Bravo!

Not stated – injunction against what?  It just says against Kimberlin, but it has to be an injunction against him doing something.   

And interesting:

Bruce takes an unapologetic position in support of working people; his firm is at all times pro-union, pro-labor and pro-worker, and does not represent management against a labor collective bargaining unit or against workers in unemployment, wrongful termination or civil rights claims.  

It appears to be an injunction as a precursor to a suit.

Given the attorney it could be a civil rights claim based on First Amendment, claiming that Kimberlin is acting in a way that denies Walker’s civil rights, so the injunction would be to get him to stop doing that, specifically through the lawfare.  

May be a hard case to make, but then again, worth the effort to go on offense.  

As Stacy sas, updates sure to come.  

Patterico has a new post. A commenter notes that BK has just filed another peace order against someone in Fairfax, VA.

I am not surprised to see more info coming out here, and The Trenches. Rats flee a sinking ship, others will cut deals, and some, for example, someone with many years of experience in the criminal justice system, will most likely have alibis in place. The people at the top who will not dirty their hands but are not above using cyber experts, will walk away scott free – plausible deniability, you see. And, in the end, it will be two or three useful idiots who will be hung out to dry.

The motion for injunction is to stay enforcement of the peace order insofar as it prohibits AW from blogging/tweeting about BK in violation of the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent.

“Our first salvo in that effort has been to file a federal lawsuit today against Brett Kimberlin, seeking, in part, an injunction to prevent the state from ever again arresting Mr. Aaron Walker, an American citizen, for exercising his right to free speech, and to release him from any prior censorship restrictions imposed by unlawful judgements.”

From: http://rightsolutions.org/projects/bloggersdefenseteam/

Duly linked.  I have been a linking fool. Hopefully it will get some notice!  Hint hint.  I would be happy with being added to the blog roll here.  

Now it is on.

http://alturl.com/rt9ay

Neat to “get served” by comments on a blog!  

They may never utter a public word, but you can bet the Tides Foundation and big money donors like Soros, Gore, and Streisand don’t want their names associated with this stuff (even though they may secretly approve of it).  The pressure on the money will be key.

One of the comments at Patterico claims that Maryland’s vexatious litigant statute is hard to invoke.  Really?  A guy has filed over 100 lawsuits and lost nearly all or all of them, and it’s tough to get him declared vexatious?  They might as well have no law on the books then.

 You’re the very silly person who tried to take a picture of BK’s car when he had his daughter in it? As if he weren’t already paranoid and hypersensitive?

Think things through, would you? That was intensely silly.

 You’re going to jump on me, but I have a theory about the Streisand Foundation grant.

The boiler plate for JTMP mentions something like, “nationally known entertainment lawyer Jeff Cohen.”

I strongly suspect that the very small board of the Streisand Foundation thought it was (as Team Kimberlin intends people to think) Jeffrey B. Cohen, who is, indeed, a very well known entertainment lawyer. They do not appear to have a staff; it’s a question I’d love to have answered.

I’m even more curious, since it seems that the grant was not renewed. Did they figure out that the Jeff Cohen was a different person entirely?

I didn’t recognize the name, but I vaguely remember orcinus, and I am slightly familiar with the line stolen by Warren Zevon. Thanks!

Yes, I get that you can’t link a lack of interest – I was just at sea on who you were talking about.

 Wait a darned minute here.  A citizen has every right to take pictures in public place or on a public street.  If you don’t want your picture taken, stay the heck indoors.

He didn’t threaten the guy, he just took his picture.  He didn’t like having his picture taken?  Tough beans.

Crack that whip!

I have mostly been a lurker and have not followed every twist and turn of this convoluted saga.  But I have learned enough to know that TOM has playeda vital role in keeping the light shined on BK and his minions and has helped this come to pass.  Thank you, Stacy.