VIDEO: The Man With No Plan Accuses House Republicans of Irresponsibility

Posted on | July 30, 2011 | 35 Comments

“President Snippy Pants,” as William Teach calls him, evidently believes what America needs is more lectures from him:

While accusing the House GOP of wasting time by, y’know, passing legislation, our Lecturer-in-Chief uses his weekly address to issue yet another iteration of Democrat Party talking points:

Republicans in the House of Representatives just spent precious days trying to pass a plan that a majority of Republicans and Democrats in the Senate had already said they wouldn’t vote for. It’s a plan that wouldn’t solve our fiscal problems, but would force us to re-live this crisis in just a few short months. It would hold our economy captive to Washington politics once again. If anything, the past few weeks have demonstrated that’s unacceptable.
Any solution to avoid default must be bipartisan. It must have the support of both parties that were sent here to represent the American people — not just one faction of one party. . . .
Now all of us — including Republicans in the House of Representatives — need to demonstrate the same kind of responsibility that the American people show every day. The time for putting party first is over.

One hesitates to spend “precious days” (or even precious minutes) fisking this, as the hypocritical falseness of Obama’s rhetoric really ought to be self-evident.

Let us first have done with Obama’s bogus insinuation that he represents the credible voice of “responsibility.” He hasn’t put forward any detailed plan of his own. Instead of providing a budget, he gave a speech — April 13 at George Washington University — in which he dishonestly used the phrase “my budget,” and rolled out the focus-group-tested phrase “balanced approach” (i.e., code for “tax increases”).

In his GWU speech, the president recycled the old-and-busted partisan talking-point that ObamaCare “will reduce our deficit by $1 trillion” (laughably false), and then infamously asserted that his “balanced approach” would “achieve $4 trillion in deficit reduction over twelve years.”

I say he “infamously” made this assertion, because it stands as a historic milestone in the annals of deceptive political rhetoric.

The first thing to notice is that Obama employed the Large Number Trick, whereby politicians throw out a sum of millions, billions or trillions knowing full well that the average listener will be so awed — “Four trillion dollars! Wow!” — that rational thought ceases. But when our current annual deficit is $1.4 trillion, and the president projects that out over 12 years ($16.8 trillion by simple multiplication), a rough back-of-the-envelope calculation shows he’s actually proposing about a 24% reduction in the deficit, so that the 2024 budget deficit would still be $1.07 trillion.

Beyond the president’s deft use of the Large Number Trick in his April 13 GWU speech, there is the obvious problem of a “plan” (or an “approach” which Obama dares to call “my budget”) that presumes to know the state of economic and political affairs in 2024.

This is what we might call the Future Projection Trick: Make your budget calculations based on some distant point in the future and propose draconian cuts in the latter years of that multi-year span. This permits you to claim to have saved taxpayers a lot of money while not actually cutting much of anything in the near term. And of course, those projected future draconian cuts never actually happen, because future congressmen and future presidents don’t consider themselves bound by their predecessors’ promises.

Even if Obama gets re-elected next year, the 2017 budget would be the last over which he had any influence, so his future-projected deficit cuts in 2018, 2019, et cetera, are even more utterly worthless than every other promise he’s ever made.

Yet the final and most important thing about Obama’s “budget” (or “plan,” or “approach,” or whatever you want to call what he outlined April 13 in his only explicit attempt to address the debt-ceiling issue) is that it was so lacking in specificity that it couldn’t be scored by the Congressional Budget Office.

Here once again we see Obama employing a rhetorical trick — the Virtue of Vagueness — in a phony attempt to claim that he is serious about the budget problem. He employs the “bully pulpit” to present himself as responsible (he used “responsibility” or “responsibilities” 10 times in his April 13 speech), the spokesman for an America that “is generous and compassionate,” and yet utterly fails to provide the kind of numbers that will permit a green-eyeshade accounting of whether he has actually done what he wants listeners to believe he has done, i.e., reduce the deficit.

While I’m not sure whether an “approach” is supposed to be subject to an accountant’s scrutiny, an actual budget must be. (My “approach” to making money from this blog is to rattle the tip jar and try to hustle up some lucrative Amazon sales, but this Underpants Gnome business model would never pass muster with the CBO.) What Obama avoided through his Virtue of Vagueness Trick was having to say, for example, what the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration budget would be in 2014, or how much would be spent to fund the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division in 2015.

Obama’s “approach” is arithmetically nebulous for the very reason that he doesn’t want to have to explain or defend any actual budget reductions. An actual budget must be specific as to the amount of funding allotted to each department, each division, each agency, each program, and this Obama was unwilling or unable to do, so his big “bully pulpit” proposal on April 13 wasn’t something for which the accountants and economists at the CBO could produce a score.

How much money would Obama’s approach save? We don’t know!

And this, I suggest, can only be a matter of cold political calculation.

From the very outset of the debate over the debt-ceiling, Obama was playing a game: Make the House Republicans spell out in a CBO-scored budget proposal exactly what they were planning to cut. Then claim that, by doing so, they were rejecting the “balanced approach” of the “generous and compassionate” president.

The House GOP’s legislation would, by necessity, include specific numbers for agency budget reductions, which could then be employed as campaign attack-ad fodder next year, frightening the ignorant “swing voters” and gullible “soccer moms” with scary-talk about greedy Republicans who want to slash funds for the Bureau of Generosity and eliminate altogether the Department of Compassion.

The president’s not-so-secret-weapon in this political attack strategy is, of course, Harry Reid’s Democrat majority in the Senate which predictably rejected anything that John Boehner could actually push through the House. Thus, Obama’s partisan attack machine not only gets the specific budget numbers with which to smear Republicans as heartless villains in next year’s campaign, but also affords the president an opportunity to claim — as he did today — that this entire ginned-up crisis is due to the ideological fanaticism and partisan opportunism of those dangerous right-wing GOP extremists.

As usual with Obama, the truth is the exact opposite of whatever he says. He is the one seeking partisan advantage and being irresponsible. It is not the House Republicans but the Senate Democrats who have acted the part of ideologues and obstructionists. And the only question now is whether President Snippy Pants will get away with this transparent trickery.

Obama predictably relies on deceptive sophistry to advance his self-serving agenda. His address today is entitled “Compromise on Behalf of the American People,” which more honestly could be called “Compromise on Behalf of My Re-Election Campaign.” And he might very well get away with it unless Republicans unite and speak with one voice to explain to voters exactly what the president is doing.

Call him out on his phony political gamesmanship, his dishonest partisan rhetoric and his unspeakable hypocrisy in claiming to be “responsible” while abdicating his own responsibility.

* * * * *

What You Can Do
If you agree with the logic of the foregoing argument, why don’t you copy it in an e-mail and send it to your Republican representative, senator, governor or state GOP chairman? You can also e-mail it to your favorite local or national talk radio host, or Republican presidential candidates (who certainly ought to be speaking out on the current budget debate). Also, by using the “share” button at the bottom of the post, you can share it via Twitter or post it to Facebook. Thanks in advance for your help in spreading the word. — RSM

UPDATE: Linked by That Mr. G Guy, Bob Belvedere at The Camp of the Saints, Dan Collins at The Conservatory and — of course — welcome, Instapundit readers!

Category: Barack Obama, Budget, Congress, Conservatism 101, Election 2012, Harry Reid, John Boehner, Senate

Comments

35 Responses to “VIDEO: The Man With No Plan Accuses House Republicans of Irresponsibility”

KingShamus
July 30th, 2011 @ 4:52 pm

“Call Obama out?”

Oh RS, you know Boehner is far too busy for that sort of thing. He’s too busy cutting deals to, you know, win the debate or anything.
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 4:56 pm

Where is Obama on Budget Crisis?http://t.co/MwrBc1O
Dianna Deeley
July 30th, 2011 @ 4:58 pm

Where is his plan? Where is a Democrat plan?

BTW, has anyone (except Stacy, of course) managed to listen to the whole three minutes and fifty-eight seconds? I lasted 28 seconds before I feared for my laptop’s screen.
Vermontaigne
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:05 pm

Hobbit denouncer (yes, it’s come to that) Robert Reich put it into his head that what we needed was more lecturing, in IBD, yesterday, I think.
Vermontaigne
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:09 pm

Gosh, and this reminds me of skating around the rink at Wirth Park with Kirky Nelson in 6th grade, mittened hand in mittened hand: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQCgfxtBRlM
Ladd Ehlinger Jr.
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:14 pm

One day, when we’re eating our government supplied moldy bread, we’ll look back at all this and laugh.
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:14 pm

What can possibly explain this persistent idea among Democrats that what Americans really want is more lectures from Obama? During the 2010 mid-terms, every Democrat with a functioning survival instinct was desperately running away from Obama. And yet now, evidently, they think that they can “win” by turning him into the omnipresent face and voice of their party. If they keep this up — and if Republicans will capitalize on the opportunity it presents — the only real question of the 2012 election will be whether the GOP gains a filibuster-proof 60-seat majority in the Senate.

Of course, expecting Republicans to be smart is about as hopeless as expecting Democrats to be honest.
Saturday Sounds: He’s Misstra Know It All
July 30th, 2011 @ 1:32 pm

[…] For Stacy: […]
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:40 pm

They KNOW we don’t want them.. They’re just Alinksying Obama, making HIM the face of the problem they’ve been constructing since the Clinton Administration, so HE gets the blame instead. Like when the White publisher and editor of the NY Times decided to fire the black editor to cover THEIR responsibility for Jayson Blair.

Democrats screwing the black man again…
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:06 pm

Wait a minute: You haven’t started eating your government-supplied moldy bread yet?

What? Are you on a diet?
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:08 pm

Old and busted: “Rickrolled.”

New and hot: “Precious and Fewed.”
Bob Belvedere
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:13 pm

Also, Your Majesty, I don’t think stubborn Barry is ready to ‘come out’.
Bob Belvedere
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:17 pm

And saying ‘mmm…doubleplusgood’.
Dianna Deeley
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:22 pm

The ergot-inspired hallucinations are to be savored!
mockmook
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:29 pm

I think I read somewhere that the GOP plan gives targets for cuts (in growth!!!), but doesn’t say what departments or programs are to be “cut”.

Doesn’t really matter much, since the only chance for REAL cuts won’t come until after 2012.
Sukie Tawdry
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:40 pm

I say we call Obama’s bluff.
mRed
July 30th, 2011 @ 6:51 pm

Well said Mr. McCain. Well said! I shared with others including my Rep. and my Senator Charade Brown (Doofus-OH). I also put it on my site: http://invinciblearmor.blogspot.com/2011/07/president-snippy-pants-lectures.html
Dianna Deeley
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:09 pm

I sent a modified version to my critters. Along with a suggestion to the Senatrix (I seem to remember that covers the plural) to untable and vote in favor of CC&B.

Of course, I’m pretty sure they just cried out, “Ew! Ucky!” and ignored it.
Joe
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:17 pm

You and Collins are sick and twisted. Bewarned people, you will wish you were Helen Keller after watching that video.
Joe
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:20 pm

I do fondly remember the days when Grandma would bring home Reagan cheese from the Senior Center. Those were the good old days.

Soon the moldy bread will be gone and we will be down to this.
The Man With The Molding Tongue « The Camp Of The Saints
July 30th, 2011 @ 3:34 pm

[…] intrepid Stacy McCain does the dirty work for us and actually listened to the whole thing [he's resting comfortably is stable, but serious, […]
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:37 pm

Hold the American economy hostage for crass political advantage?

Yes we can!

This is the Hope&Change! that you voted for.
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:39 pm

Flashback to The Two Towers:

“We ain’t had nothing but maggoty bread for three stinking days!”
The F#@ked Up Mess In Washington D.C. « That Mr. G Guy's Blog
July 30th, 2011 @ 3:41 pm

[…] McCain has some thoughts on this mess here with video of Obama’s weekend address and here where he gives reasons why the blame can be […]
Bob Belvedere
July 30th, 2011 @ 7:42 pm

-Well put – very well put.

-Barack Hussein Obama is just like the dude hanging around the sidewalks inviting you to play the shell game: any bet is a sucker’s bet because the game is rigged. However, the guy in the streets has more nobility: he will at least give you a wink when you let him know you know it’s all a con.

-Quoted from and Linked to at: The Man With The Molding Tongue
The Fiddler « threedonia.com
July 30th, 2011 @ 4:13 pm

[…] UPDATE: and “The Other McCain” has a video of that chief of Batman villainy — The Jacker — who apparently thinks Republicans don’t have a plan… […]
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 8:21 pm

Here’s a partial transcript.

Blahblahblahblahblahblah……………..wawablahwaawablah…………
Anonymous
July 30th, 2011 @ 8:27 pm

Aye, he is bluffing if no deal is reached by Aug 3 the sun will still rise birds will still fly and O’Sputnik won’t be able to go to Chicago to celebrate his birthday. A successful outcome by any measure.
Ed Driscoll » Never Let the Opportunity to Manufacture a Crisis go to Waste
July 30th, 2011 @ 5:04 pm

[…] Stacy McCain spots “The Man With No Plan [Accusing] House Republicans of […]
gahrie
July 30th, 2011 @ 9:26 pm

Forget the Balanced Budget Amendment. I want an Amendment that states that anytime the Government cannot pass a budget (preferable balanced or maybe a surplus) than no member of Congress or the President may receive a paycheck, and this pay cannot be made up at a later date.
McGehee
July 31st, 2011 @ 1:11 am

I remember my mother’s neighbors urging her to run and get the free cheese, and mom telling them no, she had all the cheese she needed.

“But it’s free!” they wailed as they fled her obviously insane presence.
Serr8d
July 31st, 2011 @ 1:52 am

He’s a ‘Community Organizer’ first; always has been, always will be. Unfortunately, for this little Republic, that didn’t translate into ‘Leader’.
J.M. Heinrichs
July 31st, 2011 @ 5:34 am

Cheers
Teeing it up: A Round at the LINKs | SENTRY JOURNAL
July 31st, 2011 @ 12:40 pm

[…] THE OTHER McCAIN: VIDEO: The Man With No Plan Accuses House Republicans of Irresponsibility […]
FMJRA 2.0: Boys Go Crazy : The Other McCain
August 8th, 2011 @ 1:36 am

[…] GameCranky ConGay PatriotEd DriscollNice DebBits’ BlogThe Camp Of The SaintsAdelie ManchotVIDEO: The Man With No Plan Accuses House Republicans of IrresponsibilityConservative CommuneThe Camp Of The SaintsThat Mr. GuyThreedoniaEd DriscollSentry JournalHow to […]