The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Brett Kimberlin Gets Spanked

Posted on | August 5, 2014 | 25 Comments

“Brett Kimberlin does not want people writing about his past — a past that includes convictions for serial bombing, drug smuggling, perjury, and even impersonating a member of the military.”
— Ace of Spades, June 8, 2012

Another day, another denial — actually Brett Kimberlin had two motions denied today by U.S. District Court Judge George Hazel in the federal lawsuit that John Hoge has dubbed Kimberlin v. the Universe, et al.

Hoge has the latest letter order, in which the judge denies (a) Kimberlin’s request for additional time to file a motion for a preliminary injunction, and (b) Kimberlin’s request for a ruling on his previous attempt to disqualify Paul Alan Levy, who is the lawyer defending Ace of Spades’ anonymity. Both of these denials were delivered with decisive brutality — the judge saying in effect, “Stop bothering me with your badly argued and legally flawed nonsense, you creep” — but Kimberlin got taught an especially embarrassing lesson on the Levy matter:

Finally, Plaintiff has sent a letter to the Court (see ECF No. 174) urging the Court “to rule on [a] Motion to Disqualify [Counsel]” (see ECF No. 174) that Plaintiff previously filed on February 26, 2014. See ECF No. 93. That motion, however, is no longer pending on the Court’s docket. In fact, that motion has not been on the Court’s docket since March 4, 2014, when the Clerk of Court terminated it due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s February 21, 2014 Letter Order. See ECF No. 96. Obviously, the Court cannot rule on a motion that is not currently pending on its docket. If Plaintiff wishes to file a Motion to Disqualify Counsel, he must file a Request pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Case Management Order. See ECF No. 97

Here’s the thing: Kimberlin seems to have been so overcome by wrath toward Paul Alan Levy — and gosh, I wonder why — that Brett completely forgot that his original attempt to have Levy removed from the case had never even been accepted by the court, because Kimberlin had failed to comply with a previous order by the court.

Aaron Walker, who has endured more of Kimberlin’s abusive lawfare than anyone, explains the larger significance of all this:

As you might remember, when Paul Levy entered the case Brett when into full whine mode and filed an improper motion to have Levy disqualified.  This was just after the court first decided to attempt to restrict the flow of filings in this case (more than 80 documents ago), and rather than obey the court’s order and request leave to file a motion to disqualify, he just filed it, and the judge returned it to him as improper.
But that is not what this is really about.  What this is really about, in my humble opinion, is that Paul Levy wrote a fairly devastating blog post last week about the case. Really, seriously, read all of it. Not only was that pretty harmful to Brett’s public reputation (based on facts that cannot be denied), but it was pretty widely read.  For instance, it was Instalanched. And it was WashingtonPostalanched, via the Volokh Conspiracy.  Long time readers know that Mr. Volokh helped me out last year when Brett obtained a blatantly unconstitutional peace order forbidding me to even mention Brett Kimberlin’s name for six months.

You can read the whole thing. Aaron also discusses the “scattered” thinking behind Brett’s motion in regard to Ace’s anonymity, from which I’ll quote this little sample paragraph:

Contrary to counsel’s argument, Ace of Spades engaged in wholesale and per se defamation against Plaintiff, not once, but multiple times. . . . For example, he falsely stated, imputed and published in five articles that Plaintiff committed the crime of “swattings,” that he was involved with “terrorism” and “murder,” that he was trying to “kill” people,” that he is a “thug” and “nefarious,” that he is running “scams,” that he is engaged in “lawless vigilantism,” the he is involved with “ongoing crimes,” that he is engaged in “alarming harassments,” that he is a “menace,” that he is a “one-man crime wave,” the he is “escalating” his criminal activities, that he is engaged in a “crime in progress,” that he is “abusing and corrupting” the justice system, that his life is one of “escalat[ing] risk taking,” that he is “a dangerous man,” that he is engaged in “digital” and “real life terrorism,” that he is a malicious threat to society,” and that he is engaged in “lawfare.” Not only did Ace of Spades make these defamatory statements and publications, he demanded action by others, including Congress, to stop Plaintiff through various actions including passing a bill of attainder. His publications were a call to arms against Plaintiff based on defamatory hysteria — either stop Plaintiff or terrible things will happen. Ace of Spades was using his defamatory statements to destroy Plaintiff by any means.

To which Ace’s lawyer should reply: “You mad, bro?”

“I have filed over a hundred lawsuits and another one will be no sweat for me. On the other hand, it will cost you a lot of time and money . . .”
— Brett Kimberlin, Oct. 10, 2010


By the way, in one of his motions in the separate Maryland state case Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., this is Kimberlin’s Exhibit A:

Why did Brett Kimberlin insist on making that Twitter message a part of the public record in his $1 million lawsuit? I don’t know.

Just reporting the facts here, folks.

Maybe you think Brett Kimberlin is a nefarious thug and a malicious threat to society, and nobody is preventing you from researching Kimberlin’s criminal career and judging for yourself. Whatever you do, don’t include a Pedobear cartoon of Kimberlin in a Twitter message, or the (alleged) “one-man crime wave” might sue you for a million dollars.

Consider yourself warned.

HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!

 

 

Category: The Kimberlin Files

Kentucky Democrat Race-Baits McConnell’s Wife; Deletes ‘Asian’ Tweets

Posted on | August 5, 2014 | 35 Comments

Kathy Groob is a Democrat Party stategist in Kentucky, where Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell is fighting for re-election against Democrat Alison Grimes. Saturday, in a complete non sequitur, Groob sent out a series of Twitter messages saying that McConnell’s wife, former Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, “isn’t from KY, she is Asian.”

Groob’s tweets quickly disappeared — indeed, she deleted her entire Twitter account — but not before Phillip Bailey, political editor for Louisville public radio station WFPL screen-capped the “Asian” messages. Democrats rushed to condemn the messages, but this certainly isn’t the first time Chao’s ethnicity has made her the target of Democrat race-card tricks in this campaign. They were doing this stuff last year, back when it was still rumored that movie star Ashley Judd was going to seek the Democrat nomination against McConnell.

Question: How is this different from “birther” attacks on Obama?

How is it that Democrats get a free pass for doing this kind of stuff to Republicans, yet object vehemently to anyone who dares mention that the president’s father was a Kenyan socialist? If “the personal is political” — as feminists have been insisting for more than four decades — why is it these kind of identity-politics arguments are only acceptable if they help elect Democrats and advance a left-wing agenda? Far be it from me to argue that one’s personal experience, including perceptions about ethnicity, are always irrelevant to politics. Dinesh D’Souza (who, last time I checked, wasn’t from Kentucky, either) was roundly vilified for arguing that Obama’s worldview was profoundly influenced by his father’s anti-British/anti-colonialist/anti-capitalist attitudes.

D’Souza’s argument was less “racist” than the arguments of liberals who routinely claim that anyone who opposes Obama is a racist. And certainly, D’Souza’s own worldview has been shaped by his personal experience. In order to be a conservative Indian-American, after all, one must reject the kind of anti-Western attitudes — the residual resentments of colonialism — which D’Souza saw in the attitudes of Obama and Obama’s father. And I would argue that, whatever one’s ethnicity, for any “outsider” or underdog to succeed in America, it is necessary to resist the temptation to resent successful people. If you don’t want to be a loser, you must learn to emulate winners, not envy them.

Whatever your disadvantages in life, or whatever unfair privileges others may enjoy, determination, hard work and an honest character can overcome any obstacle anyone puts in your way. Resolve yourself to work hard despite every discouragement and to learn the lessons of every failure. Study the examples of others who have triumphed over adversity. Make a vow that, whether you ultimately win or lose, no one will ever be able to say that you failed because you didn’t work hard enough. Develop the kind of mental toughness that enables you to survive amid crisis and confusion. Constantly improve your skills, learning whatever you need to know to become better at whatever it is you do. Be flexible and quick to adapt to new circumstances. Learn to recognize opportunity. Become resourceful, so that no problem you encounter leaves you helpless. Most of all, remember that your struggle has a purpose that transcends your narrow selfish desires.

If God has chosen you to do great things, your success will be to His glory. God’s chastisement of your weakness and lack of faith — for this is what your failures really are — should be welcomed with gratitude, for by such chastisement is your faith tested, so that you become more humble, recognizing your debt to God’s grace, even as you grow stronger with each failure. God has some reason for all your toils and setbacks. God is testing you and teaching you, so that you will be ready to fulfill whatever purpose He has for your life. Therefore, thank God for your struggle, and determine to work harder every day to be prepared for whatever He may choose for your task.

This is my belief, and as D’Souza is a Christian, I presume that it is his belief also. Faith in God and a belief in the value of hard work were both crucial to the founding of this nation. We fight to defend our liberty and to defend our faith, and if it should be necessary, we will fight to defend America against any enemy, because we know that America truly represents the last hope for humanity. As Ronald Reagan once said, people come to America in search of freedom, but where will we go if we lose freedom here?

Elaine Chao is not exactly my favorite Republican. She’s not the kind of ferocious, two-fisted, red-meat, right-wing populist who gets me fired up. She’s a Chamber of Commerce type who speaks generally for the interests of big business. Nor is her husband a politician I admire; to be honest, I’m not even sure I would vote for McConnell if I lived in Kentucky. Nevertheless, insofar as Elaine Chao’s ethnicity is of any relevance to this election in Kentucky, it is as an example of how the American Dream is still very much alive. She arrived in America in 1961 as an 8-year-old who didn’t speak English, yet through hard work she got a Harvard MBA, became the Secretary of Labor and married a man who has become the most powerful Republican in Washington.

It is this kind of success story that should make every parent scream at their children: “Turn off that TV! Put down that videogame console! Pick up a book and start studying, you lazy brats! This is America! If Elaine Chao can make it, you’ve got no excuse!”

Such is the true lesson of Elaine Chao’s life, but Democrats . . . well, they’re Democrats, and if appeals to racism or sexism will help elect Democrats, this is what we expect from them. Last summer, when Alison Grimes announced her Democrat candidacy, Kathy Groob gushed all gooey what a wonderful thing it was for women:

Kathy Groob, a Covington-based political consultant and author of the book Pink Politics which focuses on female candidates and the way they can win, is supportive of a Grimes candidacy.
“Alison’s announcement (Monday) is an important step for women in politics in Kentucky and across the country,” said Groob, who attended the press conference in Frankfort. “When a 34-year-old accomplished woman is ready to take on one of the most powerful political men in the country, it’s a great day for women.”

Yeah, “a great day for women.” The feminist message in Kentucky:

“Vote Democrat, because you have a vagina!
And that Republican guy is married to a Chink.”

You stay classy, Kentucky Democrats.

 

Category: Democrats, Kentucky, Mitch McConnell, Racism

LIVE AT FIVE: 08.05.14

Posted on | August 5, 2014 | 5 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
Israel Accepts 72-Hour Truce With Hamas

A good start

IDF had been considering pulling troops out of Gaza without cease-fire deal
IDF finishes destroying tunnels, kills Islamic Jihad commander



Second American Ebola Patient En Route To US For Care
NY man “unlikely to have Ebola”, Health Department says

Toledo Water Ban Lifted
All clear given for use of Lake Erie water



POLITICS
Tea Party Insurgents Looking For Upsets In GOP Senate Primaries This Week

Milton Wolf and Joe Carr seek to knock out incumbent GOP senators in Kansas, Tennessee

Both challengers lag by double digits, hope to emulate Dave Brat’s upset of Eric Cantor


Colorado Governor Strikes Key Fracking Deal


Pressure Builds On Walsh To Resign Over Plagiarism

Gun Control Advocate James Brady Dies, 73

McDaniel Challenges GOP Primary Loss To Cochran, Cites Vote Irregularities

Administration Closing Centers For Illegal Minors On Military Bases

Democratic Strategist Erases Twitter Account After Making Racist Remarks About Mitch McConnell’s Wife

Texas Abortionists Press Judge To Block Portions Of New Law

Firm Running Federal Charity Drive In California Misspent Millions



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Up On Supply Disruption Fears: WTI $98.43, Brent $105.60
Feds Start Civil Probe Of Subprime Car Loans
Late Surge Lifts Wall Street; Utilities Sag
Gannett Reportedly Buying Remainder Of Cars.com For $1.8 Billion
LinkedIn Settles Overtime Violation Charges For $6 Million
Porn Out, Hotels In As Sunset Strip Reborn
Xiaomi Overtakes Samsung For Sales Lead In Red China
Google Defends Child-Porn Tipoffs To Police
DirecTV Agrees To Deal With SEC Network
Comcast Extending Its $10/Month Internet Program For The Poor
Google Removes “Bomb Gaza” App After Outcry



SPORTS
NASCAR The Big Winner With Jeff And Junior On Top

Dale Earnhardt Jr. doused by his crew after winning at Pocono

In the dog days of summer, everything is going right for stock car racing

Giants Rally To Beat Mets 4-3; Cain To Have Season-Ending Shoulder Surgery

Tribe Scalps Reds 7-1; Kluber Now 12-6

Pale Hose Beat Rangers 5-3 In Rain-Shortened Game

Angels Blank Dodgers 5-0 In Start Of Freeway Series

Yankees Edge Tigers 2-1


O’s Handle Roark, Nationals 7-3



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Tara Reid Thought “Sharknado” Would End Her Career

Experiencing a career resurgence thanks to her fishy friends

Could a third installment be in the works?

Zooey Deschanel Splits From BF Of Two Years

Should We All Calm Down A Bit About Those Studio Ghibli Rumors?


“Big Bang Theory” Stars Parsons, Galecki & Cuoco Sign Big New Deals

Sandra Bullock Tops Forbes’ List Of Highest-Earning Actresses At $51 Million

CNN Sued Over Correspondent Who Bit EMTs In Drunken Rage

Sony Launches Female Superhero Movie Mining Spiderman Universe

Sylvester Stallone Wants Signourney Weaver For “The Expendabelles”

Nickelodeon Orders Live-Action “School Of Rock” Series



FOREIGNERS
Many Ukrainian Soldiers Cross Into Russia Amid Shelling
Rescuers Battle To Clear Bodies After 400 Die In China Quake
World Dignitaries Attend WWI Commemorative Services In Britain, Belgium
Iraq Offers Air Support To Kurds
Death Toll From Ebola In West Africa Nears 900
Chicoms Probe Canadian Cafe Owners For Stealing State Secrets
WTO Failure Points To Fragmented Future For World Trade
Juncker Downplays Prospect Of Full Write-Off For Greece
Germany Blocks Shipment Of Military Training Gear To Russia
China Test Looms For Widodo As Indonesia Faces Xi’s Campaign
Libya’s New Parliament Calls For Unity As Rival Militias Clash



BLOGS & STUFF
Doug Powers: Stay Classy – Nancy Pelosi’s “Unusual Breach Of Decorum” On The House Floor
Twitchy: Katie Pavlich Shreds Marc Lamont Hill’s Equivocation On Israel And Hamas
American Power: Wolf Blitzer Calls Out Hamas Spokesman For Blood Libel Against Jews
BLACKFIVE: The Laws Of War And Killing Civilians
Conservatives4Palin: How The Kook Fringe Is Taking Over The Democratic Party
Don Surber: Political Scoreboard, August 4
Joe For America: Obamacare Architect Lies, Media Ignores
JustOneMinute: In ObamaWorld, It’s Never The Right Time To Arm Our Allies
Protein Wisdom: Calling Your Daughter A Princess Is Sexist Now
Shot In The Dark: Rep. Ron Erhard – “I’ll Blow Your Head Off”
STUMP: Are Metropolitan Opera Workers Underpaid?
The Gateway Pundit: Dem Rep Gutierrez Blasts GOP – “They Despise And Hate All Our Children”
The Jawa Report: Captured Hamas Combat Manual Explains Benefits Of Using Civilians
The Lonely Conservative: Lame Response From White House On Why Obama Didn’t Pass Immigration Reform While Dems Ran Everything
This Ain’t Hell: So What Are They Saying In Montana?
Weasel Zippers: Pic Of The Day – Israelis Have A Message For Obama
Megan McArdle: Unions Are Lovin’ McDonald’s Labor Ruling


Category: Live at Five

Neal Rauhauser’s ‘Lubed Up’ Criminal Pervert Buddy, Thomas Retzlaff

Posted on | August 4, 2014 | 42 Comments

Neal Rauhauser (@nrauhauser) is sufficiently notorious that I hesitate to describe him, knowing that most regular readers here are thoroughly familiar with this heinous Internet troll. He was a Democrat campaign consultant and Daily Kos contributor who, in 2010, was accused of running a weird online harassment scheme that became known as “TwitterGate.” In 2011, Rauhauser re-emerged as a so-called “Weiner Truther,” promoting a conspiracy theory that the Anthony Weiner sex scandal was a “hack” perpetrated by Andrew Breitbart. Subsequently, Rauhauser was part of what Patrick “Patterico” Frey called a “campaign of political terrorism” that Frey said was directed at him and other enemies of Brett Kimberlin. At one point, Rauhauser used the online alias “Gaped Crusader” to smear and harass Frey. It was Rauhauser’s connection to Kimberlin, a notorious criminal, that first attracted my attention to the Kimberlin case, which has resulted in two lawsuits where I am named among the defendants.

So, if you previously had no idea who Neal Rauhauser is, now you know.

More recently, Rauhauser has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by James McGibney of Bullyville.com. One of Rauhauser’s co-defendants in that lawsuit is Thomas Retzlaff, a Texas resident with a frightening criminal history. Bullyville has posted a 1998 court document filed by Texas officials, which reads in part:

During the course of [Retzlaff’s] ten-year-marriage to [his ex-wife] … [Retzlaff] participated in several extra-marital affairs. . .. He also owned a collection of pornographic books, magazines, and videotapes which were often left in areas of the home accessible to the children. . . . He kept these materials for the purpose of masturbation. . . . [Retzlaff] often masturbated in the living room using a can of Crisco while the children were home and able to observe him. . . .
[His wife] witnessed [Retzlaff] videotaping himself and his girlfriend having sex in the living room. . . . On another occasion, [Retzlaff] videotaped himself forcibly sodomizing his wife in the living room while the children were in their bedrooms. Toward the end of the videotaped scene, his wife is screaming in pain.

Thomas Retzlaff is a real classy guy, eh? Exactly how Retzlaff got mixed up with Rauhauser, and with Rauhauser’s known associate Lane Lipton (a/k/a “Qritiq”) is a very interesting story:

You can click to see it larger, but let me quote:

“Defendant Thomas Retzlaff was a prolific use of these ‘revenge porn’ sites. Plaintiff Mr. McGibney has identified at least 18 victims (mostly female) whose personal information and/or nude images Retzlaff has posted on revenge porn sites . . .
“It has also been proven that Defendant Retzlaff posted his own daughter on numerous revenge porn websites. Within one site, where he uploaded naked images of his own daughter, he stated, ‘I wanna rape her, I will see u in El Paso Brittany.'”

Here’s more (click to enlarge any image):

You can read the rest of that in McGibney v. Retzlaff, et al. The way I became familiar with all this? Well, this morning, I got a call from someone on Rauhauser’s enemies list. This person explained a pattern of harassment familiar to me and, realizing the common denominator involved, I issued a series of Twitter warnings:

Do I know exactly what kind of online mischief Neal Rauhauser has been involved with the past few months? No, but when Rauhauser’s enemies find themselves being harassed, it’s a reasonable surmise to suspect Neal is behind the harassment.

Yeah, Neal’s a sick freak, and his friends are all creepy, too.

 



 

 

 

Category: The Kimberlin Files

Rule 5 Monday

Posted on | August 4, 2014 | 8 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Unusually this week, Rule 5 got a shot in the, er, arm thanks to the Israeli punitive expedition into Gaza. A patriotic group of ladies (and a few men) bared their bodies, often inscribed with “I (heart) IDF” on the Standing With IDF Facebook page, which after a brief takedown by the libtards at Facebook returned with a big splash. Many of the photos are borderline NSFW – much like some of the links posted below, which is as much of a disclaimer as you’re getting this week.

Goodstuff leads off this week with Alien Morgan Fairchild and ComicCon Thailand, followed by Animal Magnetism with Rule 5 Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon. Ninety Miles from Tyranny checks in with Morning Mistress, Hot Pick of the Late Night, and Girls with Guns; Blackmailers Don’t Shoot adds ComicCon 2014 Rule 5, and First Street JOurnal has the very topical Fighting For Their Flag.

EBL began the week with Rock & Roll Lifestyle (featuring Lyda Loudon), and followed that with ComicCon, Gal Gadot, Disney’s Princess Jasmine, Jennifer Rubin, Blake Lively, Fifty Shades of Gray trailer, Crazy Eyes, and Dana Loesch: Separated by Sanity.

A View from the Beach offered Isla Fisher – Dying for an Acting Job (Almost), Go Pro!, Eat Your Veggies – and Die, Jealous Old Crone Resents Competition From Lovely Young Rival, Butterfly du Jour, The Pole Dancing School, Foxes and Go Pros, “Hideaway”, and Cuties Dance. No cavegirl content this week, but too much Frazetta goodness would only spoil us anyway. 🙂

Soylent Refuge brought us coffee without dessert first, followed by a new linky-love contender, Monday Motivationer At The Beach, Evening Awesome String of Pearls, Tuesday Titillation With Tongue, Overnighty Window Dressing, Humpday Hawtness Hillary, The Wrong 4th Of July Celebration, Fursday Fiery Fantastic, Afternoon Aaaargh, Must Be A Southern Hemisphere Thing, Corsets Strings and Things, T-GIF Friday Scissors, Overnighty Awesome, WeekEnder Tinna, and Bath Night Buoyancy.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe was Jasmine Walz, his vintage Babe was Linda Purl, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Coco Ho. Also, Sexual Harassment at ComicCon! At Dustbury, it’s Jessica Williams and Charli XCX.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery! Deadline to submit links to the Rule 5 Wombat mailbox for next week’s Rule 5 roundup is midnight on Saturday, August 9.


Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop

.

Category: Rule 5

Can Mitch McConnell Survive?

Posted on | August 4, 2014 | 108 Comments

Sam Youngman of the Daily Beast has a feature-style article about the annual Fancy Farm barbecue in Kentucky that is the traditional kickoff of the campaign season there, focusing on the Senate race between Mitch McConnell and Alison Lundergan Grimes:

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell rolled up his sleeves and walked to the podium on stage at the brand new pavilion at Kentucky’s annual Fancy Farm picnic.
As McConnell geared up to rail against President Barack Obama and his “Kentucky candidate” Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes, he began by noting that, “Fancy Farm is fun, but there are serious problems facing our country.”
“YOU!” someone in the crowd shouted for all to hear.

The real political analysis is way down in the story:

Grimes has struggled since Kentucky’s May 20 primary, and while the race is a dead-heat, McConnell has edged into a slight lead, claiming momentum but still falling short of 50 percent in almost every poll. . . .
[O]ne reason McConnell is ahead and still favored to win this race is that both he and the outside groups supporting him have run a relentless campaign to tie coal and President Barack Obama’s unpopularity (the Bluegrass Poll released last week showed the president at 28 percent favorable) to Grimes.
In Eastern and Western Kentucky, where coal fields are pitching in to supply 43 percent of the nation’s electricity and both Democrats and Republicans believe that Obama is trying to murder their industry, livelihood and culture, Grimes’ numbers are down as McConnell appears at this stage in the game to have found the right vehicle for his anti-Obama message.

You can read the rest, but this is the baseline in Kentucky: McConnell is consistently polling below 50 percent, an indicator of trouble for any incumbent. His Democrat challenger, however, has been unable to take advantage of McConnell’s weakness because Democrat Party policies are so far to the left — not just culturally out of touch with Kentucky voters’ values, but directly opposed to their economic interests.

So a weird sort of stalemate grips the campaign, and we await the turning point that will decide the election. The lamentable part of this situation, from the GOP perspective, is that McConnell and the National Republican Senatorial Committee have spent the past 18 months crushing the enthusiasm of grassroots conservatives, waging a campaign to exterminate the Tea Party. The arguably criminal — certainly dishonest and unethical — conduct of the Mississippi primary campaign to re-elect Thad Cochran was witnessed by every Tea Party activist in the country, Kentucky included. Every deceitful smear against Chris McDaniel in Mississippi was a deliberate “f–k you” to grassroots conservatives, courtesy of the D.C.-based Republican political establishment of which Mitch McConnell is the official leader. If it weren’t for this factor — the transparent selfishness and corruption of McConnell and his GOP Senate cronies — the Senate race in Kentucky would not even be close. The major obstacle to McConnell’s re-election is not the usual problem of wooing undecided “swing” voters; his problem is that many thousands of Kentucky conservatives have little motive to vote for him in November.

As a conservative who profoundly despises Mitch McConnell and everything that unprincipled swine stands for, I feel guilty offering his campaign good advice, but the crisis facing our nation requires me to transcend my personal animosity to the man.

Therefore, I advise this: Get evil.

It’s time for McConnell, the NRSC and the Kentucky Republican Party to unleash against Alison Lundergan Grimes the kind of sneaky underhanded Nixonian dirty tricks that the GOP establishment used against Chris McDaniel in Mississippi:

  1. Racism — You can play this both ways. First and most obviously, circulate anonymous e-mails to rural white voters insinuating that Grimes is not only politically involved in promoting miscegenation in Kentucky schools, but is secretly engaged in an interracial affair herself. Meanwhile, you target black Democrats with anonymous e-mails that accuse Grimes of betraying civil rights and secretly harboring white supremacist tendencies. If the Grimes campaign finds out and blames Republicans for the e-mails, you say this proves that Grimes is a paranoid extremist.
  2. Anti-Semitism — Again, your dirty tricks squad will want to play the hate card both ways. Jewish voters will be targeted with messages claiming that the Grimes campaign is funded by wealthy Arabs and staffed by Muslim Brotherhood members who are working to elect Grimes, a fanatical Hamas supporter, to the Senate. Meanwhile, you assign a few operatives to troll neo-Nazi and 9/11 “Truther” Internet forums, claiming that Grimes is not merely a neocon warmonger, but is actually a Jew. “What kind of name is ‘Lundergan,’ huh? She made that up. Her real name is Lunderberg.”
  3. Homophobia — Here’s where you really pull out all the stops. You cover your bases by sending out anonymous messages to LGBT voters that Grimes is a hateful homophobe, but your main effort is to convince religious voters that Grimes is a radical lesbian, and you need to micro-target this message for maximum effect. For evangelicals, you tell them Grimes is having a gay affair with a black woman. You tell orthodox Jews that Grimes’ secret lesbian lover is a Palestinian Arab (one of her Muslim Brotherhood staffers). On neo-Nazi and 9/11 Truther forums, of course, your trolls claim Alison Lunderberg’s secret lesbian girlfriend is a Jew.

A dishonest smear campaign like this would be unethical and perhaps even illegal, but considering what the GOP establishment did to Chris McDaniel in Mississippi, why not do it to a Democrat?

 

Category: Election, Kentucky, Mitch McConnell, Senate

LIVE AT FIVE: 08.04.14

Posted on | August 4, 2014 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
Israel Plans Cease-Fire In Parts Of Gaza

Ceasefire would allow displaced Palestinians to return home

Truce does not apply to Rafah; IDF will return fire if attacked
Israel begins withdrawing troops
IDF says missing soldier Hadar Goldin is dead




First Of Two Ebola Patients Arrives In Georgia For Treatment
Ebola vaccine possible, but doubts persist

Narendra Modi Wins Hearts And Minds In Nepal
Uses Nepali language in gripping speech to Nepal’s parliament



POLITICS
McConnell, Grimes Trade Jabs At Kentucky Political Picnic

The Senate Minority Leader waits to speak at the Fancy Farm picnic

Snark and pointed remarks flowed freely at St. Jerome’s

Pols Bash Administration’s Handling Of Israel-Hamas Ceasefire

CA Battle Over Right To Concealed Carry Could Be Headed For Supreme Court

FL To Begin Redrawing Unconstitutional Election Maps Thursday

Rubio Defends His Immigration Plan, Calls Obama’s Policy A “Lure”

Air Force Academy Superintendent Calls For Probe Following Reports Of Rape, Drug Use, Cheating

Teacher Tenure A Likely Presidential Issue In 2016?

Sen. Chambliss Defends Enhanced Interrogation Measures Post-9/11

Rep. Pelosi Confronts GOP Congressman In Rancorous Debate



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Up Slightly, Capped By Weak Demand: WTI $97.93, Brent $105.01
Portugal Splits Banco Espirito Santo In $6.6 Billion Rescue
Asian Shares Pressured By Wall Street, Geopolitical Tensions
Trucks, SUVs Boost US Auto Sales
P&G To Divest Over Half Its Brands
Colorado’s Edible Pot Facing Tighter Rules On Packaging, Potency
Iliad May Face Tough Battle Cutting Costs At T-Mobile
Google Sells Mystery Barge For Scrap In Portland
Austrian Student Launches Class Action Suit Against Facebook
Microsoft Sues Samsung
USB Security Flaw Lets Hackers Hijack PCs



SPORTS
Beckett’s Struggles Continue As Dodgers Fall To Cubs Again

Hanley Ramirez makes an over-the-shoulder catch

Can’t finish five innings as Cubs pound Dodgers 7-3


Tribe Edges Rangers In Extras, 4-3

Dale Earnhardt Jr. Surges To Late Victory At Pocono

Bumgarner K’s 10 As Giants Blank Mets 9-0

Twins Pound Pale Hose Bullpen In 16-3 Rout

Reds Take Series From Fish With 7-3 Win


Buchholz Struggles With Everything As Red Sox Fall To Yankees

Tillman Outduels Iwakuma; O’s Top M’s 1-0

Feldman Goes The Distance At Home As Astros Beat Jays 6-1

Braves Skid Extends To Six As Padres Win 4-3

Royals Hang On To Beat A’s 4-2

Tigers Blank Rockies 4-0 For The Sweep

Angels Top Rays 7-5

Cards Rally To Make Lackey A Winner Over Brewers

Strasburg Returns To Form As Nats Own Hamels, Phillies 4-0



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Jennifer Garner Pregnant?

Sure looks like a baby bump…

Would be child #4 for Garner and Ben Affleck

“Guardians Of The Galaxy” $160.4 Million Breaks Records But Not Summer Slump

“American Idol” Alum Michael Johns Dies, 35

“Transformers: Age Of Extinction” Passes $1 Billion

“Ghostbusters 3” Targets Paul Feig As Director; Reboot Will Focus On Female Ghostbusters


Cheryl Hines Marries Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“Wire” Actor Anwan Glover Stabbed At DC Nightclub

Unspeakable Armenian Reunites With Paris Hilton

Sia Furler Marries Erik Anders Lang

Remy Ma Released From Prison After Six Years

Lionsgate Sues Over “Expendables 3” Leak

“Gray’s Anatomy: Star Ellen Pompeo Developing ABC Family Drama

25 Things You Don’t Know About John Stamos

Jennifer Lawrence And Nicholas Hoult Split

Dolce & Gabbana Demand Anna Wintour Kill Expose

David Gregory Meets With CNN



FOREIGNERS
China Quake Death Toll Hits 381
Investigation Team At Malaysian Airliner Crash Site Finds Personal Belongings But No Human Remains
In Flanders Fields – 100 Years Since The Great War
Booming African Lion Economies Gear Up To Emulate Asian Tigers
Kosi Flood Alert: Bihar Evacuates 50,000 People
Somali Firing Squad Executes Three Jihadis
Chicoms Claim Nearly 100 Killed By Terrorists In Sinkiang
Japan Inc. Seeks To Recover Influence In Brazil
Guamanian Convicted Of Knife Attack On Tourists
Lawyer Says American Imprisoned In Cuba Has Said Goodbye To Wife, Daughter



BLOGS & STUFF
American Power: Communists, Hamas Solidarity Protesters In LA Demand Israel’s Extermination
American Thinker: Three Ninnies And A Jackass – This Week In Gaza
BLACKFIVE: B-1 Bomber For Sale (Visa, Mastercharge Accepted)
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot: Young Man Beclowns YouTube Feminist
Conservatives4Palin: Full Battle Rattle Comforts Vets Through Music
Don Surber: Listen To Our Industry Advocates, Too
Joe For America: Jackie Mason Goes Off On Anti-Israel Celebrities
Protein Wisdom: Study Says Hundreds Of Obama Administration Rules Are Technically Illegal
Shot In The Dark: The Host I Wanted To Be When I Grew Up
STUMP: Following Through – When There Is No “There” There
The Gateway Pundit: Turkey Caught Exporting Ball Bearings To Gaza As “Humanitarian Aid”
The Jawa Report: Confused Democrat Thinks Israel’s Iron Dome Defends Against Tunnel Terrorists
The Lonely Conservative: July Job Report Disappoints, Unemployment Ticks Up, White House Claims This Is Good News
This Ain’t Hell: 550 Army Majors To Get Pink Slips
Weasel Zippers: Rick Perry Says Record Numbers Of Illegals From Syria, Pakistan, And Afghanistan Being Caught At The Border
Megan McArdle: What We’ve Forgotten About Obamacare


Category: Live at Five

Sex Trouble: #DearFeministMen Illustrates a Fundamental Problem

Posted on | August 3, 2014 | 63 Comments

“You can never please a feminist woman. And even feminist women despise men whom they can push around.”
— Charlotte Allen

“That’s what’s wrong with you. You should be kissed and often, and by someone who knows how.”
— Rhett Butler, Gone With the Wind (1939)

Let’s begin by explaining something that should be obvious, but which is seldom stated explicitly. Feminism is a movement of women, by women, for women. Men may support feminism, but they cannot participate in feminism. It’s an exclusive all-girls club.

From this premise — which, as I say, should be obvious — several conclusions may be drawn. For example, we realize that there are financial rewards to be reaped by the female author or journalist who can gain recognition as a “feminist writer.” There is a ready-made market for her books, a readership for her columns, an audience for her lectures/book signings at colleges and conferences. To become that kind of Feminist Celebrity (e.g., Naomi Wolf) is the career objective of many college girls with literary ambitions, most of whom will fall far short of their goal. However, in the process of striving to achieve their Feminist Celebrity aspirations, many of those young wannabes will publish innumerable feminist blog posts, columns, articles and essays. Among these young feminist writers, there is a ferocious competition for that coveted reward, the book contract that will entitle them to call themselves “author,” no matter how small the advance payment, or whether their book actually sells.

This is all part of the Feminist-Industrial Complex, mostly parallel to but sometimes overlapping the campus Women’s Studies grievance factories, and the important thing to remember – returning to our premise — is that it is an exclusive all-girls club.

Knowing this, is it even necessary to explain why “male feminist” is a category that makes no sense whatsoever? Even if a man were willing and able to explain feminist ideology, to apply it to contemporary social problems in columns and blog posts and books, any success he had in this endeavor would be fiercely resented by the women writers whose aspirations were thwarted by his success. If you understand feminism as a career field exclusively for women, you see why there is no market for the male feminist’s work. The college girls majoring in Women’s Studies, who attend lectures and book signings for feminist authors who visit their campuses, are there not just to absorb the Feminist Celebrity’s wisdom, but to gaze in admiration at a role model who represents their own aspirations. The male feminist is never going to be invited to give such lectures, nor are his books going to be included in the syllabus of assigned readings in Women’s Studies classes, not merely because he lacks the requisite personal perspective — “the authority of experience” — to speak of women’s grievances, but also because any success he enjoyed would be viewed (and perhaps rightly so) as having been subtracted from the fixed-pie/zero-sum-game quantity of success available to women authors. A male’s success as a Feminist Celebrity would actually be oppressive to women.

Quod erat demonstrandum.

No matter how much he may sympathize with women’s plight, no matter how adept he is at articulating feminist ideology, no man can ever expect to be accepted in the all-girls club of feminism. John Stoltenberg, a gay man who was the male companion of radical feminist Andrea Dworkin, was one of the few men ever to write books — Refusing to Be a Man (1989) and The End of Manhood (1994) — that are occasionally included in Women’s Studies curricula. Yet even Stoltenberg (who also has the necessary radical feminist credential of being a very bad writer, incidentally) was never more than a peripheral sideshow to the Feminist-Industrial Complex, tolerated rather than celebrated by the movement, a sort of carnival freak-show exhibit: “Come one! Come all! See the Amazing Feminist Man, a bizarre one-of-a-kind creature with a penis, yet capable of cohabiting with the Dreaded Dworkin!”

Stoltenberg was deservedly viewed with contemptuous pity, by contrast to Jeffrey Masson, the millionaire womanizer who bedded radical feminist Catharine MacKinnon, tricking her into believing for a while that he actually wanted to marry her. Handsome, wealthy and brilliant, Masson briefly inspired mystification and envy as the ideal feminist Dream Man. The fact that there was no Happily Ever After ending to their engagement was little remarked by feminists, except to nod at each other and say, “See? I told you there is no such thing as a feminist man.”

‘Feminist’ Date Rapists and Porn Addicts

The Twitter hashtag #DearFeministMen arose as a spontaneous online expression of what Professor Glenn Reynolds calls “shrew culture,” i.e., feminism as a perverse and sadistic desire to humiliate males. Perhaps a psychology graduate student could write a master’s thesis or doctoral dissertation on this phenomenon, were it not for the fact that anyone who expresses overt hostility to feminism would never be able to gain employment in 21st-century academia. But the #DearFeministMen hashtag was swiftly hijacked by conservatives — including the #WomenAgainstFeminism brigades, God bless ’em — who used it to remind these would-be male “allies” of feminism that men are at best irrelevant to the women’s movement and generally viewed with contempt by the feminist rank-and-file.

Amid this burst of hashtag activism, one anti-feminist woman quoted a 2006 blog post by feminist author Janice Erlbaum:

Lately, there’s been a spate of “male feminists” posting at the [Internet bulletin boards] where I lurk. At first I saw them and I thought, great! I mean, I like feminists, and I like men, so you’d think I’d love this purported hybrid of the two. And yet, no, not so much, not so much at all.
As a matter of fact, it’s caused me to realize that most of the men I’ve personally known who have made a huge hairy point of identifying as feminists have been either date rapists, mom fetishists, porn addicts, or bear daddies inflicting their frustrated pseudopaternal tendencies on women. They are some of the most passive-aggressive, patronizing, out-dishing without it-taking twerps on the planet, and they are poisoning the women’s movement from the inside by sapping the hell out of everyone’s goddamn energy.

Preach on, sister! Insofar as feminists want male “allies,” they want male allies who will shut their mouths and nod their heads in mute acquiescence while women get paid to proclaim to the world what wretched and despicable creatures men are. Erlbaum’s perception that many soi-disant “male feminists” are “date rapists” and “porn addicts” was amply vindicated by the 2013 meltdown of Professor Hugo Schwartz. The so-called “porn professor” was exposed as a dangerous psychotic and a compulsive womanizer who had more or less habitually engaged in sex with his female undergraduate students, some of them mere teenagers. Schwartz was emblematic of the kind of male “allies” feminism attracts. It is impossible to imagine any psychologically healthy man supporting a movement devoted to demonizing men, and so we automatically suspect the worst of men who claim to embrace feminism. High-profile “progressive” perverts like Bill Clinton, Elliott Spitzer and Anthony Weiner are by no means anomalous examples.

Why, then, does Janice Erlbaum call herself a feminist? She is heterosexual — describing her live-in boyfriend as her “domestic partner” — and we might therefore expect her to reject feminism’s anti-male ideology. But notice how she describes her boyfriend Bill Scurry:

Now, I’m not saying that every man who believes in the equality of the importance of women and men is secretly a douche; I’m not saying that at all. I’m lucky enough to be domestically partnered to a guy who does half the housework, yields 50 percent of the remote, rallies and marches with me, and writes the appropriate outraged emails to Congress when needed.

This is a huge clue. If control of the TV remote is such a source of strife in your relationship that you consider it a political necessity to achieve “equality” this way, you’ve got a problem that can never be solved through politics. And if having a man do half the housework is such an important issue for you, why not live by yourself? Sure, if you lived alone, you’d be doing 100% of your own housework, but at least you wouldn’t feel that you were being oppressed in the process. If what a woman most desires in a man is a servant to wash her dishes, mop her floors and fold her laundry, she could simply hire somebody to do the job. Maybe her domestic servant would even agree to join her at protest rallies, for an hourly fee, but such a commercial arrangement probably wouldn’t satisfy the feminist’s psychological needs, would it?

Janice Erlbaum and Bill Scurry in a 2009 YouTube video.

This is not to say that I dislike Janice Erlbaum. She is in fact a very funny and surprisingly sane person, especially when one considers the horrific background of her youth. Her mother was evidently the type of divorceé who just has to have a man around all the time, without regard to the consequences for her children:

Her mother’s string of abusive boyfriends and husbands had left her with no choice; after her mom kicked her last stepfather out, Erlbaum told her, If you take him back, then I’m leaving. When she was 15, she left her Manhattan home after her mother once again reunited with the man. She spent several weeks in a shelter and eventually ended up in a group home.

That’s from a review of Erlbaum’s 2006 memoir, Girlbomb: A Halfway Homeless Memoir, and here’s an excerpt of another review:

Erlbaum . . . left her Manhattan home at 15 after her mother reunited with Erlbaum’s abusive stepfather. Landing first in a shelter and then a group home, Erlbaum — shattered by her mother’s choice — embarks on a treacherous course of self-destruction. Casual sex with a series of brutally uncaring boys coupled with daily drug and alcohol abuse become her antidote to the violence and racism in the child-welfare system housing her. Her isolation and loneliness threaten to swallow her whole. Yet when Erlbaum’s mother invites her home (the dreaded stepfather gone for good), things don’t improve. Erlbaum has more freedom, which allows more opportunity for trouble. At 17 she leaves again (this time to live with an older boyfriend), becomes addicted to the cocaine so plentiful in the 1980s New York club scene and nearly dies from an overdose.

There are many insights one could glean from this tale, although they are perhaps not the lessons Erlbaum herself learned. For example, the common liberal claim that the so-called “homeless epidemic” of the 1980s was a result of Ronald Reagan’s policies — which even at that time was recognized as a partisan falsehood by any honest person who examined the problem — clearly doesn’t describe Erlbaum’s plight. Bill Bennett or any other conservative analyst might cite Erlbaum’s story as Exhibit A in the case for how the breakdown of the traditional family has contributed to the problem of homelessness.

Janice Erlbaum with her book ‘Girlbomb’ in 2006.

One might further conclude from Erlbaum’s tale — just reacting to the reviews, without having read the book — that the nut doesn’t fall too far from the tree. That is to say, Janice Erlbaum seems to have spent her adolescence and young adulthood in “got to have a man” mode, which pattern continued long after her stint as a homeless teenager ended. She reproduces at her blog a journal entry from 1995, when she was 23 or 24, breaking up with one boyfriend and haphazardly hooking up with another male acquaintance:

The day after Richard and I broke up, I woke up at 8 and put on my clothes and went over to his house and crawled into his bed. “I’m almost ready to go,” I announced. “Just one more hug.” He pulled my arm over him and gave my hand a kiss.
I went home and called Nathaniel. My voice was about six octaves lower than usual.
“We broke up, of course.”
“Oh, kid,” he said, very sympathetically. “It’ll be okay.” . . .
“I’m going to meet my dealer. Tonight I’m going to Biblios, from where I’ll probably take home my friend Ward.”
“You’re so dramatic and tragic. I just love it.” . . .
Ward delivered the line, “You’re too beautiful to have to cry” . . . He is a lowercase poet. Really it was comic. The sex part was cursory, in the morning, idiotic grappling in the lowest sense. So why am I on my way to meet him now? Maybe this is just the perfect aversion therapy. . . . Ward is so obvious.
Nathaniel wonders why he spends so much time groping his female friends, and why we only put up with it to a point. It was wrong of me to refer to him at the party as my auxiliary boyfriend. I was showing off and it was mean.

There is a word for this condition: Psychologically damaged.

Of course, thinking back on myself at age 23 or 24, I realize that if anyone would pay me money to write a memoir of my reckless youth, I’d be exposing myself to the same kind of armchair analysis. But nobody pays male conservative writers for stories of their youthful misadventures, so my kids won’t have to endure the embarrassment of Dad’s tell-all memoir, All Girls Named Tonya: Strippers, Psilocybin and Other True Tales of My Life as a Teenage Democrat.

The Implausible Fictions of Liberalism

The publishing industry is liberal, so unless you’re a big-name professional athlete or some other bankable celebrity, your memoir is only of interest to the industry if it somehow dramatizes the liberal worldview. In fact, there have been a couple of examples of such morality-tale memoirs that were exposed as works of fiction; if you can write a story that makes an editor say, “Wow, Oprah’s gonna love this one,” they won’t even bother to fact-check your story.

We have no reason to doubt the veracity of Janice Erlbaum’s memoir, however, and its truth seems verified by the street-smart cynicism with which she sees through “male feminists” whose purported devotion to equality conceals an ulterior motive:

[L]et’s post a handy checklist for the symptoms of Male Feminism.

  1. Name drops bell hooks (making sure to drop the caps), or has sig quote by Rigoberta Menchu. Will suggest that you read such and such essay by such and such feminist before you discuss the topic at hand further, as it’s a “must read.”
  2. Feigns sympathy for the rigors of the menstrual cycle. “Oh, cramps, bummer; I getcha, sister. By the way, most men are really put off by talking about cramps, but not me, I’m used to your crazy gross moon blood vagina ritual, because I’m evolved.”
  3. Is smarter than you, and more “rational” (i.e., not ruled by terrifying and psychotic mood swings), but doesn’t hold that against you. Understands that women are more “emotional” than men, and therefore susceptible to “simple misinterpretation.” Smirks, smarms, provokes, and blathers until you go crazy, then calls you crazy.
  4. Loves porn, even if he pretends to hate it. As a matter of fact, the more he professes to hate it, the more hardcore and specific the porn is.

Like I said, Preach on, sister!

No self-respecting bullshit artist would ever dabble in that particular brand of bullshit. “Yeah, baby, after I went to the moon on Apollo 19, I was a covert operative for the CIA running arms to the Contras in Nicaragua — and also, a male feminist.”

Yet is it possible that some of these men are sincere, and under the delusion that they are feminists? Well, there are all kinds of crazies running around in the world — 9/11 Truthers, Commies for Hamas and so forth — as a result of the shortage of treatment facilities for the mentally ill, so we can’t lock up all the “male feminists” in the lunatic asylums where they belong. Nevertheless, we can try to persuade these deranged nutjobs that their worldview is unrealistic.

Here’s a hint, guys: Women who like men are not feminists.

Oh, sure, there are heterosexual women who for one reason or another describe themselves as “feminist,” but the more she studies feminist theory and embraces feminist ideology, the more she is compelled to the belief that all men are violent predatory oppressors. Feminism is a journey to lesbianism and any woman who tries to reconcile this ideology with a normal female life — men, marriage and motherhood — is condemning herself to disappointment, while creating needless misery for those around her. It would be better for such a woman simply to avoid this exercise in futility; the minute she decides to major in Women’s Studies, a young woman could adopt radical lesbian separatism as her creed and avoid all the harms she would otherwise inevitably suffer herself or inflict on others in pursuit of an ideologically consistent “heterosexual feminism.” But some people are so profoundly unhappy that their only source of satisfaction in life is to make other people unhappy, and some heterosexual women embrace feminism as an excuse for taking out their resentments on the men in their lives, an ideological rationalization for their weird sadistic love/hate relationships with men.

Why do you think Hillary Clinton refuses to divorce Bill?

Feminism’s war against human nature means that, insofar as any man internalizes feminism’s critique of masculinity — abjuring those qualities of assertive confidence which feminists condemn as “male domination” — he thereby becomes less attractive to women, even those feminists who routinely complain that men are oppressing them.

No matter how hard you try to be a latter-day Ashley Wilkes, any woman worth having will always prefer Rhett Butler.

So please, guys, don’t embarrass yourselves by atttempting to appease feminists, becoming a Vichy collaborator with the feminist regime. Whatever you might hope to gain by being a “male feminist” can never compensate for your loss of dignity and self-respect.





 

 

THE ‘SEX TROUBLE’ SERIES:

 

Category: Feminism, Sex Trouble
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin