The @Nero Solution (and an Unfortunate Update on the #FreeKate Fallout)

Posted on | July 6, 2016 | 30 Comments

Milo Yiannopoulos has solved the “harassment” problem:

The fact is, women are more easily rattled by nastiness than men. That’s a stereotype, but it’s also true — in the landmark Pew study on online harassment, women were more than twice as likely as men to say they were “very upset” by online harassment. That’s why, despite the fact that men are more likely to face abuse online, it’s mostly women you hear complaining about it in the pages of The Guardian and on Buzzfeed.
Men have had enough of third-wave feminism’s incessant and pathetic whinging about everything from gender pronouns to this bizarre “online harassment” craze — or “cyber-violence,” as they sometimes bizarrely call it. Women are upset at men being rude to them, and feel “oppressed,” we are told, whenever they are treated on equal terms as men in the maelstrom of trolling that is social media.
Consider the GamerGate controversy, where gamers fought back against the nannying, hectoring feelings police and were branded “harassers” and “misogynists.” It’s also happened in comics: if you go to an online comics forum and talk about anything but how stunning and brave the new SJW storylines are, you’ll get the boot.
The internet can’t cope any more with such strenuous tension between the sexes. I mean, there’s a reason that male golfers don’t compete against female golfers. They’re in a league of their own, and it would end in tears. It’s time to apply this logic to the online world.
Here’s my suggestion to fix the gender wars online: Women should just log off. Given that men built the internet, along with the rest of modern civilisation, I think it’s only fair that they get to keep it. . . .

Read the whole thing at Breitbart.com.

Of course, the absolute worst to complain about online “harassment” are not actually women. Transgender weirdos like “Brianna Wu” (John Walker Flynt) and Nicholas “Sarah” Nyberg were among the whiniest opponents of GamerGate. Their self-created victimhood, like their self-created “womanhood,” is a delusion in which they would require the rest of us to participate. And, of course, the alleged “harassment” of feminist SJWs is endlessly publicized by the liberal media, whereas the harassment of conservatives (including conservative women) is generally ignored.

Our frequent commenter Jeanette Runyon is being sued in a Florida court by a man who is claiming “harassment,” etc., over a flame war that broke out in 2013 about the Kaitlyn Hunt case. Jeanette was one of a handful of people who followed the so-called “Free Kate” movement and exposed the extremism of those who made excuses for a tattoo-covered dildo-wielding dopehead lesbian hoodlum’s sexual abuse of a 14-year-old girl. The man who is suing Jeanette was one of the worst “Free Kate” fanatics who evidently believed either that (a) there should be no laws against statutory rape, or (b) it’s wrong to enforce the law against homosexual predators like Kate Hunt. Thomas Mix, the man who is suing Jeanette, called the parents of Kate Hunt’s 14-year-old victim “bigoted, disgusting people” who “used the laws to express their hatred and rage.”

Question: Why did Thomas Mix care so much about this case?

Here you have parents trying to protect their daughter from Kaitlyn Hunt, whose criminal acts were astonishingly brazen, and yet simply because this case involved homosexual behavior, Thomas Mix insisted that it was wrong for the victim’s parents to expect the law to be enforced. As I wrote of the case after a court hearing in October 2013:

Having sex with a 14-year-old is a crime in Florida, and the criminal sex offender Kaitlyn Hunt pleaded “no contest” today in Vero Beach, accepting the deal offered by prosecutors. It was the third such plea bargain Kaitlyn had been offered and, if she had taken the first deal back in May, nobody outside Indian River County ever would have heard of this foul-mouthed tattoo-covered teenage pervert.
Her parents didn’t think their precious little snowflake had done anything wrong, so they rejected the plea deal and decided to make their daughter The World’s Most Famous Sex Offender.

Everything that happened to Kate Hunt was her own fault.

She was an adult when she molested a 14-year-old girl. She was an adult when the girl’s parents asked her to leave their daughter alone. She was an adult when she decided to continue her obsessive pursuit of the victim despite knowing that this was a crime and having been warned by the girl’s parents. All she had to do was walk away, and the case might never have been prosecuted. Even after she was charged, however, Kaitlyn Hunt’s crimes would have been no more than a few lines in the local newspaper’s “police briefs” column, except that she refused to do what nearly everyone charged with such a crime would do in a similar circumstance — take the plea bargain.

No prosecutor ever wants to take a case like that to trial. It is inhumane to expose to cross-examination the victim of statutory rape who, as in the Kaitlyn Hunt case, was a “consensual” victim. The enforcement of statutory rape law is very difficult for this reason, and the subsequent events in this case showed why it is so difficult. Yet if parents are the rightful guardians of their own children’s safety — including the duty to protect teenagers against “consensual” exploitation — the perpetrators of these crimes must be prosecuted. It is rather notoriously true that many such crimes are never prosecuted simply because law enforcement never becomes aware of these crimes. The 15-year-old sneaks off and hooks up with a 19-year-old and nobody ever catches them or complains, so the cops and courts never become involved. In other cases, the parents of the underage victim become aware that their teenager is being pursued by an adult and, as in the Hunt case, the parents warn the pursuer to leave their child alone “or else.” Faced with the threat of criminal prosecution, almost any 18- or 19-year-old would desist from their pursuit, no matter how much they might be “in love” with a minor.

Kaitlyn Hunt did the wrong thing over and over and over again. She could have walked away, but she didn’t. Even after she was charged with serious crimes (of which she knew she was guilty) Kaitlyn Hunt could have accepted the plea bargain offered to her by prosecutors. She didn’t.

What happened instead was a strategy that one psychologist has named DARVO — Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender:

DARVO refers to a reaction that perpetrators of wrong doing, particularly sexual offenders, may display in response to being held accountable for their behavior. The perpetrator or offender may Deny the behavior, Attack the individual doing the confronting, and Reverse the roles of Victim and Offender such that the perpetrator assumes the victim role and turns the true victim into an alleged offender. . . .
It is important to distinguish types of denial, for an innocent person will probably deny a false accusation. Thus denial is not evidence of guilt. However, I propose that a certain kind of indignant self-righteousness, and overly stated denial, may in fact relate to guilt.
I hypothesize that if an accusation is true, and the accused person is abusive, the denial is more indignant, self-righteous and manipulative, as compared with denial in other cases. Similarly, I have observed that actual abusers threaten, bully and make a nightmare for anyone who holds them accountable or asks them to change their abusive behavior. This attack, intended to chill and terrify, typically includes threats of lawsuits, overt and covert attacks, on the whistle-blower’s credibility and so on.
The attack will often take the form of focusing on ridiculing the person who attempts to hold the offender accountable. The attack will also likely focus on ad hominem instead of intellectual/evidential issues.

When the criminal claims to be a victim — denouncing law enforcement and demonizing truth-tellers — these DARVO tactics function to confuse observers unfamiliar with the factual background of the case. Anyone familiar with the Brett Kimberlin case knows how confusing this can be. Despite the facts of the case, Kimberlin’s bogus Maryland lawsuit against me and three other defendants went all the way to trial before it was thrown out, and even then, Kimberlin did not cease.

The use of “lawfare” as an element of DARVO tactics is a problem with which I am directly familiar and, while I am not fully aware of all the details of the conflict between Thomas Mix and Jeanette Runyon, his lawsuit against her seems dubious to me, based on my own experience. John Biver believes her case has profound significance:

The more the public learns about large sections of the pro-“homosexual” agenda crowd the easier it will be for proponents of common sense to retake the culture. The public will be stunned to learn how “un-gay,” that is unhappy, many of those people truly are. And because they are miserable people, they lash out. . . .
Sometimes these people with damaged psyches use the Internet to harass and slander those they disagree with.

Read the whole series:

Where are those who will defend Jeanette Runyon’s rights? Where are those who care about religious liberty? Where is the Army of Davids?

Stand up! Stand up! Stand up!

UPDATE: Linked by John Hoge at Hogewash — thanks!

UPDATE II: Are you threatening me, Mr. Mix? Gosh, it’s almost like you believe you can out-crazy Stacy McCain.

Category: Crime, Gays, Kaitlyn Hunt, Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 07.05.16

Posted on | July 5, 2016 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
Kurt Schlichter: You Owe Them Nothing
EBL: The Fix Is In – Lying Loretta And Crooked Hillary
Michelle Malkin: We Are NOT Celebrating “The Fourth Of July”
Twitchy: It’s Over, Right Wing! Sally Kohn Says You Can Shut Up About Hillary Now

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: Nigel Farage Resigns As Head of UKIP
American Thinker: Comey Speaks, Hillary Skates
BLACKFIVE: Freedom Is Free. Maintaining Freedom Is What Costs
Da Tech Guy: Baldilocks – Lawlessness Flexes Its Muscles
Don Surber: Heirs Bash The Kennedy Legacy
Jammie Wearing Fools: Swedish Feminist – You Know, All These Migrant Rapes Aren’t That Bad
Joe For America: Kerry – Istanbul Attack Proves We Have ISIS On The Run!
JustOneMinute: The Tribe To End All Tribes
Pamela Geller: Muslim Former National Guardsman Arrested For Plotting ISIS Attacks In America
Shark Tank: Rubio Positioned To Face Off Against Charlie Crist Democrat Patrick Murphy
Shot In The Dark: A Whole New Flavor Of “Democracy”
STUMP: Good News For (Last) Thursday – Hooray For Technology!
The Jawa Report: Shocking News – Media Outlets Had “Hillary Is Cleared By FBI” Stories Ready To Go
The Lonely Conservative: Sarah Palin Isn’t Doing Trump Any Favors
The Political Hat: Fighting The White Man With Native Feminist Time Traveling Dogs
This Ain’t Hell: Bryton Mellott’s Free Speech
Weasel Zippers: Hillary Demands Trump Condemn David Duke, Forgets She Was Endorsed And Given $20K BY KKK Leader
Megan McArdle: Forget The White House, Dump Trump To Save The Rest of The Ticket
Mark Steyn: The Blunder Down Under

Countdown to Prime Day – Prime Music Giveaway
Shop Amazon Fashion – Up to 70% off Summer Savings

Category: Linkagery

Is Laci Green (@gogreen18) a Rapist?

Posted on | July 5, 2016 | 32 Comments

Laci Green is a “public sex educator, and feminist activist” who has “hosted online sex education content on behalf of Planned Parenthood and Discovery News.” Therefore, I was shocked to hear the suggestion that she is also “one of the most serious sexual predators on YouTube.” However, this was the subject of a video by Dr. Phil Mason helpfully entitled, “IS LACI GREEN A SERIAL RAPIST?”

More than 250,000 people have watched that video, and as Laci Green herself says, we should always believe anyone who makes an accusation, because “only” between 2% and 8% of rape accusations are false. And far be it from me to say that Dr. Phil Mason, a respected scientist, would be among that single-digit percentage who peddle slanderous falsehood “for attention, for revenge, out of jealousy,” as Laci Green said.

The problem is one of (a) math and (b) definition, as I’ve pointed out in relation to the “campus rape epidemic” hysteria. There are about 12 million college and university students ages 18-24 in the United States, of whom 57 percent (about 7 million) are female. If, as feminists have frequently claimed, 1-in-5 female college students are victims of sexual assault, this would translate to many hundreds of thousands of cases annually. Therefore, even if “only” between 2% (1-in-50) or 8% (1-in-12) of rape accusations are false, this still means that thousands of college boys might be falsely accused every year.

Having addressed the math side of the problem, now let’s examine the issue of definition. One of the problems with the infamous “1-in-5” statistic is that the surveys from which this number is derived ask questions about “unwanted” behavior that is not rape. If a couple are dancing at a party and the guy grabs the girl in a sexual way, or if a couple are making out and the guy makes a move toward third base that the girl rejects, either of these incidents might be listed as “unwanted” behavior in response to a survey question, but this is not rape.

Only the idiots who promulgate “affirmative consent” legislation would expect two teenagers in the midst of a makeout session to interrogate each other — “May I place my hand on your thigh now, Kathy?” — at every stage of their sweaty encounter in the back seat of a parked car. There is a difference between a bad date and a felony, an important difference that is obscured by the bogus “1-in-5” number. (See “Statistical Voodoo and Elastic Definitions,” June 15, 2014.) When adults with common sense expressed doubt about the “1-in-5” claim, feminists smeared these skeptics as “rape apologists,” and reasonable discussion became impossible because feminism is a synonym for shut up.

Context matters, definitions matter, math matters and evidence matters. Adults with common sense understand how sex actually happens — steaming up the windows of a 1973 Volkswagen parked behind a shopping center, for example — and we know what rape is. The idiots behind “affirmative consent” are all much younger than me. Certainly there have been changes in sexual culture over the past 30 years that might require us to examine whether, for example, the greater availability of hard-core pornography (since Al Gore invented the Internet) has created new problems, e.g., boys coercing girls into acts which are painful and unsanitary, although we are no longer permitted to call these acts perverse or abnormal, lest we offend the Sodomy Lobby.

Normal people having normal sex with each other are not the problem. Even horny teenagers routinely negotiate their makeout sessions without committing felonies, and common-sense adults are not deceived by the propaganda tactics behind the “campus rape epidemic” hysteria. However, feminists are not normal people with common sense.

Laci Green is a “pansexual” who advocates “butt sex.” Laci Green is an atheist who is an expert on lesbian sex and, perhaps not coincidentally, she had to seek professional treatment for serious mental illness. To put it as bluntly as possible, Laci Green is an insane pervert who makes her living by encouraging young people to have abnormal sex.

Does any of this mean Laci Green is a serial rapist? No, and I am not aware of any specific accusations that she has ever coerced or forced anyone into unwanted sexual activity. However, this may be because (a) Laci Green is a feminist and (b) sane normal people avoid feminists.

Everybody knows feminism causes herpes, and anyone concerned for their health and safety stays far away from feminists like Laci Green.

This probably explains why no one has ever publicly admitted having sex with Laci Green. Check her Wikipedia page, and you find that this 26-year-old woman has never been married, nor does her biography name any of her alleged boyfriends or girlfriends. Don’t you suppose that a celebrity who has made numerous TV appearances — named by Time magazine as one of the 30 most influential people on the Internet — would have occasionally been the subject of a mention in a gossip column? Wouldn’t you expect to see paparazzi photos of Laci Green with a date at an awards ceremony or something? However, while Laci Green has claimed to have a boyfriend (they “prevent pregnancy together”), this alleged boyfriend never stepped forward to admit that he was having sex with her. Doesn’t this seem rather suspicious, ladies and gentlemen?

Do we have evidence of her known proclivities? Read more

Category: Sex Trouble

‘The Children of Alinsky’

Posted on | July 4, 2016 | 13 Comments

Anita Moncrief was one of the major sources who helped expose the radical group ACORN. A friend of the late Andrew Breitbart, now Anita is planning to expose the radical influence of Saul Alinsky:

Decades after the death of “Rules for Radical” author and community organizer, Saul Alinsky, his vision has become reality. Alinsky believed that organized chaos could undermine and fundamentally transform the government. The radical Left has thousands of foot soldiers connecting with their neighbors in what Alinsky dubbed “trouble spots” to further their narrative. His legacy allowed progressives and the Democratic Party to create a permanent, year-around field program. From Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton to ACORN to Black Lives Matter, Alinsky is more alive in his death now than in his four decades of community organizing. The Children of Alinsky will expose the activist leaders, the protesters they lead and the groups that comprise this permanent, agitating grassroots structure which is broad enough, deep enough and efficient enough to win elections.

Visit her Kickstarter page and help make this project happen!

Category: ACORN, Movies

Wicked Witches: Marion Zimmer Bradley and the Feminist Pagan Sex Cult

Posted on | July 4, 2016 | 77 Comments

Marion Zimmer Bradley was famous for her Avalon novel series.

“Wicca refers to the practice of European paganism popular throughout Europe and North America. . . . Dianic Wicca refers to a more radical women-only practice, named for the Goddess Diana. The novels of Marion Zimmer Bradley have been influential for Dianic Wiccans . . .”
— Meredith Miller, “Dianic Wicca,” in Historical Dictionary of Lesbian Literature (2006)

“The first time she molested me, I was three. The last time, I was twelve, and able to walk away. . . . She was cruel and violent, as well as completely out of her mind sexually. I am not her only victim, nor were her only victims girls.”
— Moira Greyland, Marion Zimmer Bradley’s daughter

When the revelations about Marion Zimmer Bradley rocked the world of science fiction two years ago, I pointed out that the evidence of Bradley’s bizarre perversion had been hidden in plain sight. Not only was she married to a bisexual pedophile, Walter Breen, who was rather notorious for his interest in young boys, but Bradley wrote lesbian pulp fiction under pseudonyms, including I Am a Lesbian (as Lee Chapman, 1962) and The Strange Women (as Miriam Gardner, 1967). Furthermore, Bradley quite pointedly rejected Judeo-Christian morality:

Bradley . . . professed a lifelong interest in the occult and in the early 1980s described herself as “neopagan,” explaining her faith as one that “rejects the Christian belief in man’s dominion over the earth.”
She said she also believed in clairvoyance, extrasensory perception and reincarnation . . .

As I explained two years ago:

Most people have no idea how influential Bradley was in 20th-century neo-paganism. Categorizing her pagan feminist genre as “lifestyle fantasy” novels, historian Brian Stableford has recounted how Bradley “became something of a guru to numerous writers of a similar stripe, several of whom — including Diana L. Paxson and Gael Baudino — described themselves as priestesses of ‘Dianic Wicca.’” Bradley and Paxson were co-founders of the California-based Center for Non-Traditional Religion, subsequently renamed the Fellowship of the Spiral Path, which is focused on the “Triple Goddess” (Maiden, Mother, Crone) of neo-pagan belief.
Dianic Wicca is quite nearly a synonym for “lesbian paganism” or “feminist witchcraft.” It was founded by a crazy Hungarian-born woman known as Zsuzsanna Budapest who became a feminist, divorced her husband, abandoned her two sons and turned lesbian.

Marian Zimmer Bradley was a monster whose occult beliefs and deviant sexuality were widely viewed as “progressive” among leftist bohemian avant-garde intellectuals. The Commie Dopehead Sex Maniacs of the 1960s did not suddenly appear out of nowhere. The philosophy of the Sexual Revolution had been developed in preceding decades by Wilhelm Reich, Alfred Kinsey and Hugh Hefner, among others.

Feminism’s distinctive contribution to this perverse ideology was somewhat belated and widely misunderstood. However, if you read Karla Jay’s Tales of the Lavender Menace (pp. 195-207) you will find that this lesbian feminist (who subsequently became director of Women’s and Gender Studies at Pace University) spent some time in the 1970s hanging out with Jeff Poland. He was co-founder of the Sexual Freedom League and the Psychedelic Venus Church (PVC) and Karla Jay’s book describes orgies that went on at the PVC. Not coincidentally, Jeff Poland was a pedophile who spent five years as a fugitive in Australia after he was charged with sexually molesting an 8-year-old girl. According to radical feminist Nikki Craft, Poland committed his crime while baby-sitting for a couple at a “swinger” party hosted by a nudist group. It is interesting to note, in Craft’s article, that Jeff Poland was friendly with Lee Baxandall, founder of The Naturist Society. Baxandall’s wife, Ros Baxandall, was an early leader of radical feminism, a member of both the Redstockings and W.I.T.C.H. (Women’s International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell).

Nudists, feminists, “swingers,” pedophiles, lesbians, witches — every kind of madness was unleashed from Pandora’s Box in the 1960s, and justified as a rejection of Christianity and sexual “repression.”

Katy Faust was raised by a lesbian couple after her mother divorced her father. She became a Christian activist (her husband is a pastor) and her blog Ask the Bigot features well-informed criticism of the LGBT agenda. Last July, she published a lengthy account by Marion Zimmer Bradley’s daughter Moira Greyland, which included this concise summary of her parents’ pagan sexual cult beliefs:

My observation of my father and mother’s actual belief is this: since everyone is naturally gay, it is the straight establishment that makes everyone hung up and therefore limited. Sex early will make people willing to have sex with everyone, which will bring about the utopia while eliminating homophobia and helping people become “who they really are.” It will also destroy the hated nuclear family with its paternalism, sexism, ageism (yes, for pedophiles, that is a thing) and all other “isms.” If enough children are sexualized young enough, gayness will suddenly be “normal” and accepted by everyone, and the old fashioned notions about fidelity will vanish. As sex is integrated as a natural part of every single relationship, the barriers between people will vanish, and the utopia will appear, as “straight culture” goes the way of the dinosaur. As my mother used to say: “Children are brainwashed into believing they don’t want sex.”

Many of these beliefs, especially hatred of “old fashioned notions” about marriage and family, are now considered mainstream in feminism. When will people wake up to the danger of this satanic wickedness?

“Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”
— Exodus 22:18 (KJV)

Jehovah was quite clear about this and, while I certainly do not advocate a return to Salem circa 1692, it seems to me foolish to ignore the possibility that supernatural evil really exists. You might believe in witches, too, if you spend enough time staring into The Feminist Abyss.

“Ye shall be as gods” (Genesis 3:5) was the false promise of Satan’s original lie. https://t.co/t77KB9H1NI pic.twitter.com/xkCzVSBGDR

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) July 4, 2016

+ + + + + +

The Sex Trouble project has been supported by contributions from readers. The first edition of Sex Trouble: Radical Feminism and the War on Human Nature is available from Amazon.com, $11.96 in paperback or $1.99 in Kindle ebook format.

Be afraid, America. Be very afraid. pic.twitter.com/nJP3EL2lAe

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) July 4, 2016

Category: Gays, Sex Trouble

Rule 5 Sunday: Independence Day Weekend Edition

Posted on | July 3, 2016 | 6 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

It’s time once again to commemorate the original #Brexit, and what better way to remember the great deeds of our Founders than by reading “The Americans Who Risked Everything,”, the powerful tale of just how much some of the Declaration of Independence’s signers gave up to make us free. On a happier note, by this time of year, the beaches and pools are full of young ladies in attractive swimwear: for example, Kate Upton. As usual, many of the following links are to pics normally considered NSFW; failure to exercise discretion in the time and place of clicking does not make us responsible for your problems.

Salute!

Goodstuff leads off this week with Vica Kerekes, who he describes as “the Czech Christina Hendricks”, followed by Animal Magnetism with Rule 5 Gun Policy Friday, the Saturday Gingermageddon, and a bonus Independence Day patriotic totty dump! The Last Tradition offers Miranda Kerr and Bridget Malcolm, and the First Street Journal has American Soldiers for Independence Day.

EBL’s thundering herd this week includes the B52s, Misty Snow, Sailing for Westeros, Amy Schumer, and Seven Brides for Seven Brothers.

A View from the Beach brings us The Humans, “Letter”, Never Has Business Seemed So Compelling, Dogs: So Nice We Tamed Them Twice, Gone Fishin’, Top Gun Star Get CCW Permit, A Wild Swedish Girl, and Why Skye Hates Iran.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Roseline Luo Zilin, his vintage babe is Barbara Leigh, Sex in Advertising is covered by Victoria’s Secret, and there’s also Women of PETA LI. At Dustbury, it’s Bai Ling and Carol Alt.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery! Deadline to submit links to the Rule 5 Wombat mailbox for next week’s Rule 5 Sunday is midnight on Saturday, July 9.

Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop

Category: Rule 5

Feminism Means Women Must Kill Babies (and Silence Anyone Who Disagrees)

Posted on | July 3, 2016 | 49 Comments

“Especially important is the warning to avoid conversations with the demon. . . . He is a liar. The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don’t listen to him. Remember that — do not listen.”
— The Exorcist (1973)

St. Olaf College (annual tuition $42,940) is a formerly Christian school that now offers LGBTQ scholarships, teaches courses in gay sexuality, and sponsors a student organization called Gay, Lesbian or Whatever! (GLOW) “that welcomes and affirms the identity and expression of all genders and sexualities.” St. Olaf’s anti-Christian curriculum includes a department of Women’s and Gender Studies, where “students explore scholarship about women and gender across cultures and throughout history to examine intersections of gender, race, class, sexual orientation, nationality, ability, religion, and age.” Because no Christian parent would let their child go anywhere near St. Olaf’s College, it is now an elite progressive indoctrination center for the children of rich liberals.

Feminist bloggers have spent the past few days high-fiving each other over the “perfect” and “epic” letter to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune written by Heidi Seltz (St. Olaf, Class of 2011):

ABORTION
It’d be nice if men would shut up
and editors would help them
To the two men whose anti-abortion letters were published June 28: Unless you have a woman’s body, I don’t want to hear your opinion on what women’s bodies should or should not do. In fact, it would be a delight if the Star Tribune Editorial Board ceased publishing men’s letters about women’s bodies entirely. Perhaps newspaper readership among young people would grow if every time we opened a paper, we didn’t have to read old men’s fusty opinions about uteri.
Heidi Seltz, Afton

This is what feminism is about. It is not about “equality.” Feminism is about hating men, hating God, killing babies and silencing anyone who disagrees with feminism’s anti-Christian totalitarian agenda.

Never talk to a feminist. Avoid conversations with the demon.

Feminism: Males must be silenced.
Men are always wrong about everything,
because NO UTERUS! https://t.co/lDyPlWDBtU pic.twitter.com/upG2mSp1ME

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) July 3, 2016

Nurses Share How Babies Born Alive After Abortions are Killed or Left to Die https://t.co/V8otB1G90f pic.twitter.com/PcnJN42VkR

— Steven Ertelt (@StevenErtelt) July 3, 2016

262 Babies Saved From Abortions in Minnesota as Abortions Drop to Lowest Point Since 1974 https://t.co/nkz5PclCB9 pic.twitter.com/MrNjguzz8Q

— Steven Ertelt (@StevenErtelt) July 1, 2016