St. Mary’s College of California is a private school where annual tuition is $41,380, according to U.S. News & World Report.
Of the 3,055 students who attend Saint Mary’s, 41% are male and 59% are female. As an exercise in understanding the “campus rape epidemic” that feminists assure us is a nationwide scourge, let’s apply the notorious 1-in-5 statistic to Saint Mary’s.
By my calculation (59% of 3,055) there are 1,802 females enrolled at Saint Mary’s. The 1-in-5 number means that 20% of these (360) will have been raped by a fellow student before they graduate. This in turn would mean that, if we suppose that about a quarter of the female students graduate each year, then there are approximately 450 females in the senior class, of whom 90 are rape victims.
Could this be true? Well, in September 2011, police investigated two separate rapes reported by Saint Mary’s students in the span of two weeks. The college’s Student Coalition Against Rape (“a peer education and outreach team that is dedicated to ending gender based violence”) clearly have their work cut out for them, battling the pro-rape coalition on campus. Women students at Saint Mary’s who are victimized by male student predators can call a 24-hour Campus Assault Resources and Empowerment (CARE) telephone hotline.
About 10 victims a month or two a week during a nine-month school year because, of course: 1-in-5.
It seems shocking that parents would spend more than $40,000 a year to send their daughters to a place where rape is so common. However, I guess the parents who spend more than $40,000 a year to send their sons to Saint Mary’s must figure that’s just one of the benefits provided by this Catholic private school.
SAINT MARY’S COLLEGE
Raping Your Daughters Since 1863
I really miss Lawrence I’m so glad I got to meet and photograph him. I did comment on hi blog and we emailed each other frequently. I read and comment on Laura Woods blog his inheritor more or less. http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/
Actually bullfighters fear cows more than bulls because they tend to keep their eyes open when they go to gore you.
Of course, feminists are opposite. They keep their eyes definitely shut.
What does it matter? All men benefit from rape and 50 executions will put the fear of god into them and then justice and peace reigns the land. Plus the Horns of Gabriel will blow and then the asteroid hits.
Sorry, but yes.
Cookies.
1970s ditty at UK from the sorority girls not in Chi Omega.
Our Lord would agree with that final paragraph.
As for Mr Jensen, I have to wonder: just how does one “convert” to homosexuality? Haven’t we been told, ad infinitum, that sexuality is hard-wired into us . . . unless that argument happens to be inconvenient?
“Haven’t we been told,ad infinitum, that sexuality is hard-wired into us . . . unless that argument happens to be inconvenient?”
Progressives, feminists, and the like actually believe that a person can change one’s sexuality…as long as that person changes it to something that is not heterosexual.
How dare you deny the rape victims’ experience using math. After all, math is just a social construct designed to bolster the cisnormative western European, white male patriarchy. SHUT UP!
SMOD, take us now!
Didn’t she cite drinking as one of the reasons she never wanted to be pregnant? Kinda revealing there. 9 months without booze is too horrible to contemplate.
Scientists could probably move her eyes farther apart.
Didn’t someone calculate that would be one rape every minute across colleges in America? That’s like here come the Mongols territory, isn’t it?
“On the question of sex: “Male” and “female” are sex categories, tied to reproduction, which is a compelling biological basis for the categories. (The existence of people born “intersex,” with reproductive or sexual anatomy that does not clearly fit the definitions of female or male, does not change that.) It is not clear what it means when people say they were born male but believe themselves to be female, or vice versa. I don’t intend that to be disrespectful—it just isn’t obvious to me (and to many others) what such a statement can possibly mean. If we were to assume there are distinctly male and female minds/souls/essences (a claim that is speculative, far beyond the reach of any current science, more in the realm of theology), what would it mean to say that one was born into a body in the wrong sex category, that one’s essence is out of sync with one’s body? That appears to suggest that a person is like a machine that may get assembled with some of the wrong parts, which does not square with our understanding of what an organism is. No obviously coherent account of such a claim exists, and it’s difficult to know what such an account would look like. My problem with this kind of assertion is not that it doesn’t match my experience, but that I cannot understand what is being asserted.
Equally unclear is how chemical and/or surgical interventions, such as sex-reassignment surgery, actually would move a person from one sex category to another. How do manipulations of hormones or genitalia accomplish that shift? Given the complexity of the human organism, can we say that such treatments/surgeries transform a person in such a fundamental way? Again, our current understanding of ourselves—biologically and philosophically—does not lead to an obvious answer.”
http://dissidentvoice.org/2014/09/ecological-and-social-implications-of-trans-and-climate-change//
Here’s the lesbian author Michelle Tea weighing in on the subjects discussed herein:
http://www.radarproductions.org/on-hysteria-transphobia-man-hating-sobriety-anonymity-and-writing/
Ironically enough, on pages 132-135 of her memoir RENT GIRL, she recounts her experience of witnessing a false rape accusation offered up by her then-girlfriend, a person Tea depicts as a chronic pathological liar.
I’m willing to accept that 1-in-5 women experience a sexual encounter that they regret. Hell hath no fury like a womyn scorned.
Well, I just hope they won’t dip me in honey and throw me to the young, thin, feminine “LUG” lipstick lesbians… Anything but that!
I was reading an opinion piece on CNN about campus gun control really stuck out to me:
“We know that college campuses, historically, are incredibly safe places, with homicide rates far below the national average. Administrators and campus police know how to keep schools safe better than NRA headquarters does, and polling reveals campus communities agree.”
How can campuses be incredibly safe yet have 20% women being raped? Campus communities agree administrators and campus police know how to keep schools safe yet they are filing lawsuits left and right about the pervasive rape culture that has women feeling like they are in a warzone?
It’s like the narrative completely changes depending on circumstances. If 1-in-5 women are being raped then permitting self-defense should dramatically reduce that number.
You’d think, huh?
So let me see if I’ve got this straight.
I have a beautiful and loving wife and a nice home. I go to work everyday and put in an honest day’s work and am very fairly rewarded for it. I think I’ve got a pretty good life, a fine example of the American middle class some might say.
Now, let’s say I decide to enroll in college in order to pursue greater career opportunities or perhaps even just because I love history and art and want to broaden my own mind.
Does this mean that once I start attending class that there’s a 20% chance that I’ll become a rapist? Do all of us men have this “rapist” thing in our DNA and is college just a trigger that sets us off?
I mean, where are all these rapists coming from if it not just something inside all of us?
Wait!!!! How many of these sexual assaults and rapes are being committed by lesbian faculty members and members of the Womyn’s softball team.
I reckon that’s got to be at least as likely a reason than the DNA thing.
(I’m going to keep my day job and read books at home just in case.)
I’d say you have a 20% chance of being falsely accused for being a rapist
I like to bring a good book along when I go out raping, so I can catch up on my reading
SJWs lie. SJWs always lie.
Memorize that. You will see this material again.
The fact that so many people actually believe these lies and feel morally superior to anyone who speaks the truth doesn’t bode well for the future. What is really scary is the though control and oppression is not from the government but form the masses of brainwashed useful idiots
The only we can get out of these mess I’m afraid is by bloodshed.
What’s wrong? You too lazy to look up how to write ???
alas.
I troll over at Politico and Atlantic now and again (just had a fun time at Atlantic over the last cuppla….) and the comment sections are full of vile lies. The big problem is they really think it’s the truth. Puts an exclamation point behind Paul’s statement in 2 Thessalonians,
9 The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, 10 and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, 12 that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12
Given what we’re seeing, it’s no surprise they’ll believe Satan’s lies easily. Look at the nonsense they believe now.
Would that be rape “rape” or one or more of the other forms of normal human interactions that are considered rape by the kooks these days?
Eh…I’ll just stick to Amazon, the local book reseller and of course, The Other McCain.
I’m reading Tea’s memoir “How To Grow Up” right now, and it’s definitely worth your time: growing up, she says, has required her to give up a lot of the notions her younger self thought would be mandatory.
Ole’!
And SJWs always project.
Brilliant piece!
It’s so easy to mock these bastards, but alas, the bastards are in control.
A fate worse than death, indeed.
The Atlantic can be amusing once in awhile.:-
While there was nothing earth shattering there, it was nice to see some numbers put to it, especially that 100% one. I wouldn’t have guessed the number to be 100% but it does make perfect sense to me.
Thank you for the link JV.
It would make Ghengis Khan envious!
From what I understand of modern feminism, their belief is that there’s no such thing as a “consensual encounter”. ( All that heteronormative brainwashing dontcha know?)
Crikes… I thought is was coming of the gateway pundit site.
When I blocked third-party cookies it stopped but then I had to sign into disqus on every individual tab I opened.
THAT got to be more of a pain than the redirects.
Perhaps that GoGarden redirect thing is compiling an execution list?
A weapon of Math Destruction?
@#$% I’ve regretted at least 1-in-5 that I’ve had but then that’s a hole ‘mother thing I reckon.
Well, I’ve got to upvote that even if it’s the only one you get.
Sick but funny. Marine by chance?
It’s not over yet… You know what they say—it’s always darkest before it goes completely pitch black!
Game of Thrones should get you in the mood. By one count, the book series has 214 rapes of 117 victims (so far), averaging out to about one rape per 24 pages.
This is actually an example of lefty cannibalization, since George “Rape Rape” Martin has tended to favor the SJW side of things in the Hugo Awards kerfuffle, and (of course) the count was compiled by concerned SJWs that were suddenly offended by the treatment of a fan favorite in the TV series.
It is a rather beautiful bit of cognitive dissonance.
The big problem is they really think it’s the truth.
Oh, I think it’s worse than that. I think most of them don’t actually care whether it’s true or not.
Mandatory homosexuality for men is the only possible solution.
TBH when I look at some of these crazy feminists, mandatory homosexuality starts to look quite an attractive option.
I suppose transsexualism would make a certain amount of sense under a Cartesian view of humanity, wherein you could just say that a female soul had accidentally got into a male body or vice versa. Then again, I suspect most of these libprogs don’t believe in souls, Cartesian or otherwise.
Being attracted to members of your gender is biologically hard-wired into you. Gender is an arbitrary social construct with no basis in biology. Good luck squaring those two statements.
I think the fact that, after so many episodes of brutality, murder, torture and psychological abuse, it was a rape scene that lead to controversy is a good piece of evidence against the whole “rape culture” narrative.