Two Gay Men Used Russian Surrogate Mother to Create Boy for Sex Abuse Ring

Posted on Comments

Peter Truong and Mark Newton with their 5-year-old sex toy, 2010

What could possibly go wrong? In July 2010, two men — their names given only as Mark and Peter — were the subjects of an Australian Broadcasting Company feature story with this headline:

Why two dads are better than one
Becoming parents was hard work for gay couple …
but they’d do it all over again if they had to

The article by Ginger Gorman positively oozed with sympathetic admiration for Mark and Peter, whose son was conceived in 2005 with the assistance of a Russian surrogate mother. Fast-forward three years:

Australian pair in L.A. convicted for making
child porn with ‘adopted son’ from Russia

He was only two weeks old the first time Newton, now 42, molested the boy that the Russian surrogate was paid $8,000 to bear for him and Truong, now 36. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:

Police believe the pair had adopted the boy ‘‘for the sole purpose of exploitation’’. The abuse began just days after his birth and over six years the couple travelled the world, offering him up for sex with at least eight men, recording the abuse and uploading the footage to an international syndicate known as the Boy Lovers Network. …
[U.S. District] Judge [Sarah Evans] Barker said the pair brainwashed the child to believe the sexual abuse was normal. Newton was also said to have trained the boy to deny any inappropriate behaviour if he was ever questioned by authorities.

An international syndicate of child molesters — this was the market for which Mark Newton and Peter Truong hired a surrogate to help them create a highly valuable commodity. That’s why they did that “hard work” referenced in the glowing 2010 feature — which the Australian Broadcasting Company has now deleted from its Web site, in a shameful attempt to hide their shameful misdeed in celebrating this shameful couple as an example of “Why two dads are better than one.”

But of course, they’re liberals. They have no shame — only an agenda.

UPDATE: A few more details:

The Queensland Police Task Force Argos, an Australian service branch that targets child exploitation, suspected Newton and Truong of wrongdoings when investigators found images of them with the child among images of the child porn on a fellow sex offender’s computer in August 2011.
Argos conducted background checks and examined the couple’s chat logs. …
U.S. police raided the men’s Los Angeles home and arrested them in October 2011. …
Initially, Newton and Truong claimed they were being targeted because of their sexual orientation.

Of course: They were “targeted because of their sexual orientation” — they were victims of homophobia! By the time they were featured in that 2010 article by Ginger Gorman of the Australian Broadcasting Company, Truong and Newton had been molesting that boy on video — and pimping out the boy to their friends in the “Boy Lovers Network” — for five years. The fact that these two men were key figures in an international sex-trafficking ring . . . when did the Australian Broadcasting Company learn this information? And how long did they hide from their viewers the fact that these child pornographers were the men Ginger Gorman celebrated in her 2010 feature?

 

202 comments

  4. This story is horrific. Has any of the American press covered it? (I mean aside from the gay-adaption angle that they did in 2010) Or is this another case of something so embarrassing to the American left that we only see it reported by the foreign press?

  5. Where is the Atheist God that provides morality, like all those atheists say they have?
    Or are they waiting their turn with the boy?

  6. What were the two pedos going to do to the child once he came of age to attend school? Children talk, draw pictures, act out.
    Those two were planning to murder the child and grow another.

  7. Who connected them to the ABC? Are they self-promoters or did they have well-connected friends who put them in touch?

    After reading through the WashTimes’ reports on the Craig Spence case around 1990, I’m no longer quick to dismiss claims of sex rings in high places.

  9. In the mirror Dave. Narcissist have a god. It is themselves. Which is why they have no morals other than the ones that provide them with excuses to their self pleasuring life style. When a child is a burden, an inconvenience or a punishment due to their own irresponsible behavior, they have no problem killing the child. They can deem who dies and who lives since THEY are god!

  10. Reckon they could have gotten him a puppy or a little brother that they could threaten to kill if he tattled…

    Or better yet, groom him to believe that he actually instigates or deserves the abuse to shame him into silence! The child could be made to believe that this was a normal part of being “gay” and that it was nobody’s business. There are ways! And this is why this sort of thing happens.

    There are also ways to screen kids for possible abuse even where the child is actively concealing it… The problem here is that the people who might have the skills and tools to detect it, (social workers and psychologists in the schools, e.g.) often have ideological disincentives to look for it. In this particular case, this pair were a sacred cow, above scrutiny, and they knew it!

  14. Don’t worry. The libtards will say, “You can’t paint all gays with such a broad brush.”

    Oh hell yes I can! And I will! Libtards paint Catholic priests as one big child molestation ring. But when confronted with one of their protected liberal grievance groups doing the molesting, the media is so quiet you can hear a gnat fart on the other side of the world.

    This will become “old news” soon because it doesn’t fit the agenda.

  15. If gays think that this sort of thing will be next on their menu of things to push on the American people, that is grown men marrying young kids, I can assure you it will not go well for them.

  17. It is one and the same. It’s no coincidence homosexuals are at least 20x more likely to be pedophilies than heterosexuals.

  18. ABC loves to push the gay agenda. They actively seek out fluff pieces like this within the homosexual “community”. It obviously backfired here but they won’t stop.

  19. Heterosexuality is the only “orientation” – the others are aberrations, mental illnesses. Which explains the extraordinary overlap of homosexuals and pedophilies (maybe as high as 50%).

  20. Now that gay marriage has been legitimized image what’s coming 5 or 10 years down the road.

  23. Unless I missed this in the article, it has said nothing of the child being removed from that home. I hope he was and both of them prosecuted to the fullest extent and then some!

  24. […] Liberals, including Liberal members of the media, often jump onto a story, or spin a story a certain way because, they WANT it to be true. One such example, can be seen in an Australian news story about a Gay couple who adopted a child. A story that painted the rosiest of pictures. A picture of two devoted dads, and a very luck infant. a story that the reporter who did it likely WANTED to be true, but, as  Stacy McCain writes, was just a lie. A story not of love, or devotion, or family. But a story of evil, and sadistic child abuse […]

  30. This poor, poor child of God. A beautiful gift of life entrusted to monsters disguised as “parents” courtesy of liberalism’s demented stepchildren–Political Correctness and Equality.

    Just when you think you’ve heard it all, and the world could not become anymore depraved. No punishment could be swift nor harsh enough for these animals.

    There are so few words, yet so much rage. *spit*

Comments are closed.