Man Rapes 7-Year-Old Girl at Gunpoint, Infects Her With Chlamydia

Posted on Comments

If you read this story carefully, you realize the poor girl was victimized by one of her mother’s ex-boyfriends:

Police say Andrew Hunter Jr., 23, entered the girl’s St. Roch home armed with a gun around 5:45 a.m. on Oct. 17 and woke her up. He told her to go to the back of the house and lock the door. She complied. There he used clothing to tie her hands behind her back, put a scarf in her mouth and raped her, Detective Jounay Ross wrote in an arrest warrant.
Hunter then put his gun to the victim’s head while telling her to go to sleep and count to 50, police wrote.
The victim underwent a rape exam at Children’s Hospital where staff found she had contracted chlamydia. She told authorities the assailant had shoulder-length dreadlocks, but she couldn’t see his face.
The rape kit was sent to State Police’s crime lab for DNA testing. On Dec. 2, police were notified that analysts had obtained the DNA profile of an unidentified male from the rape kit.
The victim’s mother told police she believed the suspect was a friend she knew as “Drew,” who had shoulder-length dreadlocks. The mother’s suspicions were solidified when she found out her daughter had been infected with chlamydia. She said she had also contracted chlamydia from Drew about a month earlier, police wrote. . . .

You can read the whole thing. This atrocity is being ignored by feminists shouting about “rape culture,” because the perpetrator was not a member of Phi Kappa Psi at the University of Virginia.

(Hat-tip: Kirby McCain on Twitter.)

 

54 comments

  2. One of the statistics about sexual abuse and assault of children that you will always hear, is that the perpetrators are mostly “household members.” That statistic over the years has been used to deny fathers meaningful access to their children. In reality, the vast, vast majority of those “household members” are mom’s new boyfriend. While fathers occasionally abuse their children, they normally don’t. They protect them. There are predators out there who seek out newly single women with children for the express purpose of future abuse. Yet, our court system seems incapable of acknowledging these facts, preferring to adhere to the old “moms are better caretakers” dictum without considering where society has traveled in the last 50 years.

    This is part of the entire feminist agenda to destroy the institution of The Family. I’ve seen it too many times over the last three decades to be dissuaded.

  4. IIRC, Governor Jindal and the LA legislature tried to make this a capital crime, but were thwarted by the same lefties now screaming about “rape culture”. Well, one way to end real “rape culture” is to send the rapists to hell.

  6. There was an excellent study a few years ago — I’m sure I could find it if I wanted to spent a half-hour Googling for it — in which a female academic pointed out that parental divorce increases the risk that girls will suffer abuse, especially sexual abuse. After seeing the data presented in that study, I concluded that the most dangerous man in the world is Mama’s Boyfriend. Over and over, you see different versions of the same story, yet feminists (who are supposed to be against child abuse) simply refuse to acknowledge the reality, because that would require them to admit that the traditional family is not the worst thing in the world.

  9. I’ve known the truth of this for years via observation. The problem is such studies are suppressed, as are all studies showing the benefits of Marriage and the Traditional Family. They adversely affect the desired outcome. That outcome is that women should be allowed to end marriage on a whim and place the male in penury. Husbands and fathers are by definition evil. Mothers–or more precisely–women are by definition saints. Thus, nothing can be allowed to counter that, including data showing that mothers fail to protect their children from abusers because they’re more interested in creating a “new life for themselves” than they are in making sure their children are safe.

    And don’t get me started on how the welfare/child-support industrial complex profits from this. States have a financial stake in encouraging divorce because they get money, i.e. a cut, of child support payments plus federal dollars to boot.

    Meanwhile little kids get raped. Eggs, omelet, whatever.

  11. Feminists pretty much DGAF, they are working towards another iteration of Umwertung aller Werte similar ,but not identical to , what took place in Weimar Germany. I recently spoke to an old family acquaintance who’s family left Germany after the hyperinflation but before the NAZIs fully took over (currently 90yo). He showed me a copy of Metropolis (1928) by Otto Dix which depicts the “Cabaret” life in Weimar

    https://d1ycxz9plii3tb.cloudfront.net/additional_images/4fec69d381f8f10001001c83/large.jpg

    Just imagine a modern version of this theme and the accolades it would get, or check current reviews at imgur or Twitter for androgynously dressed people.
    It’s a fairly safe bet that the nascent Frankfurt School observed this and the profoundly destructive effects it had on the culture. Wilhelm Reich surely took the ball and ran with it regarding sexual depravity.

  12. It’s probably worth mentioning again that the hallmark of a supremacist culture is any crime committed by a member of an out-group is far worse than a crime committed by a member of the in-group. We already know the in-group when it comes to intersectional feminism would be any woman, especially a non-white gay woman. It is the out-group that is the crucial factor, since we also know intersectionalism is a cult ruled by a descending hierarchy of race, gender and geography.

    “Drew” is of no interest to an intersectionalist. He is a member of the “marginalized” group with protected status, like a UNESCO world heritage site. If intersectionalism were a video game, the most valued points-target would be the white, male, heterosexual.

    Targeting intersectionalism’s precious “people of color,” no matter how much a group might act as a actual misogynist “rape culture” – as rap/hip-hop culture clearly does compared to college culture – is of no value. Modern feminism’s ancestors are not pragmatic rationalists devoted to minimalizing crime wherever it is found, but women with a psychotic phobic sociopathy toward white colonialist slaving genocidal men who have destroyed the viability of the Third World and therefore any indigenous person who is originally from there, no matter how many generations removed. That is how radical gay feminist Judith Butler can call violent Hamas and Hizbollah “progressive.”

    There is no equal protection or principles of law in play here but a single unmoving target intersectionalists will move history, facts and statistics to keep in the cross-hairs. That is why the handful of wrongful black deaths by white cop is of much more interest than the wrongful deaths of 6,000 blacks at the hands of other blacks each year.

    The great achievement of black intersectionalists has been to sell that can of worms to naive middle class white people to the point they act as shock troops to raise their hands and chant they can’t breathe. It is the same mindless race worship of “street cred” impressionable English rock bands like The Rolling Stones and The Beatles bestowed on the West’s true rebels and voice of truth to power – black people. Intersectionalists cash in on that like an ATM machine. The irony there is it is as racist to ask a black man to stand in a ditch as it is to stand on a pedestal. But that is a principled argument of no use to people who use race and gender in place of principle.

    Don’t look for Amanda Marcotte to ever write a single word about “Drew” in her ongoing rape pogrom. It would be against her “principles.”

  14. I’m sure we can all agree that the central allegation is horrific in its own right, but I’m going to take it a couple of steps further. I apologize in advance, as I may push the bounds of polite discourse.

    1. The choice of victim. He went to all that trouble, which could’ve overwhelmed damn near anybody, and really? That was what he wanted most in the world? If true, he has issues far beyond just being a sociopath.

    2. The overwhelming force. He was going after a 7-year-old girl whose mom he knew, and really? He needed a gun, bonds and a gag? What kind of retarded weakling are we talking about here anyway?

    3. The inattention to details. He had no idea that his chlamydia, dreds, and DNA might combine to identify him? Has he never seen any episode of any police procedural in the last ten years? Unbelievable.

    That is not to say that there is one kind of rape that is better than another, or that I wish criminals were better at their crimes; far from it. It’s just to point out that the details only make him look worse: not just a rapist, but one that actually prefers children; not just a pedophile, but a scaredy-cat; not just a coward, but an idiot.

  16. “Has he never seen any episode of any police procedural in the last ten years?”

    The stupidity of most criminals should never be underestimated. For example, there was this drug smuggler who set off a series of bombs in an Indianapolis suburb, and then went to a print shop to get some counterfeit government documents printed, and when the police arrested him for that, he had some explosives and timers in his car. Stop me if you’ve heard this story before …

  18. ” This atrocity is being ignored by feminists shouting about “rape culture,” because the perpetrator was not a member of Phi Kappa Psi at the University of Virginia.”

    They’re ignoring it because the rapist is the wrong color to fit the narrative. The Wichita massacre and the Knoxville gang rape and double murder were ignored for the same reason despite how extremely brutal these crimes were. Neither got any mention by the media outside of their local areas.

    Also, this happened fairly close to where I live, I could be there in my truck within 5 minutes if I caught the lights just right.

  20. Child rape should warrant the death penalty. Especially when you have left DNA proof of your malevolence.

  21. It’s not just momma’s new boy. It is every form of predator, from the teacher to the guidance councilor, to the court ordered therapist.

    Broken children are like the limping gazelle on the edge of the herd.

  25. Ward and June Cleaver had it right…

    …but people still insist on being “clever” and coming up with “great new alternatives” to the simple and brilliant monogamy for life.

  26. Pedophilia is always about a lopsided power dynamic; fear of an equal.

    That guy just has a worse case of it than most. He’s just impatient; doesn’t want to go through the months of grooming to get his prize.

  27. Just the clue “he had dreadlocks” gave it away.

    White people with dreads don’t rape kids. They just corner you into horrid conversations about environmental justice.

  37. Down here in Crazyland, er, Florida, Mama’s Boyfriend is the perp for all kinds of child abuse including murder.

  38. In later years, he brags openly to a reporter that he intends to tie his “enemies” up in lawsuits for the rest of their lives!

  40. I know this demon’s victim was female, but, seeing his picture, I’m getting Mikey Signorile-sized returns on the display of my gaydar…

  41. “After seeing the data presented in that study, I concluded that the most dangerous man in the world is Mama’s Boyfriend.”

    Theodore Dalrymple has written about this. He worked with the underclass, where he saw this kind of behavior all the time.

  42. Nobody has commented on this little gem:

    “The mother didn’t know Drew’s real name or where he lived.”

    She got Chlamydia from the man and didn’t know where he lived!

  43. Well, from my perspective it’s not anything racial as far as the crime. Race may figure into reporting or explain why the left might ignore this crime. If someone were to argue that somehow porn alleviated sexual desires that led to such crimes then in our porn saturated society there would be zero crimes like this. When Planned Parenthood is doing PSAs for the Girl Scouts on the joys of BDSM should we be surprised at what happened to those Amish girls? Not only did feminists hail Miriam Weeks as a hero but there are awards for feminist porn. How these women, who claim to be so concerned about the welfare of their sisters, could condone porn is a glaring contradiction for me. It’s obvious that what feminists are and what they say they are is two different things.

  44. AmRen has been regarded as a “white supremacist” organization. That’s been the smear from such lights as the ADL and SPLC, both members of good standing in the Leftard smearbund. Noticing the truth, much less telling it, is a serious offense when it comes to such subjects.

  45. Mama’s boyfriend is normally the most likely to abuse according to the people I know who work with abused children, but other family members can be about as bad. My wife used to work for a non-profit that worked with sexually abused children so I had conversations with doctors, social workers, and lawyers who helped the kids about this.

    Also mama’s boyfriend often has a nephew or son or someone else who comes along who can also be a threat. The big issue is that in a lot of poor families and children from illegal immigrant families who didn’t want to go the police or else they need the accused for support.

    After mama’s boyfriend the next most dangerous is some other non-father relative like a cousin, uncle, or brother that causes the problem. And they don’t want this family member to go to jail.

    It was rare that the biological father that was doing the abuse, but from what I gathered most of the time he wasn’t even in the picture to begin with.

  47. Indeed. Note the Lawyer did not put his name to the article. I’d say there is very good reason not to have done so. I’m sure the idiotic left is howling for his blood already.

  48. That actually makes a certain kind of sense. If she knew his real name and where he lived, then she might’ve known his STI status. (Just one of several good reasons for not having sex with strangers.)

  49. That’s ok…throw him in with the general population in prison and make sure everyone knows what he is….Justice served

  50. He’s pretty. You seem to be mistaking that for wanting to take it up the butt, even when there is (alleged) evidence to the contrary.

    Pretty isn’t a synonym for gay, and he’s already been accused of worse than that anyway. Might as well leave it at that.

Comments are closed.