Two Gay Men Used Russian Surrogate Mother to Create Boy for Sex Abuse Ring

Posted on Comments

Peter Truong and Mark Newton with their 5-year-old sex toy, 2010

What could possibly go wrong? In July 2010, two men — their names given only as Mark and Peter — were the subjects of an Australian Broadcasting Company feature story with this headline:

Why two dads are better than one
Becoming parents was hard work for gay couple …
but they’d do it all over again if they had to

The article by Ginger Gorman positively oozed with sympathetic admiration for Mark and Peter, whose son was conceived in 2005 with the assistance of a Russian surrogate mother. Fast-forward three years:

Australian pair in L.A. convicted for making
child porn with ‘adopted son’ from Russia

He was only two weeks old the first time Newton, now 42, molested the boy that the Russian surrogate was paid $8,000 to bear for him and Truong, now 36. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:

Police believe the pair had adopted the boy ‘‘for the sole purpose of exploitation’’. The abuse began just days after his birth and over six years the couple travelled the world, offering him up for sex with at least eight men, recording the abuse and uploading the footage to an international syndicate known as the Boy Lovers Network. …
[U.S. District] Judge [Sarah Evans] Barker said the pair brainwashed the child to believe the sexual abuse was normal. Newton was also said to have trained the boy to deny any inappropriate behaviour if he was ever questioned by authorities.

An international syndicate of child molesters — this was the market for which Mark Newton and Peter Truong hired a surrogate to help them create a highly valuable commodity. That’s why they did that “hard work” referenced in the glowing 2010 feature — which the Australian Broadcasting Company has now deleted from its Web site, in a shameful attempt to hide their shameful misdeed in celebrating this shameful couple as an example of “Why two dads are better than one.”

But of course, they’re liberals. They have no shame — only an agenda.

UPDATE: A few more details:

The Queensland Police Task Force Argos, an Australian service branch that targets child exploitation, suspected Newton and Truong of wrongdoings when investigators found images of them with the child among images of the child porn on a fellow sex offender’s computer in August 2011.
Argos conducted background checks and examined the couple’s chat logs. …
U.S. police raided the men’s Los Angeles home and arrested them in October 2011. …
Initially, Newton and Truong claimed they were being targeted because of their sexual orientation.

Of course: They were “targeted because of their sexual orientation” — they were victims of homophobia! By the time they were featured in that 2010 article by Ginger Gorman of the Australian Broadcasting Company, Truong and Newton had been molesting that boy on video — and pimping out the boy to their friends in the “Boy Lovers Network” — for five years. The fact that these two men were key figures in an international sex-trafficking ring . . . when did the Australian Broadcasting Company learn this information? And how long did they hide from their viewers the fact that these child pornographers were the men Ginger Gorman celebrated in her 2010 feature?

 

202 comments

  2. My point in posting this link is not to promote this person’s opinion, but to point it out and condemn it!

  4. Interesting these media corporations still seem to think they can “scrub” what they’ve posted online. So they are as dumb as they are dishonest.

  6. If they allowed themselves to be profiled in the media, the two perverts were very confident that no one would look into what they were doing.

  7. After the millstone is hanged about his neck and he is cast into the sea, if he floats he is innocent.

  8. I’vd seen and heard a lot of bad things in 67 years but this story made me want to weep.

    May it please the Lord to save this child and wreak vengeance on his tormenters.

  10. Funny how the worst of humanity in prison have more morals than such animals as these and know that swift justice is the only way to deal with it.

  11. So are these “normal” homosexuals?

    I ask because every time a homosexual horror story like this takes place (just as with Muslim terror), defenders say “They don’t count, that’s not a true, normal gay.” And neither, they say, are the leather boys in the parades. Nor flaming drag queens. Nor jailhouse man-rapists. Nor the NAMBLA chickenhawks. Nor whoever’s idea it was to teach fisting to middle schoolers.

    So will the truly “normal” homosexual please stand up?

  12. A month or so ago commenter Evil Blogger Lady (I think) posted a link to a 1992 NIH study on the incidence of attraction to children among heterosexual and homosexual men.

  15. Exactly: The gay-rights movement (and their media apologists) have in effect created a Venn diagram where there is no overlap between Set A (homosexuals) and Set B (pedophiles). Anyone who suggests the existence of Set AB (gay pedophiles) is denounced as a homophobe.

Comments are closed.