Two Gay Men Used Russian Surrogate Mother to Create Boy for Sex Abuse Ring

Posted on Comments

Peter Truong and Mark Newton with their 5-year-old sex toy, 2010

What could possibly go wrong? In July 2010, two men — their names given only as Mark and Peter — were the subjects of an Australian Broadcasting Company feature story with this headline:

Why two dads are better than one
Becoming parents was hard work for gay couple …
but they’d do it all over again if they had to

The article by Ginger Gorman positively oozed with sympathetic admiration for Mark and Peter, whose son was conceived in 2005 with the assistance of a Russian surrogate mother. Fast-forward three years:

Australian pair in L.A. convicted for making
child porn with ‘adopted son’ from Russia

He was only two weeks old the first time Newton, now 42, molested the boy that the Russian surrogate was paid $8,000 to bear for him and Truong, now 36. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:

Police believe the pair had adopted the boy ‘‘for the sole purpose of exploitation’’. The abuse began just days after his birth and over six years the couple travelled the world, offering him up for sex with at least eight men, recording the abuse and uploading the footage to an international syndicate known as the Boy Lovers Network. …
[U.S. District] Judge [Sarah Evans] Barker said the pair brainwashed the child to believe the sexual abuse was normal. Newton was also said to have trained the boy to deny any inappropriate behaviour if he was ever questioned by authorities.

An international syndicate of child molesters — this was the market for which Mark Newton and Peter Truong hired a surrogate to help them create a highly valuable commodity. That’s why they did that “hard work” referenced in the glowing 2010 feature — which the Australian Broadcasting Company has now deleted from its Web site, in a shameful attempt to hide their shameful misdeed in celebrating this shameful couple as an example of “Why two dads are better than one.”

But of course, they’re liberals. They have no shame — only an agenda.

UPDATE: A few more details:

The Queensland Police Task Force Argos, an Australian service branch that targets child exploitation, suspected Newton and Truong of wrongdoings when investigators found images of them with the child among images of the child porn on a fellow sex offender’s computer in August 2011.
Argos conducted background checks and examined the couple’s chat logs. …
U.S. police raided the men’s Los Angeles home and arrested them in October 2011. …
Initially, Newton and Truong claimed they were being targeted because of their sexual orientation.

Of course: They were “targeted because of their sexual orientation” — they were victims of homophobia! By the time they were featured in that 2010 article by Ginger Gorman of the Australian Broadcasting Company, Truong and Newton had been molesting that boy on video — and pimping out the boy to their friends in the “Boy Lovers Network” — for five years. The fact that these two men were key figures in an international sex-trafficking ring . . . when did the Australian Broadcasting Company learn this information? And how long did they hide from their viewers the fact that these child pornographers were the men Ginger Gorman celebrated in her 2010 feature?

 

202 comments

  3. I would go so far as to assert that the very same psychological derangement that motivates the pedophile motivates the homosexual!

  4. Not really. Homosexual child abusers report themselves as victims when children at about 10%. Other male pedophiles report about 20% were victims. But here is the stat that angers me….ONLY 20% of all sex offenders are convicted of a crime. Even Elmo had charges dropped due to “statute of limitations”

  5. Good find. Thank you for showing exactly what is coming. My question to that author would be simple. Why show pity for a pedophile when a mentally ill Adam Lanza has been demonized? No compassion for the mentally ill but pity for pedophiles? There is madness but sadly liberals cannot see their own hypocrisy.

  6. The really disturbing part here is the author’s assumption that pedophilia is just another “sexual orientation”!

  8. One of my clients is a facility for children with a history of traumatic abuse. People have no idea the lasting scars that such abuse leave behind. The sad fact is that most of those children are doomed to a rather sad existence and I have little doubt that I have crossed paths with a future serial killer or two.

    To paraphrase what someone else once said, my veneer of civilization grows exceedingly thin in the presence of an injured child.

  9. The “genetic sexual orientation” argument, for which there is precisely zero evidence, is the the place the abusers and their enablers on the left hang their hat. Toss in a SCOTUS which is more interested in what the “cool kids” inside the Beltway think, than actual philosophical implications of ruling and you have the makings of a degenerate future. I’m glad I’ll probably cash in my existential chips before that, but I fear for my, as yet, unborn grandchildren.

  13. They are holding baby chicks in the photograph. This picture takes on some kind of sick foreshadowing when you think of the term “Chickenhawk.”

  15. Having worked in cps for 30 yrs, let me tell you pedophiles will justify their abuse of children as a right. They will demand equality just like gay marriage, pornography, prostitution, to make all perversions legal. Progressives will help them because with degeneracy comes chaos, chaos allows for tyranny.
    We must fight back for all our children and grandchildren.

  16. “Why show pity for a pedophile when a mentally ill Adam Lanza has been demonized? No compassion for the mentally ill but pity for pedophiles?”

    Because NAMBLA is honest about what, historically, all homosexuals will do with boys if given the chance…but politically (for now), that fact must be memory-holed at all cost.

  17. My suspicion is that the pet chickens were part of the Skinner-type operant conditioning (i.e., “brainwashing”) used to train the boy. It may have been that “good” behavior (cooperation) was reinforced by the opportunity to play with the pets, whereas “bad” behavior (non-cooperation) would be punished with threats of harm to the pets.

    If you think about it, though, aren’t chickens kind of a strange choice of pet for a child? Isn’t this one of those creepy little warning signs that, in retrospect, makes people say, “Hey, there was something obviously out of whack here”?

    But if anyone had remarked about warning signs in 2010, they would have been denounced as an irrational homophobic bigot, I suppose.

  18. In the view of the demented left this child is nothing more than a dependent ‘worm’, worthy of death…is it really a crime to sexually abuse a ‘parasite’?

  21. Indeed. And heaven forbid parents try to protect their children. See, e.g. the victim’s parents in the “FreeKate” saga.

  22. That guy disgusts me. He claims pedo’s are only 3-9% of the population…makes it easier to eliminate them

Comments are closed.