About the #Cuckservative Thing: By Whom Is the ‘New Right’ Being Trolled?

Posted on Comments

My temptation is to name names of “New Right” friends who can vouch for my bona fides, but why help the SPLC connect the dots, eh?

When Ace of Spades called attention to the #cuckservative hashtag attack on conservatives, I was puzzled. WTF is this?

Well, today they started jumping up in my Twitter mentions, and I began to investigate. There is a definite “walks like a duck” vibe with these trolls. When I encounter people (a) attacking Republicans from the Right who (b) seem to view Jewish influence as a problem within the GOP, I become concerned. This is toxic politics. People have a right to their own opinions. I’ve actually been accused of “hate” for defending people’s right to their own opinions. If America is a free country, our liberty must include The Freedom to Hate. I hate Auburn University and Canada, not necessarily in that order. I am and have always been a philo-semite and am perhaps more Zionist even than Netanyahu.

However, I do not expect everyone to share my opinion on these matters. If you’re Canadian, I realize that you can’t help the fact you were born in The Worst Country in the World. And if you’re an Auburn fan, it’s not my fault you’re wrong.

Thus, also, you don’t necessarily have to like Jews or be pro-Israel to be my friend. But if you start making noises about “international bankers” or “neocons” or otherwise signaling to me that you have a paranoid hostility toward Jews — what I call conspiratorial anti-semitism — well, no, I can’t hang with that. The Politics of Paranoia is always doomed to fail; your hostility and your fear are both equally misdirected, and a politics based on such sentiments will not save American liberty from destruction. In fact, if you go down that road, you’re likely to destroy yourself and do more harm than good to the cause of American liberty.

Genesis 12:3 — you want the blessing. You do not want the curse.

Having said all that, I’ve hung out with some hard-core types whom I consider friends and whose idiosyncratic opinions don’t make them Bad People in my book. Basically, I favor a broad coalition strategy as the only way we’re ever going to defeat the Left. I’m a uniter, not a divider. If the Republican Party can appeal to both religious conservatives and gay libertarians — as it arguably does — there is no reason why it can’t get votes both from Jews and from people who don’t like Jews. There may be feasible limits to the ultimate reach of a broad coalition on the Right, but look at the Democrats. How they got 69% of the Jewish vote for the most anti-Israel president in history, I don’t know, but they did. And how do they get half the Catholic vote for the Party of Planned Parenthood? Is the RNC staffed by chimpanzees?

So, yeah, I know a lot of radical “New Right” who think the Republican Party is hopeless, and some of them have rather idiosyncratic opinions on certain other issues we need not further belabor here. However, the anti-Jew vibe coming off the #cuckservative hashtag is just a bit too blatant. And the thought crossed my mind: agents provocateurs.

There was an old joke down in Georgia that if five guys show up for a KKK meeting, at least three of them are working for the FBI, and I’ve got a hunch something like that must be behind this #cuckservative thing. My bullshit detector is pretty reliable, and if I had to bet money, I’ve got $20 that says either Justice Department informants or Democrat Party dirty tricksters have infiltrated the “New Right,” because this #cuckservative thing is just way too perfect to be a coincidence.

As James Carville says, if you see a turtle sitting atop a fence post, you know it didn’t crawl up there by itself and — in case nobody told you yet — Team Hillary is playing for keeps. Don’t be a chump. Know who you trust and trust who you know. Beware of dirty tricks.

If we can’t defeat Team Hillary, America is doomed and deservedly so.

 

625 comments

  3. No. They’re hostile to us. The very existence of aggressively expansionist monotheists with no moral compunction against the destruction of outgroups is an abomination we have no duty to suffer.

  4. Good point. Progressives can’t into trolling because they really don’t understand why anyone would have a different opinion.

  7. “Teabagger” is a moronic slur, because it simply riffs dirty on the word “tea,” and the meaning of the slur word has nothing to do with the actual beliefs and psychology of the Teaparty. Cuckservative is brilliant, because it gets into the psychology of the conservative establishment. As Mike Enoch says, it can’t be a Leftist troll, because Leftists are incapable of any psychological insight into their opponents.

  8. I am a leftist yes, thank you for noticing. I do not seek to emulate the Jews in anything but their persistence and vigorous defense of their culture; European peoples and cultures have a right to exist unmolested; and yet the Jews seek to molest us whenever possible; to enslave us; deprive us of the profits of our produce; and kill us when we rise against them.

  9. I’m more than a little tired of the “lost 5 out of 6” bullshit.
    That claim IS VERY CAREFULLY WORDED so as to be technically true, but misleading.
    For example, how do you “lose” a popular vote? The layman would probably say “get 50% minus one vote, or less.”
    By that definition, the Democrats have lost 4 OF THE LAST 6 themselves.
    That claim is thinly veiled leftist propaganda, designed to falsely impugn the appeal of the GOP and implicitly boost the appeal of Democrats.
    Sort the list at the link by year, and see how Dems have won less than 50% in 4 of the last 6 presidential elections:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

  10. there is a very strong anti-Jew contingent in the libertarian ranks it pops up all the time on more libertarian leaning blogs, both political and financial, often making their comment sections unreadable. It often corresponds with a comment section that overwhelmingly supports pot legalization and Ron Paul.

  11. Even the gun issue shows the uselessness of the GOP. Most of the pro-gun activism came from outside groups like the NRA and grassroots gun owners forcing it on GOP politicians. If it wasn’t for a massive pro-gun movement the Republican party and Conservatism Inc. wouldn’t have done anything.

  12. Thanks for that input. I see the comments on this post have become a carnival of madness, which was perhaps predictable.

    You see that racialists (of whatever persuasion) must always impute dishonorable motives to their critics. This is a mirror-reverse of the way that the Left is forever accusing the Right of racism. The fact that I have been hate-listed by the SPLC does nothing to defend me from the accusation by racialists that I am, somehow, insufficiently aware, lacking “racial consciousness.”

    Caught between the Devil of the SPLC and the “deep blue sea” of racialism, I have no answer except to say that (a) I am profoundly interested in facts, and (b) I consider the conservative cause to be a defense of American liberty. On the latter point, iI consider that our liberty is threatened both by cultural decline and by the remorseless expanison of federal authority. These are related, because as immorality flourishes, the people are less able to govern their own passions and to provide for their own material needs, so that government expands to fill the vacuum created by the collapse of organic institutions, i.e., faith, family and community.

    As to point (a), we ought to be able to candidly discuss the facts regarding human behavior without being required to endorse any particular theory to explain these facts. For example, liberals look at facts about racial groups and attribute observable differences to discrimination, prejudice and historical oppression. Conservatives, while not denying that any of the factors cited by liberals are relevant and relevant, insist that what is important are the (equally real) opportunities available to individuals in a free and prosperous society. Even before the civil-rights revolution of the 1960s, many black Americans were remarkably successful, even in the segregated South. As a matter of fact, Thomas Sowell has pointed out that many socioeconomic measures show the black community was (generally) advancing more before the mid-1960s than afterwards. Sowell attributes the problems that affected the black community after the 1960s to the vast expansion of the Welfare State that began under LBJ’s “Great Society.”

    Of course, Sowell’s analysis is more complex than that brief summary suggests, and we are under no obligation to endorse Sowell’s analysis. My point is that the Left/Right argument over the causes of racial problems in America is about ideas — it is a debate over public policy — and is not (as the Left claims) a matter of the Right’s “racism.” And really, why should it matter whether or not anyone is “racist” in any sense of that word? This word has become a mere epithet, a slur used to silence critics of liberalism, so that liberal policies can be enacted without any real debate over the efficacy of those policies.

    Perhaps I am more “racist” than some people and less “racist” than others, but what does this have to do with anything in terms of debating public policy? Why are we expected to subject ourselves to a sort of public psychoanalysis where it is to be determined (by whom?) whether we pass the Not-a-Racist Test?

    The attempt to debate public policy (or to discuss social and cultural problems) is not helped when you have a swarm of avowed white racialists insisting that any conservative who does not adopt racialist rhetoric (and subscribe to whatever theory this rhetoric expresses) is a coward, a “race traitor.”

    Three words: Bull. Fucking. Shit.

    Just as I will not let feminists dictate to me what I can or cannot say about sex, neither will I let anyone (Left or Right) tell me what to think about race. I will say, in concession to the “New Right” (or “alt-right” as they sometimes style themselves) that they are essentially correct that discourse about race is hemmed in by artificial constraints imposed by Cultural Marxism. Anyone attempting to talk about race relations is required to tiptoe around a minefield where any false step produces explosive accusations from the Left that one has exposed his own racism. The mainstream Right frequently cooperates with the Left in this project by periodically purging someone (e.g., Sam Francis, Trent Lott, John Derbyshire) who has transgressed the boundaries of permissible racial discourse. I myself was targeted for such destruction, and miraculously survived, because I had watched what happened to Sam Francis (whom I knew personally) and learned a lot about the tactics of the Left.

    Notice this: I have never apologized for anything, and this drives the Left insane. How could someone hate-listed by the SPLC manage to continue a career in conservative journalism with such remarkable success? The Left’s theory, of course, is that my success proves that everybody on the Right secretly endorses the racism of which I am accused. Yet the truth is that my friends on the Right know I was unjustly accused — that I am not the hateful bogeyman depicted by the SPLC — and so the Left is confronted with its failure to destroy me. Grant that I have been harmed by the Left’s attack, it was my destruction they had in mind, and I am manifestly not destroyed. This example of the Left’s impotence might encourage others to defy the Thought Police, and I hope this possibility troubles their sleep.

  13. You’ve arrayed the employment history of two people against the entire array of alt-right opinion journalism.

    John Derbyshire and Joseph Sobran had actually been mollycoddled for years by National Review‘s editors. Sobran was disposed of after an act of insubordination after seven years of being warned by other editors that his newspaper column was damaging the magazine’s brand. In Derbyshire’s case, it’s an amazement he was not fired six years earlier when he wrote a venomous and stupid attack on a book written by one of National Review‘s staff editors.

    Dr. Richwine was treated quite shabbily by the Heritage Foundation. He is, however, welcome as a contributor at National Review. Dr. Richwine is the odd figure of the alt-right who simply promotes his research projects and is not in the business of posing as a sophisticate opposed to the sinister ‘neocon’.

  15. Most of them also have low comment/vote counts, and their accounts are private so nobody can look up their history.
    Odd.

  16. We question your motives, you question our sanity. Why not just set such speculations aside and talk about policy? Explain to me why Republicans pander to base ethnic interests among non-whites and yet, when I have merely expressed that I am not compfortable with the prospect of whites becoming a minority in this country, they pretend that they never heard me, or flee the room as from a snare. Why do they do that, even though their own party will never win another election anywhere that whites are a minority? They seem hell-bent on failure, and I feel that they are just stalling whites until the demographic clock has run out.

  18. It’s you people who will not engage in any kind of cooperative enterprise with anyone else because you are all about purging people that the left doesn’t approve of from your ranks and forbidding speech on issues of race.

  19. The ones that are open are all over at far left wing sites that claim to be right wing. All of it filled with vile hate and bigotry sort of stuff all with the usual trapping of Skokie Nutsy or Clannish backwoods comments.

  21. Art Deco, my statement used many times on cooperating with Libertarians applies….First, you hit them in the head with a stick, then you can have a reasonable conversation with them.

    If you let them act like a bunch of black gangbangers getting up in your face, they will drink their own koolaid, or piss, and go nuts on you.

    So..”Smack!” and “Nice to meet you, Mr. Libertarian.”

  23. I’m not sure how pot legalization and Ron Paul always seem to get lumped together. Simply because Ron Paul supports it does not mean in any way, shape, or form that even a thin majority of those on the Right who support decriminalization also support Ron Paul and his lunacy.

    It’s insulting.

  24. I think it comes from their hatred for the gaming of the banking system (something the Paulbots care deeply about) by the “Jew banker cabal.”
    IMO, their religion/ethnicity is a coincidence.

  30. What do #cuckservative and #gamergate have in common? They’re like 50% of my Twitter timeline, I have absolutely no idea what either one means and I intend to keep it that way.

  33. People don’t really care what the evangelical position on Israel is, all we need to know that evangelicals put it first above all other political issues because of their ridiculous religious ideas.

  34. Meh, Getting your real name smeared by the $PLC is srs shit. Ease up on Mr. McCain a little.

  35. And how, pray tell, does a group with less than 1 percent of the total world population accomplish this “destruction” of “outgroups?” And, if this desire on their part is so open and obvious, why then have they managed to avoid destruction themselves and indeed thrived while those who have sought their destruction have foundered? Those facts seem to indicate a problem with your theory, unless, like the advocates of climate change, anything is deemed supportive of your thesis.

  36. Says the naked emperor dancing down the streets as if he is wearing the finest clothes that only the best can see.

  37. Attacking me is the best thing you could do for the democrat party. By purging “racists” and “white supremacists” from your midst and doing everything you can to distance yourselves from them at the behest of the left, you are just ensuring their political success far into the future. Well cucked.

  39. It’s pretty much the same with other “West” countries. In some of them there is a lot of shrieking and crying about “fascism” even if you only want to celebrate independence day. Not sure if it’s the same with the USA.

  40. I am pointing out that it has become harder for the Republican party to win nationwide elections due to demographic changes.

    White gentiles are the ONLY group in the country that votes majority Republican. If the GOP wants to stay relevant they should be making sure that their base doesn’t get demographically replaced by mass immigration and amnesty.

  41. We don’t care about facts. Gotcha.

    Followed by ignorant attack. Look, I’m trying to help you not be such a waste of oxygen. Listen. Learn.

  42. Because they believe their principles are universal, the appeal of which is not limited to one ethnicity.

  43. I see there are a lot of accusations flying back and forth about the motives and beliefs of various people, and who hates Jews or whatever. Let’s leave that aside for a second. I want to honestly ask a question of the conservatives here. I want you to explain how white people becoming less than a majority in the US is good for the conservative program and the electoral success of the Republican party. If you can explain that, then I’ll admit that I was wrong about ever caring about race and switch over to your side.

  46. Its not, and I doubt anyone here thinks it is. Which is why your lot sounds like a bunch of drunken Picts who haven’t yet discovered the use of hay balls for wiping their bottoms, and who wandered into the White City of Gondor.

  47. Ok, so given that you acknowledge I am right, wouldn’t you say that the behavior of the GOP on this issue is absolutely inexplicable and simply shows cowardice in the face of attacks from the left? Why won’t they defend their own interests?

  48. So tell me, what is so “supremacist” about wanting WHITE countries to be for white people? Nobody is asking the Chinese to give away their country to third world invaders. Your understanding of the term “white supremacist” is fundamentally flawed.

  49. Wow, you seem like a pretty morally righteous guy that puts philosophy first and would never stoop to something so vile as racism. You must have pretty high social standing to have such enlightened ideas.

  50. Lol what an idiot. If us “racists” don’t take back the country, then America as we know it is doomed.

Comments are closed.