Justin/Riley’s long and winding road of bad analogies. I’ve omitted, for the sake of brevity, the anti-vaccine analogy that Justin/Riley threw in as an example of invalid viewpoints that are not worthy to debate. You see the apples-and-oranges problem with going from (a) flat-Earth kooks, to (b) global warming, to (c) people who refuse to vaccinate their children, to (d) questions of law and policy regarding sexual behavior.

The preamble in Justin/Riley’s argument was a set-up for accusing conservatives of denying “basic human rights” to gay people. But what do these phrases mean? What does it mean, for example, to say that certain people, self-defined categorically by their sexual behavior or preferences, “deserve respect”? What does it mean to be “treated equally under the law”? What counts as “discrimination”? How is this offense defined, who is authorized to determine whether “discrimination” has occurred, and how shall this policy be enforced? These are not moot speculations, of course, because we know how advocates of soi-disant “basic human rights” operate — they file lawsuits, accusing people of illegal “discrimination,” in order to force people to do things they don’t want to do, e.g., employ “genderqueer” elementary school teachers:

A “transmasculine” teacher at an Oregon elementary school has been awarded $60,000 by her school district as compensation for harassment she claims to have suffered on the job, including being referred to by the wrong pronoun.
According to The Oregonian, Leo Soell was born a woman, but now prefers to identify as “transmasculine” and “genderqueer,” meaning she does not consider herself to be male or female . . .
The school conducted an internal investigation after Soell complained, but found no proof of harassment.
Eventually, Soell was able to cut a deal with the school to have her referred to by her preferred pronoun, “they,” but Soell said the harassment didn’t stop, so she finally hired an attorney and prepared to file an official complaint.
Oregon is a very friendly state for individuals who claim they have suffered discrimination based on gender identity. The state’s labor commissioner, Brad Avakian, forced a bakery to pay $135,000 to a lesbian couple they wouldn’t bake a cake for, and he has also compelled a bar owner to pay a whopping $400,000 to a group of transgender customers he tried to ban from his bar.
Eager to avoid meeting a similar fate, district officials agreed to pay Soell $60,000 in compensation for her emotional distress, and they also agreed to adopt a whole battery of new policies to make the district more transgender-friendly.

Now, ask yourself this: If the school officials had suspected that Brina Soell was a transmasculine genderqueer when she applied for the job, would they have hired her? But having once hired Brina, were school officials then obligated to play along with her gender-identity game when she changed her name to “Leo,” got her breasts amputated, and demanded to be referred to with the pronoun “they”?

We may be ignorant about “nuances of gender,” but we are not naïve as to how claims of “discrimination” operate in the real world. When people start blabbering about “basic human rights” and claiming they’re denied “equal treatment under the law,” what they’re really saying is, “Hand me that whip, so I can boss you around and make you do what I say.”

Declaring yourself a Victim of Social Injustice can be a pretty lucrative racket, if you can get a sharp lawyer and a friendly judge. Calling yourself a super queer transfeminine lesbian and a polyamorous, atheist, gender non-binary transwoman — well, Justin/Riley is a federal lawsuit just waiting to happen, isn’t he/“she”? For some reason, however, I’ve got a hunch that Preisdent Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions aren’t going to make the “basic human rights” of gender non-binary queer trans feminists a top priority at the Justice Department.

Anyway, Riley J. Dennis wants to give you some sex advice:

And some more sex advice:

And here, have some more sex advice:

Remember: Riley J. Dennis went to prestigious Whittier College and is an expert. You are ignorant and don’t know anything about sex, which is why he/“she” is educating people on the nuances of gender and sexuality. If you disagree with him/“her,” that’s because “you just don’t have a valid viewpoint and you’re not worthy of being debated.”

Riley J. Dennis has dedicated his/“her” life to insulting people — you’re ignorant if you disagree with him/“her” — and yet he/“she” is shocked to discover that people resent being lectured so insultingly.



 

Category: Gays, Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 01.02.17

Posted on | January 2, 2017 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
BattleSwarm: LinkSwarm For December 30
EBL: Ace And Ricochet Have An Open Letter To #NeverTrumper Egg McMuffinEvan McMullin
Twitchy: Garry Kasparov Calls 2017 UN Human Rights Council Roster “Another Sick Joke”
Louder With Crowder: EPA To Fine Alaskans For Burning Wood To Stay Warm?


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Podcast #32 – The Hotel Episode
American Power: Donald Trump – “No Computer Is Safe”
American Thinker: Obama, A Political Corpse
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Monday 2017
Da Tech Guy: John Ruberry – Actually, 2016 Was A Pretty Good Year
Don Surber: Reporter Loses It Over President Trump, also, The Year National Review Committed Suicide
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries, also, Worst Titles Of 2016
Fred On Everything: The Sisterhood And A Profound Weariness – Unbiased Analysis
Joe For America: Federal Court Has Devastating New Surprise For Hillary
JustOneMinute: Squashing A Free Press – Thanks, Obama!
Power Line: Evidence For Russian Involvement In DNC Hack Is Nonexistent, also, Has Liberalism Ruined College Football Bowl Season?
Shark Tank: Trump’s New Year’s Eve Tweet Targets His “Enemies”
Shot In The Dark: The Best Threat Money Can Fabricate
STUMP: Around The Pension Blogosphere
The Geller Report: CHAOS IN GERMANY – Muslim Migrant Sex Attacks, Explosives Thrown At Police During NYE Events
The Jawa Report: Death To 2016!
The Political Hat: Happy New Year!
This Ain’t Hell: Fake News In The New Year, also, Two VA Secretary Picks Bail On Trump
Weasel Zippers: Congressional Black Caucus Plotting Resistance To Trump’s Presidency, also, Most Circulated Paper In Turkey Claims “America Top Suspect In Nightclub Terror Attack”
Megan McArdle: Hacking Democratic Rules Isn’t Good Government
Mark Steyn: A Glorious Rain


Today’s Digital Deals

Category: Linkagery

Who Democrats Really Are: @joshtpm Displays His, Uh, Feminist Theory

Posted on | January 2, 2017 | 1 Comment

Friday night, while endeavoring to make another attack on Donald Trump, the editor of the left-wing blog Talking Points Memo made a minor mistake. Josh Marshall (@joshtpm on Twitter) evidently cut and pasted the wrong URL into a tweet, so that his message included a link to a lesbian porn scene involving “Angela & Strawberry.”

 

Absent any feasible explanation from Marshall, everyone immediately reached the obvious conclusion: While running his anti-Trump rants on his Twitter feed, this eminent progressive pundit was also simultaneously scrolling through the PornHub site on another PC window.

Talking Points Memo Chief
Tweets Out Hardcore Porn by Accident
While Trying to Attack Trump
— The Ralph Retort

TPM’s Josh Marshall Reduced
To Tweeting Porno Link
Of ‘Teasing, Licking’ ‘Angela & Strawberry’
— The Daily Caller

Talking Points Memo Editor Josh Marshall
Tweets Out Link to Lesbian Porn
— Ace of Spades HQ

Of course, no one cares how Josh Marshall gets his jollies, except for the fact that he and the rest of the Democrat Party propaganda apparatus have spent the past two years promoting feminism as the core argument of a campaign to rid the world of patriarchal misogyny. And the evils of “objectification” of women by the “male gaze” was one of the core themes of Anita Sarkeesian’s attack on the videogame industry, which gave rise to the “Gamergate” controversy. If “the personal is political,” as feminists insist, then Josh Marshall’s porn addiction is politically problematic.

 

As Anita Sarkeesian has made clear, feminists are against any “personal choice” for women that is oriented toward male sexual pleasure, especially if this involves appealing to the “male gaze,” because feminist theory condemns male sexual interest in women as “objectification.” Yet because feminists are part of the Democrat Party coalition, “male allies” of the feminist movement are expected to ignore (or make excuses for) feminism’s anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology.

 

Democrats use feminist rhetoric as a partisan weapon in a propaganda war to depict Republicans as “anti-woman,” and so the abusive behavior of male Democrats (e.g., Anthony Weiner, Eliot Spitzer, Bill Clinton) is never interpreted by feminists as evidence of a pervasive problem with their “male allies.” To admit the obvious truth — that Democrat men in general are predatory perverts who exploit “feminism” as a means to their own selfish ends — would require feminists to consider the possibility that Republicans are not actually the villainous sexist bogeymen that they’re portrayed to be by the liberal media. For feminists to tell the truth about their “male allies” would be to admit that feminism is just a scam, the same kind of phony hustle that enables Democrats like Bill Clinton to get rich by pretending to care about poor people.

Don’t expect any feminist — Amanda Marcotte, Jessica Valenti, Jill Filipovic, et al. — to criticize Josh Marshall for tweeting out lesbian porn. Feminists have no integrity, because if there is one thing the Democrat Party can never tolerate in its ranks, it’s people with integrity.



 

Category: Sex Trouble

Murder City, USA: Chicago Ends 2016 With Nearly 800 Homicides for Year

Posted on | January 2, 2017 | 2 Comments

 

The city’s gun-control laws are so effective:

An argument between two men at an Uptown bar in the early hours of Jan. 1 ended with the two shooting at one another, leaving both dead.
Their deaths ushered in the new year, marking the first and second homicides of 2017 and keeping up 2016’s pace of violence – levels that haven’t marred the city for 20 years.
By the time police were dispatched to the double homicide at 4:30 a.m. there had already been an officer-involved shooting, according to Chicago police. A man who led police on a car chase, before physically resisting arrest, ultimately was shot by an officer before 3 a.m. That man, whose name was not released and for whom a warrant was issued, was in critical condition Sunday.
The last homicide in 2016 came before 1 p.m. Saturday when a 24-year-old, whose name has not been released, was killed in South Austin in a possible road rage act that may have been retaliation for hitting another driver’s Mercedes. According to data from the Chicago Police Department, his death became the 762nd homicide for the year – the most since 1996, when there were 796.
Data kept by the Chicago Tribune tallied at least 781 homicides for the year; the Police Department statistics do not include killings on area expressways, police-involved shootings, other homicides in which a person was killed in self-defense or death investigations.
At the double homicide scene on Broadway Street near Wilson Avenue, a fire official said first responders found a 38-year-old man with gunshot wounds to the chest and right leg, as well as a second man, 25, who had multiple gunshot wounds to his right side. Both men were taken by ambulance to Illinois Masonic Hospital, where they later were pronounced dead, officials said.

The deadly violence in Chicago escalates year after year. In 2015, there were 468 murders in Chicago, a 12.5% increase over the 416 murders in 2014. In September, it was reported that Chicago had more murders that Los Angeles and New York City combined.

This is the city where Barack Obama was a “community organizer,” a city that in 2011 elected as its mayor former Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. Chicago is a city where Hillary Clinton got 84% of the vote on Nov. 8 and, not coincidentally, it is also a city where hundreds of black people are murdered every year. Democrats are the Party of Death.

 

Category: Chicago, Crime

Rule 5 Sunday: Happy New Year!

Posted on | January 1, 2017 | 4 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho
Well, I hope everyone had a good time last night, no matter how you chose to spend it, and I hope 2017 hasn’t found you draped over the toilet expressing your regrets (among other things) over those good times. As for me, well, a driver drives. Today’s appetizer is Kate Beckinsale, perhaps best known as the star of the Underworld movies, which appear to be about a war between vampires and werewolves, but as Daddy Warpig says, “If you’re watching Underworld for the plot, YOU’RE WATCHING IT WRONG.”
As usual, most if not all of the following links are to pictures normally considered NSFW, and the management is not responsible for problems caused by your failure to click with discretion.

Proof that not all Rule 5 has to involve nudity.

We begin this week with Ninety Miles From Tyranny, who brings us Hot Pick of the Late Night, Morning Mistress Carly Baker, and Girls With Guns, followed by Goodstuff with Tara Reid’s Notorious Boobs and other delights. Animal Magnetism checks in with Rule 5 Buhbye 2016 Friday and the Saturday New Year’s Eve Gingermageddon.

EBL’s thundering herd this week included La La Land, Y The Last Man, Carrie Fisher, Debbie Reynolds (with a curtain call),  Kirstin Maldonado, the Peach Bowl,  Fiesta Bowl, Vintage Hollywood New Year’s, and Orange Bowl and Rose Bowl Queens.

A View From The Beach brings us Another Brazilian – Sophia Resing, Ariana Grande Objects to “Objectification”,Surfing into Thursday, To The Stars, Alice!, How About Some Paint for Wednesday?, RIP: Princess Leia, Mrs. Stephanopoulos!, California Man Charged with DUI for Caffeine, Happy Boxing Day!, Merry Christmas, Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas!, and I, For One, Welcome Our New Overlords.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Zoe Duchesne, his Vintage Babe is  Patricia Richardson, Sex in Advertising is covered by Victoria’s Secret, and there’s also Your Schadenfreude NFL/Niners Report. At Dustbury, it’s Savannah Guthrie and Gong Li.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery!

Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women

Category: Rule 5
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin