Category: Democrats

America Loves You, Sama Elmasry!

Posted on Comments

Finally an Egyptian belly-dancer tells the truth about Obama:

Hey Obama, Hey Obama
Hey Obama, support the terrorism
Traitor like the Brotherhood members

Obama say it’s a coup
That’s not your business dirty man
Obama say it’s a coup
That’s not your father, mother business
And you Patterson, stop messing
Old bitch woman

The “bitch woman” is U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson and, hey, if Obama appointed her, she’s probably pretty bad. The lyrics to Sama Elmarsy’s song also include this:

You want us to release Morsi
Hey Obama, you are stupid, bad man
You want us to release Morsi
Stop this or I will stab you
Why then you told Mubarak
To leave immediately?

You threaten us with the U.S. aid
F–k it and f–k you
You are a jerk

Let’s be honest: Rand Paul couldn’t have said it better. If Karl Rove’s super-PAC had a message this clear, Romney would be president!

 

The Big Benghazi Secret

Posted on Comments

In May, we began to learn the truth about what the Benghazi cover-up was all about: The State Department had a secret program to provide weapons to the Libyan insurgents who overthrew Gaddhafi. Once the dictator was gone and it became apparent that some of the “insurgents” the U.S. had armed were, in fact, dangerous radicals with ties to al-Qaeda, there began an effort to disarm these groups.

It was these negotiations that brought U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens to the Benghazi consulate on Sept. 11, 2012, in what appears to have been a carefully planned trap by the radical groups the U.S. was trying to disarm. It seems quite likely that the ambassador and three other Americans were killed with U.S.-supplied weapons. The fact that Benghazi was crawling with CIA operatives is something the Obama administration doesn’t want to talk about, for reasons that should be obvious enough. Jonathan Tobin writes at Commentary:

If Benghazi is a “phony scandal,” Americans are entitled to ask why the government is behaving so suspiciously. . . .
At this point with so many unanswered questions about Benghazi, the administration should be facilitating the investigation of the attack rather than actually impeding it. We don’t know whether the code of omerta being imposed on CIA personnel is merely a function of bureaucratic inertia or a far more sinister attempt to prevent Congress and the public from finding out more about the failures of both the agency and the State Department. No one should make assumptions about wrongdoing, but given the unwillingness of the administration to apply its supposed belief in transparency to this question, it is, at the very least, reasonable to conclude that something is amiss here.

“Something amiss” is putting it rather mildly. It stinks to high heaven. The administration has been lying since Day One, and what they’re trying to do now is to run out the clock, to delay as long as possible — if they cannot entirely prevent — disclosure of the truth, so that they can then dismiss it as, “old news.” And this is really the scandalous part of it: What if the American people had known in fall 2012 what we know (or at least think we know) now?

The absurd claim that what happened in Benghazi was a “spontaneous” demonstration inspired by a YouTube video was a deliberate lie, part of a cover-up, the initial purpose of which was to deflect blame from the administration during the presidential election campaign. In truth, the Benghazi attack was a direct consequence of President Obama’s embrace of the “Arab Spring,” four Americans died as a result, and the administration is still trying to conceal the facts because Hillary Clinton was deeply implicated in this debacle.

John Hinderaker gives heed to rumors that weapons were being shipped from Libya to Syria. I’ve heard nothing about that, but I was impressed by Joe Curl’s reaction to the CNN item:

Here’s my thing: I don’t really have a problem with shadowy CIA operations. I understand considerations of foreign-policy realism and I know that sometimes it’s hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys. But when you screw up — and I’d say a dead U.S. ambassador counts as screwing up — you can’t stonewall and lie and claim it’s all a “phony scandal.” Not if you’re the president who promised America the “most transparent administration in history.”

 


‘Cracker!’ Says Mendacious Swindler Charlie Rangel, Who Should Be in Prison

Posted on Comments

Behold, the antonym of honesty speaks!

In an interview with the Daily Beast published Friday, Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) suggested Tea Partiers are the “same group” who fought for segregation during the Civil Rights movement. “It is the same group we faced in the South with those white crackers and the dogs and the police. They didn’t care about how they looked,” Rangel said.

Every time Charlie Rangel opens his mouth, remember that the only time his name ever appeared in the same sentence with the word “ethics” was when he was censured by the House Ethics Committee:

Rangel was found guilty by the ethics panel of 11 counts of violating ethics rules, including charges that he improperly solicited millions of dollars from corporate officials and lobbyists for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College of New York, failed to disclose hundreds of thousands of dollars of income and assets on financial disclosure forms, maintained a rent-stabilized apartment as a campaign office in a Harlem apartment building and failed to pay income taxes on a villa in the Dominican Republic.

If he weren’t in Congress, he would be in federal prison, which is basically true of every Democrat, but Charlie Rangel is so crooked, even Democrats can’t deny it (and they lie about everything).

You could call him a “thief,” but that would be an insult to thieves.

 


Democrat Agenda for Women: Abortion and Also, Getting Groped by Bob Filner

Posted on Comments

Oh, sure, they’ve got some language in there about “equality,” education, health care, yadda, yadda, yadda, but when it’s time to get down to business, there are only two things that liberal women care about — killing babies and getting felt up by skeezy Democrat perverts:

A ninth woman has emerged to accuse San Diego Mayor Bob Filner (D) of sexual harassment. . . .

(There would be 10 of them by now, but at least one woman had enough sense to run the moment she laid eyes on that creep.)

Emily Gilbert, who was hired to sing at a fundraiser days after Filner took office in December, told Fox5 that Filner grabbed her inappropriately at the event.

(Is there an “appropriate” way to grab a singer?)

“He grabbed me a little too tight, then proceeded to slide his hand down my arm and then did a little grab on my derriere,” Gilbert said. “I didn’t want to make a scene, there were kids around.”

(“There were kids around” — getting a free sex-education lesson from the mayor. “Vote Filner: It’s for the Children!”)

Eight other women have alleged Filner sexually harassed. One, his former communications director, is suing Filner and the city of San Diego.

(An interesting sort of welfare: Vote Democrat; Democrats molest women; women sue the city; taxpayers are forced to pay the bill.)

Filner, a former member of Congress, has said the city failed to provide state-required sexual harassment training, though a contradicting report states that Filner’s office cancelled the session.

(Oh, this is rich: “Harassment? How was I to know that groping women was wrong? I didn’t have sexual harassment training!”)

Several lawmakers on Capitol Hill have slammed Filner’s behavior. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had the harshest words, calling the mayor’s actions “reprehensible” and “disrespectful of women.”

(It’s “reprehensible,” as opposed to stabbing babies in the head, which is a “right” all Democrats are sworn to defend.)

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) called on Filner to resign.
“The misconduct Mayor Bob Filner has been accused of is reprehensible and indefensible,” Wasserman Schultz said in a statement. “I am personally offended by his actions and I firmly believe no employee should face a hostile environment or harassment at their place of employment.”

Of course, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz knew all along what a lecherous creep Bob Filner is. It wasn’t exactly a secret on Capitol Hill, but as long as Bob Filner had a “D” beside his name and was willing to vote for the Democrat agenda (i.e., stabbing babies in the head), Wasserman-Schultz was willing to help elect and re-elect him, until the “misconduct,” by which she means, getting caught.

If you ever see a Democrat heading toward you, ladies — RUN!

 

‘Gentleman’ Jim Moran: I Love This Bitch

Posted on Comments

by Smitty

Austin Price over at Fishbowl DC writes:

For Abby the Shih Tzu mix, Tuesday was a big day. Until last Friday, when she was picked up by animal shelter Homeward Trails, she had been roaming the streets of Washington. On Tuesday, however, Abby got a chance to find a new home at the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal’s Paws for Celebration adoption drive (yes, that was a mouthful) in the Cannon Caucus Room.

<= Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va), co-chair of the Congressional Animal Protection Caucus, spoke to the crowd while holding Butter, who stole the show. Moran encouraged everyone present to adopt a pet, noting that one of his staffers did just that. (From FishbowlDC article)

I, for one, rejoice that Moran could take a break from the day trading to express more concern for strays than the unborn. Somewhat less snarkily, this is what you do if you want to stay elected: go make friends with pet owners who have vast amounts of cash to spend keeping you in office, while blowing off any sort of leadership role entirely.

It’s not fair to say that Moran is, to politics, what Wally is to the Dilbert cartoon strip; Wally at least affords an occasional guffaw. Moran and the rest of the senior leadership in DC continue to epitomize the truth that, while the Founders served up some great mechanism, there was no guarantee that sound policy would ensue. That’s on us.

One hopes that the Almighty will coax Patrick Murray to run again in 2014. Not to wish an ill fate on Moran, but the sooner Jim’s political career ends, the sooner we can set about avoiding Detroit as a national destiny.

In closing, let’s cast our mind back to an era before the likes of Moran blighted our politics:

Email hat tip to Paco

Is McAuliffe Taking One For The Team, Or Do Dems Think Virginians That Stupid?

Posted on Comments

by Smitty

Virginia is for lovers of elections, but it’s not clear whether Terry McAuliffe is the kind of Anthony Weiner that Virginia needs in the Governor’s Mansion. His main claim to fame, or wealth, was Global Crossing, right?

In 1997, McAuliffe invested $100,000 in Global Crossing, a telecommunications company providing fiber-optic networking services worldwide. After the company went public in 1998, McAuliffe sold his shares for a large profit. The company later filed for bankruptcy on January 28, 2002. Global Crossing reemerged from bankruptcy in late 2003 and in 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission, after a four-year investigation, ruled that no wrongdoing occurred at Global Crossing and no enforcement action was necessary.

Oh, and then there is his whole GreenTech boondoggle, detailed over at Fairfax Free Citizen.
What is it that keeps this zombie fop twitching, then?

McAuliffe has had a prolific fundraising career within the Democratic Party, and has used his political career to make a personal fortune. McAuliffe has had a long personal and political relationship with Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton.

Ah, the Aristocracy of Pull. While not seeming to be any more effective than, say, President Barack Obama, one can say that McAuliffe has at least done a better job of faking showing up to work, to look at Global Crossing and GreenTech. But what is the point of running for Governor of Virginia, then? Does Terry think that there is enough media artillery available to blow away Ken Cuccinelli? Even if you don’t fancy Ken’s conservative slant on issues, nobody with at leas one good eye would deny that Cuccinelli’s résumé is a full essay, compared to McAuliffe’s sad little tweet to #UniteBlue.

Then there is the debate drubbing McAuliffe took from Cuccinelli last Saturday. While it’s likely that McAuliffe will do well amongst the junior Gollums infesting Northern Virginia, who keep re-electing the likes of ‘Gentleman’ Jim Moran and ‘Merry’ Gerry Connolly, is the rest of the state so decadent as to send a no-talent clown like McAuliffe to Richmnod? As we research more of McAuliffe’s rather whiffy record, one wonders how he will do at the next debate, in September. One does not expect Cuccinelli to get any less Irish or Italian in his onslaught. One also does not expect McAuliffe to be “packin’ the gear” enough to pick up his end. It would cut into his fundraising time.

This is not to say that Cuccinelli can afford complacency. One turns one’s back on a friend of the Clintons at one’s peril. Just ask Ambassador Stevens. Oh, wait.

No, the real point of Terry McAuliffe’s candidacy seems to be an attempt to blunt the rise of Cuccinelli, who, while by no means perfect, does seem to play a solid, methodical hand.

Cuccinelli for Governor

Let McAuliffe take his carpetbagging ways back to New York

‘Carlos Danger’ Is a Democrat’s Fake Name, But Sydney Leathers Is Real

Posted on Comments

In 2011, Sydney Leathers created a Change.org petition, “Tell Sarah Palin to stop inciting violence,” blaming the former Alaska governor for the Tucson massacre. Sydney Leathers subsequently worked as a field organizer for Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.

Tuesday evening, BuzzFeed outed Sydney Leathers as the woman whose revelations of “sexting” have effectively destroyed Anthony Weiner’s political comeback and, by the time a Twitter friend called my attention to it, the BuzzFeed item was already a Drudge headline, so no one can blame me for outing her, and the ViralRead headline is a bit more specific:

BREAKING: Ex-Obama Campaign Worker
Identified in Weiner Scandal

Frankly, I think it was Weiner’s slime machine that tipped her identity to BuzzFeed, but who cares about such reprehensible creatures?

Wiener “lured” the young woman “via Facebook,” wrote Nik Richie of TheDirty.com, saying that the online relationship — “sending sexually explicit pictures of each other and having sexual conversations via phone” — between the married 48-year-old politician and the woman continued for six months. The damage of the revelations will likely destroy Weiner’s hope of winning the New York mayoralty, Mara Liasson of National Public Radio said Tuesday evening on Fox News: “I just don’t see how he can survive this … This has to be the end.”
The woman who told her story to Richie said, “I was 22 and in a bad place. … I really admired him. … I thought he was misunderstood. Until I got to know him. I thought I loved him. Pretty pathetic. … I was young and dumb. I just want people to really know he’s lying when he acts like he has changed.”
The woman said Weiner offered to get her a condominium in Chicago, and offered to recommend her for a job at the D.C.-based liberal news site Politico.com. “So they are looking to create a panel of bloggers … can I give him your deets?” . . .

Read the rest at ViralRead. “I thought I loved him”? Yuck.

UPDATE: Jeff Dunetz has a selection of photos of Sydney Leathers displaying her progressive cleavage and so forth. Exactly why girls engage in this kind of online behavior is something worth discussing. “The New Normal,” I guess? But we shouldn’t really be surprised when Democrat girls end up being “in a bad place” because, after all, they’re working on behalf of Satan’s Own Party.